Chuvash people

Not to be confused with Chumash people.

Chuvash
Чăваш

Regions with significant populations
Russia	1,637,094
Kazakhstan	22,305
Ukraine	10,593
Uzbekistan	10,074
Turkmenistan	2,281
Belarus	2,242
Moldova	1,204
Kyrgyzstan	848
Georgia	542
Latvia	534
Azerbaijan	489
Estonia	373
Languages
Chuvash Russian (as second language)
Religion
† Orthodox Christianity
Related ethnic groups
Possibly Sabirs or Volga Bulgars

Chuvash diaspora in Volga Federal District

The Chuvash people (Template:Lang-cv; Template:Lang-ru; Template:Lang-tr) are a Turkic ethnic group, native to an area stretching from the Volga Region to Siberia. Most of them live in Republic of Chuvashia and surrounding areas, although Chuvash communities may be found throughout the Russian Federation.

Etymology

There is no universally accepted etymology of the word Chuvash, but there are three main theories that try to explain it:

Suvar

According to one theory, Chuvash is a Shaz-Turkic adaptation of Lir-Turkic Suvar, an ethnonym of people that are widely considered to be the ancestors of modern Chuvashes. Compare Lir-Turkic Template:Lang-cv to Shaz-Turkic Template:Lang-tt (‘cauldron’).

Jăvaš

Another theory suggests that the word Chuvash may be derived from Common Turkic jăvaš (‘friendly’, ‘peaceful’), as opposed to şarmăs (‘warlike’).

The Tabghach

An early medieval Xianbei clan and founders of the Northern Wei dynasty in China. The Old Turkic name Tabghach (Tuoba in Mandarin) was used by some Inner Asian peoples to refer to China long after this dynasty. Gerard Clauson has shown that through regular sound changes, the clan name Tabghach may have transformed to the ethnonym Chuvash.

Origin

There are rival schools of thought on the origin of the Chuvash people. One is that they originated from a mixing between the Turkic Sabir tribes of Volga Bulgaria and also according to some researches with local Finno-Ugric populations. Another is that the Chuvash are a remainder of the pre-Volga Bulgar population of the Volga region, Volga Bulgars. They are unusually susceptible to Osteopetrosis, with a prevalence of 1 of every 3,500—4,000 newborns.

The closest ancestors of the Chuvashes seem to be the Turkic Volga Bulgars. It cannot be absolutely proven that the Chuvashs are indeed direct descendants of the early Bolgars, but it is does seem very likely. Naturally, they have been subjected to much infusion and influence, not only from Russian and Turkic peoples, but also from neighboring Finnic tribes, with whom they were persistently and mistakenly identified for centuries, perhaps aided by the fact that the Chuvash language is a highly divergent form of Turkic, and was not easily recognized as such. Racially, the Chuvash seem to be a mixed Finnic and Turkic type.

Genetics

In the samples (~25) of the Chuvash DNA project haplogroups J2 (mostly J2a) and E are more common than the rest of the haplogroups among Chuvashes, followed by N and R1a. According to the data of Rootsi et al 2004, Tambets et al 2004 (79 samples), and Trofimova 2005 (43 samples) the following distribution of haplogroups is obtained:

• I1: 7%
• I2a2: 0-2%
• I2a1: 0-2%
• J1: 0-2%
• J2a: 0-9%
• J2b: 0-5%
• Q: 0%
• R1b: 2-4%
• R1a: 28-32%
• N1c1: 18-19%
• N1c2: 9-10%
• E-M78: 0-14%
• C: 0-1%

Haplgroups Q and C are rare among Chuvashes. Chuvash carriers of Haplogroup R1a (19% in hundreds of samples) belong to the Balto-Slavic Z282 subclade.

A study sampling of unrealted 96 Chuvashes concluded: " Earlier genetic research using autosomal DNA markers suggested a Finno-Ugric origin for the Chuvash. This study examines non-recombining DNA markers to better elucidate their origins. The majority of individuals in this sample exhibit haplogroups H (31%), U (22%), and K (11%), all representative of western and northern Europeans, but absent in Altaic or Mongolian populations. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was used to examine distances between the Chuvash and 8 reference populations compiled from the literature. Mismatch analysis showed a unimodal distribution. Along with neutrality tests (Tajima's D (-1.43365) p < 0.05, Fu's FS (-25.50518) p < 0.001), the mismatch distribution is suggestive of an expanding population. These tests suggest that the Chuvash are not related to the Altai and Mongolia along their maternal line but supports the 'Elite' hypothesis that their language was imposed by a conquering group — leaving Chuvash mtDNA largely of Eurasian origin with a small amount of Central Asian gene flow. Their maternal markers appear to most closely resemble Finno-Ugric speakers rather than fellow Turkic speakers." Later, the assertion assertion H, U, and K are "absent in Altaic or Mongolian populations" turned into "virtually absent in Altaic or Mongolian populations." MtDNA gene pool was found to be 89.1% Caucasian, 9.1% Mongoloid, and 1.8% Unidentified.

According to autosomal analyses: "Present-day Chuvash speak an Altaic-Turkic language and are genetically related to Caucasians (Georgians), Mediterraneans, and Middle Easterners, and not only to Central or Northern Europeans; Chuvash contain little indications of Central Asian-Altaic gene flow. Thus, present-day Chuvash who speak an Altaic-Turkic language are probably more closely related to ancient Mesopotamian-Hittites and northern European populations than to central Asia-Altaic people."

Finally, an autosomal analysis detected an indication of Oghur and possibly Bulgar ancestry, from which the Chuvashes developed their language: "Chuvashes, the only extant Oghur speakers showed an older admixture date (9th century) than their Kipchak-speaking neighbors in the Volga region. According to historical sources, when the Onogur-Bolgar Empire (northern Black Sea steppes) fell apart in the 7th century, some of its remnants migrated northward along the right bank of the Volga river and established what later came to be known as Volga Bolgars, of which the first written knowledge appears in Muslim sources only around the end of the 9th century. Thus, the admixture signal for Chuvashes is close to the supposed arrival time of Oghur speakers in the Volga region."

Another study admitted substantial Finno-Ugric component in Chuvashes, unlike its complete absence in Bashkirs, but noted that some aspects of HLA in Tatars are close to Chuvashes and Bulgarians, declaring the suggestion of Bulgar descent.

According to other study of HLA the Bulgar descent of the Chuvash can not be confirmed and that Bulgarians and Chuvashes are clearly different: "Bulgars left for the Balkans, while another subdivision moved to the mid-Volga region and made up the ethnic base of the Chuvash and Kazan Tatars...The Chuvash have a central European and some Mediterranean genetic background (probably coming from the Caucasus).... Chuvash and the fifth representing present day Bulgarians. From the data obtained in the present work, the genetic backgrounds of both populations are clearly different...It is possible that only a cultural and low genetic Bulgar influence was brought into the region without modifying the genetic background of the local population...The Chuvash relatedness to Caucasian (Georgians) and Middle Eastern people suggests that the Chuvash genetic pool has characteristics from ancient Middle Eastern, Caucasian, and Mesopotamian people... On the other hand, whether the Chuvash are a remnant of the Bulgar Hordes cannot be resolved with the data presented in this paper, and further studies are necessary."

Subgroups

Chuvash people are divided into two main groups:

• Virjal or Turi (Template:Lang-cv; ‘upper’)
• Anatri (анатри; ‘lower’), which is subdivided into:
  • Anat jenci (анат енчи; ‘mid-lower’)
  • Hirti (хирти; ‘steppe’)

History

Main article: History of Chuvashia

Distribution of Chuvash in the broader Volga-Ural region. Source: 2010 Russian Census.

The Turkic ancestors of the Chuvash people are believed to have come from central Siberia, where they lived in the Irtysh basin (between the Tian Shan and Altay) from at least the end of the third millennium BC. In the beginning of the first century AD, the Bulgars started moving west through Zhetysu and the steppes of modern-day Kazakhstan, reaching the North Caucasus in 2nd-3rd centuries AD. There they established several states (Old Bulgaria on the Black Sea coast and the Suar Duchy in modern-day Dagestan

Old Bulgaria broke up in the second half of the 7th century after a series of successful Khazar invasions. Some of its population fled north, to the Volga-Kama region, where they established Volga Bulgaria, which eventually became extremely wealthy: its capital being the 4th largest city in the world. Shortly after that, the Suvar Duchy was forced to become a vassal state of Khazaria. About half a century later, the Suvars took part in the Khazar-Arab Wars of 732-737.

Culture

They speak the Chuvash language and have some pre-Christian traditions. In addition to Chuvash, many people also use the Russian language.

Religion

To prevent an onslaught of Orthodox Christianity and Islam, they separated themselves from other surrounding ethnic groups, which brought on several centuries of endogamy. Today Chuvash people are partially Orthodox Christians and belong to the Russian Orthodox Church. They retain some pre-Christian (or pagan) traditions in their cultural activities. A Pagan revival has taken place since the fall of the Soviet Union under the name Vattisen Yaly.

Gallery

• 
  Performing Chuvashes at Russian Winter Festival.
• 
  Chuvash dancer.
• 
  Portrait of Chuvashes during a festival.
• 
  Chuvashes at the court with traditional dress.
• A Chuvash woman in traditional dress.
  A Chuvash woman in traditional dress.

See also

• List of Chuvashes
• Chuvash Wikipedia
• ChuvashTet
• Chuvash National Museum
• Society for the study of the native land
• Chuvash National Congress