User talk:Utcursch/archive/11

Archives: 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10

---

Thank You

I appreciate the heads up.

Sincerely,

NinaEliza 15:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

:)

• blush*Oyvind 16:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Buddhism in modern India

I've moved the article to Buddhism in modern India. I hope this will end the move war. User:Hkelkar and User:AMbroodEY were justified in moving the article to "Dalit Buddhist movement", because currently the article talks only about Ambedkar and his followers. I will add some information about others. Hi utcursh,

I believe the current title is inappropriate one... the article specifically talks about Buddhist sect founded by Dr.Ambedkar commonly referred to as Neo-Buddhism. We already HAVE an article on Buddhism in India!

अमेय आर्यन DaBrood^© 17:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

The name is proper. Because India got independance since 1947 and we also became one country. The Buddhist conversion Movement initiated by Dr. Ambedkar is in 1956. So the title is proper. It is true because of separation of Buddhism from Hinduism and 22 vows many Hindus don't like the the minority Buddhists in India but that is not our problem. Pkulkarni 18:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Pkulkarni

Yep he definitely appears to be our man PK aya Kulkarni.. anyways

check this edit where he slurs Buddhists! Wierd...

अमेय आर्यन DaBrood^© 22:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry at Buddhism in modern India

As you were involved in the discussions, I thought you would like to see this. Regards, - Aksi_great (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

User:P K aya Kulkarni also indef-blocked as suspected sockpuppet of Pkulkarni. - Aksi_great (talk) 12:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

thanks for your help

Hi. thanks for your help, in keeping an eye one my user page (specifically, the following: Utcursch (Talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 209.155.49.3 (talk) to last version by Sm8900)

however, actually, 209.155.49.3 is me. So that IP address is ok. i appreciate the help though. Very impressed with how you guys are on the job. i'm a little curious; is there a regular function of Wikipedia, or do you happen to check this from time to time? thanks for your help. see you. --Sm8900 17:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

hi. that's good to know! very interesting. thanks for your reply. keep up the good work. see you. --Sm8900 17:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again

I appreciate you letting me know about the move. I posted my approval on the talk page. NinaEliza 03:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Pkulkarni...

Our friend PK seems to be running a bigger sock empire then we first suspected. He even has strawmen sockpuppets!

See Hindushudra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Shudra123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). They have trolled Maratha, in nearly same fsahion as Pkulkarni. See [1] , [2] & [3].

अमेय आर्यन DaBrood^© 22:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Ten socks! Record for a South India editor, I guess! utcursch | talk 04:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Dalit Buddhist Movement

Thank you for the re-write, it looks like a viable article now. I appreciate your effort.

On a side note, I'm afraid that I can do no more than to check occasionaly on the page. It's not that I no longer care, but frankly it's accumulated to much "baggage" for me at this time. I also have a limited number of hours on Wikipedia, and as a fairly new user it takes me longer to get things done. Given the current circumstance of my personal life, I feel it best that I work on things that actually alleviate my stress. I also do a bit of reading in that regard as well (such as your rewrite). I hope you understand. All the best, NinaEliza 04:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

That's perfectly alright, edit what you enjoy :) utcursch | talk 04:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Editor Review

Thanks for reviewing me, I appreciate your sentiments and will take your advise. Thanks again, Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . Editor Review} 21:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Blcoked user reverting Copyvio messages anonymously

Hi, Please see this. User:Srkris who is under one week block has been editing anonymously and removing copyvio messages. - Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 01:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Apparently Your Enthusiasm for Spam Link Removal Is A Minority Opinion

But I thank you for it, in any case. If you've dealt with such issues in the past, I'd love some support in either obtaining mediation or a third opinion on the ongoing attacks that arose out of my link spam removals.

Please note that the above user is an owner of a commercial OTR website (www.digitaldeliftp.com) who charges access to radio shows on his website. The sites he is removing are sites which offer people access to radio shows FOR FREE. Because the content is free, easily accessable and very relevent for the pages in question, they qualify for inclusion. What the above user is doing is simply trying to remove all links giving free access to the same type of OTR shows he CHARGES for. He is editing here in bad faith. PrinceAl 01:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Enough with the continued personal attacks, or shooting the messenger. Following me from page to page is abuse, and won't be tolerated much longer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.170.239.56 (talk) 03:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

Who are you threatening? Me or the Wikipedia Foundation? 03:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Its my website!

Chembai.com belongs to me!!! I have every right to upload my own images and no one has the right to remove them by calling it copyvio. --59.92.46.252 12:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

The idiot called Venu62 is already aware of it.