User talk:Ceyockey

Links to things to consider for inclusion

https://www.clinicalomics.com/articles/qiagen-bolsters-its-oncology-informatics-with-n-of-one-buy/2070

https://www.clinicalomics.com/articles/sophia-genetics-completes-77m-financing-with-more-hospitals-in-mind/2069

Issue --> https://clinicalomics.epubxp.com/i/1040438-nov-dec-2018/5?m4=

http://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/latest-business-and-people-news-28?topic=249&CID=actdirect.2339934.APCT*%2520Applied%2520Clinical%2520Trials%2520Direct%2520%7c%2520Bi-monthly&eid=188358419&bid=2339934 — Preceding P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 17:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)unsigned comment added by 104.129.194.127 (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

ABA Chemicals and archiving your talk page

Hello. This is TheSmartPersonUS1, and I want to thank you for adding citations and more information to the ABA Chemicals article. But I will remind you that you can archive your talk page. Use any of these templates (go into source code and copy and paste the one you want) But if you want to turn this page into an archive, add the /archive suffix with the number of archives there are (currently, 0)

• {{Archive}}
• {{Archives}}
• {{Archive box}}

From, TheSmartPersonUS1 ^(TSPUS1) 18:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC).

P.S. My computer is lagging so bad

Thanks

Thank you for your additions and references for Buzzi Unicem. Now it is safe from deletion, after my delaying tactics.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking

The Wikimedia Foundation is planning a global consultation about communication. The goal is to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to improve tools for communication.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis, whatever their experience, their skills or their devices.

We are looking for input from as many different parts of the Wikimedia community as possible. It will come from multiple projects, in multiple languages, and with multiple perspectives.

We are currently planning the consultation. We need your help.

We need volunteers to help talk to their communities or user groups.

You can help by hosting a discussion at your wiki. Here's what to do:

1. First, sign up your group here.
2. Next, create a page (or a section on a Village pump, or an e-mail thread – whatever is natural for your group) to collect information from other people in your group. This is not a vote or decision-making discussion: we are just collecting feedback.
3. Then ask people what they think about communication processes. We want to hear stories and other information about how people communicate with each other on and off wiki. Please consider asking these five questions:
   1. When you want to discuss a topic with your community, what tools work for you, and what problems block you?
   2. What about talk pages works for newcomers, and what blocks them?
   3. What do others struggle with in your community about talk pages?
   4. What do you wish you could do on talk pages, but can't due to the technical limitations?
   5. What are the important aspects of a "wiki discussion"?
4. Finally, please go to Talk pages consultation 2019 on Mediawiki.org and report what you learned from your group. Please include links if the discussion is available to the public.

You can also help build the list of the many different ways people talk to each other.

Not all groups active on wikis or around wikis use the same way to discuss things: it can happen on wiki, on social networks, through external tools... Tell us how your group communicates.

You can read more about the overall process on mediawiki.org. If you have questions or ideas, you can leave feedback about the consultation process in the language you prefer.

Thank you! We're looking forward to talking with you.

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Thalidomide

You added there a little bit about SALL4. It seems, that your "Note" in the reference ist obsolete now? --Mueck (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z152

Nanotherapeutics (Company)

I believe you developed this article but have not contributed to it since 2015. The company changed its name to Ology Bioservices in 2017. I'm still pretty new here and have never revised the main title of an article, but feel this needs changing. Can you help? Or just point me to a reference for everything that needs changing when the main title is revised? Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Marketing companies established in 1996

A tag has been placed on Category:Marketing companies established in 1996 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Article moves

You don't move an article then start a discussion. And you sure as hell don't give it a horrible title that makes not one lick of sense grammatically. Please familiarize yourself better with move procedures before making such decisions. oknazevad (talk) 00:54, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

• @Oknazevad: editing in anger and with a petty attitude is no way to work here. Next time, calm down before you do any editing. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
• @Oknazevad: That was a really poor way of phrasing things. Ah, well - we're human. I don't disagree with the revisions you've done, and I appreciate the change. My titles were grammatically correct based on an assumption that there was a distinction between Women's and Men's WWE, but I think your titles are based on a better understanding of the WWE franchises. Thanks for the changes which make things better. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I did fly off the handle a bit. The two things that bothered me the most were that you were moving a page to a title that wasn't discussed when there was a specific and better title discussed as part of the move request. There was also the erroneous opening of a move discussion after the page was already moved. I'm sorry I lost my temper. oknazevad (talk) 03:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
    • @Oknazevad: I think the phrase "all's well that ends well" applies. No scars. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

RM relists

FYI, re: this edit, when you place your relist after opinions in a requested move, or anywhere else except where the instructions advise us to place the relist, the bot does not recognize that the discussion has been relisted. P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 17:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Keith Hart close

Can you double-check your close at Talk:Keith_Hart_(wrestler)#Requested_move_6_August_2019 please? If you don't agree you got it wrong, would you mind reverting to let someone else take a look, please? Or at least explain there how you read "no consensus" out of that discussion? Thanks. --В²C ☎ 23:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for the review ;) Hotondo22 (talk) 01:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Brazilian companies established in 1971

A tag has been placed on Category:Brazilian companies established in 1971 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

UFC Fight Night: Magomedsharipov vs. Kattar

Hey mate, could you please move the page UFC Fight Night: Magomedsharipov vs. Kattar to UFC Fight Night: Zabit vs. Kattar instead? I wanted to and would've done it myself, but am currently unable to do so. Cheers 29cwcst

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thanks for all the work removing predatory publishers. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:17, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

intechopen.com

What do you mean by /www.intechopen.com being a predatory site? Pierre cb (talk) 03:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

• @Pierre cb: The publisher Intech Open Science has been highlighted as a predatory publisher, and there is an edit-comment bot that highlights every edit which includes the intech.com url sub-string. The original designation appears at Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested#Special:AbuseFilter/891: More predatory publishers, and the 'abuse filter' appears at Special:AbuseFilter/891 (when I click through this, I get the 'edit filter' dialog, but I'm not sure what you will see). What I'm doing in respect to this publisher is considered standard operating procedure with respect to clearning the encyclopedia of predatory publisher content. Predatory publishers are considered along side vanity press publishers as not providing sufficient (or any) editorial input or filtering to be considered peer reviewed and rather are considered self-published; see the essay at Wikipedia:Vanity and predatory publishing for a better explanation of this. There are occassional disputes about specific citations, but I am not going to dispute any reversion of edits I'm doing along these lines; I will let others act on the abuse-filter-added comment addendum. Does that help explain what I did? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
• @Pierre cb: I'll point out a disagreement that happened shortly after I started doing this activity, at Archaea; take a look at the history of the page following https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archaea&oldid=930235249 and the discussion at Talk:Archaea#Response to Headbomb. User:Headbomb has been VERY active in this space for years. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

OK. What you explain is not very clear but the link to predatory publisher is. So I understand and found more reliable peer reviewed article for my references. Pierre cb (talk) 03:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

BTW, a few remain. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Curiosity (rover) ~

Hi Ceyockey! Can you tell me how NASA Technical Reports Server's (NTSR), on a report from NASA here is an "attributable to predatory publisher"? By the way nice to meet you. ~mitch~ (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

• @Mitchellhobbs: You had me worried there for a minute that I'd removed this in error. The chapter referenced is in the book "Radioisotopes: Applications in Physical Sciences", where it is the last chapter of the book, which was published by IntechOpen, which has been highlighted as a predatory publisher and which has an abuse filter deployed against it. See Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested#Special:AbuseFilter/891: More predatory publishers for the abuse filter request, and Special:AbuseFilter/891 for the edit filter itself. One of the triggers for this edit filter is the DOI substring "10.5772", which appears in the citation parameter "doi=10.5772/23914", which was found in my "insource" search. The URL in the citation DOES point at NASA, but it is a 'locally hosted' abstracted chapter from the book and not a technical report per se. Hope that sufficiently explains my edit. I'm doing searches to manually remove citations to this publisher which took place before the introduction of the edit filter / abuse filter. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your work Ceyockey ~ I kinda figured that DOI triggered the filter ~ I did not read to the bottom ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 02:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:US Army Cyber Command SSI.png

A tag has been placed on File:US Army Cyber Command SSI.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (📧) 14:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Predatory publisher

Ceyockey, you edited out a citation on the Epstein–Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative diseases page because it was by a "predatory publisher" viz., . Since I wish to use this reference in another page and will correct this reference on the Epstein-Barr...page, would you please let me know what is wrong with this reference? Thank you. joflaher (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

The issue was the IntechOpen link to the wrong citation (with the same article title). Really what should have been done is simply to remove that link, since doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2017.09.006 is the correct citation. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

References

Fifteen years of editing!

Hey, Ceyockey. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Ceyockey,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of PainCeptor Pharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PainCeptor Pharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PainCeptor Pharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ImpactFactorChart AnnHumGen.png

The file File:ImpactFactorChart AnnHumGen.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Smit.gif

The file File:Smit.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Unilever

Hi - Thanks for the additional figures that you have added to the Unilver infobox. I note that your source is the annual reports of the company which you have identified as a "self-published source". While updating the financial data of some other UK companies I noticed that some editors have been using some pretty diverse secondary sources for financial data including (i) (via wikidata) the Justice Department of the Czech Republic in the case of Avast; in this case the figures were in Czech koruna when the company publishes its annual report in US$, and (ii) a source known as "Macrotrends" in the case of British American Tobacco: in the latter case the revenue figures seemed to be much larger than the figures in the audited accounts (possibly but not necessarily because of a different treatment of tobacco taxes). My own view is that it is best to use primary sources for financial data but would welcome views. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 15:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2019 Cure Award

In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Non-renewable resource companies established in 1842

A tag has been placed on Category:Non-renewable resource companies established in 1842 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

A K Peters

I have put the article up at WP:RM#C, in line with some comments in the recent deletion discussion. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of William E. Morris (politician) for deletion

I have nominated the page William E. Morris (politician) for deletion, the discussion can be found here. Devonian Wombat (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

I read your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William E. Morris (politician) and think that you coud make it clearer that you would like to merge or redirect the material.Djflem (talk) 10:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eckerle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eckert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ceyockey! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Technical Inquiry: Export full set of edit summaries and-or search, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Category: Irish companies by year

Re Irish companies established by year eg Category:Irish companies established in 2004, I have created the usual container category for them i.e. Category:Companies of Ireland by year of establishment. Note that the by-year category can be copied for other (new) years without amendment. Hugo999 (talk) 11:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Glassdoor

I see that awhile back you were involved in editing at Glassdoor. I was wondering if you could take a look the Criticism section and talk page to help weigh in. The page doesn't seem to have active users, so I'm reaching out to some people who have edited it in the past to see if they can help examine the situation. Thanks! only (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Ceyockey. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chartered companies established in 1839

A tag has been placed on Category:Chartered companies established in 1839 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 01:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

• note to self -- deleted category and talk page. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedily rename category

• Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Bahrainian companies established in 1971 to Category:Bahraini companies established in 1971 per C2A as "Bahraini" is the correct adjectival form, e.g. Category:Bahraini people. Hugo999 (talk) 22:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
• @Hugo999: I went ahead and moved the category ... before I saw it said not to move it. Nonetheless, I think I've cleaned up sufficiently not to leave too many scars. Thanks for bringing this forward. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC) Why not, if you created it! Hugo999 (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Companies established in 1971

Hi Ceyockey, I have expanded some of the categories for “Companies established in 1971” by country that you created in 2014 by adding other years e.g. Category:Sri Lankan companies established in 1972 as well as for 1971 etc. and have added a parent category (e.g. Category:Companies of Sri Lanka by year of establishment.

But there are some countries left which have few articles in the parent category and could be considered for deletion and upmerging to the “1971 establishments in .…” category. The countries are Category:Companies of the British Virgin Islands, Category:Companies of Burundi , Category:Companies of Cameroon, Category:Companies of the Gambia, Category:Companies of Guatemala, Category:Companies of Senegal, and for Category:South Yemeni companies established in 1971. Though Category:Companies of Colombia seems to have a bit more content, and could be expanded by more years of establishment. Hugo999 (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

@Hugo999:—Thanks for keeping me in the loop. As you point out, I created these years ago and they were a seed rather than an endpoint. It certainly could be that some country or year categories might be insufficiently populated, but as long as there is a framework for expanding the category set as needed, all's good. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

@Hugo999:—another thought about cats like 'xxx of British Virgin Islands', this could go into a higher order category like 'xxx of British Overseas Territories' for instance, which would cover sixteen distinct territories. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ceyockey; as well as 1971, there are several (single-year) countries in 2007: Bolivia, Cambodia, Equatorial Guinea, Finland, Gabon, Ivory Coast, Nepal, Syria, and Venezuela. And in 2004; The Bahamas, Iraq, Qatar, Slovenia, Sudan, and Vietnam. Re a category for British Overseas Territories companies, the trouble is that several territories of Britain may fall outside it as they are Crown Dependencies etc, like the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man (which are handy to London for secret offshore companies!). I think I will just do Finland and for the others just the year in question (so that the country appears in Category:Companies by year by country though with only a subcategory for one year). I would also like to merge your Category:Korean companies established in 2004 to Category:South Korean companies established in 2004. Hugo999 (talk) 02:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

• New partnerships
  • Al Manhal
  • Ancestry
  • RILM
• #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
• AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

• New partnerships
  • Al Manhal
  • Ancestry
  • RILM
• #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
• AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Gus Edwards (vaudeville)

Hi. When you added (vaudeville) to disambiguate all these links, which was good, you should also have added "|Gus Edwards", so that the link would cover the disambiguation, like so: Gus Edwards. I did it for a couple of these, which showed up on my watch list, but would you please fix the others? Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

• @Ssilvers: I think I've taken care of them all now. Thanks for pointing it out. I was using WP:JWB and wasn't sufficiently careful. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks! Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emerson (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

• Special report: Paid editing with political connections

• News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki

• In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later

• Featured content: Life finds a Way

• Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests

• Traffic report: Is there no justice?

• Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

• Special report: Paid editing with political connections

• News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki

• In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later

• Featured content: Life finds a Way

• Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests

• Traffic report: Is there no justice?

• Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

Administrator changes

Ajpolino • LuK3

Jackmcbarn

Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM

There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely 1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.

Technical news

• The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).

Arbitration

• The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
• Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.

Miscellaneous

• The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
• Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Born vs b.

Hi there, I saw you changed some (born to (b. in dab article lists. Please don't, as it barely saves any space and just introduces more confusion. Here is a brief discussion on it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Disambiguation_pages#Should_life_dates_use_%22b.%22? The-Pope (talk) 04:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Administrator changes

John M Wolfson

Bduke • Nilfanion • Philosopher • Rspeer • Yunshui

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

TonyBallioni

CheckUser changes

EdJohnston • Oshwah • Yamla

Yunshui

Oversight changes

Anarchyte

Yunshui

Guideline and policy news

• Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.

Technical news

• Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
• Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
• Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.

Arbitration

• The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
• The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.

Miscellaneous

• A reminder that standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. (American Politics 2 Arbitration case).

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

• News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking

• In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books

• Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20

• Op-Ed: Anti-vandalism with masked IPs: the steps forward

• Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story

• Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.

• Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?

• Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner

• News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year

• Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters

• In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Daniel Edwards (name)

Hi Ceyockey, you recently moved the page Daniel Edwards (disambiguation) to Daniel Edwards (name), arguing that the page only contains personal names. While that is true, that doesn't mean at all that it should be called "X (name)". It's still a disambiguation page. There are hundreds of disambiguation pages about names just like this one, that is "X (disambiguation)" as "X" is already taken by a primary topic, and obviously they all contain only personal names, but they're still called "X (disambiguation)". Page titles like "X (name)" are instead used for just first names or surnames; sometimes they contain information about the name (etymology etc) and sometimes they contain nothing more than a list of people with that name, but they're not disambiguation pages. Daniel Edwards (name), however, is one, and should be moved back to Daniel Edwards (disambiguation). Lennart97 (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Move review of Allan Boyd

I'm afraid I don't agree with your close at Talk:John Boyd (footballer, born 1929). The single opposer had no relevant argument and it's clearly shown that the common name, and the name the player used, is 'Allan Boyd'. DrKay (talk) 16:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Except two of the sources say 'Alan'. The 'no consensus' close was therefore correct. GiantSnowman 16:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Stop following me around please. Stop responding to every single comment I make on every football-related page. I've asked you at least 4 times now to stop harassing me. Both sources that say 'Alan Boyd' also say he was born in 1926, but you rejected them for that. Only one source calls him 'John Boyd'[1]; three call him 'Allan Boyd'[2][3][4]. All the others call him 'John Allan Boyd'. DrKay (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

You know damn well you only opposed at Allan Boyd as part of your petty feud and campaign of harassment. DrKay (talk) 16:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

If you think I am harassing you then please raise it at ANI. FWIW your revert at your talk page was the first time I have seen you accusing me of harassment. The Boyd article has been on my watchlist because I created the article in 2009... GiantSnowman 16:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

[5][6][7][8][9][10]. Leave me alone, please. Don't reply here or anywhere else. I'm not seeking an explanation, justification, apology or counter-argument. Just leave me alone. DrKay (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)