Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 September 15

< September 14	September 16 >

September 15

File:Petrus Christus Nativity (Cain and Abel).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Petrus Christus Nativity (Cain and Abel).jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This can be speedily closed. It's (part of) a painting. Vexations (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Vexations, this is a crop of a 15th century painting. If any doubt remains, the source shows a CC0 label. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I just added File:The Nativity, c. 1450 by Petrus Christus (NGA).jpg (which I just uploaded) to the nomination as it is the original that this file was extracted from. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz, euh... yeah, that's what I meant. It's a painting, so the deletion rationale does not apply. Speedy keep. Vexations (talk) 19:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although the picture is in the public domain, there is no need to keep this local copy as there is a copy on Commons. I assume that the file will be kept on Commons when the deletion request is closed. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2, if the Commons file is kept, sure. Until that happens though we should hold on to our copy. The file I just added (which you couldn't have known about) which is the source for this crop doesn't exist on Commons as far as I could tell, only photoshopped versions. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is a crop from File:Petrus Christus Nativité Haute résolution.jpg which exists on Commons. Victoria (tk) 20:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Alexis Jazz. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The following comment has also been posted to commons: :*I cropped the image from a file that's a featured image, it's from a 15th century painting, and I cannot understand how this is not free. I object to the deletion and would have liked to have received communication on en.wiki in turns of what needs to be done to keep the file. Thanks. Victoria (tk) 23:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nlmodel.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; no apparent use. — Pbrks (talk) 02:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:China Eastern Airlines logo (circle variant).svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Historical logo for China Eastern Airlines. No valid fair use rationale, not sure if it's simple enough for {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. It possibly is, I'm just not sure in this case. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 06:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Service Details At A Fashion Establishment In Tokyo Japan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Derivative of non-free content. No prejudice to restoration if someone is able to provide a valid fair use claim and expand the article to discuss this image in-depth. -FASTILY 23:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FFD referral, as this is a photo of a sign, which would necessarily be a derivative work of that sign, There is no additional license information concerning the sign given, and as it contains artwork which is above TOO, I am wondering if it is not in fact freely licensable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Photo of a computer screen, not of a sign. The information on the screen is presumably unfree. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ShakespeareFan00, Stefan2, I think this photo is very informative (shows how a fashion health shop in Japan works) and it's difficult to convey the same information with just text. The picture shows this isn't happening in a literal back alley, it shows the way the shop communicates with clients and how aware those establishments are of the law. And I don't see how a free alternative could be created realistically. Could this be converted to non-free? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IPL 2019 logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was being used on 2021 Indian Premier League and 2019 Indian Premier League in violation of WP:NFC#UUI point 14 (generic logos shouldn't be used on articles for specific seasons). The only page where the logo would be acceptable would be Indian Premier League, and that page uses File:Indian Premier League Official Logo.svg instead, so we don't need 2 logos Joseph2302 (talk) 10:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Clearly violates WP:GETTY (#14). Clog Wolf _Howl 10:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:K(NearestNeighbor) distribution for two real-world networks.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work, originally published in a non-free journal (preprint). While Physical Review E is now Open Access (with the payment of a publication fee), that policy did not take effect until 2011 and is not retroactive. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Size (n) and assortativity coefficient (r) for various networks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work, originally published in a non-free journal (preprint). While Physical Review Letters is now Open Access (with the payment of a publication fee), that policy did not take effect until 2011 and is not retroactive. While the data contained in this table is likely not protected by copyright in the US under Fiest v. Rural, the selection and arrangement of the data may be. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The data in the image could easily be recreated using MediaWiki markup. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.