Jump to content

User talk:ParisianBlade: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Octane (talk | contribs)
DASHBot (talk | contribs)
m Removing fair use file(s), per WP:NFCC#9 (Shutoff | Log )
Line 27: Line 27:
==Conservepedia==
==Conservepedia==
<div style="position:absolute">[[File:Blast-2.gif|Booyah!]]</div>
<div style="position:absolute">[[File:Blast-2.gif|Booyah!]]</div>
[[File:Conservlogo4.png|140px]]<br clear=all>
[[:File:Conservlogo4.png|140px]]<!--Non free file removed by DASHBot--><br clear=all>
I just thought you would like that. <b>[[User:Resident_Mario|Res]]</b>[[User_talk:Resident_Mario|Mar]] 18:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I just thought you would like that. <b>[[User:Resident_Mario|Res]]</b>[[User_talk:Resident_Mario|Mar]] 18:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)



Revision as of 00:24, 18 March 2010

Archives: 1, 2


Conservapedia | Your addition regarding Senator Obama

Perhaps I am confused, but what was the point in adding this? Were you trying to show evidence Conservapedia claims Obama may be a Muslim? If so, you can find that info on the Obama article itself at Conservapedia. Either way, I doubt the citation you provided is reliable enough to be included in Wikipedia. Thanks. meinsla talk 11:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of User:ParisianBlade/ED

I have nominated User:ParisianBlade/ED (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 20:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source said 'by their own admission'

I think you're confused. Proof is not needed. A reliable source said "by their own admission". Please go to the talk page and discuss. 7876 ann arbor street (talk) 01:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a wiki. See Irish Dance history. Please don't edit my user page. 7876 ann arbor street (talk) 03:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, FYI, my interpretation of "us" in the "But the biggest lesson she’s taken away as a young conservative is: 'There are people who want to destroy us'" quote was conservatives, not conservapedia. I think it is an insightful quote about the aspirations of some on the left to destroy the right. 7876 ann arbor street (talk) 04:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. It treated it unthinkingly like a username, but you're right, it could have been a personal name. 7876 ann arbor street (talk) 04:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I'm not naive

Reverting the RW entry back to what it should be is not vandalism and you know this. If you have a personal issue with the site itself, so be it. But do not threaten that I am vandalizing. A revert is not vandalization, not in this case, where the revert is to an entry that is specific to the topic. Please do not carry over any of that CP/RW junk into Wikipedia. Anyway, as if I have to justify myself, have you looked at RW lately? It is not dependent solely on CP. It has commentary on all different things now. Again I just want to reiterate, do not make veiled threats and insinuate that I am vandalizing. Thank you in advance. Jersey John (talk) 10:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sceptre

Whatever your opinion of Sceptre and his block/unblock, try not to goad him into responding in a manner unlikely to be helpful to anyone. Your comment on his talkpage isn't productive in the least. - auburnpilot talk 20:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've had personal conflicts with Sceptre before so I don't have a whole lot of sympathy for him, but I agree that my comment was hasty. I'll keep anything else I have to say about him confined to the thread. Thanks.--ParisianBlade (talk) 20:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conservepedia

140px
I just thought you would like that. ResMar 18:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, ParisianBlade. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Article Rescue Members are not necessarily inclusionists, all wikipedians are warmly welcome to join.~~~~

What! Glorious Democratic People's Republic of Korea very democratic, have election just last year. Have many new election techniques for make benefit Glorious Democratic People's Republic of Korea, such as volunteer death camp for vote against Glorious Democratic Front for Reunification of Fatherland candidate. Is much free, more than filthy pig-dog capitalist country of vile West that seek to destroy Glorious Democratic People's Republic of Korea, last bastion of hope and freedom of working class in all world. Octane [improve me?] 22.02.10 0919 (UTC)