User talk:BjeliRabac

I thank you for your concern but many of the editing I added are actually on Wikipedia it's self:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WarriorofShiism (talk • contribs) 04:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You appear not to have listened to any of the advice any of the users you came in contact with gave you. This is still not a permanent block. Please reform, not all of your changes are vandalism. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Categorisation of Battles involving Chetniks

G'day, the reason I reverted your edits is that there is a subcategory for these battles. The parent category is Category:Battles involving Chetniks, and these battles fall into the subcategory of Category:Battles of World War II involving Chetniks. Categorisation is quite important on Wikipedia, and some editors do not understand it properly, it certainly took me some time to get the hang of it. But in this case your edits were reverted for good reason. The categorisation tree for Chetniks is not terribly complex. User:No such user has rightly reverted your reversion on Srb uprising. Please revert all your incorrect categorisations of WWII battles. You might like to have a look Wikipedia:Categorization. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 22:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Specifically, its chapter WP:SUBCAT: A page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category (unless the child category is non-diffusing - see below). For example, the article "Paris" need only be placed in "Category:Cities in France", not in both "Category:Cities in France" and "Category:Populated places in France". No such user (talk) 07:21, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

So, on the basis that the child category of Category:Battles of World War II involving Chetniks is a diffusing sub-category of Category:Battles involving Chetniks, and the fact that you are only on WP every now and again, I am rolling back your categorisations. Please read the guideline on categorisation that No such user has linked, and do not engage in edit-warring on this issue. You have been warned and blocked in the past for not following WP policies. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 09:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Campaignbox Bosnian War

Can you prove that Template:Campaignbox Bosnian War is for battles only? The Banner talk 00:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries

G'day, BjeliRabac. I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:39, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Capture of Banja Koviljača may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kosovo Operation (1944) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 1944.svg|22px|border|Albania]] [[National Liberation Movement (Albania)|Albanian Partisans]]<small>(Limited Involvement<br>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Regards IJA (talk) 07:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm The Banner. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Template:Campaignbox Bosnian War seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 21:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Operation Una. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. The Banner talk 21:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Rubbish... (User talk:BjeliRabac) 21:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Operation Corridor 92, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 21:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Manual warning

You have been warned time and time again to stop adding non-neutral texts, especially unsourced, into articles. The fact that you have been away for a while, does not give you the right to start edit warring and POV-pushing again. And no you start throwing accusations of sock-puppetry around like grass seed. You better stop all of that or face the consequences. The Banner talk 21:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)