Jump to content

User talk:WanderingWanda: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:WanderingWanda/Archive 1. (BOT)
Tag: Reverted
Line 61: Line 61:
</table>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1056563377 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1056563377 -->

== Can I foil WanderingWanda's PERFIDIOUS SOCKERY? ==

You ask this on your user page. Maybe no one can't foil it, but maybe we can spoil it. You dropped SreySros, after all. Or will you revive the account now that I've said this?

Some of us have talked about your socking on Discord, and I think we have a pretty good idea. You're definitely SreySros. The evidence brought against you there has helped to track you elsewhere. WanderingWanda, a word of advice? Just because you have enough wit to know to change your laptop, phone, etc. and IP address with each new account doesn't mean you're clever enough to escape people seeing the WanderingWanda flags.

You were Volteer1 (before you scratched a line through that account).

You're now Xurizuri. This one is the most obvious to anyone who studies the trail. Your user page spread and attempt to cover up who you are by being a "psych editor" doesn't hide this. Maybe don't randomly talk about transgender people in a category discussion unrelated to them if you don't want it to be so obvious? Or use WP:RATER as a cover to ease into sexuality pages? Or show your obvious preference for macOS with your socks? The timing of the creation of this account is also ''very'' interesting.

You're also Kzkzb, Nosferattus, SimLibrarian, Sideswipe9th, and more. Out of the few I named in this para, Sideswipe9th is the most obvious. If you're not all of these, you're definitely some of them. You've sprinkled sleeper accounts throughout Wikipedia, and use them when the mood suits your fancy. Is Gold1fishes also you? If they are, congrats on reviving an account from 2016. Or did you buy the account?

Of course, you'll deny, deny, deny, deny, and deny some more. But we see you. You're one of the worst cases of a rogue sock that can't be fully reined in. Pity for Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/5.184.76.71|5.184.76.71]] ([[User talk:5.184.76.71|talk]]) 22:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:31, 30 November 2021

Welcome! Feel free to graze awhile.

You've got mail

Hello, WanderingWanda. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Kzkzb (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy cow appreciation day!

(It's a holiday created by a fast food company which may not, I suspect, be a true friend to farm animals, but nevertheless.) WanderingWanda🐮👑 (talk) 20:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you send this message to yourself? Panini!🥪 14:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, talking to myself is a good way to ensure an intelligent conversation. WanderingWanda🐮👑 (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's fair. I should try doing that. Panini!🥪 16:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. Panini!🥪 16:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I foil WanderingWanda's PERFIDIOUS SOCKERY?

You ask this on your user page. Maybe no one can't foil it, but maybe we can spoil it. You dropped SreySros, after all. Or will you revive the account now that I've said this?

Some of us have talked about your socking on Discord, and I think we have a pretty good idea. You're definitely SreySros. The evidence brought against you there has helped to track you elsewhere. WanderingWanda, a word of advice? Just because you have enough wit to know to change your laptop, phone, etc. and IP address with each new account doesn't mean you're clever enough to escape people seeing the WanderingWanda flags.

You were Volteer1 (before you scratched a line through that account).

You're now Xurizuri. This one is the most obvious to anyone who studies the trail. Your user page spread and attempt to cover up who you are by being a "psych editor" doesn't hide this. Maybe don't randomly talk about transgender people in a category discussion unrelated to them if you don't want it to be so obvious? Or use WP:RATER as a cover to ease into sexuality pages? Or show your obvious preference for macOS with your socks? The timing of the creation of this account is also very interesting.

You're also Kzkzb, Nosferattus, SimLibrarian, Sideswipe9th, and more. Out of the few I named in this para, Sideswipe9th is the most obvious. If you're not all of these, you're definitely some of them. You've sprinkled sleeper accounts throughout Wikipedia, and use them when the mood suits your fancy. Is Gold1fishes also you? If they are, congrats on reviving an account from 2016. Or did you buy the account?

Of course, you'll deny, deny, deny, deny, and deny some more. But we see you. You're one of the worst cases of a rogue sock that can't be fully reined in. Pity for Wikipedia. 5.184.76.71 (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]