User talk:Koala15

Koala15, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Koala15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Koala15. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Koala15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey Koala15! I'm awarding you this Barnstar for your works in articles mostly related to animation and others. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 09:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Aston Martin Music (Wale song)

Hi. I just saw this edit you made to Aston Martin Music (Wale song) calling it a hoax. Could you explain to me why you think that? Because if it is a hoax it should be deleted, not just redirected. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 05:55, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Album artworks

I saw no point at all, of you uploading an image that was EXACTLY the same for "Freaks". Doing this creates extra work for the Admins, as that one tried to point out to you multiple times. I do not know if you wanted to seem like the one who uploaded it first or what but there is no sense in those type of uploads. There is no noticeable difference between the two images. STATic message me! 01:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Maybe it seemed clearer to you or on your computer, or the "colors seem better". It is still the same exact image. I have been here for much longer then you so I know more about what is and is not new to Wikipedia. As long as it properly displays the cover and is 300x300 or less, there is no point in a new upload to create more work. We both have to work together here and, I do not mean to come off harsh but it just seemed pretty pointless to me. STATic message me! 01:13, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

So it seems that the cover with just the tiger for Hotel California is the version for the deluxe and standard versions. Also i'm curious why you uploaded new versions of Wolf and Bugatti at all, let alone on separate file pages? STATic message me! 23:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I meant next time just upload it on the same file page as the old one. Do not just create a whole new file: page. As for Hotel California it should just be the one with the tiger. I am trying to revert it to that one on the file page but for some reason everytime I try it turns back into the previous one. You know how to revert a image back right? STATic message me! 23:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Alright good job I saw that. STATic message me! 23:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

What part of uploading a new version of a album cover on the same file page do you not understand? [1] STATic message me! 17:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Letting you know it is more work for the admins to delete a whole file then to just eventually delete old versions of a file, it also keeps all the history and everything together. Trust me at this I am just trying to help you out. STATic message me! 20:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Or I understand what you mean, is the thing that happened with the Hotel California happening elsewhere? STATic message me! 20:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

No you are wrong again. They should be 300x300 or UNDER. 200x200 is just fine considering there were no 300x300 images available online. Maybe next time just do not upload the image if you are not gonna follow the fair use guidelines, and someone else has to fix your mistake. STATic message me! 19:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Czarface, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Terrific article, a pleasure to read. Many thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ready to Die (The Stooges album), Koala15!

Wikipedia editor FoCuSandLeArN just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

cheers for your article. in the future, note that citing amazon, etc. is not considered reliable and doesn't establish the notability of an article's subject. happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment on FoCuSandLeArN's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 (mixtape), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sample (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 21:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Eve

Eve's new independent label is called "Blondie Rockwell Inc." not "From the Rib". As shown on Amazon, iTunes etc. Also "She Bad Bad" was the first release on Blondie Rockwell, followed by "Make It Out this Town". Please check your edits before changing factual information. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

RED Distribution run a number of subsidiaries of which 'From the Rib' is one as far as I am aware. per 7 Digital (here and Amazon, Blondie Rockwell is the name of Eve's label, distributed through (RED) From the Rib. iTunes is necessarily always correct as proven at Talk: Trouble (Leona Lewis song). — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quick note on G8

When nomming G8s for CSD, it's easier for the sysop to review if you don't remove the redirect. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Reincarnated (album): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Gold Standard 02:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Again, please post warning templates on talk pages after reverting vandalism. Thanks, Gold Standard 00:14, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Gold Standard's talk page.
Message added 00:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gold Standard 00:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Gold Standard's talk page.
Message added 00:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gold Standard 00:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Commercial Performance

I have noticed that you constantly update these sections with the weekly sales figures, and I thank you as I have been the one to do it in the past and it can get pretty strenuous sometimes as I used to be the one that did that in the past. However I do not know if you agree with me, but I have been noticing with just having the first weeks sales and then "Since April 9 the album has sold...." in the section it makes it look awkward and small compared to the critical response section. I think from now on we should somewhat track the sales/chart positions in the section for I would say the first five weeks after release, like I partly did at I Am Not a Human Being II and The Nacirema Dream. Then after those five weeks, then have the tally of "Since April 9 the album has sold....". Every new week the total should then be removed from the end of the previous sentence. If you understand. This should make the article and section look better, also with HipHopDX updating us every week it should not be too hard. STATic message me! 22:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

I meant it should be more like this [2]. Listing how many copies it sells each week for the first five weeks and then after that listing how many copies its sold to date. Do you understand what I mean now? STATic message me! 15:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Random placement I know, but it has to deal with the same thing. Recently I noticed you have been updating the sales, but using the wrong date. Such as today you said "Since August 28" however that is not true as the HipHopDX article says, "The week ending August 25". You should use the date HipHopDX says the sales track week ended, rather than the date it was published, because we both know there is no way they could factor in sales from today, or the day before, so it is best to just go by what the source says. STATic message me! 16:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

It really is not a big deal, but just better to be precise you know? And it would avoid confusion such as this. It is just a minor thing, but it just keeps it consistent with the reference. STATic message me! 18:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to God Forgives, I Don't, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 05:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Finally Rich Deluxe.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Finally Rich Deluxe.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Croods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Sanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3ca7864b5098a1fdc2664ad805828722.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:3ca7864b5098a1fdc2664ad805828722.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation

Hi there, great work on the Bob's Burgers episode articles like "God Rest Ye Merry Gentle-Mannequins" and "The Unbearable Like-Likeness of Gene", but in the future could you please take the time to write up fully plot summaries in your own words? The summaries on websites like TV Guide are almost certainly copyrighted, and as such copying these verbatim, as you've done, is a violation of the copyright policy. Thanks and happy editing! Euchrid (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whiteout (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dawn Richard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:David Banner Certified.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:David Banner Certified.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

RE: April 2013

MOS:ALBUM#Track_listing: "A track listing should generally be formatted as a numbered list ... In more complicated situations, a table or the {{Track listing}} template may be a better choice." Dan56 (talk) 00:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

I said this before while reverting you the first time. Dan56 (talk) 00:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rittz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rittz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Revolution1221 ^{(talk · email · contributions)} 03:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image changes

It would help if you used edit summaries so other editors know why you made your edits. You should read WP:BRD, because you like to make BOLD changes without edit summaries, then when reverted by another editor using an edit summary, you keep reverting back, most of the time still without any edit summary or even talk page discussion. Once you have been reverted, you should start a discussion somewhere, preferably on the article or image talk page, so a consensus could be reached instead of starting an edit war.

1) Asleep in the Bread Aisle - PNG is a preferred file format over JPG and should be used. You should have tagged the original file for needing to be reduced instead of creating a new JPG file that also was too big and needed to be reduced.

2) Certified, The Hunger for Moore - You never once explained why you replaced these files that were already at the correct size to pass WP:NFCC.

3) Scooby-Doo - This image was not too small.

4) Disney images except for Peter Pan - These images were not too small. The first versions are from October 12, 2007 and listed as "fair use reduce", so they were already at an acceptable size.

5) Peter Pan image - This image is different than the above because it is from a later date, but is the exact same size as the others.

Images have to be orphaned for seven continuous days to be deleted. Once the tag has been removed, you cannot simply revert because the process would have to start over again. You are clearing trying to game the system as can been seen in your edits to File:David Banner - Certified.jpg. You re-orphaned the image on April 25 after three days of it being back in the article, so you should have tagged it for that date. You clearly tried to speed up the deletion today by changing the date to the 17, [3] then to the original 20 and then eventually to the 18, [4]. These are very disingenuous edits that are not acting in good faith.

In summary, I hope that you discuss these edits here instead of reverting back to your preferred versions. I also hope that you can take some notes from what I wrote and apply it to your future edits. Aspects (talk) 23:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I am sad, but not surprised, that you totally ignored my advice. I wanted you to take the time and address the concerns I brought up here, but instead you left one note and reverted back again. Also you did the edits without edit summaries and not restarting the orphaned image time frame, so it seems like you did not even read what I left because you ignored it all. I still would appreciate your opinions on each of the images and the issues that I brought up about them. I am going to find an admin to give a third opinion since you do not want to discuss these issues. Aspects (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

In the future, if someone starts a discussion on your talk page, you should contain all of that discussion on your talk page instead of trying to figure out the conversation by going back and forth between talk pages. Please keep all further discussion here as I have your talk page watchlisted and I can see when you add a comment. I have asked the admin User:Masem for their third opinion to help us with this discussion and I am not going to make any further edits to these articles/images until a consensus is reached. In response to your last message on my talk page, I did already ask/talk about the articles/images in each edit summary and in the start of this discussion. Aspects (talk) 02:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Aspects asked me to comment here. We have a non-free content policy that requires minimal sizes, and it does appear your uploads are violating these. If you continue to upload larger-res versions of existing non-free images that have already accceptable sizes, you will likely be reported to WP:ANI and be blocked for your actions. --MASEM (t) 02:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I was just uploading images that fit the infobox, i'm not trying to vandalize or nothing like that i'm just trying to help, the bot will re size the images to meet standards tonight so i hope there won't be any more problems. I will never do this again. Koala15 (talk) 02:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Since the Disney images have been reduced, I am fine with their size. The Scooby-Doo image seems to be about the same size as the Disney images, so I am now fine with that. The Asleep in the Bread Aisle original file has been deleted, but since you provided a reason for the change, even if I could not see this border, I was fine with the original file being deleted.

Now my only concerns are with the other two images. Both the original Certified image and the original Hunger for More were already at the ideal 300 width per Template:Infobox album. I would like to know what were your specific problems with these two images. Aspects (talk) 06:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

There not even using The Hunger for More cover i uploaded anymore, and the reason i uploaded the Certified image was because it was a version without white lines on it. Koala15 (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Koala15, you have my full appreciation and solidarity. I wish you success against this destroyer (Aspects), who hates images which do not conform to his rules, and who enjoys wasting a staggering amount of time vandalizing or otherwise pestering other editors. He enjoys damaging other editors' graphic contributions thus: he removes references in articles to their uploaded images, and then blames those same images for being "orphans", with the outcome that they get finally deleted. He freely admits his limitations, namely: "I have never uploaded an image and find that part of Wikipedia confusing, so I leave that to people who have more experience in that area.", but nevertheless has no shame meddling with images obtained and uploaded by true contributors who have devoted their time, dedication and effort. Also, he freely stuffs other editors' talk page with his sermons, his BS, and his opinions (as he has done in your case), yet has the nerve to forbid other editors from writing anything in his Talk Page (as if he owned it). What still amazes me is that they still call him "a contributor", and even grant him prizes such as "barnstars" & other stuff, despite all the damage he has done and keeps doing. --AVM (talk) 23:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

That is a spot on observation, i completely agree with you. Koala15 (talk) 23:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

In response to your message three above this message, where are the white lines you are talking about? Aspects (talk) 19:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

They are white lines from the original editor saving the image the wrong way, by cutting and pasting it. Koala15 (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2012 TV series) episodes

Okay, I'll bite. How is adding a "TBA" episode placeholder, for a show that has a 3 season order, considered "original research"? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

"There is no need to add an episode with "TBA" as the title, your just assuming an episode will air that day. That kind of research does not belong on Wikipedia"

If you don't mind I'd prefer to continue the discussion here for convenience. Whether TBA belongs in the episode list is a matter of personal preference. I don't have an opinion one way or the other. But reverting another editor's contribution, then citing an imaginary rule about how "episode title (needs) to be here" seems like a matter of personal preference as well. TBA is a placeholder and doesn't impart any information, any more than "--" would. So I think you're stretching the interpretation of "original reasearch". And there is neither a guideline for, nor a prohibition of TBAs at WP:MOS:TV. That said, another editor suggested that another way to go is to create empty fields and comment them out. This way the fields can be used as needed, won't appear on the page, and there are no offensive TBAs. That is what I've done on the page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

It is not an "imaginary rule" i've seen people use that rule on various episode list pages. Anyway your most recent edit of adding blank episode fields makes much more sense. Koala15 (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Smurfs 2 poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Smurfs 2 poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Scary Movie 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Costello and Dug

Summer Jam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Elephant Man and Ashanti

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your two cents requested

Input from some established article regulars would be much appreciated here. Thanks! AmericanDad86 (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Re:Epic poster

Well, I got totally wrong about the latest poster being the final poster (sorry about that)! But I can say that it is a new poster, Moviefone says it right here. It also debuted later than the other poster and has the rating.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 06:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I already said sorry for the new poster being the final poster! But even if its not the final poster, why do you keep reverting to the older poster? Neither it has the rating nor it is a final poster.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 05:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I will not change it. But please do not revert to the older poster as it is a new poster.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 14:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Conduct in Discussions and Debates

Just a comment about this edit: sarcasm has no place in debates and can very easily lead to flame wars. If you feel you have to say something, state it in a matter-of-fact manner, such as "Please note that this person is the article creator". Certainly don't start assuming things, especially regarding their real-life identity. Please familiarise yourself with the Assume Good Faith Policy and WP:OUTING.

Note: assuming bad faith and outing of people can result in blocks. Please practice more careful editing in future. Stephen! ^Coming... 11:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

The Cleveland Show [moved]

How did it air, did you actaully watch it? Koala15 (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes I saw the episode on television. It was pre-empted in certain American markets due to the NASCAR race. - Fantr (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Oh they did not play it all in the USA, i thought it didn't air anywhere since fox is labeling it as a new episode this week. Koala15 (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Ah, now I see the problem. Those who get the Canadian superstation Global via satellite saw the program. Therefore it aired in Canada and apparently Ireland. I'm trying to find a RS to satisfy you. - Fantr (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind my moving the discussion here. You have far more experience editing the show's page. Here's what I've found.

• A fan review with spoilers posted online on 7 May 2013. I can verify that the spoilers are correct.
• The Global superstation had the video up after airing the episode. They soon pulled the video.
• On twitter, a non-reliable source, people shared links where the episode could be downloaded; several report watching the episode that way. Therefore the show had to air somewhere.
• tvrage.com, which is on Wikipedia's blacklist and therefore is probably non-reliable, correctly states the Canadian air date. The url is tvrage.com/The_Cleveland_Show/episodes/1065265641.
• IMDB, which is a non-reliable source, states that the show aired in Canada on 5 May 2013: link. IMDB message board discussions, which are even more non-reliable, also note that the show aired in Canada here and here.

Let me know if these suffice. - Fantr (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Yeah i believe that the show aired in Canada, i'm just still not sure which air date we should use. I feel like this happened before and we used the USA air date but i'm not sure. I think we might need a second opinion. Koala15 (talk) 23:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Lip Lock

Per the conversation at Template talk:Infobox single, the use of {{flat list}} is an universal readability change, as part of the accessibility movement which makes pages more accessible and readable for those hard of sight. What you deem unnecessary actually makes a huge difference to those who use screen reader technology hence users are now being encouraged to adopt the new mark-up wherever possible. See Glassheart and #willpower as an example of how it should be used in an article. I'm afraid reasons like "I don't like mid-dots won't wash because frankly using dots or commas is purely a cosmetic change for able-sighted individuals but for those who are hard of sight if impacts on the way that screen reader technology reads a page. Additionally it has benefits for viewing on smaller screens etc. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 15:00, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

If the those are the new guidelines its fine with me. Koala15 (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

They are indeed. Its quite a recent change (as of a week or so ago) but the easiest way to get it out there is to encourage its uptake and put it in a few high profile articles. :) The album sounds really good. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 15:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Monsters, Inc.

Hi Koala, I've begun the GA Review for Monsters, Inc. and added some suggestions to get you started. Let me know your thoughts, and thanks for being willing to take this one on. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for your contributions to bring Monsters, Inc. up to GA status! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

GA Nomination

I noticed you nominated Good Kid, M.A.A.D City for GA review. For future reference you should NOT nominate an article for GA unless you are either the top or second most contributor on the article. Which you are far from. Its wrong of you to jump into the article and take credit for all the work other editors have done. I am within major contributors to this article (along with SrGangsta and Dan56 thus per WP:GA one of us should be informed if another user wishes to nominate an article when us three have done virtually all of the work for. The fact that you didn't even have the courtesy to ask is kindof rude. You are basically taking credit for the various editors hard work building the article when you have less edits then ClueBOT on the article. I would suggest you withdrawing the nomination, and check these things in the future. It would fail due to WP:RECENTISM anyways. STATic message me! 02:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

No reason to take any offense, and I pointed out myself it was not my "credit" I was after, more taking notice of this before the top two contributors noticed. Trust me I will be glad to link to you the exact place where it says you must be one of the top contributors to nominate an article for GA. Even if you made the adjustments necessary, I doubt you would still be high enough to nominate it. When you only have 30ish compared to the 100s by others it is taking credit for someone elses work. STATic message me! 04:27, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions it is highly preferable that the nominator has significantly contributed to the article. When you have less edits then ClueBOT or an IP, then you should not really even consider nominating. It is a pretty good article, give it a couple months it should be a GA in no time. STATic message me! 04:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

SNL Cast

"It seems to be confirmed" means It has not actually been confirmed, but I think it will be. That's not good enough under WP:BLP. The source you cite doesn't confirm the departure, but cites an anonymous source for the New York Post. That would be the same newspaper that last month identified the wrong individual as a Boston Marathon bomber and spewed misinformation from similarly anonymous sources about that event for days. (Its sources also "confirmed" that Richard Gephardt was the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2004; that was not an isolated incident. Every year, various departures from the cast are "confirmed" yet don't happen, cast members are "confirmed" to be staying on, but don't, and new cast members are reported to be hired, but aren't. Wait until it is confirmed, on the record, by a legitimate source. And there was way too much snark in your edit summary. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Farmer Guy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Patrick Meighan

Q-Tip discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Girls, Girls, Girls

Spell My Name Right: The Album (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mims

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Weird Al album images

Why are you uploading higher-quality images of album covers if they're too big to be considered fair use, and if they're going to be reduced again sometime in the future? Trivialist (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Carry on, then. :) Trivialist (talk) 21:28, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

File:J Cole Born Sinner2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:J Cole Born Sinner2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Cleveland Show

This is why we don't speculate from random blogs something is canceled until the official word comes from the network. CTF83! 03:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Prodigy Albert Einstein1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Prodigy Albert Einstein1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

AfDs

I've just looked at a lot of those AfDs you've started today, and it looks like you've made a right hash of them. You're clearly not following WP:BEFORE, in fact, you've made nominations that barely apply to the articles at all, at times (naming individual musicians as groups). You've also not bothered to add the AfDs into today's AfD log, and you've nominated far too many, far too quickly. Please stop, read the guidelines, and make sure you're doing the job properly - else please, don't do it at all. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I saw your comments on Lukeno94, and he's actually right here. You're just declaring on these AfDs that these people aren't notable...but you're not actually providing evidence of that, especially on some that are obviously notable, like Kalyn Heffernan. If you didn't have so many edits, I'd think you just didn't understand what notabilty means, but your long tenure here makes me wonder about your motivation. By our very definition of notability, someone who has been discussed in detail in multiple, independent, reliable sources is notable. That's what notable means. We don't get to just decide "Oh, this person isn't important". There are sometimes additional notability criteria that can be used, but you haven't even raised those. On one AfD you state, "Regardless of the sources, he still does not meet notability guidelines." That simply doesn't make any sense. You may want to consider reviewing WP:GNG and WP:BAND, and possibly even withdrawing some of those AfDs. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Koala15, you asked on my talk page which one is clearly notable. It's hard to AGF here, because I explicitly said, just above, that Kalyn Heffernan is clearly notable, as she has received multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Heck, those articles actually featured her. Thus, she meets WP:GNG. Thus, she is notable. Please explain, so that we can help you: what specifically are you not understanding here? In what way does she not meet WP:GNG? Qwyrxian (talk) 00:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Why is the gross of Epic being removed?

I don't understand why is the gross of Epic being removed? I understand BOM does not show domestic gross but it shows the foreign gross? Why is it being removed again and again? KahnJohn27 (talk) 05:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your AfD has been closed

Hi there. Just informing you that I closed your AfD discussion early. See here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yea Big + Kid Static. JamieS93 08:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Twinkle?

Hey Koala, I saw you nominated a batch of articles for deletion and I thought I'd post you a note. Each of your nominations seems not to have been transcluded properly and bots have added each one to today's log. You should think about enabling the Twinkle tools - there's a one-click XfD function (and a CSD function) that does everything for you. Makes the whole thing a lot easier and prevents basic mistakes. Cheers, Stalwart111 03:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

No worries, I use it for everything these days. Stalwart111 05:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Jaynilshah

Heyo, if you see someone deliberately adding false numbers/information into articles, please leave them a warning so that they either stop or can be blocked. In this case, he continued for the entire month of May with basically no one noticing. Thanks! :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 15:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

It was on Escape from Planet Earth and Scary Movie 5 today. I'm not laying this at your feet -- plenty of other people didn't warn him either -- just a suggestion to leave a warning next time (if there is one!). Thanks much, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 18:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

AT TItle/Logo Debacle

Hey there, just thought I'd drop a line. MoS for series pages states that "The image presented in the infobox of the main article should ideally be an intertitle shot of the show (i.e., a screenshot capture of the show's title) or a promotional poster used to represent the show itself." I don't mean to be a butt (I do prefer the Logo myself), but we have to comply to MoS. Cheers.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

In a perfect world, I'd have to say the logo looks cooler, but I had a similar debate when I was working on The X-Files. It really is supposed to be the title screen.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Too bad

I don't give a shit about you forcing guidelines... You ain't no damn admin... And no admin has yet told me otherwise so ima keep doin it... --2Nyce 15:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Tables

Just remember I was warned to not attack you. I wasn't warned for not reverting your edits. It's time to move on. The Wiki Tables are more applicable for renovating the pages. --2Nyce 19:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Show me what guidelines your talking about?? Waiting......... --2Nyce 19:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trey Songz discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

What Was Found

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians/Article guidelines: The first following reads on page: Suggested layout. This is a guide only and editors are free to organise articles differently. --2Nyce 18:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

But yet your section doesn't have anything that reads "should be enforced is used otherwise".

This was also found on another related page Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists of works: "The use of a table may be advisable to keep the information readable and organized".

With this also: "The exact format chosen will depend on the discography and the amount of verifiable information available, which may vary greatly between musical acts. In all cases, the format should follow from what's best for the article, and not vice versa." --2Nyce 18:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy note

Hi Koala15, just dropping a courtesy note that I mentioned you here. Nothing major, just summarizing a conversation we had about TBAs in episode lists, to explain a recent edit on that article. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Talk:New Slaves#Third opinion.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 18:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

This Is the End

Did you read the guidelines that I referenced in my edit? See MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, so its use of copyrighted images must be limited. Having the soundtrack cover image is not limited use. Erik (talk | contribs) 02:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Koala15, you told me last week that you understand that soundtrack cover images are not appropriate in film articles per the guidelines linked above. However, I see that you've continued to upload such images like at Turbo (film). Can you explain why you're doing this? Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia; we cannot insert copyrighted images so readily. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 8Ball & MJG discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foxy Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Reflinks (Pups)

Never knew about this tool before, good to know. BTW, that is a great album imo! regards, Middle 8 (talk) 08:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joey Badass, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. STATic message me! 01:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh really? You sure? These beg to differ. Looks like you just removed a big portion of the discography for no reason. STATic message me! 02:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wiz Khalifa discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Excuse My French (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ([[Executive producer|exec.]])}}, [[Rick Ross]] {{small|(exec.)}}, Harve Pierre {{small|co-exec.)}}, Allen Ritter, The Arsenals, The Beat Bully, Bos, [[Cardiak]], Danny Boy Styles, Earl & E, [[
• skuId=8927054&st=french%20montana%20excuse%20my%20ffrench&lp=1&cp=1 |title=Excuse My French [Best Buy Exclusive] [PA] - CD - French Montana |publisher=Bestbuy.com |date= |accessdate=2013-06-23}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

RE: Albums

I said according to WP:NALBUMS if there is not content EXCEPT a infobox, lead and tracklist it is not notable, you sure have trouble reading edit summaries. This was a random independently released (by a not notable label). That is not available for normal sale on iTunes or Amazon. It could even been a mixtape who knows. Does anything about these independently released album scream notable or worth having encyclopedia article to you? It is all about COVERAGE by RELIABLE SOURCES, the AllMusic review in the article does not even have a review, there is just a rating. STATic message me! 15:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Population Control (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Population Control (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Population Control (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 13:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

• To be clear, you do not normally send an article to AFD before you redirect, that is silly to even claim. I went ahead and sent it, but it is pretty common to redirect an album that didn't chart to the main artist, particularly when the primary sources are itunes and amazon, which are not remotely reliable via WP:RS Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 13:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

List of hip hop musicians

Hi Koala15, you will like this list. 12.168.46.153 (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Album covers

Please note that we can't use high-resolution samples of non-free media. Usually, album covers should not be much larger than c. 300 x 300 pixels or 100,000 square pixels (see Wikipedia:Non-free content). This is to avoid commercial exploitation of those images while they're hosted here at Wikipedia. And for the same non-free content policy, we can only have one image in each file's history, and the unused old version will routinely get deleted. De728631 (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

The latest version of File:The Eagles - One of These Nights.jpg is now 316 x 314 pixels which is ok for a representative use in the article, and meets our non-free content criteria. De728631 (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

And I've also reduced your version of File:The Eagles - The Eagles.jpeg to an acceptable resolution. De728631 (talk) 22:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Age Against the Machine

"not really paraphrazing"?? We are not idiots. Please don't do this again. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 02:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Koala15, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Age Against the Machine has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Note that the text you reinserted is almost word-for-word from the source. That's not allowed.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Scooby-Doo does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Mlpearc (powwow) 15:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Album covers

read WP:NFCC... it says low quality too. The quality should be sufficient enough for identification. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Lasers (album). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. STATic message me! 23:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boss of All Bosses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mr. Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Soundmaster T

Hello Koala15, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Soundmaster T, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. w^{L<speak·check>} 01:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

It claims that its song has charted in a major chart. You may have to WP:AFD it instead. --w^{L<speak·check>} 01:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to X (Chris Brown album). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. STATic message me! 15:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Not to mention the reference I left in the edit summary, there is just this run of the mill source from 9pm last night. "Brown hit the stage with his backup dancers in tow, sporting a black leather jacket while all the members of his crew donned sweatshirts with a neon "X" across them, a nod to his upcoming July 16 album." Maybe he is going the Yeezus way, who knows. STATic message me! 15:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ¡Mayday! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• music-video/ |title=¡Mayday! – Groundhog Day (Feat Mack Maine, Cee-Lo Green & GhostWridah) [Music Video |publisher=Young Money HQ |date=2011-01-19 |accessdate=2013-07-04}}</ref> The band were

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Nacirema Dream may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fantasia Barrino discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:45, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to French Montana discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rebellious Soul may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |title=News | K. Michelle Signs Major Record Deal With Warner Bros, Talks Being Blessed [EXCLUSIVE |publisher=Singersroom |date=2012-11-19 |accessdate=2013-07-23}}</ref> Originally titled '

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schoolboy Q discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Feds Watching may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• chainz_has_the_feds_watching_at_summer.html |title=2 Chainz Has The "Feds Watching" At Summer Jam [Video |publisher=Sohh.Com |date=2013-06-03 |accessdate=2013-07-26}}</ref><ref name="autogenerated2">

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jurassic Park (franchise). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 05:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Believers (¡Mayday! album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Believers (¡Mayday! album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Believers (¡Mayday! album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 21:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Unorthodox (Joey Badass song)

I have seen that you have been going around to numerous song articles and turning them into redirects because they are "not notable". Just because "Unorthodox" didn't chart DOESN'T mean that it isn't notable. You have violated Wikipedia policy many times by doing this. I ask you to please restore the page "Unorthodox" which I have created.  11Block |talk 23:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Have you not seen that the final result of the deletion was KEEP. Stop adding the template just because you are not getting it your way.  11Block |talk 00:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Method Man discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Street Life and Streetlife (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hodgy Beats Untitled 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hodgy Beats Untitled 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. STATic message me! 20:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Green Day/Anchorman 2

Look up Green Day Anchorman 2 and you will see that they indeed have a cameo appearance in the film — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 00:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

It has it under all their wiki pages it has them credited being in Anchorman 2. If you don't believe me look up Billie Joe Armstrong, Tre Cool, Mike Dirnt, Green Day and 2013 in film it has them credited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 00:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks also quick question would it be ok if we begin a group discussion on adding garage rock to Green Day's genre? It was the genre for both Dos and Tre — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 00:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

You know what else I never got was why they call Green Day, Pop. I dont get that — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 00:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

I the in development American Idiot film and Incredible Hulk 2 films in the list Universal films and TW wrote back saying, that they werent even confirmed and they have Universal still has the rights to the Hulk and American idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 00:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Grown Ups 2

Please stop reverting edits on Grown Ups 2. You are about to violate WP:3RR. The edit improved and updated the "critical response" section. If you really have an issue with the six words that were removed from a single review for brevity, please take it up on the talk page. The other changes were to update the RT score, remove repetition and make corrections. Thanks, Tiller54 (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dreamchasers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gunplay

Turbo (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Archcaster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fairy Guy because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 拱連鑄機談話 23:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Chris Brown discography

Hi Koala15, it would help if you also updated the total of guest appearances in the lead section and infobox when you add new features. Also, could you please use the correct date format for references as seen in the article (2013-07-15 not July 15, 2013). Thanks. 0z (talk) 03:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks. 0z (talk) 07:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

AGF

I know we have a lot of IP vandalism as it relates to producers and such but "Critacal" is a somewhat known producer that collaborates a lot with Cardiak. I think when the album leaked some torrent/unreliable sites said he co-produced it, which we now know as wrong. Try to assume good faith more, and not make accusations that the IP/user is the producer trying to add their name in, because that is not always the case. No big issue though just something you shouldn't be doing, a edit summary of "Reverting unsourced content" or something looks and sounds much better. Even Cardiak's website says that him and CritaCal both produced it. I am not sure about the album booklet, because I don't have the album. STATic message me! 00:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah that is pretty odd, and I would have probably thought the same thing. However, do you think we should add it due to confirmation by the songs main producer? Unless you have seen the linear notes and he is not there. On the No Love Lost issue I just searched it, and see Cardiak's official site again crediting Critacal as producing the song along with Cardiak. STATic message me! 00:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah that is true, I wish more reliable sources would take pictures of the liner notes like Hothewhiphop does sometimes to make this much easier, since I haven't bought an album since Goblin I think. And unless he's under his real name, he is not in the AllMusic entry for the album so I guess it is just best to keep him off. STATic message me! 01:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cashis The Art of Dying.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cashis The Art of Dying.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Year of the Dragon

Many mixtapes are released to digital retail outlets like iTunes, and still available on DatPiff. We call these "retail mixtapes", examples would be that Black Friday and Overly Dedicated. Both were released for free and to iTunes, and not are not their "debut albums". mixtape, mixtape, and many others call it a "free album" which we both know means mixtape, We do not call "Trunk Muzik Returns" Yelawolf's third album, Bastard Tyler's first album, or Blag Flag Machine Gun Kelly's second album, just because they called it a album. That is why E.L.E.2 (Extinction Level Event 2) is his ninth not tenth album. STATic message me! 17:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The Incredibles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

AfDs

Hey there, you do a lot of AfD nominating, but you usually forget to transclude the pages to the daily log. This is detailed in step 3 of WP:AFDHOWTO. While a bot will go through and automatically do this for you, it's preferred that you do it yourself. Also, I recommend WP:Twinkle, which does AfDs and a lot more automatically. Thanks, Ansh666 00:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletions

I've just declined your ten recent SD taggings, as they did not meet criteria for speedy deletion. Please do not add any more speedy deletion tags to articles until you have familiarized yourself with what is and what is not appropriate for a speedy deletion. I find that User:SoWhy/Common A7 mistakes is also a useful guide. Thank you. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 06:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Scary Movie 5 Soundtrack.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scary Movie 5 Soundtrack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Scary Movie 5 Score.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scary Movie 5 Score.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Amazon.com

There is a new guideline for sources as it relates to albums at, Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. Maybe if you are going to edit album articles you should check it out. It clearly says Amazon is not a reliable source for albums, so no more using it. Instead of just reverting you should have added one of the reliable sources that you left on my talk page, don't you think? I just did not want another not correct tracklist like with Wolf and Yeezus, which were taken from other countries Amazon website. STATic message me! 17:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

They get release dates wrong all the time, and you do not remember the report Dave Matthews was going to be on Wolf. That started on Amazon, was added to Wikipedia and then reliable sources reported it, because it was on Wikipedia, then it all turned out to be wrong, among other credits and names of tracks on that album. But that is just one of many examples. STATic message me! 17:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj Videography.

I currently opened a peer assess for the article Nicki Minaj videography, I was hoping that you could take a look, leave feedback for improvement and contribute to the article where you see it's nessessary. If you can help it would be appreciated. :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Nicki_Minaj_videography/archive1 KaneZolanski (talk) 12:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Turbo F.A.S.T.

It was announced that Titmouse would be producing the cartoon check their twitter account and Chris Prynoski's account.So will you please fix what you did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent (talk • contribs) 00:18, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

http://www.imdb.com/company/co0186051/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent (talk • contribs) 00:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

The other source is Titmouse's official twitter account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent (talk • contribs) 21:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Epic

Can you explain why you undid my edit to Epic? The soundtrack section almost never appears after release information, and definitely not as the final section in the article. It typically comes either under the Production section, as in Prometheus (2012 film), or as its own section immediately after Production, like 300 (film). I have undone your edit for now; please provide reasoning before changing anything, so as to not start an edit war. --AznBurger (talk) 19:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

The article The Incredibles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Incredibles for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Congrats! One of my favorites. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

WordGirl at the Movies

Why did you erase Emily and Eli from WordGirl at the Movies? --24.170.77.177 (talk) 02:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Interstellar

I disagree with your logic at Interstellar (film). In the infobox, we have the "Starring" field which will not list all the cast members, but in the "Cast" section, we list more. Likewise, the infobox has crew-related fields that are not comprehensive. It makes sense that we can identify the rest of the names in the article body. We should be able to encourage cross-navigation of Wikipedia articles. Panic Room#Production is another example of this. I ask you to reconsider. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

There is no rule that says that the infobox should be the only place for credits, especially when it cannot mention people like the production designer, the costume designer, and the visual effects supervisor, which are positions for which awards can be won. Like I said, the "Cast" section shows more cast members than the infobox shows, and the "Production" section can show more crew members than the infobox shows. Why would this be detrimental? What about including the crew members in a collapsible format in the "Production" section? Erik (talk | contribs) 17:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

As you have probably seen, I commented on the talk page. The guidelines not mentioning crew lists does not mean they should not be included. I think that it is possible that this is something that we never really considered because we assume that the infobox is the only place to name names. We can try to be creative with how we approach film articles. On the surface of it, do you not think that listing crew members is helpful? The production designer and the costume designer have roles that are more contributing than the actors we see at the end of a "Cast" section. We should be able to link to them when possible, to give them access on Wikipedia to their biography and the articles of the other films they've done. Are there other ways to present this information, such as in prose or in a collapsible table? I think what I added allows for easy lookup for their names and roles. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I think that we have a variety of readers looking for different kinds of detail. We often get detailed about film production or box office performance, but it's possible that some readers skip over one or the other entirely. While we don't want to bloat the article with indiscriminate detail, I think we can follow rules of thumbs about what to include. The fact that film reviews do mention crew credits at the end, as well as highlighting some key contributions, is one. Another is the award recognition for some of the work. I'm not necessarily looking for crew lists all over the place, but I think in the case of Interstellar, most crew members have won awards or worked on mainstream films. As for your "Personnel" suggestion, do you mean something like 47 Ronin (2013 film)#Crew? (Yeah, I put that there... haha. I want to encourage new thinking!) I'll wait to see if others can comment at Interstellar about the crew list. Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 18:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Z-Ro discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 08/12/new-music-kirko-bangz-progression-3-mixtape/ |title=New Music: Kirko Bangz – ‘Progression 3′ [Mixtape] |publisher=Rap-Up.com |date=2010-10-18 |accessdate=2013-08-14}}</ref>
• |"I'm from Texas" <small>([[Trae tha Truth]] feat Z-Ro, [[Slim Thug]], [[Paul Wall]], [[Bun B]] & [[Kirko Bangz]]</small>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:42, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stay Trippy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry David, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The View and The Marriage Ref (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hall of Fame (Big Sean album)

Hi, Sorry...I'm not trying to be difficult...just trying to keep it accurate. Peace.—Iknow23 (talk) 19:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Album notability

M.O. is not notable for the following conditions at WP:NALBUMS:

1. it does not have a confirmed track listing.
2. whilst 2 notable singles have been released, albums albums do not inherit notability from singles or their artist
3. coverage must be independent of the subject i.e. of the artist/record label.
4. Per the guideline, Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release
   • WP:TWITTER is a source to be used in caution.
5. Per wikipedia is not a crystal ball, a handful of information (poorly sourced) about release dates, collaborations and possible songs constitutes a breach of wikipedia rules regarding future album releases.

It is for those reasons that M.O. is not notable. If you disagree you would need to answer each of the above violations of wikipedia policy. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 23:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Whatever, you make your own rules anyway. Koala15 (talk) 23:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

How have I made my own rules up? I've directed you to all the relevant pages. There's no need to not assume WP:Good faith. If you're miffed fair enough but that's more to do with wikipedia... I didn't form those rules, they existed long before I started editing. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 23:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Well you tend to throw up random policys to prove your point. Koala15 (talk) 23:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Plus i think it would be a shame not to have this article since the pre orders are already up for the album, but whatever we can undo the redirect when the tracklist or cover is released. Koala15 (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

They're not random policies. Its called WP:NALBUMS as in when albums are notable. If you have never seen policies before or you don't know of their existence then that's not my fault... that's down to you to do the research (you'll see there's also WP:NSONGS and WP:NMUSIC). And actually no... a cover alone and/or tracklisting by itself will not help notability. It still needs coverage from external third party sources. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it's not here to serve as promotion for an album and as for it being "a shame" that's opinion ... wikipedia is supposed to be factual. Pages are only created when (and in some cases IF) they have enough information to warrant one. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 00:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Goodie Mob and Rolling Stone

I was putting in the review from the physical magazine, which it is not electronically available yet, so I linked it to the album reviews section of the website. This is standard operating procedure on here.HotHat (talk) 00:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

I fixed the references so that they look more professional as well, but you do a great job on finding reviews and putting them on the encyclopdia.HotHat (talk) 01:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Koala15 (talk) 05:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

It is linked now with the actual review.HotHat (talk) 06:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Haunted House 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 01:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Riddick (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pixar Theory

As the concept of a Pixar Universe preceded the Negroni thesis by a decade, I seek your opinion about THIS. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps I can fold my little sourced article into the main topic Pixar and we'd have a suitable redirect target for The Pixar Theory? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Bout That Life

As I said there were many different drafts of the tracklist released/rumored about who was featured on what tracks. I do not even think Amazons is the same as iTunes. If you see [5] [6] [7] [8] and [9] all call it a song from Self Made 3 and never once is the word "remix" said or anything. If you think about it, this lineup makes much more sense than a bunch of unknowns on a song about stuntin, especially when it comes to Diddy. Also reverting an edit in whole when I fixed other mistakes (I remember you being the one that expanded that part of the lead leaving French out of the MMG members), is kind of disruptive, if you do not agree with one part of an edit, fix that one part.STATic message me! 02:11, 11 September 2013 (UTC)