User talk:Dumfounded watsD: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:31, 10 December 2016

Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, so even if your edits are constructive, your edit summaries and messages are not collaborative. Please be more civil toward other editors. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Chula–Thammasat Traditional Football Match without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edits removed citations. If there's a valid reason for the removal, you need to be clearer with your edit summary so we understand how the article is improved by the edits. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Dumfounded watsD (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Seek & Destroy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dbrodbeck (talk) 23:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from [[:Chula–Thammasat Traditional Football Match]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:C.Fred|my talk page]]. ''Your edits removed citations. If there's a valid reason for the removal, you need to be clearer with your edit summary so we understand how the article is improved by the edits. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 20:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 :OK. [[User:Dumfounded watsD|Dumfounded watsD]] ([[User talk:Dumfounded watsD#top|talk]]) 20:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
+[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Seek & Destroy]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
+'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Dbrodbeck|Dbrodbeck]] ([[User talk:Dbrodbeck|talk]]) 23:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)