User talk:Prede: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:54, 16 March 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Prede, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Kinu ^t/_c 06:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Planetzot

A tag has been placed on Planetzot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Planetzot. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Escape from NY

Hi Prede, you undid most of my revisions. Editors are allowed to make revisions. It is not like articles have to stay the same. You may wish to check out the guidelines for film articles; overly long plot summaries are discouraged. Nazamo (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, according to the Wikipedia Film Project guidelines, "The plot section is made self-contained (and is a totally separate section designated by ==Plot==), so plot details and actor names already mentioned in the lead section, and/or mentioned in a cast section, are repeated here. Plot summaries should be between 400 and 700 words and should not exceed 900 words unless there is a specific reason such as a very complicated plot."Nazamo (talk) 22:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I did a word count on the plot summary as of Dec 16, 2007, and it clocks in at 950 words. Since EFNY is not a complex movie (while I love it, it is an action-scifi film, not an art film with a hugely complex plot), I argue that it should be in the main length range cited (400 to 700 words). So 250 words have to be trimmed.Nazamo (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

February 2008

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into List of Kare Kano characters, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop adding non-free images to the article. Per Wikipedia policy, your additions are not appropriate. Also, do not continue trying to add a section on Pero-Pero. He is NOT a major character, and this list is not a catchall for every character in the series. Its fancruft that belongs on a wikia or anime wiki, not here. The existance of an article on Pen Pen does not justify your edits. Collectonian (talk) 21:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None of my edits were vandolism. You should have assumed good faith. The character is a major character (shown in almost all episodes) and should be listed. The artcile was listed for expension so that is what I was doing, expanding it. The fact the other pet exist justifies it for me. The pictures I added were very usefull and there was no reason they should have been deleted either. But whatever, I'll let you edit the artcile how you want. Prede (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pero Pero

I have nominated Pero Pero, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pero Pero. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Collectonian (talk) 21:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pero Pero.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pero Pero.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Th KanonKarekano.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Th KanonKarekano.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tsukino Kare Kano.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsukino Kare Kano.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bildungsroman

To make a conjecture answering the question in your edit comment, Eureka Seven may have been deleted from the list because neither it's page nor this one included any Reliable Source that categorized it as being a Bildungsroman. Categorizing it independantly as an editor merely by watching the content of the work is Synthesis a form of Original Research, which means it may be appropriate for deletion. While I agree Eureka Seven is almost certainly a valid example, Wikipedia is Verifiability, not truth. (Granted none of the other works properly justify their inclusion either. I feel this should be fixed). -Verdatum (talk) 21:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, thanks for answering my question. I was just listing it on that page. It was written under the genre and explenation of the anime Eureka Seven so I figured it was scourced or whatever. I was just putting it on that page, sense it seemed like it was just missing and just needed to be added there. I am sure it is a "Coming of Age" story, but I don't have any scources so. There might be scources on that page, not sure. Anyway none of the others seemed scource either if memory serves me. Oh well, perhaps in my free time I could list those examples as "need references" or whatever. But I'm kinda busy right now. :) Thanks for answering why it was deleted though I was very confused lol...As for now I say leave i there though. - Prede (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I see no need to remove it. Nor would it be of much help to tag each item in the list as needing citation, since none of them are cited, it's needlessly messy and the topic has already been raised in it's discussion section. -Verdatum (talk) 22:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tenshinhan

How the hell did this nonsense happen? What to fix? Please respond on your talk page, as I've watchlisted it. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the refferences being messed up and all crazy?(at first i had no idea what you meant). I have no idea how that happened but I will look into what to fix, and respond here. - Prede (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the references being all screwed yp. It's now back to the way it should be ^^ , it was a simple mistake of putting the ref tag 2 times in the front and then ending it, instead of just putting it once in the front. Thanks for informing me - Prede (talk) 01:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that was it. Thanks. Do you happen to have the Daizenshū? I have no idea how to obtain it, much less a page number. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad I could help. AND all I know about the Daizenshū is from this website http://saiyajinscholar.tripod.com/daiz.html . I don't have them nor do I know how/where people got them from. BUT the website says he got it from ebay.com and Amazon.com so I suggest starting there if you wanted to buy them. - Prede (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen daizenshuu 7 lists tenshinhan as an alien there isn't any part of the manga who states tenshinhan as an human.

This is a piece of shit made by a fan and obviously it is dumb

26. ^ "Biographies Tien" (2001). Retrieved on 2008-03-14. “People often wondered if this three-eyed warrior was even human like Krillin or Yamcha. He is.”

If you don't believe me contact daizenshuu site. Please read this thread:http://db.schuby.org/daizex/viewtopic.php?t=3605&highlight=tenshinhan Let me remind you VegettoEX showed us tenshinhan is in fact an alien. I'm not going to edit anymore,however now you have the proof and the scans. if an encyclopedia made by toriyama's staff under his supervision is not reliable i don't know what is reliable. Plus toriyama calls daizenshuu 7 perfect in the introduction. Good luck for db project,but with this kind of mistakes made by fanboys english wikipedia is not reliable. Let me remind you japanese wikipedia lists tenshinhan as an alien. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.23.133.162 (talk) 12:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are trying to say or what you are talking about. Perhaps if you wrote in english I would pay attention to what you are talking about. If you are questioning what Tien is, he IS a human. I have a Beckett Magazine that proves it "The Best of DragonBall Z" , Beckett does not print incorect data. It also states Tien as a human in one of the DBZ games for Ps2 (idk what one right now). - Prede (talk) 23:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

let me know if you understand this fuck you fucking krillin fanboy. you are a fucking liar and i can't waste my time with losers from pojo forum,lol.