User talk:166.70.238.45: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:45, 31 May 2009

Welcome

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (166.70.238.45) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Maelwys (talk) 19:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email me, please

Jeff, please email me. You'll not make friends by doing what you're doing (even though it is correct). Better to mobilise what friends you do have, and let me fix this with the arbitrators. Guy (Help!) 22:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-03-13/Scandal fallout continues, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Arbitration Enforcement request

Per policy, I am supposed to notify you of an arbitration enforcement request that I have submitted. Pfagerburg (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1 year block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for block evasion in regard to the Arbitration Enforcement thread. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 21:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Paul Fagerburg is under a Civil Stalking Injunction issued by the 4th District Court (which has not been served on him as of yet but was before Judge Stott this week and last). He has also been listed in a nationwide database as a stalker. Anyone acting in concert with him is subject to criminal prosecution for stalking. Please contact Mike Goodwin for the details. You can block this IP all you want. In doing so, you just made Wikimedie liable and yourself along with him. Thanks for taking the bait. Have a nice day....

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

166.70.238.45 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia's admins may not act in concert with a convicted stalker in aggravating the offense and committing further violations of Utah's criminal statutes, and in doing so become personally liable. The order issued by the Court applies not only to Fagerburg but ANYONE who acts in concert with him. This includes the anonymous internet stalker body referred to as "The Wikipedia Arbitration Committee".

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Wikipedia's admins may not act in concert with a convicted stalker in aggravating the offense and committing further violations of Utah's criminal statutes, and in doing so become personally liable.  The order issued by the Court applies not only to Fagerburg but ANYONE who acts in concert with him.  This includes the anonymous internet stalker body referred to as "The Wikipedia Arbitration Committee". |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Wikipedia's admins may not act in concert with a convicted stalker in aggravating the offense and committing further violations of Utah's criminal statutes, and in doing so become personally liable.  The order issued by the Court applies not only to Fagerburg but ANYONE who acts in concert with him.  This includes the anonymous internet stalker body referred to as "The Wikipedia Arbitration Committee". |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Wikipedia's admins may not act in concert with a convicted stalker in aggravating the offense and committing further violations of Utah's criminal statutes, and in doing so become personally liable.  The order issued by the Court applies not only to Fagerburg but ANYONE who acts in concert with him.  This includes the anonymous internet stalker body referred to as "The Wikipedia Arbitration Committee". |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

PhilKnight,

Please provide your contact information off wiki so I can obtain your address and full name. I am required by the Court to report you for service of an order to show cause. I would prefer not to use Wikipedia's pages for this purpose, however, I am required to post this here pursuant to Federal Court Guidelines in Seescandy vs. Columbia when dealing with anonymous internet users. Wikipedia and Wikimedia domains are blocked at my mail server so you can call me on my cell phone or email from another domain. Absent this, I will turn the matter over to the Court and watch them hunt you down like an animal and serve you. Thanks.

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 Paul Fagerburg is under a Civil Stalking Injunction issued by the 4th District Court (which has not been served on him as of yet but was before Judge Stott this week and last).  He has also been listed in a nationwide database as a stalker.  Anyone acting in concert with him is subject to criminal prosecution for stalking.  Please contact Mike Goodwin for the details.  You can block this IP all you want.  In doing so, you just made Wikimedie liable and yourself along with him.  Thanks for taking the bait.  Have a nice day....
-:Before a civil injunction can issue, the target of that injunction must be served and have an opportunity to respond. You can bring this into court if you really want to waste your time and money, but all you'll have is the proof that '''you''' stalked '''me''' and called my employer in a vain attempt to get me fired, against your vague allegations and imaginary court orders.
-:Provide references: a court case number that can be properly dereferenced, and a link to your "nationwide database" of stalkers.
-:If you weren't already permanently blocked as a stalker, I'd ask WP to block you for violating - once again - your permanent legal threat parole from that 2007 arbcom case. [[User:Pfagerburg|Pfagerburg]] ([[User talk:Pfagerburg|talk]]) 23:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 {{unblock|Wikipedia's admins may not act in concert with a convicted stalker in aggravating the offense and committing further violations of Utah's criminal statutes, and in doing so become personally liable.  The order issued by the Court applies not only to Fagerburg but ANYONE who acts in concert with him.  This includes the anonymous internet stalker body referred to as "The Wikipedia Arbitration Committee".}}
-:"Convicted stalker"??? Conviction is criminal, and I guarantee you I've never been convicted of anything more than moving violations. Multiple background checks (with fingerprints) have been conducted when I applied at various times for certain licenses handled by agencies that used to have 3 letters for a name. '''I invite you to retract your libel.''' [[User:Pfagerburg|Pfagerburg]] ([[User talk:Pfagerburg|talk]]) 23:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 PhilKnight,