User talk:Hypo
Thanks for the support! Jonesboy1983 18:37, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Martha Argerich
Thanks for your contributions in Martha Argerich article. We really need more poeple working on that subject :) I do think though that the picture you uploaded should be renamed to a more descriptive title (for example ArgerichCD or something like that). If you have any questions, feel free to write me on my talk page :) -Missmarple 10:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Link re-insertion
May I ask why you reverted my link removal at Netiquette? The link was spammed across a few articles and was removed for this reason. Thanks. --AbsolutDan (talk) 22:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes that appears to be correct - my edit removed the article (I did this because it was spammed). Your edit then re-included the article. May I ask why you feel the link should be there? Thanks --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- The article isn't deleted... it's still right here: Netiquette. So you're saying that you're not vouching for the link itself, you only re-added it because you thought my removal was vandalism? If this is the case, would you mind if I re-removed the link? --AbsolutDan (talk) 12:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, I apologize for any confusion. Cheers --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:060501.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:060501.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:1400050219.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:1400050219.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Qst 16:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, do you work for the USGOV?
Hello, do you work for the CIA, the DOD or any other part of the USGOV? If so which one? Your edit history causes this concern. It's not a problem if you do, but you should divulge this so you don't have a COI. Thank you very much. ΞBMEDLEYΔSUTLERΞ 06:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)