Jump to content

User talk:Legolas2186: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 156: Line 156:
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#6 January 2012|6 January 2012]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Truth or Dare (fragrance)]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the perfume '''[[Truth or Dare (fragrance)|Truth or Dare]]''' was inspired by singer [[Madonna (entertainer)|Madonna]]'s memory of her mother's fragrance?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Truth or Dare (fragrance)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Truth or Dare (fragrance)]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Truth or Dare (fragrance)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Truth or Dare (fragrance)]].}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201201/Truth_or_Dare_(fragrance) quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#6 January 2012|6 January 2012]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Truth or Dare (fragrance)]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the perfume '''[[Truth or Dare (fragrance)|Truth or Dare]]''' was inspired by singer [[Madonna (entertainer)|Madonna]]'s memory of her mother's fragrance?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Truth or Dare (fragrance)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Truth or Dare (fragrance)]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Truth or Dare (fragrance)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Truth or Dare (fragrance)]].}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201201/Truth_or_Dare_(fragrance) quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 08:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
}} [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 08:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Why are you here you fucking bastard?! Paki's like you are not allowed on Wikipedia.

Revision as of 14:19, 7 January 2012

User:Legolas2186/header

Hi all!!! This is Legolas and welcome to my talk page.

Archives
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · 43

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Re: Fame Kills

I'll give it a few weeks since the merge discussion was fairly recent and I don't want the article to be failed again for stability reasons. I wonder why Stephen has such a problem with the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

Happy holidays.
Best wishes for joy and happiness. Hope you have a great one! Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 00:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC) [reply]
Happy holidays Ajonba. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closing of the AfD on Gimme All Your Luvin (Madonna song)

Interpret it how you want, I just wanted to bring it to your attention.

  • [1] ← Check out the closing statement. Keep in mind that there were 10 opinions for delete and 7 for keep.
  • [2] ← Check out our conversation on the matter.

| helpdןǝɥ | 03:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What to do dear? The artist name alone here is trumping all other rules and regulations. People know that this will be eventually created and that's what seems the case here. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is...

... this reliable? The information is true but I cannot find a reliable source for it, nor can I find one which stated that Thierry Mugler designed Knowles' gold dress for the music of "Sweet Dreams". Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:54, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got the one for the ring. *weeps* Can you find one for the dress please? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:58, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Let it be. I got one. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey sorry for not seeing it before. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna Masterpiece

When will Wikipedia produce an article on Madonna's latest song 'Masterpiece'?? I mean, it's already released on itunes for download! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.129.106 (talk) 02:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm untill it passes WP:GNG. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A mini-favour

Hi Avi. How's it going? I was wondering if I could possibly ask you a mini-favour. (If you don't have the time or inclination, no worries—maybe I can ask someone else.) Could you look at Tute and tell me if you think the game rules are clear? This is an article I've been reviewing for GA. When I started the review I thought, "This one looks like fun—a card game." But I soon found that the rules were kind of complicated, and I've been getting bogged down on it. (I've been actively trying to help the editor to improve it, which I tend to do—which is usually fun, but in this particular case I have reached my limit on it.) It has definitely become clearer than it was, but I kind of need a set of fresh eyes to judge how clear it is. I'm not asking you to edit it, just say whether you can understand the rules well enough. If you can, I may just pass it. If you can't, I may just fail it. I need to finish off the review and be able to move on to other things. One thing I've learned is that I don't want to ever review card game articles again! :P Moisejp (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wil surely look at it Moise. Anything for ya friend. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see your note above as I'm posting this, but the concerns appear to have been addressed three weeks ago and the review looks ready to be closed, so hopefully you can get to this soon. If you're unable to I could wrap it up. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 21:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No no, I am reviewing it as I type here. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This

is exactly what I mean by your rude, ignorant and sarcastic behaviour. And you really expect to believe what you said in the thread above when you write things like this? Calvin Watch n' Learn 03:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO!!! I meant to type "Better late than.." and I missed the word late... And you thought I taunted you? Superb like! — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeahhh, right. Instead of lying, just be honest. People don't like liars. Calvin Watch n' Learn 02:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And you're still here I see. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hello, Legolas2186. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Commander (Ping me) 09:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looking. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit request (one section only)

Avi, please please please c/e this for me and paraphrase quotes if possible. I did what I could. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avi, you now how tricky it can be at times to write a decent composition section. Please tell me... the step word here, is the the one that concerns walking or this one? I would say it is the walking one but please consult the sources in that section and tell me what you think as you are the only Mr. Know It All who I know. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Its actually talking about this. — Legolas (talk2me) 18:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that's damn complicated. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Its not that complicated. Basically the piano and the steping up beats is what its talking about. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have written, The piano work is augmented by handclaps and step sounds provided by a stomp box. Good? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the c/e. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(→) No problem dear. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I asked a question. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops I missed it. Sorry. I think the correct usage is The piano work is augmented by handclaps and beats provided by a stomp box. That way you dont have to link it to Coltrane. REmember, step sounds are basically beats which occur at pristine progression, the process being helped by the stomp box. Leaving it at just beats allows you not to explain it further. LEt's not bog the section down technically. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. You are genius. :P Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Temme sumthin new *sips wine* :P — Legolas (talk2me) 08:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New, well I love you a lot. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Peer review

Hi, I had listed this article for peer review long back. It is yet to receive any suggestions/improvements. Can you spend sometime reviewing this. Commander (Ping me) 05:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2012 WikiCup

Hello, and welcome to the 2012 WikiCup! The competition officially begins at the start of 2012 (UTC) after which time you may begin to claim points. Your submission page, where you must note any content for which you wish to claim points, can be found here, and formatting instructions can be found in hidden comments on the page. A bot will then update the main table, which can be seen on the WikiCup page. The full rules for what will and will not be awarded points can be found at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There's also a section on that page listing the changes that have been made to the rules this year, so that experienced participants can get up-to-date in a few seconds. One point of which we must remind everyone; you may only claim points for content upon which you have done significant work, and which you have nominated, in 2012. For instance, articles written or good article reviews started in 2011 are not eligible for points.

This round will last until late February, and signups will remain open until the middle of February. If you know of anyone who may like to take part, please let them know about the comeptition; the more the merrier! At the end of this round, the top 64 scorers will progress to the next round, where their scores will reset, and they will be split into pools. Note that, by default, you have been added to our newsletter list; we will be in contact at the end of every month with news. You're welcome to remove yourself from this list if you do not wish to hear from us. Conversely, those interested in following the competition are more than welcome to add themselves to the list. Please direct any questions towards the judges, or on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn (talk) and The ed17 (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Favor!

Hey Lego. How are you? I need a little favor from you. I am working on List of Rihanna concert tours and I am basing in on the model from the Madonna ones that you created. Can you check the lead, c/e, and tell me what you think about it. It's still not finished, but the first paragraph is done. Thanks — Tomica1111Question Existing? 15:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look here

Peer Review

Hi, I had listed this article for peer review. Your suggestions are most welcome. Commander (Ping me) 16:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vensatry, it suffers from the same problem I had notified you earlier. Somehow you are not grasping the reference formatting. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Same problem? I have revamped the article's design, format everything based on other FLs in WP:CRIC. The article even underwent a thorough copyedit. Commander (Ping me) 09:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you so much for the barnstar! :D --Christianrxx (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx[reply]

If you get a spare minute...

Could you tell me whether the chord progression of this remains E–A–B throughout the chorus and middle eight as well? Thanks. BTW what do you think of 1D? Honestly. —Andrewstalk 06:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can see a change to the flat keys during the line "Don't Need makeup to cover...". You can say that the tone shifts one key down I guess. I honestly have listened to two songs by 1D, they are cool I guess. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Government Hooker

Hi Legolas, I wondered if you could create Government Hooker since there is enough information here. Bye!Flores,Alberto (talk) 18:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, it can be. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question about referenciing

Noting that you helped bring Madonna (entertainer) to FA, do you think you could give me some feedback? I'm working on the article for Chrisye (and it is now quite possibly our most developed article on an Indonesian singer, although Anggun comes close) and I want to bring it to FA class after it passes the current GA nomination. The biography I have has testimonials from numerous famous people, including former President Megawati Sukarnoputri. Now, to cite this should I do:

  • Sukarnoputri, Megawati (2007). "Dia Penyanyi yang Seniman". In Endah, Alberthiene (ed.). Chrisye: Sebuah Memoar Musikal (in Indonesian). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. p. 339. ISBN 978-979-22-2606-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |trans_chapter= ignored (|trans-chapter= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)

or the standard

What do you think? Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:56, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are using only this book, then you can go with the first option. However, if there are multiple books like the Madonna bio article, then go with the second option for the book-lists and {{harvnb}} template for the references. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Truth or Dare (fragrance)

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Why are you here you fucking bastard?! Paki's like you are not allowed on Wikipedia.