User talk:Particleman24

Hello Particleman24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! WillMak050389 18:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Image copyright problem with Image:CSuper_Sprint.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CSuper_Sprint.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

March 2008

Please do not add misinformation to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes. Each season of the show has 13 episodes. Until that episode aired, season 5 had only 12. There is no contract for a sixth season, and no current plans to produce one. Thank you. -- Elaich ^talk 21:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Talk: Ed Edd n Eddy. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. You also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. treelo _talk 15:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. treelo _talk 15:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy

How many times do I have to tell YOU that if you have no proof other than rumors or self research that it does not fly on Wikipedia? The LAST confirmed statement we have on Season 6 is that it is postponed in lieu of making the movie. A bunch of fanboy rumor mongering on a fan site does not change that. There is also NO PROOF that the 2 episodes in question have ever aired ANYWHERE. They allegedly aired once in Australia, of which no proof can be found, and since have never aired anywhere. The fact they are on Youtube means nothing in this context, as they could have been (intentionally?) leaked. Give it up. Unless you can find written, verifiable proof that the 2 episodes aired (not from a fansite) AND that they are season 6 episodes, they remain in season 5, as it fits the past pattern perfectly. -- Elaich ^talk 18:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of YouTube poop

A tag has been placed on YouTube poop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of YouTube poop

A tag has been placed on YouTube poop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of YouTube poop

A tag has been placed on YouTube poop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

User Warnings(s)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

YouTube Poop

Why did you delete this article? --Particleman24 (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Tagged par WP:NEO and WP:SOURCE. This sentence was in no way sourced as being important enough, and seems to be an unimportant neologism. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

No offense, but I didn't understand a word you just said. Second, I'm a YouTube Pooper myself. --Particleman24 (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I guess i can't get away with a 1 line responce this time :). Now, for the longer version: For a subject to be on wikipedia, certain guidelines have to be met. The first one is WP:N, or notability. This rule states that an article must be important enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. The article you created, does not seem to be about a notable subject as there is no sourcing.

Second, the article fails WP:NEO. The sentence "Youtube Pooper" is a new sentence that has only recently appeared. The first problems with neologisms is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary made to explain the meaning of a certain sentence. The second problem is that this neologism is not widely spread (IE: used by a lot of people, or at least the article doesn't indicate this) Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ed, Edd n Eddy, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. YouTube Poop (and variants) have all been salted due their status as neologisms and non-notable. Please do not add information regarding youTube Poop and any animated series to any article or warnings will be issued due to the subject being of no note and also being a conflict of interest. Thank you. treelo _talk 11:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I think it's time to begin the vandalism warnings. This person has repeatedly demonstrated that he does not "get it": and has repeatedly gone against the will of the editing community. There is no good faith here, and there is certainly a long enough record of disruptive editing to proceeed. -- Elaich ^talk 13:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I've had it with you people. I'm just going to leave for a long time. Goodbye! --Particleman24 (talk) 23:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Trust me sonny, the feeling is completely mutual. If you do come back from your extended break don't bother if you're just going to scatterspamming with your next failed meme. treelo _talk 00:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:TOON

Considering your last explosion [1], [2], [3], and others which I won't point out, but I am sure you are aware of; I am going to ask that you talk on the WT:TOON page before you attempt to re-join the project. Yngvarr (c) 14:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

What exactly am I supposed to talk about on the talk page? --Particleman24 (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)