Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Reason: Wikipedia information is being edited intentionally and for repeated editing in a wrong way, I request protection if there is any kind of editing, please request Arpita1234 (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Declined Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Today is opposite day! I do “not” request edit protection for this page, because many times schoolchildren (or whoever) have “not” inserted the respective current date for opposite day. ABC…XYZ ‑‑ K (🗪 | ✍) 11:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Not sure if this is meant to be a joke request, but Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 13:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by MattFullerUK. User is not acknowleding the discussion on the talk page about the picture. Also, the article might be affected because of the current events. RealMeep (talk) 11:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DatGuyTalkContribs 13:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are continuing to be disruptive w.r.t. some sort of Mets-Braves Major League Baseball rivalry. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Declined Since the protection expired, there's only been one user that edited and was later reverted, and the first of their two edits can be reasonably considered in good faith DatGuyTalkContribs 14:08, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection request. I664k (talk) 14:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 14:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been subject to numerous edits by IPs and new users, mostly to remove the content relating to the scandal the subject is involved in. Though there has been numerous discussions in its talk page, the users and IPs that edit them keep arguing that the source is incorrect, but without specifying enough information that allow editors to verify how the source is incorrect. Given the persistence of the edits in the same pattern, I am requesting the PC protection be applied indefinitely in order to allow established editors to review the addition/removal while not outright preventing the IPs/new users to introduce the source and/or further content, if they choose to properly do so. 124.120.109.104 (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Two protection changes were set by TFA Protector Bot on July 10 and July 30. The changes set temporary move-protection that is applied to articles selected as "Today's featured article" on the main page. The indefinite move-protection at sysop level should be set—there is no real need to move that article. So TFA Protector Bot will not produce changes of protection settings in the future. Vlad5250 (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Different IPs keep removing the name of the founder of this company without any explanation. There seems to be some agenda here. This is a history of strange edits to this article, like hidden links things to letters of the alphabet. MB 16:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Blindfoldedjustice (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)