User talk:Kinu/Archive 16

In the event of persistent vandalism, administrators are authorized to semiprotect this talk page for a reasonable duration to prevent further disruption.

Are you here because I deleted/reverted something you had contributed? Read me first, please!

More than likely, the reason you're here is because I deleted something you had contributed. Before writing here, why not see if you can answer your question yourself? If your article was speedy deleted, please read the reason in the deletion log. Also note that, while I may have been the one to actually perform the deletion, another editor was likely the one who actually tagged it for deletion. If so, they left a message on your talk page, so please read the information there first. It might be a good idea to have a dialogue with them in lieu of with me. If your article was about a band, please see WP:MUSIC. Wikipedia administrator User:Chrislk02 explains our speedy deletion of band articles in more depth here. If your article was about a company you work for, founded, etc., please see WP:COI. Chances are your article looked like WP:SPAM. Take a moment to think about whether it could be considered advertising. If your article was a joke... no thanks. If I reverted content that I say was unsourced or poorly sourced, please see WP:RS. Verifiability is taken seriously around here. If your question still isn't answered or your would like more clarification... Post a new message at the bottom of my talk page. If you post it at the top, do something to break the formatting of this page, or replace everything on this page with your question, I will likely ignore and/or delete it. Common courtesy, please. For a new topic, use a headline that's more descriptive than "my article". For best results, make the topic the title of the article. I deal with scores of articles a day, and I'm not going to go hunting for one. Sign and date your entries using ~~~~ or the signature icon in the toolbar above the edit box. Avoid comparisons and provide reliable sources for me to consider. Glib rants that compare your three-piece garage metalcore band to Metallica or that say your website is just as important as Google generally won't sway anyone. Communication that is in ALL CAPS, is barely in English, lacks punctuation, is otherwise poorly worded or incoherent, contains profanity/personal attacks, or generally assumes bad faith will likely be reverted. I have no obligation to respond to anything that I feel does not benefit the project. Thank you, and happy editing!

Are you here to ask me to perform an administrative action (a block, page protection, deletion, etc.)? Read me first, please!

If there is an issue that you feel requires or would benefit from my attention and administrative tools specifically, because we have communicated regarding it previously or you have other reasons to believe I might be the right person to deal with it, please feel free to create a section on my talk page! However, for general requests for administrative actions, it is best to file a report at the proper venue (WP:AIV, WP:RFPP, WP:ANI, etc.) instead of pinging me specifically, for the reasons outlined below. While it may appear that I am active based on my recent contributions, I do tend to jump from task to task here (and between here and the "real world") quite frequently. Thus, even though I may be actively performing administrative work during one short spell, I may not be during the next, instead focusing on another task (either on-wiki or in the "real world"). Likewise, if I have a high level of activity at a particular board and have actioned many reports, but not one that you have already filed there, it may be because I do not feel comfortable actioning it: I may not have a full understanding of the context and/or history or actually be involved with the editor/article in some way. That being said, any information you provide with the good-faith intention of maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia, either here or to the relevant noticeboard, is appreciated! Rest assured that someone will act on it appropriately in due time.

Why you delete the micronation Frestovenia

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello. You have deleted the micronation Frestovenia at the list of currencies of micronations.Europeanfret (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC) I see no indication that this particular micronation is worthy of inclusion on this list; indeed, the article you created about it was speedily deleted, and rightfully so. Wikipedia is for notable topics, not things made up one day. I hope this information helps. --Kinu t/c 16:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello, Kinu. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort. A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello, Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hi Kinu. A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best. If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello, Kinu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello!

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Thanks for the thanks. However, the IP Special:Contributions/168.184.255.32 seems to be related to an awfully familiar/recent SPI. --JustBerry (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Nevermind. Similar changes per Chargers relocating to Los Angeles. --JustBerry (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed. Administrator changes NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67 Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13 Guideline and policy news A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016. Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use. Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators. Technical news When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950) Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448) The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017. Arbitration The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing. Obituaries JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive 13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

salted page recreation

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hi there, it seems you where the most recent admin to review the deletion discussion and salting around Nicholas Alahverdian. It seems there is some recent news around the case that made the person known - childcare in RI and his involvement in some lobbying. A new author has circumvented the salting by introducing an article with a slightly misspelled name Nicolas Alahverdian. I was wondering if you have any guidance in this case? My initial reaction was a CSD, but given time has moved on and it appears there may be some lobbying done, this may require another look? The two related deletion discussions are Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alahverdian v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, et al and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Alahverdian. Many thanks! Jake Brockman (talk) 10:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

I noticed you program in JavaScript...

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. The JavaScript WikiProject is now up and running. We organize and develop JavaScript articles, navigation aids, and user scripts. Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page. For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts. The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list. Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 15:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Extended confirm user
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Am I a extended confirm user if not how do I become one Colored (talk) 18:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello, Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment. The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators. To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form. We really appreciate your input! Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team. For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello, Kinu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

11 years of adminship!
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Wishing Kinu a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Thank you! --Kinu t/c 02:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your signature

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. You are encouraged to change <font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> : Kinu t/c to <span style="font-family:Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<strong style="color:blue">Kinu</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<i style="color: red">t</i>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<i style="color:red">c</i>]]</sub></span> : Kinu t/c —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Thank you for updating your signature. However, I forgot to escape the ampersand of &nbsp;, so the nonbreaking space in your signature turned into an ordinary space. If you want the nonbreaking space back, change your signature to: <span style="font-family:Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<strong style="color:blue">Kinu</strong>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<i style="color: red">t</i>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<i style="color:red">c</i>]]</sub></span> : Kinu t/c —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

13 years of editing, today
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hey, Kinu. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Jesse Waugh (artist)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Thanks for salting Jesse Waugh. Jesse Waugh (artist) and Jesse R. Waugh (artist) might also be good to salt. All told, although it is hard to keep track, there have been three AfDs and four or five page deletions ( Jesse R. Waugh and Jesse Waugh) via AfD or speedy. Thanks.104.163.147.121 (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC) oops, I see that has already been taken care of! Thanks. 104.163.147.121 (talk) 08:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC) (Sorry for the delay in responding!) Not a problem. I certainly hope that salting helps to put an end to any shenanigans! --Kinu t/c 03:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon_Merrill

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hi Kinu So if I request that the Giger site add the reference AND get consensus on the Giger article to mention this commercial then would this article be a keep ? Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 11:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC) If you feel that the consensus in the deletion discussion was not properly assessed or if additional sources have become available since then to suggest that notability criteria are now met, you are welcome to take the issue to deletion review. Nonetheless, I believe that the consensus was apparent in this case, in that the information presented about the commercial of which you speak was deemed by the other !voters to be inadequate to establish (or support) notability, and that their !votes to delete were based on stronger applications of policies and guidelines than any put forth by those !voting to keep. --Kinu t/c 03:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Thank you for the information. I mainly do minor edits, but I am trying to learn the world of page creation. My questions are. How can I minimise wasting time adding content to an article that will probably get deleted ? Also if I did the above (if I request that the Giger site add the reference AND get consensus on the Giger article to mention this commercial then would this article be a keep ? ) and managed yo get consensus that acting notability included commercials would that have worked ?Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Typo on RDMA
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. You presumably wanted "x·4x", not "x·4x2". Otherwise, great answer. Cheers! -- ToE 19:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Well, that's embarrassing. Ha. Thanks for the note. --Kinu t/c 19:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

UTSA library is working with 2 history classes on creating Wikipedia articles/edits on Women of San Antonio

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello from a fellow Roadrunner! Kinu, this semester the UTSA library is working with two History faculty members on Wikipedia class projects. Students in two classes (Historical Methods, History of San Antonio) will be given assignments to write research papers on notable women who had/have a connection to San Antonio. We're planning a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon on November 10, where interested students (these are undergrads) will bring their research papers and will receive help creating basic articles or improving existing articles. Do you have any advice for us, or would you be interested in working with us in some way? Cheers, Kemphem (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Cambium Networks

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. The Cambium Networks Wikipedia page was removed due to disruptive editing in 2016. I fully understand the reason, and apologize for this activity now 2½ years ago. Over that time, our company has changed and there are more citations available. I ask for your reconsideration for us to have a presence on Wikipedia. Cambium Networks will abide by the rules. We would like to be able to professionally share information with readers who are seeking the details on our company. Here are some recent stories that may qualify Cambium Networks for a page: • Being selected by Facebook as a partner for their Express WiFi program • Providing WiFi connectivity to rescue teams in the Thailand Cave Rescue project I appreciate your consideration to have an administrator unblock the page. We will provide a quality page with a neutral, well-cited content. We will abide by the rules. If a conversation with our CEO Atul Bhatnagar would be helpful, I am glad to set this up. --12.220.246.2 (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC) Ray Savich Director, Content Marketing Cambium Networks ray.savich@cambiumnetworks.com 847-640-3621

Nomination of Martha Rogers (professor) for deletion

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martha Rogers (professor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Rogers (professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 00:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Why I listed it as vandalism

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Thank you for blocking Boogily. I can see why at first glance this might not be obvious vandalism, which is why I originally did not call it this in my edit summaries until recently, so just to clarify; 1) Per the school website, the currently listed principal is correct and there is no need to change it 2) They are purposely spelling the school's name wrong 3) The changes they are making to enrollment are not backed by reliable sources 4) Most importantly for me, their list of notable faculty is just...trash for lack of a better word. For example, "Steve Rabinowitz - One of the humanities teachers, Steve is easily recognizable by his appearance. Many of the students have noted that he looks irritably like Jesus. One of his talents include him being able to respell his last name as Rainbow Zit." As well, I have been recently harassed by students from this school [1] and the page history is full of IPs and new accounts vandalizing this page (like this IP for example, which made the same edits this "new" account is making) so I am being watchful of this. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC) After investigating the edits further, I have to agree with you, and I have thus decided to block this user indefinitely. I'll add the article to my watchlist so I can keep an eye on it after the semiprotection expires. Thanks for the note and for all your work here! --Kinu t/c 16:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Username

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hey Kinu, since you seem to be on call, please see User:Wonacottcommunications. And thanks for blocking that Connor dude. 199.80.13.80 (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC) Looks like another admin beat me to it. Definitely promotional and rightfully blocked. Thanks! --Kinu t/c 17:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC) No, thank you. And User:SenorPeePeePooPoo. I know the WMF is writing checks for you as we speak. $5 per block. Hurry up, because Oshwah is raking it in, probably. 199.80.13.80 (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello, Kinu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Kmakers

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hey, thanks for this, but any idea if we can find out who it was? Of the people I pinged, almost all are "in good standing" and unlikely to create a sock account that could be tied to them by CU, Dream Focus (talk · contribs) already knows I'm on to him as I've explicitly stated that I'm convinced the original Malaysian IP was him[2][3] and so if it were the same person and that person was DF they'd have to know there was no way they could get away with it, and of the ones that are blocked (or were placed under a limited ban and left the project, or were clearly only trolling to begin with, got away with it for a few months, then got bored and left) there's basically Brough87 (talk · contribs), C. W. Gilmore (talk · contribs), Expectant of Light (talk · contribs) and JohnWickTwo (talk · contribs). B87, CWG and JWT are all stale for CU purposes, as is EoL but the latter is almost certainly still active under a new account, which Kmakers could be used to catch. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 04:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Untitled

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Abuse is not acceptable Dear Sir firstly I new to wiki and made a few errors on the page I wrote this is not a crime if your long term wiki editor you should be offering advice not bulling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarryConroy5 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC) The advice that I gave is to cease moving articles to namespaces where they don't belong, such as the Talk and Category namespaces. If you heed that, all should be fine, right? Thanks! --Kinu t/c 17:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Joji Musician Reversion

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. @Kinu: Hi, I would like for you to undo the reversion you did on your part. As I understand I should not have reverted 3 times (though I believe I fall under the exceptions to that rule due to vandalism), the 3RR rule was first broken by JJMC89. On top of which he has been breaking several other rules (such as posting generic templates on my talk page) and has been known to vandalize. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFixerUpper12 (talk • contribs) You inserted this material four times; that violates WP:3RR and I see no exception because you were not reverting vandalism. On the other hand, you were reverted exactly three times by that editor (the fourth time was by me), and you reported that editor with a false report at WP:AIV. Most of your edits are attempts to insert this material. Take it to the talk page or you will find yourself blocked for disruptive editing. --Kinu t/c 03:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC) I also note that you have now been blocked. If you are unblocked, I suggest following the advice given to you here, on the article's talk page, and on your talk page. --Kinu t/c 03:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Please revert my corrections immediately!

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hello Kinu of Wikipedia. This is Danny Seigle again. For the record, (which i have stated in the help page already), My job position in Alab Pilipinas is Team Consultant (not assistant coach). I am making these corrections to ensure the information on my page is current, accurate and factual. Kindly acknowledge my edits and Please revert it back to my corrections. Anything that says "assistant coach" needs to be corrected to "Team Consultant".I have tried several times to explain via reps and myself why these edits are being done. Someone keeps editing my changes back to assistant coach which is false. I have never been an assistant coach for any team. What do i need to do to prove that I am a CONSULTANT and Not An Assistant coach? I hope that we can resolve this matter as soon as possible. Should you wish to verify my info, you may check the profile page on my twitter & instagram accounts(@dannyseigle42) wc state my job title. Further can i request to be unblocked. Thank you for your understanding! If you need to confirm my identity you can direct message me on my Instagram or twitter account: @dannyseigle42 -Danny Seigle Dannyseigle (talk) 10:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC) ———————————————————————————- Hi Kinu, Here are three articles links from different publications as proof of my correct job title. I hope you find this sufficient enough, and can immediately revert my edits. So to clarify, anything that says assistant coach please change it to Team Consultant. The discrepancy is written in my page five times. In addition "I led San Miguel to 7 championships (not 6) out of 8", this error is found in the first paragraph. Respectfully, Danny https://sports.abs-cbn.com/basketball/news/2017/11/07/danny-seigle-alapag-s-newest-consultant-alab-pilipinas-33220 https://www.philstar.com/sports/2018/04/18/1806972/danny-seigle-busy-new-role https://fastbreak.com.ph/loaded-danny-seigle-joins-alapag-hontiveros-in-alab/

Thank You!

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Dear Kinnu, First of all thanks for catching ma mistake. Secondly, its a pleasure to meet a person like you. You possess an excellent bIo over your user page. Regards, SB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saadullah Bhatti (talk • contribs) 23:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet nonsense

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. you deleted my America's Next Top Best Friend for literally no reason. You said it got deleted because they weren't notable enough. Bullcrap. 1. They interviewed 2 contestants (who themselves were notable from TV, movie & Music video credit roles and such) from the show. 2. They were featured in other notable theatre and entertainment pieces outside of the podcast and 3. They're show expands over 100+ episodes. They ARE notable, what the Hell are you talking about? And I'll have you know that long before you came along there was another user who reviewed at the page and thought it was perfectly fine. This is an injustice. I demand you put the page back immediately. If you don't I'm going to file a complaint. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratherbe2000 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 1 December 2018 (UTC) Try again, this time with a little bit more civility. --Kinu t/c 01:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Amber Hurst Martin and The Negro Motorist Green Book

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Another edit needs redacting and another IP needs blocking. Thanks. Lard Almighty (talk) 09:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC) Taken care of. Thanks for letting me know. --Kinu t/c 21:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC) You may be watching the page but just in case, another edit to redact on the Green Book article. Thanks. Lard Almighty (talk) 08:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Why you deleted my page

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Hi Kinu, I have made all the changes mentioned. Then why did you delete my page? I welcome suggestions on what needs to be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImeandYasir (talk • contribs) 08:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC) I did not delete that page; rather, I moved it back to the Draft namespace. As indicated on your talk page, it is evident that the content does not meet the standard for something in the Article namespace. Several other editors appear to have given you suggestions, but you seemed to ignore those and instead repeatedly moved it back there, which is disruptive. Hence, it was deleted (by another administrator) and you are now blocked. If you are able to convince another administrator that you deserve to be unblocked, working a little more collaboratively would be in everyone's best interest. --Kinu t/c 16:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Thank you for your help in blocking Ranquelin and Ryan. It's much appreciated! :) Neot/c 16:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Malcolm Kendrick page

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Greetings — I strongly object to this deletion and subsequent locking of the subject; not only was the initial page deleted against the objections of a goodly number of people, my stated reasons for arguing against the deletion of the new entry were simply not addressed. There are many, many pages that ought to be expunged from Wikipedia if this one has been — true consistency is sorely lacking on this site, and the actual processes that lie behind actions such as these are veiled from public sunlight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rekleov (talk • contribs) Recreating pages that were deleted via community consensus, especially after such a short time, is disruptive. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument in a deletion discussion, nor is it a proper rationale for undoing the deletion of an article. Deletion review is thataway, but given the canvassing and meatpuppetry that characterized the original discussion, I'd make sure to build a fairly solid argument as to where guidelines and policies were breached first. --Kinu t/c 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Didn't know WP:DFTT existed. Thanks for telling me! 7_qz (ゆっくりしていってね!) 20:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Kinu!

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Happy New Year! Kinu, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 06:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)    Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Delta Psi Chi

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Right now there is an article at Delta Psi Chi Swordsmen that in my opinion should be moved to Delta Psi Chi which was blocked back in 2011. I thought I'd reach out to you first before trying things more formally. Note, if you think it should be deleted instead, feel free to RFD it.Naraht (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Sorry for the delay in responding... busy few days. It looks like this was created by the same author as the original at this location to avoid the salting. I don't see any notability, but I'll do a little more WP:BEFORE. If I find some sources of value, I'll do the move, but if not, I'll likely nominate for deletion. Thanks! --Kinu t/c 15:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Cambium Networks 2019

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. The Cambium Networks Wikipedia page was removed due to disruptive editing in 2016. I fully understand the reason and apologize for this activity now 3 years ago. Over that time, our company has changed and there are more citations available, including our partnership with Facebook XWF and the Terragraph system. Our Massive MU-MIMO technology is delivering 5G performance in fixed wireless broadband. I ask for your reconsideration for us to have a presence on Wikipedia. Cambium Networks will abide by the rules. We would like to be able to professionally share information with readers who are seeking the details of our company. I appreciate your consideration to have an administrator unblock the page. We will provide a quality page with neutral, well-cited content. We will abide by the rules. If a conversation with our CEO Atul Bhatnagar would be helpful, I am glad to arrange a conference12.220.246.2 (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC) https://www.lightreading.com/mobile/carrier-wifi/cambium-networks-joins-facebook-wifi-ecosystem/d/d-id/745695. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/why-wireless-isps-are-still-necessary-in-the-age-of-5g/?fbclid=IwAR0iqxffA512y0TULC3bSyU5bWgssObfRsLLjfe3X48O-AWkCdsn8bnU9Lo Ray Savich Director, Content Marketing Cambium Networks ray.savich@cambiumnetworks.com 847-640-3621

ArbCom 2019 special circular

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security View additional information Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA. This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z152

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z83

Cambium (NASD: CMBM)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. Kinu, Page at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambium_(company) --> "move" --> Cambium_Networks at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambium_(company) You "page protected" the latter four years ago. Can you "move" that? NASDitGuy (talk) 23:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

thank you
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here. thank you for blocking that vandal :) Assblastusa (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

A user you blocked is back at it again

Fresh off their 2 week block, this user is bask.... [[4]] Sethie (talk) 23:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! --Kinu ^t/_c 15:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

21rojasjustyn

Hi Kinu. Many thanks for your block of User:21rojasjustyn. I was considering extending the report at ANI to cover their recent activity. Thank you for saving me the effort and for taking the action of blocking them. I wholeheartedly agree with it. Best, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your continued help with 21rojasjustyn

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Kinu, many thanks for your continued diligence dealing with 21rojasjustyn. It is much appreciated. Best, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)