User talk:Ed: Difference between revisions

Re this edit, please don't misuse warning templates. I've seen the diff in question, and you claim the edit summary to be a personal attack. "No, damn it" is not a personal attack. Note that misuse of warning templates can get you blocked for incivility and disruption. Instead, try acting in a more calm manner. Cheers, – Ch acor 18:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that you have acted in an uncivil manner on my talk page. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! – Ch acor 02:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Misusing them? "Mind your own business" is most definitely incivil. I'll remind you that this is a wiki and anyone has the right to edit any page as they see fit (of course, the admins will take appropriate action against those which aren't supposed to happen). You are violating WP:OWN - keep in mind that you don't "own" your user talk page. – Ch acor 01:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not troll. – Ch acor 02:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPA

Please don't assume that my comments are a personal attack. I said "No, damn it." because your edit was stupid, and I'm sick of explaining my reasoning to Esperanza members. I was commenting on content, not the contributor. There's a difference between "damn it" and "Damn you, Leroyencyclopediabrown" (and I used the former on purpose). Ral315 (talk) 18:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving

Ed, please don't leave! Why don't you take a long wikibreak if you need one to reconsider things, and then maybe you'll decide to come back. Your contributions are invaluable to the project! —Mets501 (talk) 19:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't leave. Take a wikibreak if you need to. Or participate in something very non-controversial like grammar fixes or disambiguation repair. We do value you and your contributions! --Tachikom a 01:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second--rather, third that. We certainly don't want to lose you. Take a well-deserved WikiBreak or try being a WikiGnome like myself! :-) -Umdunno 05:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude what is wrong?!? As a Member of the AMA I would be happy to help you. Let me know but DON'T

LEAVE! Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 05:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do hope you reconsdier. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 13:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I check out your contribs and it looos really good. please don't leave. is it stress? School? or what?! Talk to me and other wikipedians. --Christy06 21:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Request

Hi. You requested a translation of some Celine Dion lyrics from French to English. I see that you removed the lyrics from the page yourself, so there's nothing left to translate. It seems you forgot to remove the translation request, though. I hope you don't mind that I did it for you. --Storkk 11:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so you're still alive on Wikipedia. Good for you. I had assumed from previous comments on your talk page that you were gone semi-permanently. Stick around. The more editors the better... To reply to your comment, yes, I realize that this was a month ago, but I have only just (since the day before yesterday) begun translating articles. I removed it precisely because it was so old and dead. Anyway, if there are any more translations you would like from French to English, please add them to the list, or alternatively, to my talk page (though I reserve the right to refuse to do any of them, if I disagree with them). Glad you're back on wikipedia! Keep the spirits up. (By the way, please sign your posts on my talk page in the future, using ~~~~). Thanks, Storkk 01:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am offering to help, if there's anything I can do. I'd much rather keep an editor that is obviously useful to wikipedia than drive them away. I've seen some of the controversy -- I can't say you are blameless, but I think everyone has room to learn. Let me know if I can help, Storkk 01:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a big issue -- and I've fixed it on my own talk page, but please don't use {{unsigned}} without piping it (i.e. adding a "|Username"). To see why, please see my talk page history. No worries, just info for the future. --Storkk 02:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chacor

Please cease the attacking posts on his page.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pleas stop. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 03:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by persistently disrupting Chacor's talk page by reposting the same message seven times to make a point despite warnings to stop by 3rd parties. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead. -- Netsnipe ► 16:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of trolling 7 times, when I did it 5 times. The first two edits were NOT trolling, only the edits that LED to the trolling. Also, after reffering to Wikipedia:What is a troll, there is a statement saying "Administrators are not empowered to block usernames for "trolling", although some accounts used for little other purpose have been blocked for this reason and have remained blocked." I cannot be blocked for violating WP:POINT because I was not warned of violating WP:POINT. Instead, I was warned for trolling, which I can't be blocked for because I have made other contributions than trolling. In addition, Chacor has made NO RESPONSE to my trolling except in his edit summaries, which I really think isn't right. If Chacor has a problem with me, them he should talk to me himself.

Decline reason:

A six hour block is fine and you have no reason to complain. You need to cool down act like you got some sense to fellow editors.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is anyone going to review this???--Ed^{talk c E} 16:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments =). --Ed^{talk c E} 17:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must concur with Pilotguy and Netsnipe. Use this time to take a break. --Fang Aili ^talk 17:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you want to wind me up, you can try. I'm not angry, I've been subjected to more testing things than what you are engaging in. I have a thick skin. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 23:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for September 5th.


Volume 2, Issue 36	5 September 2006	About the Signpost

Everyking desysopped	Explicit images spark debate
Report from the Italian Wikipedia	The English Wikipedia reaches 1,000 administrators
Voting begins in Board elections	Wikipedia in the news
News and notes	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Yall shouldn't block him. he vandalized once. block me. I'm a sockpuppet of User:Cute 1 4 u and i'm doing this cause he is a great editor and friend. I'm already bvlocked cause yall think i'm a child impersonator but i am not. if i was, i would have already admitted it. Notice i'm not here when i'm at school (from 9:00-2:45). I don't care if you believe me or not. I just want my "Cute 1 4 u" profile back. And yes i am doing all this for a friend. so block me and i'll make a new profile.--Christy06 21:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving & barnstar

I also saw your poem on you're page. Are you depressed? The point: please don't lave. you've got the coolest username and userpage here. you make great edits. and so...i know we are not getting paid for it but it fun to have someone lookl at our suscessful work. You might not know this but I am User:Cute 1 4 u. I'm tried of having to bounce from one account to another but i like visiting your userpage cause it's cool. you're a good friend and was my 1st friend here. so please don't leave. Take this barnstar.--Christy06 21:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because you're kind and a great friend and editor. This is not just because you're leaving. Christy06 21:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HEY!

Hey glad to see you are sticking around! Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 03:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about Cute 1 4 U

IT wasn't that is was the evade of her block which was for other reasons. (Sockpupperting, inpersonations, VAndalism ect) Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 21:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I never accused her of the child policy I just said this the a use that claims to be this 11 year old user. that is all I said. I wasn't even aware of the policy until you posted it. I only brought it up because of the past issues and the fact that she blantly said who she was. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 22:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the report I made in fact

Hello this user has clamed to be this 11 year old blocked user. Christy06 posted on addmisson on Leroyencyclopediabrown's talk page. Cute 1 4 U has a history of sock abuse. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 01:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I never said she was in violation of the policy (Which I wasn't aware of but thought was a general rule of thumb). And I do beleave in that policy's spirit (If not its letter) when In Real Life information concerns may come up. My biggest issue with her is the sockpuppet, vandalism and abuse of other editors. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 22:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So! don't listen to them. I only did impersonation of 1 person/celeb and a few bits of vansdalizing. however, I am 11. --75.34.176.105 23:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I know what you said on my talkpage and I already did. I can't say what my username is but I will login to it and leave a message on your talk page. I'm logged in to my ip address now though. --75.34.176.105 23:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...

Hi Cool user page. It's me...i'm logged on ;-) --New York from Flavor of Love 23:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 137: / Line 137: @@
 ==Hey==
-I know what you said on my [[User talk:Christy06|talkpage]] and I already did. I can't say what my username is but I will login to it and leave a message on my page. I'm logged in to my ip address now though. --[[User:75.34.176.105|75.34.176.105]] 23:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
+I know what you said on my [[User talk:Christy06|talkpage]] and I already did. I can't say what my username is but I will login to it and leave a message on your talk page. I'm logged in to my ip address now though. --[[User:75.34.176.105|75.34.176.105]] 23:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
+==...==
+::Hi Cool user page. It's me...i'm logged on ;-) --[[User:New York from Flavor of Love|New York from Flavor of Love]] 23:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)