User talk:Burabshurab

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Burabshurab/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 04:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Burabshurab! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 04:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

its okay. i dont really mind my subbmission being declined. i literally created this account yesterday to try and make a wikipedia page for washington gubernatoiral candidate semi bird. i took a look at certain articles to see how they were written and turns out i need to put alot of links and references ect. i'll learn to edit someday but not right now. i would like to thank you for the invite to teahouse but ill have to decline. sincerely -BurabShurab. Burabshurab (talk) 05:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 United States presidential election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Congressional Progressive Caucus, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

What the hell? how is that vandalism?? And another thing, it is NOT incorrect i can easily prove you wrong if you look at someone like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez or Cori Bush's voting records. They have and vote on far-left socialist ideas in congress. Socialism is extremism because it takes away someones right to run their own business and controls how much money you are allowed to have, does that sound right to you? I seriously hope it doesn't, plus it tears countries apart! When Hugo Chávez started socialism in Venezuela, it was fine for a tiny bit but then suddenly inflation started to rise, the general socialist ideas oppressed the people of Venezuela, THEY WERE SO POOR THEY STARTED EATING ANIMALS OUT OF THE ZOOS BECAUSE THEY WERE SO HUNGRY BECAUSE MONEY WAS WORTHLESS!!! Would you like THAT to happen to america? This isnt vandalism, its truth. Thank You. Burabshurab (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

looked at your page. turns you're apart of a far-left party. no wonder you said my edit was vandalism. you're a disgrace to wikipedia who claims to be unbiased. Burabshurab (talk) 06:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to October 2023 Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Esolo5002 (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

oh i just assumed that everyone knew because he publicly said it but ok thanks for reminding me! Burabshurab (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Burabshurab/sandbox

Hello, Burabshurab. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Burabshurab/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Peace and Freedom Party, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Yeah.. i know i technically need a source, but their ideologies are literally socialism which wikipedias biased editors call regular left wing which we all know is incorrect. So because i don't have a source i wont edit it back, however its the truth. Thanks. Burabshurab (talk) 00:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hilary Franz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SounderBruce 04:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

It already says that she was born on July 1st 1970 on the page. I don't get whats wrong. Burabshurab (talk) 22:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Burabshurab/sandbox

Hello, Burabshurab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

k Burabshurab (talk) 04:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello! I'm Fred Zepelin. Your recent edit(s) to the page Governorship of Ronald Reagan appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fred Zepelin (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

i just put that because on "1968 Republican party Presidential primaries" it said Rockefeller won 1 state, but Reagan won 2. Burabshurab (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Joe Kent : Talk

Talk:Joe Kent#"far-right_political_candidate"_references_do_not_cite_any_sources Can I get your opinion on that dispute? Tonymetz (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Sure, i think Joe being classified as "Far Right" is VERY out of pocket, i don't know how someone could compare someone who's just a good conservative to Hitler or Mussolini. It makes it even worse that apparently they didn't cite sources on that, showing how bad of a claim that is. If you ever saw it being changed to "Right wing political candidate" instead of "Far-right political candidate" that was me changing it. if you were to ask me i think it should be changed. Thank you. Burabshurab (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

agreed. and my bigger concern is what this precedent sets for WP . we already have a rep for not living up to npov .

The bar for "far right" should be pretty high e.g. money, actions, network, etc.

"endorsed by xyz" could levy an accusation against everyone. As I showed, Richard Spencer "endorsed" JB Tonymetz (talk) 15:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

you can see the obvious goal from the edits is to make the association JK --> far right --> swastika picture . the page isn't about the biographical topic Tonymetz (talk) 15:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)