Talk:Usman Dar: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Page protection: cmt |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Per BLP, editors should not restore contentious material about living people that has been removed on BLP grounds without consensus. Since editors where not discussing the issue, but rather reverting each other, I have just protected the article for a week, reverting to a version that, in my opinion, did not contain any contentious information. If consensus is reached before the week is up, please let me know and I'll unprotect the page. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 14:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC) |
Per BLP, editors should not restore contentious material about living people that has been removed on BLP grounds without consensus. Since editors where not discussing the issue, but rather reverting each other, I have just protected the article for a week, reverting to a version that, in my opinion, did not contain any contentious information. If consensus is reached before the week is up, please let me know and I'll unprotect the page. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 14:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC) |
||
:I repeat what {{ping|User:SheriffIsInTown}} said in the edit summaries that since the education section is all about a degree which Usman Dar received fraudulently from a degree mill, it does not qualify under section heading "Education" but "Dubious degree case" because the section title should be descriptive of the content it contains. --[[User:Saqib|Saqib]] ([[User talk:Saqib|talk]]) 14:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC) |
:I repeat what {{ping|User:SheriffIsInTown}} said in the edit summaries that since the education section is all about a degree which Usman Dar received fraudulently from a degree mill, it does not qualify under section heading "Education" but "Dubious degree case" because the section title should be descriptive of the content it contains. --[[User:Saqib|Saqib]] ([[User talk:Saqib|talk]]) 14:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC) |
||
::{{re|Salvio giuliano}} There is no BLP violation in that content. It is supported by sources and stated as-is. I request you to restore my edit, you can count my opinion as [[WP:3O|third opinion]] and consider that there is already consensus. I do not see the objecting IP raising any valid points so far. If you yourself are contesting it then please let us know why do you think that it is a [[WP:BLPVIO]]. [[User:SheriffIsInTown|<b style="color: blue;">Sh</b><b style="color: red;">eri</b><b style="color: blue;">ff</b>]] | [[User talk:SheriffIsInTown|<b style="color: black;">☎ 911</b>]] | 15:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:17, 11 October 2018
 | This article was nominated for deletion on January 10, 2018. The result of the discussion was delete. |
 | Biography Stub‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Pakistan Stub‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because it meets WP:NPOL. Chairman of the Prime Minister’s Youth Programme is a cabinet level position. --Saqib (talk) 10:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Page protection
Per BLP, editors should not restore contentious material about living people that has been removed on BLP grounds without consensus. Since editors where not discussing the issue, but rather reverting each other, I have just protected the article for a week, reverting to a version that, in my opinion, did not contain any contentious information. If consensus is reached before the week is up, please let me know and I'll unprotect the page. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
- I repeat what @SheriffIsInTown: said in the edit summaries that since the education section is all about a degree which Usman Dar received fraudulently from a degree mill, it does not qualify under section heading "Education" but "Dubious degree case" because the section title should be descriptive of the content it contains. --Saqib (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Salvio giuliano: There is no BLP violation in that content. It is supported by sources and stated as-is. I request you to restore my edit, you can count my opinion as third opinion and consider that there is already consensus. I do not see the objecting IP raising any valid points so far. If you yourself are contesting it then please let us know why do you think that it is a WP:BLPVIO. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)