Jump to content

Talk:Encapsulation (computer science): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DarkseidX (talk | contribs)
re rate to Redirect using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=stub|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=Redirect|importance=NA}}


==Low quality==
==Low quality==

Revision as of 13:58, 19 December 2013

WikiProject iconComputer science Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Low quality

This page is of low quality. I'm however not knowledgeable enough to write a new version. 81.231.1.134 (talk) 19:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Since the above comment, the page has been rewritten). Mhkay (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Information hiding - redirect?

Shouldn't it redirect to Information Hiding? 152.78.174.19 (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of the references in the Information Hiding entry is an article called "Encapsulation is not Information Hiding". So probably no. But there should certainly be a cross-reference. Mhkay (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. This article is quite wrong and needs a rewrite. Here's the c2.com link referred to above: http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?EncapsulationIsNotInformationHiding DarkseidX (talk) 07:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The information in this article is so innacurate and misleading that I propose it be cut down to a single sentence pending an accurate article with references. DarkseidX (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]