User talk:CambridgeBayWeather

I have two requests for people coming here:

• If you intend to revert personal attacks could you please use the {{subst:unsigned|user name|date}} template instead.
• If you are here to complain about something I deleted could you please tell me the name of the article that you are talking about. If you do I will respond but if you don't I will ignore you.

Thanks.

• Signpost

About americarx articles

Hi Cambridge,

Greetings from AmericaRx.com. We have submitted article about Americarx. But it 3

I need our article protection. Our article was deleted for advertising or promotion. But We have submitted article with AmericaRx history. Please guide us to submit AmericaRx article next. Please inform us with more details.

Regards, Rachel AmericaRx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.183.18.194 (talk) 06:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Cat and subcat

Hi. I'm contacting you as an administrator. I found tha all or almost all of the articles in the category International Trade Stubs are also in the category International Trade. However, International Trade Stubs is a subcat of International Trade. Is this a problem? Thanks--达伟 (talk) 20:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know...but as a general rule, are there are any guidelines I should be aware of, with respect to overlapping categories or anything like that? Thank you--达伟 (talk) 08:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Great. Makes sense. So what you said about Category:International Trade and Category:International Trade Stubs is something of an exception?--达伟 (talk) 09:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks for the information. That helps a great deal. I hope you don't mind me being chatty--do you live in Cambridge bay? I'm an American but I'm extremely keen on Canada and love learning more about its geography. Until a few minutes ago I knew nothing about Nunavut geography but now I know about Victoria Island and Ellesmere and Baffin Island. Is Cambridge Bay located on the "mainland" of North America?--达伟 (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. That's cold! Nunavut is really fascinating. You must like it otherwise you'd leave? It's so unique...and it's the size of Western Europe! According to Wikipedia, flights from your side of Nunavut to the capital are $2200! Will air travel be expanded in the future? Also, it's quite interesting that the capital was founded as an American airbase in 1942. Also, if you have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do and want to explore some random intellectual musings, you can check out my "blog" of sorts, though a lot of it may be uninteresting to you: User:达伟/pensieri--达伟 (talk) 10:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I will try not to take up much more of your time. I imagine things must be expensive, kind of like Alaska (as far as I know). In towns in the low-population central belt of the US, and in southern Canada -- for example New Mexico where I've lived before -- prices are low, but when you get to be rather isolated geographically (no offense), I guess the costs really go up. I looked up Ulukhaktok, and it seems you have the most northerly golf course in the world, and many of the town's inhabitants are descended from a Danish explorer. Not bad :) How much Inuktitut do you speak? Do you mind if I contact you for time to time with questions about Canada? If you have a busy life please don't hesitate to say no! --达伟 (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Would you mind holding this star for me?

		The Surreal Barnstar
		I don't know exactly what you've been up to, and I'd never heard of you prior to yesterday. But the way I see it, you are quite crazy. In a good way, of course. I assume you wrote that poem? It's a good spin-off. A star from that "2D so-and-so" guy talk, sign 13:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I just saw your name under RC. Thought it was a clever name, a semblance to The weather in London. that "2D so-and-so" guy ^{talk, sign} 13:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Deh Cho BridgeWiki

I recently became somewhat interested in the Deh Cho Bridge project, and spent some time trying to figure out the various bits of the agreement. I set up a little wiki site to help organize things for myself, and I'm doing some cleanup in hopes that it might be useful for others. I put a link to the site into the Deh Cho Bridge article, but I've temporarily reverted it out again (here). I'd like to have someone else add it back in to avoid any conflicts.

Perhaps you could swing by the article and re-enable the link? Thanks. NorthernRaven (talk) 04:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

cm vs mm

Please see Template talk:Infobox weather#cm vs mm. Peter Horn User talk 16:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

What is the link to the US guide lines? Peter Horn User talk 16:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I was referring to Crete#Climate. Peter Horn User talk 16:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The source is wrong. The template:convert does not lie: 49 cm (19.3 in) & 490 mm (19.29 in) Peter Horn User talk 17:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Add up the cm or the mm manually and then convert. Peter Horn User talk 17:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The person who drew up the chart was "full of prunes". I only get a total of 42 cm (16.5 in) or 420 mm (16.54 in) for the year. Double check my arithmetic, Crete#Climate 17:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The revers: 19.3 in (49 cm) or 19.29 in (490 mm) as well as 16.5 in (42 cm) or 16.54 in (420 mm). The source table is a royal foul up. Peter Horn User talk 19:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot. 19.6 in (49.8 cm) or 19.6 in (498 mm). template:convert works just fine, it is the source table that is in ludicrous error. Peter Horn User talk 19:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah that's what I thought. something lame from CBW 21:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Skepta

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Skepta. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skepta (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Pervert snail

hi, im writing about a page i spent at least 45 minutes making about a species of snail. the page was titled "pervert snail" and you just deleted it due to vandalism, i find this highly uncalled for and i am not happy, could you please tell me why it was accused of "vandalism"??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervertsnail (talk • contribs) 14:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Isaaq

FYI and FWIW, I've opened a discussion at WP:CNOTICE#Somali clan listings. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Southampton Airport (Ontario)

Ooops :) But not the one in England. Look at the stop on the island in the north of Hudson's Bay. File:Atcroutes-1sep1945.jpg. This is the airport I'm wanted was Coral Harbour Airport. Thank you for noticing. Bwmoll3 (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Just did, thank you :) Bwmoll3 (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Siamese Ghosts band deleted 31st march 2010 at 13:39

Hi there my article relating to the Scottish band Siamese Ghosts was deleted yesterday i was just curious as to why, if you could let me know so as i could remedy the situation it would be much appreciated thanks,

Neil9834 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neil9834 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Wales Live

Hi there - wondering why you deleted Wales Live? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.0.230 (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

I deleted it because it was a direct copy of http://www.waleslive.tv/About. Please see Wikipedia:Copyrights. Thanks. something lame from CBW 10:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hello CambridgeBayWeather, Rehman⁽⁺⁾ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

AfD nomination of Wilderness Air

An article that you have been involved in editing, Wilderness Air, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilderness Air. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Whenaxis (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:Talk:Edmonton Airports

Done! Kyle1278 18:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

From user page

CambridgeWeather made a totally cool edite to the Muso Jikiden Eishin Ryu page recently. Thanks! Scottprobst (talk) 07:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

GPS

Well I'm sure it could be added manually to every airport. I could go about and manually add it to the state airports when I find the time, but since it's been used everywhere, it will take a while before it is incorporated in most of the templates. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Veolia Water

Hi. I noticed you had deleted Veolia Water as it was a copyright violation. It's partly my fault you had to, as I made a mistake and moved the article from a article request page into the main space. Would you be able to unprotect the page so that I could create the page properly? Cloudbound (talk) 18:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Duck test

quack quack quack - some thing lame from SatuSuro 10:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) quack quack

article Nicholas Heavens was deleted

hello. you deleted the article about Nicholas Heavens. he is a real person who studies Mars. Could you please put it back up?

thank you. Alockwood2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alockwood2 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Western Infirmary Cologne Club

I note that this page was deleted. The Western Infirmary Cologne Club is an illustrious social club for surgeons in Glasgow. Memebership allows its members to use the letters MWICC after their name. An example can be seen on the back cover review for the following book; MRCS Practice Papers Part A: Paper 1 SBAs, by: Mr Irfan Halim ISBN: 9781905635610.

I believe this page should be reinstated to wikipedia.

iainmcgraw@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.185.213 (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Ismartyparty

Hi CBW, if it's OK with you I'm going to unblock User:Ismartyparty and give him another chance. I think the copyright/socking issues have been made clear, he's apologised, and in the past he's made some substantive contributions to Veolia Water Southeast. cheers, Rd232 ^talk 19:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Ruben Vardanian

My friends told me Ruben Vardanian died of a heart attack yesterday. --22:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.110.35 (talk)

deleted

why did you delete my article called Sneakend? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eastwooddesign (talk • contribs) 16:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Trouble Down Under

Your Grace, the minions are squabbling again. Sadly, a small group of what appears to be New Zealand based article owners have planted their national flag here: Russell Crowe [1]. Well meaning, foreign crusaders for truth are quickly identified and their edits reverted into oblivion. I pray that you will, as time allows, visit said article and liberate her from the death grip of the Kiwis. As always, I remain your most humble servant, Eudemis (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

It is entirely improper to try and raise support by canvassing in this manner. And you are entirely all wet, I am not a New Zealand based editor, I live in the United States, and your continually stating I have ownership issues is a personal attack that simply must stop. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Why I Changed My Username

I want to tell you the truth about why I changed my username from User:Bowei Huang to User:A1DF67. But there is a problem. The problem is that if I told you, you wouldn't believe it. I mean, I don't think you would believe it. Nobody would believe it. I don't think anybody would believe it. If I told you it, you would probably think that I was making it up. I think that that is what you would think if I told you it. That is the problem. That is the reason why I didn't tell you the truth about why I did it before. That is the reason why I lied about it. Sorry. I should have told you the truth before. I should told you that before. It is very hard and difficult for me to explain it. I don't know how to explain it. I am afraid that if I told you it, you wouldn't believe it and nobody would believe it.

You should have a look at User talk:Bowei Huang again.

Play N Trade

I am the Public Relations coordinator at Play N Trade and I few weeks ago I update the PNT wiki page. I noticed you reverted it back to the original. Please leave it as it is now.

Thank you

Miles Coffin(miles.coffin@playntrade.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.58.138.162 (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

If you are the PR person for the company then please take a few minutes to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and this has some excellent suggestions as to what you should be doing as does the US government. What I suggest you do is create an account for yourself, just you and not to be used by your department or anyone else that works for the company, but don't make the name anything like Play N Trade, see Wikipedia:Username policy#Company/group names for more information. Then start by pointing out your concerns and suggestions on Talk:Play N Trade. Thanks. something lame from CBW 21:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Russell Crowe

I appreciate your quick action to protect Russell Crowe to push the discussion to the talk page. As you can tell from there, there is now a clear consensus not to use the name of the other person involved in the lawsuit. Only one editor disagrees, and although he's been asked numerous times to make his case there (or on other relevant boards), he is refusing to do so. He's claiming that everyone who has commented on the matter is a meatpuppet, basically.

In any case, there's no longer any discussion over the matter, so there's no need to keep the page protected. As such, I'm requesting the unprotection of the page. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 01:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

This is patently false, of course, if you read through the talk page. Wildhartlivie has canvased everyone who weighed in on the issue- all supporting her. This vote stacking attempt included her friends Dayewalker, XLerate, MikeAllen, Victor9876, Nil Einne, CrohnieGal. After I exposed that they were all connected giving citations, they continued on as if in a few hours I would forget. [2] I asked if anyone in the room was not connected in some way to Wildhartlivie and outside her network, no one responded. Worse emboldened by her army of friends in the room, Wildhartlivie called me a "Dick". The others chimed in as well with varying levels of insults. I believe Wikipedia has an interest in enforcing its canvasing rules and putting this type of gang action to an end. If you will look, there was no neutral person in the room to discuss anything substantive (i.e. Wildhartlivie's reversions of my cited edits). If some poor soul ever did look into the talk room, they would never have felt free to comment. It's been a farce. Long, tedious yes, but I would encourage you to take a look. Thank you. Eudemis (talk) 03:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You have absolutely no grounds to make canvassing accusations here and your attempts to attack every single editor who responded on that talk page is sufficiently severe to warrant action. You were guilty of unsoliticited canvassing to editors who you do not know and then you posted a RfC, where you have proceeded to attack every single editor who has responded. Your behavior is toxic and assaultive. You attempted to create connections between me and every editor who responded, even down to trying to prove a connection between me and an editor who posted once to Talk:Judy Garland in May 2009 after I last posted to that page in February 2008. You have attacked every editor who has responded with your specious accusations of canvassing, canvassing behavior for which you were reported to AN/I. You have waged personal war and cast unfounded aspersions against every single editor who responded, down to even dragging in posts to a Star Trek bulletin board where an editor thanked me and another editor for helping on an article. Your behavior is noxious and attacking and there is no valid reason why you haven't been blocked for tenditious editing yet. Your personal attacks spread to each and every editor who responds there. Something needs to be done about you besides your refusal to respond to an WP:AN/I complaint about your behavior. CambridgeBayWeather, could you please take a look at the voluminous evidence posted at WP:AN/I#User:Eudemis, personal_attacks, improper canvassing and edit warring for the evidence and do something about this editor? He even attacked an IP poster for being an IP. This has become untenable and yet, no one at AN/I seems to care enough to take action against this assaultive editor. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

I understand that you consider this matter defused (and you're busy) but you mentioned that I, as I am the sole person on my side, had attacked someone. While the "personal attack" claims are made with virtually every post by the group of 7, I am curious as to anything personal or inappropriate I posted. Other than pointing out that everyone commenting was connected to Wildhartlivie. Any nucleus of friends can control each's pet article through cluttered talk pages, sheer numbers and personal attack claims. Nil Einne, the editor she's claiming she's not connected to, is related to XLerate [3]who is related to Wildhartlive[4]. Nil Einne entered with Xlerate and was canvased to support Wildhartlivie. It wasn't hard to figure out their connections. I can't see how Wikipedia would want Wildhartlivie with a disabled sock puppet [5] to control articles by sheer numbers this way. Eudemis (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

I am going to say this once, Eudemis, and then I expect you to stop. STOP ATTACKING ME. First of all, you keep finding obscure pages that mirror pages from Wikipedia. Those are frigging EVERYWHERE. I have never posted to the website http://www.theskyiscrape.com, that is a MIRROR site of a Wikipedia page. You are garnering NOTHING by continuing to hunt up your supposed connections. STOP trying to cast aspersions based on what you believe are connections. You cannot link me to Nil Einne. Your contentions are as specious as the connections you allegedly are finding. Sort of like when you claim you can link me to Nil Einne from a posting she made to Talk:Judy Garland 15 months after the last time I posted there. It means NOTHING. That two editors posted to a very long and drawn out discussion on Basically like Xlerate posting a response to a thread wherein I also posted, but she did so the next day and no one responded to it. That means NOTHING regarding anything you are trying to make it into. STOP IT. You have nothing to support your contention that ANYONE was canvassed to post on the Talk:Russell Crowe on my behalf and frankly, I'm sick and tired of your persistent attacks against editors. YOU were the one guilty of canvassing other editors to come in and support you. I posted NO request that anyone come in to post on the Crowe talk page, unlike you who did that exact thing. What YOU did was canvassing. If other editors come to that talk page from various points does not prove or support your bad faith accusation of canvassing on my part. STOP IT. I did nothing of the sort and you have nothing to support your bad faith accusations. What the hell is wrong with you that you feel the need to attack every editor that showed up on the Crowe talk page? WHAT makes you think, even for one second, that this sort of behavior is acceptable? You have NOTHING to support your bad faith attacks on, and it's far and away absolutely time for it to stop. I have no clue why administrators haven't taken you to task for your conduct, but it's frigging time for you to STOP. Oh, and for the record, I did my block time for the sock thing, and I submitted proof that I and the other editor are different and distinct people. There is no valid reason for me to be "run off" Wikipedia. You are reaching and launching attacks against me and I'm sick and tired of it and expect it to quit. Actually, I expect administrators to take you to task for your extremely poor conduct regarding this whole situation and I expect you to desist from attacking each and every editor who posted against you. What makes you think this is acceptable or appropriate conduct. I'm sick of it and I demand you desist from making attacks on me and the other editors on that page. There's something completely wrong with someone who spends his time searching out mirror sites and trying to use them to prove something. This is specious and horribly inappropriate attacks on various editors and your attacks MUST STOP. STOP IT. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and in case you missed it, dick is linked to an essay about that sort of behavior. It wasn't calling you names, it was a commentary on your clearly incivil and personally attacking posts. CambridgeBayWeather, what can a person do to get something done about this editor? He has clearly attacked each and every person that posted to Talk:Russell Crowe, makes unfounded and unsubstantiated accusations of violations of WP:CANVASS, after his own attempts of clearly obvious attempts to canvass support was exposed, and keeps running around the internet, posting links to pages that mirror pages on Wikipedia, and claiming that it is proof that editors routinely communicate in more than one place. And his continued assertions that Nil Einne and Xlerate are "proven" connected to me because I posted a response to Talk:Judy Garland in February 2008 and Nil Einne did the same, ONCE, in May 2009 to an entirely different thread. His continued attacks on me and on the other editors who responded to Eudemis's own RfC to Talk:Russell Crowe went over the line. Can someone please make this editor STOP attacking persons who respond to his own RfC and his specious accusations that I canvassed the responses has gone beyond the sublime into the clearly spiteful search for "proof" based on responses to talk page threads 15 months apart and his specious and unfounded accusations of improper canvassing simply have to stop. He's still carrying on and it's been days since this all started. Why won't administrators respond to Eudemis's blatant attacks to other editors? His crusade to undermine the consensus on his RfC is both bad faith and his continued attempts to stir trouble by attacking everyone who responded is incivil and quite disruptive. This needs to be stopped. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

The problem with using Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts is that he flatly refused to respond to the rather length postings on AN/I, despite the fact that several serious points were made by a number of different editors. If he won't respond to AN/I (which essentially was blown off by any and all administrators on that page since NONE responded to the complaints) I can't see him taking WQA seriously either. I'll drop a note to another editor to garner feedback on going for a WP:RfC/U. It's rather sad, and not just a little ironic, that all of his attacks were launched against editors who responded to the editor's own RfC on an article issue. It's intolerable. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

(OD) Everyone, I sincerely doubt CambridgeBayWeather appreciates this going on here on his talk page. Eudemis did make some out-of-line accusations of collusion, but the article is unprotected, and he seems to be respecting the consensus, so there's no other trouble for now. If anything else comes up in the future, it can be reported to the proper noticeboard but for now, I'd just advise everyone to let this one go and get back to editing. Dayewalker (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

In fact, after the first sentence of my post at 21:06 above, my post was to CambridgeBayWeather and the post I made just above the one by Dayewalker was directly a response to something CambridgeBayWeather posted to me from the 21:06 post and was directed to him. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

i need u to explain to me why my page was deleted

why was this page deleted explain!!!!!

i need u to explain to me why my page was deleted

why was this page deleted explain!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizad sheraz (talk • contribs) 11:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Khadijah bint Khuwaylid

Hi,

Could you take a look at this edit please. To me it seems a clear case of WP:COAT to spawn off some WP:OR. Thanks. → AA ^(talk) — 14:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphan tagging

Hi, please see this discussion, which has somehow arisen as a result of this edit you made a couple of weeks ago. Thanks, --RFBailey (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

What's Wrong?

Dear Mr. Cambridgebayweather, I would like to apologize if I angered you by my changing of the page. The part I changed was the route of a link, not deleting parts of the article, as you wrote on the Inukshuk history page. In the contex of the Inukshuk,the article was saying where Canadian Inukshuks were brought to other countries as a means of a gift. One of these places was to Washington D.C.. Rather than the link for D.C. to go to the D.C. page, I thought it more fit to redirect the link to go to the Canadian Embassy in D.C., where the actual statue is located. I did not delete any of the actual words on the article, as you wrote that I did on the Inukshuk history page. Again, sorry for any inconveniences, just please be more specific to what I did wrong, so that I work make such horrendous mistakes in the future. Thanks -Bob9999999 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob9999999 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Lolz

I caught you with this little accident :) We all make mistakes. Outback the koala (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Ha, I didn't even think of trouting you - but in the future I will! :-) I liked the AfD, soo good! To think he looked up all the proper formatting to do it. Outback the koala (talk) 04:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

??

You have just wrote something on my talk page, what i don't have a clue what you are on about.. Not one little bit, and i never even heard of the page you shown'n me, get your facts right! --78.145.32.58 (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

That's because IP's change hands over time. If you look at the date of the edits you can see that it was dated 10 October 2008, 11/2 years ago when your IP made the edits but was used by someone else. something lame from CBW 16:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

R.t.groenlandicus

Sorry for my bad pronunciation but .I know on which site you got the weight of Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus.--Marco zangari (talk) 17:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Stickstickley et al

Greetings! I see you reverted this edit made at User talk:Stickstickley, which I have reason to believe was made by Stickstickley using a sockpuppet account. You missed, however, this edit made just before. Based on that one, and based on the one you reverted, I've extended Stickstickley's block to indefinite and revoked his talk page access for abuse of multiple accounts and personal attacks. —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Wudu

Hi- Why did you delete the section from Wudu? I believe you are in error.

Please do not try to make these changes because there are obviously three translations at the USC Quran source which you noted. Sunnis believe one is correct and Shias believe the other is correct. That is why there are 2 separate categories for the translation of that verse. You cannot combine them into one.

Thank you.

I agree- however it makes sense to include both versions of the translation of the Holy Quran. Not just one interpretation- because I think it is inaccurate to say that Shia Muslims agree with the translation that verse 5:6 says "wash" feet. If they did, there would not be a difference. Rather Shia Muslims go with the Shakir translation which says "wipe" feet. This is interpretation is root of disunity on the performance of wudu. Thus, both translations : Ali & Shakir should be included. I hope you see that minor ,but very important distinction.

Thank you, Valerie

Redirecting Pages

User:A1DF67 has been renamed User:Bowei Huang 2. [6] Can you please redirect User:Bowei Huang to User:Bowei Huang 2 and User talk:Bowei Huang to User talk:Bowei Huang 2?

Bowei Huang 2 (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Settlements in the Arctic

I have nominated Category:Settlements in the Arctic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Populated arctic places (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello from Edwin Black

If I can get you a book, or some documentation, or answer any question for you, please do not hesitate to ask. Edwin Black Washington DC (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Signature

Much improved. Nicely done. Cheers.--kelapstick (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive editing at this article

Hi there. Would you please be so kind and look thoroughly into this issue? There's an editor who keeps changing the type of album from "studio" to "demo" on this article. He has no reliable verifiable sources to back up his edits, he tried unsuccessfully to have the article deleted alltogether.

The editor has a long history of disruptive editing, blocks, topic bans etc. As his own account is already blemished as such, he basically has nothing to lose if he receives a further block for edit war. This is why I belive he is so adamant in continuing his reverts, wanting to engage me in an edit war.

I am asking you, and have sent the same message to other admins online, to please thoroughly look into this issue. I have reported the whole incident to both Ani and Avi, yet to no avail. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)