User talk:Callanecc

Sorry

I'm sorry Callanecc for vandalising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PiggyFacey (talk • contribs) 13:40, 17 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Review of past issues

I'd like to have the way I've been pushed off Wikipedia reviewed. Where would be the best venue for a public review? Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 07:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jaakobou, without more information I really can't give you much more advice than to review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Have you heard any news about some of the stabbing attacks in Israel? Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 19:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

No sorry I haven't, but how does that related to Wikipedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

There is an ongoing wave of attacks on Jews (more than 30 in 1.5 months; mostly stabbing attacks), a part of the overall "popular resistance" strategy adopted at the Sixth Fatah Conference in August 2009. Incitement to "sharpen the weapons" against Jews, albeit masqueraded as a paraphrase on Shakespeare (quoted from an Arab newspaper) and whatnot; this is at the core of what was used to herd me off the Wikipedia. Arab 'mukawama' (doctrine of conflict enhancement) themes on violence and poetic militancy seem improper for Wikipedia user-space. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 15:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

(continued) There are a few editors who didn't see the real life effect of this (e.g. more than 30 attacks the past 1.5 months; mostly stabbing attacks). With respect to the fact that people are being attacked daily in real life, I'm sure there is room to reintroduce the issues of user-space usage of "poetic" violence promotion (and wiki-cliques that may drop by soon to hail the validity of these).

Proper disclosure: I was herded off for misrepresenting this matter a few years ago (observing a consensus where it wasn't as strong as I thought it was). Perhaps, a few of the involved group of people mentioned above (e.g. @Timotheus Canens:, @Foxj:, @Kim Dent-Brown:, @Black Kite:, @Crazycomputers:) would be able to see the light now that a couple years passed and there's a clearer wave of stabbings and killings and videos to boot. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 11:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Giant panda

Unprotection is requested here. This article has been semi - protected since 6 December 2013. 31.54.205.170 (talk) 11:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Done: I've changed it to pending changes to see what will happen (and if it can be unprotected). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Removing my comment at AE2

[1] I thought it was helpful, and it's also my one and only comment on the case; I've decided against making any more. Are you enjoying being a clerk? Have you considered blocking Bishzilla for threatening grievous bodily harm to an arbitrator? Bishonen | talk 11:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC).

@Bishonen: Making it on Giano's talk page was funny linking to it in the arbitration case was unhelpful and POINTy at worst. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Of course it was pointy. Shoehorning Giano into the case was pointy. He goes no better there than Bishzilla. Making that point is helpful. Bishonen | talk 08:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC).

So pointing outsomething you see as being pointy by being pointy is a good and constructive way to go about things? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)