Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Welbeck
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel Welbeck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This player fails WP:BIO as he has never played a senior match for a fully professional side. The article is made up mostly of weasel words and NPOV statements, as well as a couple of uncited quotes. WP:BIO is quite clear on these matters, and the article should be deleted straight away. PeeJay 23:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Has not played in a fully professional league (WP:BIO). Number 57 23:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While I agree that the article isn't good enough, I would like to believe that playing for England counts as the highest level of competition at his age (although there are exceptions). I will abstain from any comment on whether that level is high enough to meet the notability requirements, but that criterion does seem to have been overlooked. --StuartBrady (Talk) 23:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a policy that states that people who represented their country in a junior age group are notable? WP:BIO only makes reference to sportspeople needing to have competed at a fully professional level, which this lad clearly hasn't. A boy I was at school with played hockey for England at (I think) U-16 level about 15 years ago but never pursued it as a career and now works in an office - would he really merit a Wikipedia article.....? ChrisTheDude 21:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it doesn't require sportspeople to compete at a professional level, although I suppose you would consider football to be a "professional sport", in which case, it normally does require professional competition. However, below the age of 17, a football player in the UK would not be eligable for a professional contract, so I don't see how U-17's football could be regarded as a professional game. Surely it counts as amateur, in which case, it still fails because it's not at the "highest level" of amateur competition? --StuartBrady (Talk) 21:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a policy that states that people who represented their country in a junior age group are notable? WP:BIO only makes reference to sportspeople needing to have competed at a fully professional level, which this lad clearly hasn't. A boy I was at school with played hockey for England at (I think) U-16 level about 15 years ago but never pursued it as a career and now works in an office - would he really merit a Wikipedia article.....? ChrisTheDude 21:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He doesn't yet fulfill the notability requirements. The article can be recreated if he does anything in the future to qualify. Qworty 03:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - junior footballer still someway short of passing the notability bar. - fchd 04:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - too early for an article on this player with potential. England "name-dropping" is not enough to satisfy requirements of WP:BIO. Ref (chew)(do) 23:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as he has not yet played in a fully professional league per WP:BIO. We can restore the article if he does break into the big-time. --Malcolmxl5 12:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.