User talk:Mpc755

Welcome!

Hello, Mpc755, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Double-slit experiment shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - DVdm (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mpc755 reported by User:FyzixFighter (Result: ). Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one days for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Double-slit experiment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of five days for continuing to edit war on the same page after the previous block expired, as you did at Double-slit experiment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mpc755 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I reduced the reference to de Broglie's wave mechanics in Double-slit experiment to one line of text which I did forget to source and will not try to re-add should the block be lifted. I am done trying to modify the Double slit experiment article. I moved the text to Louis_de_Broglie as I thought this was the appropriate place to discuss de Broglie's wave mechanics as it is the foundation of all of his work. I then removed the references to the work done by Steinberg. de Broglie's wave mechanics is the foundation of everything de Broglie did and it deserves to be mentioned in the article describing de Broglie and his work. If the block is lifted I would like to add a de Broglie's wave mechanics section to the de Broglie article only and not reference it from the Double slit experiment article. I believe the "Walking droplets" section is relevant as it ends with "This physical picture is remakably similar to an early model of quantum dynamics proposed by Louis de Broglie...". The early model of quantum dynamics propased by de Broglie is his wave mechanics. When I am unblocked, if I add the following "de Broglie's wave mechanics" section: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Louis_de_Broglie&oldid=603568910#de_Broglie.27s_wave_mechanics, is that still considered edit warring? Mpc755 (talk) 09:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I reduced the reference to de Broglie's wave mechanics in [[:Double-slit experiment]] to one line of text which I did forget to source and will not try to re-add should the block be lifted. I am done trying to modify the Double slit experiment article. I moved the text to [[:Louis_de_Broglie]] as I thought this was the appropriate place to discuss de Broglie's wave mechanics as it is the foundation of all of his work. I then removed the references to the work done by Steinberg. de Broglie's wave mechanics is the foundation of everything de Broglie did and it deserves to be mentioned in the article describing de Broglie and his work. If the block is lifted I would like to add a de Broglie's wave mechanics section to the de Broglie article only and not reference it from the Double slit experiment article. I believe the "Walking droplets" section is relevant as it ends with "This physical picture is remakably similar to an early model of quantum dynamics proposed by Louis de Broglie...". The early model of quantum dynamics propased by de Broglie is his wave mechanics. When I am unblocked, if I add the following "de Broglie's wave mechanics" section: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Louis_de_Broglie&oldid=603568910#de_Broglie.27s_wave_mechanics, is that still considered edit warring? [[User:Mpc755|Mpc755]] ([[User talk:Mpc755#top|talk]]) 09:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I reduced the reference to de Broglie's wave mechanics in [[:Double-slit experiment]] to one line of text which I did forget to source and will not try to re-add should the block be lifted. I am done trying to modify the Double slit experiment article. I moved the text to [[:Louis_de_Broglie]] as I thought this was the appropriate place to discuss de Broglie's wave mechanics as it is the foundation of all of his work. I then removed the references to the work done by Steinberg. de Broglie's wave mechanics is the foundation of everything de Broglie did and it deserves to be mentioned in the article describing de Broglie and his work. If the block is lifted I would like to add a de Broglie's wave mechanics section to the de Broglie article only and not reference it from the Double slit experiment article. I believe the "Walking droplets" section is relevant as it ends with "This physical picture is remakably similar to an early model of quantum dynamics proposed by Louis de Broglie...". The early model of quantum dynamics propased by de Broglie is his wave mechanics. When I am unblocked, if I add the following "de Broglie's wave mechanics" section: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Louis_de_Broglie&oldid=603568910#de_Broglie.27s_wave_mechanics, is that still considered edit warring? [[User:Mpc755|Mpc755]] ([[User talk:Mpc755#top|talk]]) 09:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I reduced the reference to de Broglie's wave mechanics in [[:Double-slit experiment]] to one line of text which I did forget to source and will not try to re-add should the block be lifted. I am done trying to modify the Double slit experiment article. I moved the text to [[:Louis_de_Broglie]] as I thought this was the appropriate place to discuss de Broglie's wave mechanics as it is the foundation of all of his work. I then removed the references to the work done by Steinberg. de Broglie's wave mechanics is the foundation of everything de Broglie did and it deserves to be mentioned in the article describing de Broglie and his work. If the block is lifted I would like to add a de Broglie's wave mechanics section to the de Broglie article only and not reference it from the Double slit experiment article. I believe the "Walking droplets" section is relevant as it ends with "This physical picture is remakably similar to an early model of quantum dynamics proposed by Louis de Broglie...". The early model of quantum dynamics propased by de Broglie is his wave mechanics. When I am unblocked, if I add the following "de Broglie's wave mechanics" section: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Louis_de_Broglie&oldid=603568910#de_Broglie.27s_wave_mechanics, is that still considered edit warring? [[User:Mpc755|Mpc755]] ([[User talk:Mpc755#top|talk]]) 09:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Note. Adding that part ([1]) would probably be a bad idea. When your block expires or if/when you are unblocked, you probably should go to the talk page Talk:Louis de Broglie#de Broglie's wave mechanics and establish consensus before you edit the article again. - DVdm (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)