Jump to content

User talk:96.230.106.141: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Done: new section
Line 17: Line 17:


Thank you! I now hold you in high esteem! :-) [[Special:Contributions/96.230.106.141|96.230.106.141]] ([[User talk:96.230.106.141#top|talk]]) 03:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I now hold you in high esteem! :-) [[Special:Contributions/96.230.106.141|96.230.106.141]] ([[User talk:96.230.106.141#top|talk]]) 03:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

== Done ==

I'm done with you. It's people like that make other people blow their brains out. F8ck off. [[User:LLArrow|LLArrow]] ([[User talk:LLArrow|talk]]) 03:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:57, 16 April 2016

April 2016

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at The Americans (season 4) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alex|The|Whovian? 03:10, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.



Ha! I tried to move it to the talk page, but LLArrow just deleted the discussion thread and resumed the edit war!

Also, you really need to post an equivalent warning over on LLArrow's page. If you don't, your credibility here is pretty much nill (I.e. you're full of it!  :-) )

96.230.106.141 (talk) 03:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps if you decided to look, you'd find that I already have. You're welcome. Alex|The|Whovian? 03:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you! I now hold you in high esteem!  :-) 96.230.106.141 (talk) 03:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

I'm done with you. It's people like that make other people blow their brains out. F8ck off. LLArrow (talk) 03:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]