Veterinarian's Oath: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 66.244.203.244 (talk) to last version by Wikibruger |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Criticism== |
==Criticism== |
||
are often forced, through veterinary training and research work, to cause rather than relieve animal suffering.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
Animal rights advocates feel that the oath does not go far enough in stating devotion to the protection of animals. New vets should not be required to work on behalf of "livestock resources," they say. Furthermore, opponents feel that veterinarians are often forced, through veterinary training and research work, to cause rather than relieve animal suffering.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
||
==External links== |
|||
* http://www.avma.org American Veterinary Medical Association |
|||
* http://www.rcvs.org.uk Royal College Veterinary Surgeons |
|||
* http://www.avar.org Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights - presents an alternative veterinarian's oath |
|||
[[Category:Oaths of medicine]] |
|||
[[Category:Veterinary medicine]] |
|||
[[da:Dyrlægeløftet]] |
|||
Revision as of 20:01, 10 January 2008
The Veterinarian's Oath was adopted by the American Veterinary Medical Association's House of Delegates July 1969, and amended by the AVMA Executive Board, November 1999.
- "Being admitted to the profession of veterinary medicine, I solemnly swear to use my scientific knowledge and skills for the benefit of society through the protection of animal health, the relief of animal suffering, the conservation of animal resources, the promotion of public health, and the advancement of medical knowledge.
- I will practice my profession conscientiously, with dignity, and in keeping with the principles of veterinary medical ethics. I accept as a lifelong obligation the continual improvement of my professional knowledge and competence."
Criticism
Animal rights advocates feel that the oath does not go far enough in stating devotion to the protection of animals. New vets should not be required to work on behalf of "livestock resources," they say. Furthermore, opponents feel that veterinarians are often forced, through veterinary training and research work, to cause rather than relieve animal suffering.[citation needed]
External links
- http://www.avma.org American Veterinary Medical Association
- http://www.rcvs.org.uk Royal College Veterinary Surgeons
- http://www.avar.org Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights - presents an alternative veterinarian's oath