Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2019/03

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:54, 20 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
2019

01 March 2019

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 18:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Be advised that one of the recently reverted users is autoconfirmed. Samsara 19:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 99% of edits this month have been either IP vandalism or reversion of IP vandalism. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ―Susmuffin Talk 13:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – To encourage talk page discussion. funplussmart (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There's no need. It's just one editor who has a weird obsession with removing sourced information. Now being discussed on the article talk page and WP:FOOTY. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is as an alternative to blocking the lot of you for edit warring. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, cyberbot. I have blocked the editors instead and the page is now unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 18:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – due to the edit war regarding page maintainers (myself) and anonymous users regarding an ongoing project, it has been proposed to discuss page content in the talk page to no avail from anonymous users. signed:Donan Raven (talk, contribs) 16:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC). signed:Donan Raven (talk, contribs) 16:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple accounts in same IP range. Long term problem. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits. As soon as the previous semi-protection ended, the same IP started to change the birth date of the person again. Debiit (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IPs may have a proxy server, breaking WP:NPOV, doing WP:SYNTH edits, with no original citation, the user started right after removing of the previous protection, I think there is a need of long duration protection from IPs. Sairg (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to recent doping arrest. Ostealthy (talk) 13:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See my recent edit, the last post over WT:INB and the bunch of IP edits. . WBGconverse 13:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for one week: Subject is recently retired high ranking Indian air force officer. Rumours have been floating that he was sacked, which are totally against the sources present. Thus, persistent vandalism. Violates WP:BLP and WP:V —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't understand this request; according to the history, this template has not been edited since 2015. MelanieN (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Zackmann08:. -- MelanieN (talk) 06:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And now I added it to the parent article, so that I do not see the point.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Lectonar (talk) 09:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye My Lover (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Deliberate edit warring and vandalism: still adding unsourced released date outside Genius. He is still adding false information about the single that is actually released in "2005" and make it "2006". This "Tnypr" user should be blocked because he introduced himself as a retired person; so a retired person must consult another administrator, not to just continue edit otherwise he seems like make a sock puppetry 54.36.113.52 (talk) 04:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This could easily be done via AIV if necessary. Lectonar (talk) 09:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – repeated insertion of conspiracy theories by IPs. Legacypac (talk) 10:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for one week: Subject is a part of a current event, thus consistent vandalism uncostructive edits; per WP:INDIAPAKISTAN30500. Sarvatra (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to fill this request. Apart from WP:INDIAPAKISTAN30500, there is a violation of WP:BLP, WP:V and uncostructive edits by multiple IP address. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There seems virtually no disruption from autoconfirmed users; semi should be fine for now. Lectonar (talk) 13:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism as seen on the history log. Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rathfelder (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring between IPs (& also recent accounts). David Biddulph (talk) 09:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 08:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article had been semi-protected since 12 April 2010. In my opinion, it is time to try reducing the protection level. The protecting admin, User:Tnxman307, has been inactive since 3 October 2012, when his last edit to English Wikipedia added the {{RETIRED}}template to the top of his user page.—Finell 23:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I personally don't think reducing the protection level or removing protection entirely would be a net positive. The article has a long history of vandalism, and Carrey is still alive and well (and relatively popular). I think unprotection or pending changes would just waste vandal fighters' time. Airplaneman 23:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You might be right. However, almost 9 years is an awfully long time for page protection, and Carrey is not the star he was in 2010 or earlier. If semi-protection is still necessary, that should manifest itself quickly, and an admin can quickly restore protection. I am no fan of vandalism, nor am I a Wiki-anarchist. I would block vandals more quickly than the standard Wikipedia policy, and I would not send a level 1 template that mischaracterizes clear vandalism as an "experiment"; some conduct so clearly manifests bad faith that it becomes impossible to assume good faith. However, some amount of vandalism is a necessary consequence of being the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and is a cost of attracting and retaining productive volunteer editors.—Finell 03:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected I have downgraded this to pending-changes, and watchlisted; we'll see...Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:DE by users and I.P. using WP:SYNTH woth no original research breaking WP:NPOV. Sairg (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing IP-hoppers. Carl Tristan Orense 07:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent trolling and weird editing conflicts keep breaking out, to the point that even the subject of the article came out about it (raising WP:BLP concerns). At the very least, an administrator should probably keep a close eye on the page. DarkKnight2149 07:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor persistently showing up and blanking a large sourced section, with no discussion. Icewhiz (talk) 07:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Sudden burst of disruptive edits that semi-protection is not able to stop. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 00:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It looks as if the existing semi-protection is handling the situation. One recent user was a problem x3 and has been warned; consider a block if they do it again. MelanieN (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some users (mostly IPs) always puts add nonexistent follow up that usually they want this show to air again but no announcements were made and its clearly that they keep replacing some contents in this page. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 02:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anons and unconfirmed users periodically adding the same quote to this disambiguation page for over 6 months. Hrodvarsson (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IPs keep adding unsourced or poorly sourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And I am reluctant to protect because I see quite a bit of constructive editing by IPs. MelanieN (talk) 00:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

James Blunt discography (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Vandalism by changing the exact released year of singles: "Wisemen", "High", "Goodbye My Lover" and "You're Beautiful". The IP editor added wrong year for these singles, thus confuse the chronology. The article needs semi protection to prevent such vandalism of year released. 51.75.95.186 (talk) 20:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman 23:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: It's today featured article so it's getting tons of traffic and tons of vandalism. Drovethrughosts (talk) 20:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EtherealGate (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected DlohCierekim (talk) 01:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Contnet dispute. Just another run-of-the-mill dispute over like one word. SMDH. I invite the combatants to parley. DlohCierekim (talk) 01:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of WP:SYNTH material. ChamithN (talk) 00:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ChamithN (talk)'s accusations are false, not true, he's just deleting and vandalising the page by deleting referenced materal. The information added by the other editors is confirmed and already published in peer-reviewed scientific journals such as the Nature Communications journal. Please read: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05326-x
Semi-protected DlohCierekim (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please state your cases on the article talk page. Obtain consensus. DlohCierekim (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Largoplazo (talk) 01:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim (talk) 01:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've already looked at their unblock request. DlohCierekim (talk) 01:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated addition of unsourced claims by a dynamic IP address, possible sock/meatpuppetry underway. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claims by User:Jingiby who has been blocked many times for repeated edit-warring and nationalist POV, and is making threats on talk pages. See the page history. 2A02:587:280E:D100:C517:2DF2:DF9A:60B1 (talk) 19:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:42, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect for a day or so. A bunch of kids, or one kid with multiple accounts, has/have been vandalizing this all morning to add references to hitting pedestrians with cars. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 23:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting edit protection due to spam content and malicious edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.85.8 (talkcontribs) 16:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Promotional, often BLP-violating, editing by a large number of WP:SPA accounts. --Ronz (talk) 17:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over several days between an IP and a registered user. BilCat (talk) 18:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yes it has...? Airplaneman 00:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

02 March 2019

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. DannyS712 (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes can not be configured at talk pages--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of block notice by IP hopping vandal . Ebyabe (talk) 02:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Their talk page access has been removed for the duration of the block. — Maile (talk) 02:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Side note: @Carl Tristan Orense and Ebyabe: WP:OWNTALK/WP:BLANKING allows for the removal of warnings and block notices. It's decline block appeals that cannot be removed. Sometimes it's better to just let them remove it and move on, no need to engage. -- ferret (talk) 15:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. by Maile66. Favonian (talk) 19:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and Edit warring - Semi-protection ineffective, vandalism is persistent. The page has constantly been vandalised by an extended confirmed sock with two accounts Sairg and Xishuang. There is an ongoing Sockpupettry investigation against the user. Therefore the page isn't protected in the true sense here as the user is still being able to edit it. Barbariankiller456 (talk) 15:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per bot's astute observation. Favonian (talk) 19:54, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Three or four EC editors partial revert warring instead of discussing. . Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:25, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I unprotected it since following the (aggressive) request at my talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nihlus 19:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent promotional content added by COIs (also copyrighted content which has had to be rev'dl). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Well-meaning IP editors repeatedly alter this navigational template, which is transcluded in dozens of articles, contrary to MOS; and in so doing break many of the wikilinks, killing its value as a navigational tool. TJRC (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Several pro wrestling titles

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Several Ips vandaliced the articles HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the IPv6 /64 range that seems responsible for most of this. Let's see if that works for now. A few IPv4 blocks may also be required but the bulk of it was from the IPv6. -- ferret (talk) 15:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The draft is not yet ready for mainspace and Mwangi2017 constantly moving it back to mainspace even he was asked to follow the AfC process a few times, PLease protect the title in mainspace if possible including SmartBuyGlasses Group. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: The particular user has been indef blocked. Do you feel it still warrants a protection? -- ferret (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferret: Umm yes, because Mwangi2017‎ was hired to move this draft and I feel they will definatly come back to complete their task. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I salted the target instead.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and spoilers of eliminated contestants before season has even begun has already started and will only increase with the premiere coming up in a few days. Brojam (talk) 23:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- ferret (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 04:08, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Essentially 3-4 edits a year, and most seems to be good faith. This is certainly not bad faith vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 15:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. if you look at recent changes they're just undoing each other's edits also Azad kashmir name supports the cause of global terrorist organizations Wikidushyant | talk 07:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No evidence of a "high level" of vandalism. Seems to only have been one vandalism edit in the last month+, and semiprotection wouldn't stop the editors involved in the minor slow moving content dispute that might be going. -- ferret (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IP users add disruptive, inappropriate discussions in the page. [1] LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 18:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's reverting each other. Kante4 (talk) 14:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and Edit warring - The page has constantly been vandalised by an extended confirmed sock with two accounts Sairg and Xishuang. There is an ongoing Sockpupettry investigation against the user. Therefore the page isn't protected in the true sense here as the user is still being able to edit it. Barbariankiller456 (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. For 2 weeks -- ferret (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recently in the news, the article has come under a lot of multi-vector, multiple IP vandalism. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits. As soon as the previous semi-protection ended, the same IP started to change the birth date of the person again. Debiit (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and factual errors by IP editors to a BLP. StaticVapor message me! 02:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive edits and unsourced additions by IP editors to a BLP. Page has been protected many times before. StaticVapor message me! 03:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after unprotection. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To start. There's not much of a protection history here. -- ferret (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 21:05, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requested via {{help me}} at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:47.38.94.221#Help_me!. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 09:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The IP making the request objects to "democrat snowflakes" editing the article; not a reason to protect it. 331dot (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remove create protection: So the page can be redirected to Davit Hakobyan (alternate spelling). Protected by user who is inactive & no longer admin. S.A. Julio (talk) 23:09, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. MYS77 21:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – Since this is substonly it doesn't have a large number of transclusions but it is used for ALL WP:TFDs and is highly visible! . Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been protected before but continues to be vandalized. . Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Here a user doing WP:SYNTH,WP:NOR with no original research even after the warning he started editing war. Kindly protect for a long time. Sairg (talk) 11:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. 331dot (talk) 11:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CoconutOctopus talk 12:09, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sheldybett (talk) 12:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for six months: Page has been protected once before. Since last summer more than half of all edits have been vandalism, the rest minor citation tweaking. Here is a list of vandalizing edits (diff link omitted). These were all reverted, either by bot or manually by registered editors

03:34, June 4, 2018‎ 2601:647:4301:a3f1:ada5:ee8a:1d15:3fae (talk)‎ . . (27,010 bytes) +54‎ . . (undo)
00:06, July 5, 2018‎ 118.200.42.132 (talk)‎ . . (26,967 bytes) +3‎ . . (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit
00:06, July 5, 2018‎ 118.200.42.132 (talk)‎ . . (26,971 bytes) +7‎ . . (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit
00:06, July 5, 2018‎ 118.200.42.132 (talk)‎ . . (26,963 bytes) -8‎ . . (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit
04:05, July 7, 2018‎ 49.150.107.58 (talk)‎ . . (26,960 bytes) -4‎ . . (→‎Origin and use of the term) (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit
13:10, July 26, 2018‎ 106.78.175.233 (talk)‎ . . (26,983 bytes) +17‎ . . (Yuvrajhrknd) (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit
10:56, August 5, 2018‎ 120.28.198.179 (talk)‎ . . (27,003 bytes) +37‎ . . (→‎Origin and use of the term) (undo)
20:33, November 7, 2018‎ 97.103.60.10 (talk)‎ . . (27,673 bytes) +9‎ . . (→‎Origin and use of the term) (undo)
11:51, November 21, 2018‎ 197.156.102.62 (talk)‎ . . (25,905 bytes) -1,717‎ . . (→‎Extraterrestrial biospheres) (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit, references removed
02:11, November 29, 2018‎ 70.49.171.30 (talk)‎ . . (27,622 bytes) 0‎ . . (undo)
02:12, November 29, 2018‎ 70.49.171.30 (talk)‎ . . (27,290 bytes) -332‎ . . (undo)
14:11, December 5, 2018‎ 88.12.46.13 (talk)‎ . . (27,621 bytes) -1‎ . . (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit
14:12, December 5, 2018‎ 88.12.46.13 (talk)‎ . . (27,630 bytes) +9‎ . . (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit
14:18, December 11, 2018‎ Dunorun (talk | contribs)‎ . . (23,295 bytes) -4,327‎ . . (undo | thank) Tag: Visual edit
04:54, December 31, 2018‎ 171.76.103.132 (talk)‎ . . (27,614 bytes) -8‎ . . (undo)
16:58, January 30, 2019‎ 156.110.28.98 (talk)‎ . . (27,627 bytes) +5‎ . . (→‎Annual variation) (undo)
13:22, February 11, 2019‎ 5.194.203.63 (talk)‎ . . (27,569 bytes) -53‎ . . (→‎Extent) (undo)
03:25, March 1, 2019‎ 66.215.214.148 (talk)‎ . . (27,108 bytes) -53‎ . . (undo) Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit

Thanks NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. The disruption is very slow, far under the threshold for semiprotection, and not all IP edit are vandalism or disruptive. Lectonar (talk) 13:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Controversial topic that attracts vandals. Guy Macon (talk) 22:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 01:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors consistently adding unreferenced material - official flag & logo, when there is clearly no evidence that any of this actually exists. Maybe the work of sockpuppets. Dan arndt (talk) 07:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Numerous fast-paced changes from anonymous IPs blanking information that appears to be properly sourced. Several stretches of changes in the logs just undoing each other's edits. Page previously protected (2/20 through 2/27/2019). — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmandaTrust (talkcontribs) 08:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 19:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism today due to recent news. 108.176.25.66 (talk) 22:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

03 March 2019

Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism. This has been going on for a while, so semi-protection for a longer period would probably be best. Trivialist (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ruslik_Zero 20:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The phrase "according to Shia" or something along those lines keeps is frequently added to the introduction, normally by IP edits. Not only do these kinds of edits violate WP:CONSENSUS, as they are manually undone every time, they also go against the contents of the article (which includes numerous non-Shia references). It would be very helpful to have semi-protection on this page to stop these kinds of edits. Snowsky Mountain (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - R9tgokunks 21:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC) > Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I see two users editing disruptively. One has been block, another one has not even been warned. Now I warned them. If disruption continues, please re-report )if multiple users have been involved), or seek intervention agains the user (if one user is involved).--Ymblanter (talk) 16:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page frequently has IP editors attempting to remove a specific phrase. EggRoll97 (talk) 05:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page is under pending changes and not edited frequently. Samsara 08:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 08:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 19:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeatedly adding unsourced and highly exaggerated box office numbers. 2405:204:D28B:4ABB:3C59:BBEE:AEEE:F850 (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days. Enough edit-warring, take this to the talk page, please. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent addition of original research . Atlantic306 (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EC protection isn't justified at this time. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced additions and disruptive editing by IP editors. Has been protected twice in the last year. StaticVapor message me! 18:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-jumping account keeps adding unsourced information to this BLP. The page was previously protected for 2 months for the same reason, and within hours of the last protection ending, the IP returns. The article has been protected no less than four times since Oct 2018 for this very same reason. The person behind the IP has made no attempt to discuss what they are doing on the talkpage. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Releated BLP violations by anon IPs including simple vandalism as well as unsourced additions or changes to name and claims of being deceased that are not reflected in the sources. WOPR (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I currently do not see any reason for extended-confirmed protection--Ymblanter (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing of name by IP addresses. RafaelS1979 (talk) 15:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs are adding information on someone they allege to be a member of the "Incel" movement with no citations. Low traffic page otherwise, so PC would be appropriate here. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 07:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:31, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 07:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 9 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:34, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for one week: High level of POV ip edits, editing the section about a recent event 2019 India–Pakistan standoff. Protection requested under Wikipedia:INDIAPAKISTAN30500Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 10:37, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarvatra: Just as a note in the margin (and you may already know this), the document cited refers to extended confirmed protection, which is a stronger form of protection than semi. Samsara 11:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism continues after the page recently became unprotected. S.A. Julio (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the past few days, specifically from IPs with similar edit histories (same person!): 1st IP, 2nd IP Dan56 (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the status quo of the genre field. This allows the rest of the article to be freely edited. If it ever needs to be updated, ping me or look at the template source. Samsara 09:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Samsara 09:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 08:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 04:09, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a dispute between Aoi and NickFan2011 that is affecting several articles, including this one. Samsara 12:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No opinion on whether this article should be protected or not, but I just want to point out that NickFan2011 has been blocked as a sockpuppet after I filed an SPI. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Recent IP edits have not been reverted. Seems like there's nothing to do here in the way of protection right now. Samsara 23:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 23:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Semi-protection ineffective, vandalism is persistent. Probably related to the Indo-Pakistani conflict. —Gazoth (talk) 15:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the previously existing pending changes setting:
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article has been repeatedly laden with spam by multiple SPAs; I've been involved in reverting so can't really do the protection myself. Yunshui  15:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: I'm not sure a protection will work at this time, most of the activity seems to have been back in January. -- ferret (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 19:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has changed since the last protection. May also consider blocking the warriors. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 19:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's had up to full before, PC is not working as we've got 5-year old WP:SPA's editing it. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 19:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Fully protected for a week by User:Nick RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 19:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 02:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 00:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 00:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs trying to add trivial info without sources. A discussion has been opened on the talk page that they are welcome to join. MarnetteD|Talk 04:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sro23 (talk) 05:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Upgrade to TP, highly substituted. funplussmart (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 23:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs and new accounts changing all occurrences of "riot" to "massacre". It may be time to reconsider the name of this article again, but until we do it is not appropriate to rewrite the article. . Meters (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism from shifting IP, inserting fake character name every few days. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated violation by throwaway accounts, with BLP violations added - I have also requested Oversight . Jonathan (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04 March 2019

Extended Confirmed Protection: A dynamic IP6 user has been engaged in long-term COI promotional edits, edit warring, removing sourced content, not engaging in talk page discussions and adding unsourced content. The SPA (always from the same geographic area) has added unpublished information about Jonathan Green's early life on multiple occasions, it is a long-term COI case (over a year of back and forth) hiding behind a dynamic anonymous IP. -- GreenC 03:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd favor long-term or indef pending changes, given the edit rate. Will let another admin decide. Airplaneman 20:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals. —IB [ Poke ] 12:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious off wiki campaign. Doug Weller talk 21:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent reinsertion of unsourced trivia by an IP-hopping anon despite prior blocks and temporary semi-protection of the page. Needs a longer, if not permanent, semi status. oknazevad (talk) 21:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. Another option might be a rangeblock, but the chief problem seems to be this one article. EdJohnston (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since 22 Feb 2019, an IP user has been repeatedly adding nonsensical information to this page. CodeTalker (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 16:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: CSS page and template should have the same protection level. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – To make protection level the same as on Template:Script/Arabic. EdJohnston (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: CSS page and template should have the same protection level. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Make style protection the same as on the associated Template:Ug-textonly, per WP:TemplateStyles. EdJohnston (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Featured article seems to be a target for POV-pushing and unhelpful edits from drive-bys. . Montanabw(talk) 04:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 20:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every time protection goes off this page, the vandals and anon IP POV-pushing begins again. Frequent target with relatively few editors watching, needs permanent semi. Montanabw(talk) 04:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. @Montanabw: I only see 1 full protection in the protection log, so I'm not sure what perpetual protections you are referring to. That being said, I agree that the page could use some more watchers. Hopefully pending changes will help. Airplaneman 20:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection Lately, IP users have been doing whatever they can to disrupt this perfectly fine article. Only people with extended confirmed accounts should edit it from now on. Trillfendi (talk) 05:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Trillfendi: There's no evidence of disruption from autoconfirmed accounts, so I don't see a need for extended confirmed protection. Airplaneman 20:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remove creation protection: The shock site Meatspin is mentioned in a referenced section at Shock site#Meatspin and the page would redirect to that section. The redirect Meatspin (shock site) also exists and redirects to the section. One similar redirect with a section at Shock site, Goatse, is full protected; the other, Lemonparty, has no protection. I asked protecting admin User:Jarry1250 to unsalt a week ago; he has not made any edits on enwiki in over a month. 93 (talk) 08:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done I created the redirect. Airplaneman 20:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of whitewash revisionist history vandalism. Page seems to be politically and culturally sensitive. Many readers take offense at the fact that Texas was seized from Mexico primarily by illegal immigrants from USA. GalantFan (talk) 19:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 08:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Not semi'd, but pending'd… Airplaneman 20:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and personal attacks from IP hopper. SanAnMan (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done protected by another admin. Regards. Titodutta (talk) 19:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive vandalism in the form of removing/changing content by IP users without cause. Oliszydlowski, 11:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce to semiprotection or none: This user has left wikipedia and is no longer sysop.--Myrtonos (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done, and would someone with better access than I have right now please take a look at this editor’s recent contributions? They seem to consist primarily of (1) editing the userpages of ex-admins who were desysopped for inactivity to eliminate the reference to adminship, and (2) minor edits to decade-old welcome templates gratuitously referencing an ArbCom case from circa 2006 (Karmafist). See also the final section of User talk:The Rambling Man where this first came to my attention. Thanks. Newyorkbrad (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done <for bot> {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced personal attacks contrary to WP:BLP have resumed now that previous protection has been lifted. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 17:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:: Article is currently under a barrage of partisan disruptive edits from supporters of a US presidential candidate who are unhappy with her opinions, contrary to WP:BLP. --KingForPA (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 17:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 16:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring by numerous IP users over main article image. Areaseven (talk) 09:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – please make sure that the bio is protected, there are a lot of editors who write a bunch of gossip or false info just to draw attention. AnnieKalou (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined OP has been blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This template is currently fully-protected and has been so since February 2013. However, it is about to have numerous other functions added to it as a result of the decisions to merge five other templates into it, including String2 where I have been the author and maintainer. This added complexity will almost certainly increase the likelihood of bugs being exposed and of requests for modifications or extra functionality. As the frequency of maintenance increases, the rationale for locking down the module against template editors decreases. I would therefore like to see the protection level reduced to TE-level as it will give editors like myself, who know the code best, the ability to maintain the code and respond to issues, at least during the transition to the single string function module. RexxS (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomie: Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter to me. Note the module was created and protected before templateeditor existed (February 2013 vs October 2013), much less became widely used. Anomie 13:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Per above. Lectonar (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar, Anomie, and RexxS: This didn't work, the module is transcluded on the Main Page (via Template:Did you know calling Template:Main page image calling Template:Str number/trim, calling Module:String. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention that the module is used in system messages. This clearly needs to be restored to full-protection. (Yes, I am aware that I am guilty of not noticing this earlier) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I see no great problem with that; there are barely more template editors than admins (174 more to be exact), and none of them is prone to misuse the right. I will gladly reprotect to full, though, if it is really necessary. Lectonar (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The convention is for templates used in the MediaWiki namespace to be fully protected. This one request isn't the place to challenge that convention. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pppery, go to WP:RfA. It is dangerous to be open to template editors in Cascading protection modules/templates Hhkohh (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @Hhkohh: I think this comment was intended for RexxS, not me (I support the module being fully-protected, despite being a TE and not an admin) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 16:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pppery, ha, results have been overturned. Hhkohh (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, this module is currently under cascading protection so that it is only edited by admins and override TP Hhkohh (talk) 16:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of cited information in favor of unsourced speculation by IP, despite multiple reverts and attempts to discuss at talk page. livelikemusic talk! 17:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Reply to Samsara The same person Lester1231 just did the same vandalism thing again: removed the word of additional composer from Tao Liu to show him as main composer, he also added him to the music by which should be the main composer list, along with slanders for the main composer. IMDB of this film shows Roc Chen is the only Music By person and Tao Liu is just additional composers in music department, thus we require to put Tao Liu under additional composer and remove him from the music by. More importantly is to undo the vandal of Lester1231 at 13:24 which should be the last revision and full protect this page from the same user who keeps vandalism by adding Tao Liu to the main composer and remove the word of additional music for Tao Liu to show him as main composer, added slanders for the main composer. I think maybe we need full protection of this page, at least for the music/soundtrack part. Wraper11 (talk) 18:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See request above. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring. ―MattLongCT -Talk- 18:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now; discussion is ongoing. Please relist if edit-warring occurs. Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Over the past year or so, several anonymous IP editors have made persistent disruptive changes to the lead section of this featured list, specifically changing the location of Hong Kong Disneyland Resort from China to Hong Kong (see the following edits: Special:Diff/822571801, Special:Diff/866582076, Special:Diff/885990599). Referring to it as being from Hong Kong instead of China is inconsistent with the rest of the lead (Tokyo Disney Resort is stated as being in Japan instead of Tokyo, Disneyland Paris is stated as being in France instead of Paris, etc.). I left an embedded note in the lead here: Special:Diff/866704067 to discourage this, but it has been ignored. For the record, Hong Kong is ultimately subordinate to China in spite of its autonomous status, as evident by its full, official name: "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China". Semi-protection is desirable, but having it in place for a short duration may not do much due to the disruptive edits happening months apart. Semi-protection for a long period will be a better option in this situation. Jackdude101 talk cont 19:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is so extremely slow...I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 08:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - R9tgokunks 20:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 10:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the past few days, specifically from username with similar edit histories (same person!) He tried to remove additional composer from Tao Liu, which does not match the film ending roller credits. He also tried to add slander that the main composer's music is plagiarism which is not true. Both actions of him are in the benefit of the additional composer and vandalism for the main composer. 75.83.20.12 (talk) 09:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Strangely, this report was originally filed by Wraper11, the very one who was removing some mentions of the composer referred to above. I'm not sure if I'm willing to simply accept that this is a request made in good faith. Samsara 10:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: reply to Samsara:Hi there, we are the official film crew. Tao Liu is not in the field of original music in the film ending roller credits, that's why I removed him. Tao Liu is credited as additional composer. We found someone continues to remove the word of:additional composer from Tao Liu and makes him the main composer and not additional composer anymore at not only wiki but a lot of other websites as well, and the same person also attack the main composer by adding slanders that the main composer's music is plagerism. This is why we request a page protection. Wraper11 (talk) 10:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Moved here from the bottom of this page and removed {{pagelinks}}. (Diff) —RainFall 10:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
After a quick search, I can't find any sources to confirm the involvement of Tao Liu (or Liu Tao, for that matter). So unless we get a convincing second opinion (maybe from someone who can read Hanzi or has access to the liner notes), my instinct would be to remove all mention of Tao Liu; Roc Chen, by contrast, is very consistently mentioned in numerous sources. Samsara 11:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Samsara The same person Lester1231 just did the same vandalism thing again: removed the word of additional composer from Tao Liu to show him as main composer, he also added him to the music by which should be the main composer list, along with slanders for the main composer. IMDB of this film shows Roc Chen is the only Music By person and Tao Liu is just additional composers in music department, thus we require to put Tao Liu under additional composer and remove him from the music by. More importantly is to undo the vandal of Lester1231 at 13:24 which should be the last revision and full protect this page from the same user who keeps vandalism by adding Tao Liu to the main composer and remove the word of additional music for Tao Liu to show him as main composer, added slanders for the main composer. I think maybe we need full protection of this page, at least for the music/soundtrack part. I'm sorry that I created a new request but I should have just edit this part, but since now it's best to have full protection, I didn't delete the 2nd request of full protection application. Wraper11 (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wraper11: I couldn't find the original credits in Chinese, but if you can send me them I can fulfill @Samsara's request for someone that can read Chinese (我会懂中文). --DannyS712 (talk) 03:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyS712: :@Samsara: I can send you the film ending roller credits which should match the IMDB page, which is in English and Chinese, so you can see it yourself. so I upload this to dropbox for you to review: https://www.dropbox.com/s/e2titghp4suqkh6/wanderingearthendingroller.png?dl=0 Please undo Lester1231's last revision which he removed the word of additional music and add slanders for main composer. Please protect this page from further vandalism from him.
Declined This is not a case for protection; use the article's talk-page to hash things out. Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent multiple IP editing of lede to "formerly Swaziland" instead of consensus of "also known as Swaziland". —[AlanM1(talk)]— 13:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 01:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection This page has been repeatedly protected due to persistent vandalism, and every time the protection expires it starts up again. Protection expired on 3 March and the same vandalism started back within hours. Probably need a longer protection this time, will be the third time this year already. PohranicniStraze (talk) 01:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant spree of IP vandalism changing subject's name, religion etc since the most recent semi-protection expired in Dec 2018. Note that this is a long-term problem (and likely to remain so) due to the subject's connection to the Nehru–Gandhi family, and hence Indian politics. Abecedare (talk) 06:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of another year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry - see previous 3-month block here, and following diff. BilCat (talk) 06:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 10:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Factual errors from IP users. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, relatively few ip editors in the last month, and many of those were constructive. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly removing referenced content. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Specific content of this article is being targeted by User:MariaJaydHicky evading an indefinite block through different IPs: IP #1, IP #2, IP #3 (IPs' identity was confirmed by an administrator reverting the vandalism) Dan56 (talk) 19:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 02:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Lectonar (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and new users. DannyS712 (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Man, I hate protecting talk-pages. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by several IPs. Donner60 (talk) 03:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

pp-pc1 This is an article about one of the world's largest illegal movies streaming sites (just like Putlocker). It was given a one-week pp-semi, but as soon as the week expired, we have new users embedding links into the article to other illegal movie streaming sites (see [2]). This article should have the same protection level as Putlocker, as the existance of clone sites will always make it subject to such abuse. Britishfinance (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from Talk:Montequila Robinson
 – {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 19:31, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of editor vandalism. Lovelybones34 (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I see no edit that I would describe as vandalism in the article's edit history. Proposing/Nominating an article for deletion is not considered vandalism. If you wish to contest deletion (which is where that Afd looks to be heading), you should do so at the Afd discussion page. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes is not work, high level of disruption by IP editors. StaticVapor message me! 18:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary page protection due to persistent vandalism by the same person using different ips and a username (all contributed similar content for all but one edit, and all containing the same name as the contributor- "adina akiva"). Zinnober9 (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection with Template:Proposed deletion/dated. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 00:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected — JJMC89(T·C) 02:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05 March 2019

Full protection: The subject has been elected to some high religious post. Some users do not agree and tries to vandalise the page removing this information even though all mainstream media reported the election and there is no substantial proof to claim otherwise. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 09:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I fully protected for three days; following my own suggestion at the talk page I leave the thread open hoping for a second opinion.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: You semi protected for three days, was this your intent? Fish+Karate 14:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Fish and karate: I see it now, I indeed intended to fully protect but screwed it up because I did not have enough coffee. However, I had a look at it now again, and I think all disruption is coming from just one editor, Kanjikkuzhi, and full protection might be unnecessary at this point. I warned the user, and I will block them if they continue edit-warring. For the time being, I would advocate keeping a three-day semi protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now I blocked the user, so that we should be fine.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive editing by IP user over the past 2 days. Request 48 hrs if possible, no more should be necessary.  Spintendo  19:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 20:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page faces repeated vandalism, which has recently escalated to even more offensive vandalism (check IP vandalism from February 28th) The page has been protected twice already for a month duration each, however, once the protection is lifted vandalism picks back up. Can this page be protected for a longer than a month? Mrunnerm (talk) 19:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing frequency is not that high right now, PC1 might suffice. Samsara 19:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent WP:EXTPROMO issue - IP editors repeatedly adding different medical billing services, both in prose and in the EL section. Little pob (talk) 17:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant disruptive editing, adding a known hoax (which is already linked from this page). bonadea contributions talk 18:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Please prevent Wikipedia from being used to advertise a highly dangerous and toxic substance that is falsely called a health product. Legoboyvdlp Let's talk! 18:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 19:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Removed excessive information per WP:NOTEVERYTHING, some of which was unsourced or poorly sourced content. Edits keep getting reverted by IP users without explanation. Fargo1004 (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Looks like a content dispute. DlohCierekim 04:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It’s just random IP users reverting because they have their feelings hurt. They have not given an adequate reason why the removed content should be restored. Fargo1004 (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. Across a couple of pages. Looks like you might be edit warring with several "random IP's". More eyes would be nice. DlohCierekim 11:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
How are my edits wrong? They won’t stop reverting. This user does not understand WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Fargo1004 (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Fish+Karate 13:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temp Semi-protect - test pilot using either newly-registered SPAs or IP accts, making dozens of consecutive edits with each acct to make one small unexplained & unsupported change. - wolf 16:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 16:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User keeps censoring spoiler. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 13:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. Frietjes (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Perhaps the protecting admin could also block the IP (or do so instead, but temp protecting a template used on some high-traffic pages seems like a good idea, too). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Very low likelihood that new/anonymous editors would need to edit this outside of vandalism. Fish+Karate 13:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is inefficient. Please upgrade protection to semi-protection, so that trolling IPs can't smear the article. . Sk8erPrince (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 14:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism, the IP vandalism is now occuring in the article's section of Dream League Soccer 2017 and Dream League Soccer 2019. In Dream League 2017, the covering athletes were changed by IP address user as it is obviously observed by the image in the infobox. "https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/886105383". The article may meet potentially vandalism and disruption if it is unprotected. 51.75.94.197 (talk) 14:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @51.75.94.197: Articles don't get indefinite full protection usually full protection is applied temporary and when all other form of protection has failed. Based on the history if I were asking for protection I would start out with temporary pending changes protection for 1 month then re-evaluate if semi-protection is needed. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 14:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (escalating from previous 2 week protection period). Fish+Karate 14:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – Used by template-protected Template:Crossreference. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 13:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly visible userbox: (Primefac, you protected a redirect to this template without protecting its target). {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 13:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly visible userbox: match protection of redirect by Primefac. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 13:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Template:Navbox Canada. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 13:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mahveotm (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection just ended, same problems. Too much disruption for pending changes. StaticVapor message me! 04:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 12:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Constant release date vandalism. Ngyikp (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 11:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Release date vandalism. Ngyikp (talk) 05:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 11:56, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Template:Rfd bottom . {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: The page has been receiving fairly consitant vandalism by new users and IP addresses for a few months now. Helper201 (talk) 10:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any need for the moment for extended confirmed--Ymblanter (talk) 11:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. DlohCierekim 11:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: It is Today's Featured Article, it's to avoid vandalism from IP users. Luigitehplumber (talk) 11:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These pages should have the same protection level, but it's not exactly clear what that level should be. My judgement suggests extended-confirmed protection (to match the stylesheet), but any consistent level would work. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting admins: Mifter and MusikAnimal. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely., please feel free to amend if needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 04:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 05:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently she kissed someone in public, so her page is now full of unsourced claims that she has a new partner, or even husband. Meters (talk) 07:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Citobun (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Increased disruptive editing from IPs. S.A. Julio (talk) 17:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That most recent non-autoconfirmed edit looks good and worthwhile. Samsara 19:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 19:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 04:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 04:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism because of recent events. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:33, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs. ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 22:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term protection being requested. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Berean Hunter. MelanieN (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly made in error by OCA. funplussmart (talk) 01:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 05:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Levels of IP vandalism. Users are placing offensive phrases to the page in regards to a recent scandal. Rather than put the scandal in (still developing), users place edits that defame/insult the student body and school as a whole. Hauteknits (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Applied to article Caring Senior Service and the draft. MelanieN (talk) 00:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I was unable to find any previous pages by this or related names. MelanieN (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protected: One year of semi-protection just expired yesterday, immediately followed by multiple recurrences of similar vandalism. The page has a long history of moderate but highly persistent level of long-term WP:SPA and IP vandalism related to Hamilton (musical), conforming to long-standing #Hamiltrash pattern of vandalism. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. DlohCierekim 04:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism; Disruptive editing. Justlookingforthemoment (talk) 11:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. L1amw90 (talk) 12:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm WP:INVOLVED as I've been cleaning up the article, but I haven't seen anything disruptive. Possibly now it's on the main page we might get some more bother, but there are enough eyes on the article right now to make protection superfluous in my view. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I agree; please relist if it gets disruptive. Lectonar (talk) 14:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Especially high level of IP vandalism. Talk page of the article is being abused maliciously for pseudoscientific and fringe statements and declarations Ke an (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Many editors edit warring rather than discussing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP users. Luigitehplumber (talk) 12:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps adding the album cover artist [3], but seems unwilling to discuss, although is happy to leave incendiary edit summaries [4] . --woodensuperman 16:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 00:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 00:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An anon from Brazil is adding incorrect information based on the way WP:FOOTY is run, and doing so without explanation. This is nation of birth or nation the player played for, not naturalized citizenship. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 00:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06 March 2019

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs / very new users cutting out a large block of content - no discussion. Icewhiz (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:22, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 20:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 21:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Public figure in Kerala. AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OP: you've been virtually the only editor of this article for months. Be so kind and read our protection policy. Lectonar (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – continued BLP violations and NPOV issues . Praxidicae (talk) 15:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 15:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of dynamic IP socks of banned User:MariaJaydHicky. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 18:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason there's been a spike in vandalism over the past few days, from a host of IPs and users, mainly vandalising the owner of the stadium in the infobox. The current version is the same as that from 60 edits (3 days) ago. Granted a few of the vandals are autoconfirmed, but most aren't and a few days of semi might cause them to move on, while giving the PC reviewers a rest!. Neiltonks (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1990'sguy (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:42, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Heavy vandalism / factual errors. Has been protected 3 times in the last month and vandalism always returns. The event is on April 7, hoping we can get semi protection until at least three days after? So April 10 maybe. Going to be a lot of disruption around the time of the event. StaticVapor message me! 17:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. DlohCierekim 17:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used in fully-protected Template:Pp-office and Template:Pp-reset. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Same question. Fish+Karate 13:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Could cascading protection work? A Dolphin (squeek?) 16:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extended temporary protection please. IP disruptions do not seem to be stopping. —IB [ Poke ] 14:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by anonymous users; no reason for anonymous users to be editing this redirect. DannyS712 (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking of content without any real reason. Citobun (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There is a reason, namely that the article shouldn't be listing every non-notable housing estate without an article. You just don't agree with that. Fish+Karate 10:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Three instances in past two weeks is not a high level warranting protection. Fish+Karate 10:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive editing by at least two IP's and one user, all pretty much the same person! . Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. DlohCierekim 13:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a closed discussion and should not need any changes. Legacypac (talk) 03:12, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 2 instances in about 10 months is, imho, not persistent. I have watchlisted. And no, it should not need any changes. Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 05:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially 1 IP. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems fans are objecting to listing this band, that has won awards as a Christian band, as a Christian band. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 10:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal with an obsession for adding and re-adding towns that are most definitely not cities to this list of cities. Unresponsive to talk page warnings. AussieLegend () 07:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent string of vandalism. StaticVapor message me! 07:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unreferenced changes to statistics. Davidelit (Talk) 08:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This template shouldn't be only semi-protected; {{Pp-office}} is fully protected, so this should match it. DannyS712 (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 10:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sudeep Karakkat is already protected. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sharafuhere for more. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please also protect Draft:Sudeep Karat due to sockpuppetry and move-warning. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Creation-protected one, move-protected the other. Lectonar (talk) 10:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Quite a few manual reverts as well as any rollbacks. Kosack (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 09:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting a temporary upgrade in protection for at least 1 week due to disruptive editing made by autoconfirmed accounts by adding unsourced/poorly sourced content to the article that is being reverted. After ECP ends then return article to semi-protection. . Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 14:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:33, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Because or the recent India/Pakistan air strikes. Multiple new users and IPs are adding and removing poorly or unsourced text. A couple of weeks of protection would help. McSly (talk) 01:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, going back months. Some WP:BLP violations and defamatory content. 2601:188:180:1481:519F:8A6:A9D6:A931 (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The year-long protection against a certain sockmaster was lifted a few days ago, and the socking resumed like clockwork. bonadea contributions talk 06:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long term BLP violations. He is a controversial player and these violations are unlikely to stop. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 07:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edit warring. PrussianOwl (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war/content dispute. Adam9007 (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce to extended confirmed: Redirect with higher protection level than target: (Ping: Primefac) . {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 04:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Don't see a good reason to change. At present the redirect, Template:WP Languages, is template-protected while the target, Template:WikiProject languages is EC protected. It is more likely that a variety of people would have a need to edit the target, so its protection can be more liberal. The redirect may remain untouched for years, so waiting for an edit request to be handled should not be onerous. EdJohnston (talk) 01:08, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The fun never starts at the Venezuela article set. Today it's USOP's turn to have a high level of IP vandalism. Simonm223 (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I don't see any edits from multiple IPs which would warrant protection at this time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nonsense vandalism again. L ke (talk) 22:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – CSS page and template should have the same protection level . {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 23:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: CSS page and template should have the same protection level. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 23:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent serious personal attacks on subject by new, vandalism-only accounts. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07 March 2019

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and reversion to wrong information by registered users and IPs. The cast list keeps getting reverted to the wrong actors' wikilinks or to the wrong names. robertsky (talk) 08:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent disruptive editing by various IPs. There is a content dispute which in my view should be discussed but not like this (through edit summaries). Please protect so that editors are forced to engage on the talk page. Given the fact that this has been going on for a while, it might be appropriate to protect for a longer period. wikitigresito (talk) 15:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. If there are concerns about promotional editing, other steps are possible such as WP:COIN. Any specific disagreement can be taken to WP:DR. Anybody who knows German might check how a similar disagreement was worked out on the German article. EdJohnston (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple anonymous editors. LiberatorG (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too high a frequency of edits (both overall, and unacceptable edits by IPs) for pending changes to work. Page has been semi-protected 4 times since August - PC protection was made permanent since February. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 21:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Having this be TE is pointless given it is cascade-protected through the main page: it confusingly shows a "edit" link to Template Editors when they in fact cannot edit the page. (ping: RexxS, Lectonar ). {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 18:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think I'd prefer that Module:String be editable by template editors if we are going to merge another five string modules into it. The simple solution would be to replicate the two string functions used on main page ({{Str endswith}} and {{Str number/trim}} in a fully protected module of their own, and call that from main page. This would sever the link between Main page and the usual string functions, thus providing an extra layer of insulation for the Main page, while easing development and maintenance of the growing number of string functions used elsewhere in Wikipedia. --RexxS (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    You're too late: there's already consensus to merge Module:Str endswith with Module:String. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see a conflict with the merge consensus. Any sensible editor can see the value of merging all of the string modules into a single module. However, that combined module needs to be editable by template editors, so I'm looking for solutions to that problem. There's no point in raising the protection level of Module:String, and certainly not while we can explore ways of resolving the cascade-protection issues. --RexxS (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – There are ongoing discussions to see if Module:String can be taken out from under the cascade protection. When a conclusion is reached there, it may be time to consider changing this module from template protection to full. See also a discussion on RexxS's talk. EdJohnston (talk) 16:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent attempts to whitewash the article by removing content unfavorable to the subject of the article, frequently (though not always) by single-purpose accounts and IPs. This has been going on for years, and the article has been protected many times, for periods varying from 2 days to a year, but the problem always returns. I suggest it's time for protection either indefinitely or for a longer time than previously. . Breaking sticks (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, adding incorrect info. – Joesimnett (talk) 17:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is for a prominent film in Kerala and noticeably been edited by multiple users and creating false information. AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user keeps adding to the Budapest article, that the city has a humid subtropical climate, despite the claim is unsourced, quite dubious and several users reverted it. (S)he was warned at the talk page of the IP the user most often uses, 92.221.199.118, and asked for reliable sources on the Talk page of the article, as well. The user never replied, but keeps adding the questionable, unsourced claim. I think a temporary semi-protection would help in this matter. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 10:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 14:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: If they resume/persist, please report to AIV. DlohCierekim 14:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: If anyone wants humid subtropical, they can come down to Florida. DlohCierekim 14:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce to extended confirmed: Redirect with higher protection level than target. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 04:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Template-protected target. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used in fully-protected Template:Pp-office and Template:Pp-reset. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question:@Pppery: Why would template protection not be sufficient? Fish+Karate 13:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Fish and karate: Having a template use a Lua module with a higher lower protection level defeats the point of the protection of the template. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One solution would be lowering the protection of the templates. Tricky case as in trying to figure out if mere mortals may lower protection on office-related pages where PP policy would normally suggest we should, I found myself wondering whether a protecting vanished user was part of OFFICE. Maybe we should just let office look after office. Samsara 21:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – As someone pointed out in the protection log of Template:Pp-office, this banner was not *itself* protected as an Office action, it is only used to *designate pages* that are under Office protection. Normally we consider that template protection is enough to prevent vandalism. If the Office believes this is not sufficient, they can increase this to full protection. As a point of interest, there are *no* current pages under Office protection (see Category:Wikipedia Office-protected pages), though of course the system is in place if they ever want to use it. EdJohnston (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used in fully-protected Template:Pp-office and Template:Pp-reset. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Same question. Fish+Karate 13:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Could cascading protection work? A Dolphin (squeek?) 16:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Same issue as in my closure above. If the Office believes that template protection on these banners and subtemplates is not sufficient, they can increase it to full. EdJohnston (talk) 15:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used in MediaWiki:Categoriespagetext. How in the world did it manage to be the case that unprotected templates was used in system messages for over 3 years ?!. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And it hasn't even been vandalized since it was created 0-0 A Dolphin (squeek?) 15:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Probably because the system message is pretty obscure (I've actually never seen it till now). Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Different IP users keep reverting the sourced date of 1976 as the year for the adoption of the brighter shade variant of the french flag to 1958, the adoption of the constitution of the 5th French Republic, despite no source of any kind being given to show that the flag change was that year as well. I and others have reverted these many times and explained and shown the source, but it keeps happening (with no comments from the IP's) Havsjö (talk) 15:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 16:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kosack (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 18:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Low volume but persistent vandalism over weeks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 14:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism and other disruptive editing from IPs. wikitigresito (talk) 15:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recently approved for medical use as a "rapid-acting antidepressant" with strange edits like this [5][6] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Different IP users keep reverting the sourced date of 1976 as the year for the adoption of the brighter shade variant of the french flag to 1958, the adoption of the constitution of the 5th French Republic, despite no source of any kind being given to show that the flag change was that year as well. I and others have reverted these many times and explained and shown the source, but it keeps happening (with no comments from the IP's) Havsjö (talk) 15:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IP users. Gotitbro (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 13:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: short due to need to avoid collateral damage. removal can be discussed in the mean time DlohCierekim 13:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP cruft. —IB [ Poke ] 12:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated reinsertion of unsourced promotional content by various SPAs and IPs; can't impose protection myself due to having revert a few cases. Yunshui  14:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 14:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated copyright infringement. PRehse (talk) 11:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated copyright infringement. PRehse (talk) 11:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely., going too long--Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This article is attracting attention of an IP hopping LTA who leaves BLP-violating edit summaries. It's current Pending changes is due to expire, and Semi protection would be more suitable to avoid the need for revdel on edit summaries, which are needed even when a pending change is rejected. Gricehead (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am involved with this article but I fully support the semi. Later today I will also write an info page about this LTA, who already had one edit filter written especially for them and now have become really annoying.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism within hours of article being unprotected. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 19:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This seems rather subdued. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Article is related to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No disruption at the moment; last more or less disruptive edit on february 13th. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incorrect information repeatedly being added to this page and I'm the only one who seems to be correcting it. Possibly limit edits to registered users. Izztime (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Persistent, but really slow disruption. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Highly visible page, today's FA; shouldn't it be semi'd by default?. byteflush Talk 01:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Indeed; also disruption is quite low at the moment. Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Recent edit warring and content dispute between some registered users and IPs. Wario-Man (talk) 04:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Semi-protected for a week to prevent logged-out editing, and warned the two involved users about edit-warring (and apparent socking in one case). If they persist they can be blocked. Abecedare (talk) 06:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes protection: Infowars keeps pushing the claim that D'Souza isn't a conspiracy theorist, leading to multiple IPs trying to "correct" this article. Guy Macon (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Anachronist. (semi 6 months) Airplaneman 07:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, switching to different IP addresses when blocked, repeatedly adding absurd examples of animals kept as pets, such as whales, dolphins, giraffes, gorillas, hippos, manatees, and dugongs. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:12, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Continuing and repeated violations of BLP policy. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trump mispronounced his name. He is now a meme ([7]). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Such vandalism could be handled by an edit-filter, but perhaps not worth the time formulating one; hopefully this will fade soon enough. Abecedare (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A Google Doodle currently. Persistent vandalism and insetion of promotion link. . Hddty. (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 06:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 05:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 06:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: repeated vandalism / edit-warring by registered (confirmed) users, reportedly some associated with rival political party - and the page has now been gutted with lots of material removed without discussion or justification - needs to be locked at revision 886546196, suggest locked until 31 July 2019 i.e. until after NSW and (hopefully) Australian election campaigns

59.167.161.149 (talk) 00:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Editors are currently editing the article to remove NPOV material added by people with a conflict of interest (as per the discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#Eyes needed at Sustainable Australia). There's no reason to stop this. Nick-D (talk) 02:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are back soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 05:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection or downgrade to Indef Pending Changes: Sounds like the sock hasn't disrupted the talk page in a very long time, plus doesn't it make no sense to block an article talk page indefinitely?. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The McGriddles page itself is under indefinite EC protection due to extreme persistence by the sock. In my view we should keep semiprotection on the talk page indefinitely. The last attack on the article was in December 2018 and the text of the change was revision-deleted by another admin. The account responsible has been globally locked. EdJohnston (talk) 23:39, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 21:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 20:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 21:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08 March 2019

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Was ECP from WP:FRINGE and COI IP edits twice previously, and they've started up again now that the protection has lapsed. Would be good to nip this in the bud this time. I would suggest just blocking the IP that was causing the problems the last time, but one of the recent disruptive edits has come from a new mobile address. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Bennv3771 (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 18:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed immediately after previous protection expired. . Kingerikthesecond (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anonymous editors have repeatedly added leaked or glimpsed characters in the "Characters" section even though the developers have not officially confirmed them. Requesting protection until April 23, when the game releases. BenbowInn (talk) 18:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've put List of Mortal Kombat characters under PC1. Additionally,
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:15, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism right after the day protection expired. 2405:204:D30D:DF3F:E4E0:476F:FF9E:C982 (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – See [8] [9] [10]. Hhkohh (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remove protection: This page has been protected for several years by an editor who no longer seems to be active. The original justification provided for the protection no longer seems relevant, and I think the protection should be removed. Morris Schaffer (talk) 12:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – Lifted semiprotection per the request. EdJohnston (talk) 15:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism (more than a year, on and off), particularly regarding the subject's engagement. Talk Page discussion has not yielded any response. Editors have taken to putting warnings in the main body, which I don't think is acceptable. If a banner on the edit page might be more useful, or any other suggestions, I'm welcome to it. Elfabet (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 14:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Added edit notice. Removed warning from page text. DlohCierekim 14:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Re-emergence of one-time nuisance edits from IP addresses. Leschnei (talk) 12:35, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., disruption is too infrequent for semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – by a persistent IP hopper. theinstantmatrix (talk) 13:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Done - 7 days by GiantSnowman. theinstantmatrix (talk) 13:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent promotional editing. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive editing for political reasons. It recently underwent an edit warring. It was temporarily semi-protected some time ago, but the disruptive activity continued after the protection expired (Gisijo) 09:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Once again, serial vandaliser, The Drover's Wife, is just indiscriminately wiping out content, often without giving a reason. Really this user just needs to be kicked into touch. All that is happening now is edit warring.

I would have thought that it is within the remit of Wikipedia to inform the reader somewhat about the policies of a political party, to give the reader some understanding of the party, without debating the merits of those policies, or either advocating for or against those policies, and of course without simply replicating the party's web site.

As I have pointed out in one of my numerous reinstatements, this is simply borrowing sections and layout from other Australian political parties e.g. Science Party or United Australia Party. Is it permitted to document policies or not? However whatever the answer the same should apply to ***all*** parties.

The serial vandaliser seems to be of the opinion that documenting a few policies is "promotion". It is clear that said user and I will never agree on that. So it seems likely that separate apolitical assessment of that is required.

59.167.161.149 (talk) 11:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., so that the filer and their socks could not continue disruption.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war on page in recent past. Suspect logged out edits . EvergreenFir (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Not enough recent disruption, too. Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by adding false nationality information. IndexAccount (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the disruption is coming from one IP. Please warn them, and, if they continue, post at WP:AIV--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by adding false or unsourced information by unregistered editors. IndexAccount (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User is adding more hoaxes again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing by IP editor (IP hopper) after it was blocked (possible WP:LTA case given the length of the new block). – Sabbatino (talk) 06:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has started again after the protection expired. . Tolly4bolly 09:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The "affluent" editor is back: Part of slow, long-term pattern going back 11 years to 2007-10-17 on the Palos Heights article and further back than that on other pages. Setting 1-month then 6-month protection back in 2016 didn't get rid of this. Only 1 non-abusive edit by new/anonymous users in the last year, and only 2 in the last 2 years. Edits from the same IP addresses as the "affluent" addition have also been responsible for adding a copyright violation (50.4.128.79 at 2017-03-02 06:52:25) that will now have to be cleaned out. Seems to have used the username User:Deanpear in 2013 and 2016, but all other edits appear to be from anonymous IPs; not sure if I should be reporting this to WP:LTA or Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations also, since some of the IPs have added, to other articles in the past, "affluent" or other opinions about places being poor or having "low income" or "substantial section 8" housing. (Pinging User:Yamaguchi先生 since he just reverted the editor, and also page-protected the article in the past.). Closeapple (talk) 20:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected This is too slow for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wide-ranging IP-hopper vandalizing since at least January. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 07:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by adding false or unsourced information by an aggressive IP-hopping vandal, who also creates new accounts. Sjö (talk) 07:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not yet see any need for an indefinite semi.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by adding false or unsourced information by an aggressive IP-hopping vandal, who also creates new accounts. It might be necessary to protect all Bros songs as well as the article about the band. Sjö (talk) 07:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not yet see any need for an indefinite semi.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by the fierce city rival supporters. IndexAccount (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects with higher protection level than their targets (1)

See User:Pppery/pages to protect for list of templates

Reduce to template protection Template redirects should never have a higher protection level than the template they redirect to. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think these need to be considered on a case by case basis. If the reason for protecting the redirect is because of the potential for abuse then yes it shouldn't have a higher level of protection than the target, but if the redirect was protected to stop people changing the redirect or to stop people replacing it with content then it might well be appropriate for it to have a higher level of protection than the target. Hut 8.5 21:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Enigmamsg 21:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects with higher protection level than their targets (2)

See User:Pppery/pages to protect/1 for list of templates

Reduce to semi protection Template redirects should never have a higher protection level than the template they redirect to. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Enigmamsg 21:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects with higher protection level than their targets (3)

See User:Pppery/pages to protect/2 for list of templates

Unprotection No reason for a redirect to a unprotected template to be protected. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Enigmamsg 21:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – arab-israeli conflict blp. Shrike (talk) 10:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, mostly by IP addresses. This page has received temporary protection before but vandals are simply returning once the protection is lifted. Helper201 (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am concerned the pending changes protection is working as intended.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Agreed, PC is working as intended. Airplaneman 22:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Redirects with higher protection level than target. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 04:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Enigmamsg 21:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring dating back to March 3rd. INeedSupport :3 19:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – A user was blocked on 4 March by User:Floquenbeam for edit warring, and semiprotection was applied on 5 March by User:Ymblanter. Let's see how it goes from here. EdJohnston (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs are constantly adding goal stats in the infobox for matches not in the domestic league. CoolSkittle (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Part of a series of long-term creations by Special:Contributions/2600:1700:A8E1:33E0:0:0:0:0/64. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 23:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent diagnosis with Stage VI cancer has already started IP edits with vandalism and false statements. ḾỊḼʘɴίcảTalkI DX for fun! 23:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 23:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: It's already cited, so that's all we need. This should give everyone time to absorb the information and move on w/o venting in the article. DlohCierekim 23:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Manafort is all over the world news today. Plenty of registered editors can update the page properly as needed . Legacypac (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09 March 2019

Semi-protection Both 84.60.235.168 and 2605:8D80:628:D24C:CA71:A4AB:7A51:6DF6 only edited Abdul_Latif_Pedram, specifically, a passage that included being a Professor among Pedram's occupations. A google search confirmed he was a Professor, the article's existing references confirmed he was a Professor. I am going to assume 84.60.235.168 edits [11] [12] were made in good faith. However, I am sure 2605:8D80:628:D24C:CA71:A4AB:7A51:6DF6's long record of disruption, documented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Renamed user 49274c4c204245204241434b/Archive, proves that their only intent is disruption. Note their second edit summary "Reverting BLP violation. If you are going to edit here competency is required." is patent nonsense.

Note: Advice to "seek dispute resolution" would be pointless, as that only works with good faith contributors, willing to be accountable for their edits. It doesn't work with long term vandals who are using sockpuppetry specifically to evade being held accountable. Geo Swan (talk) 00:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined report IP for blocking instead next time. SoWhy 17:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP/throwaway account conspiracy-theory libelous nonsense - signal-to-noise ratio from these accounts approaches 0. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined since the main page is already protected, the talk page is the only way non-autoconfirmed users can contribute. SoWhy 17:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content - Offenses (mostly from various IP editors) include Amy Pascal producing the film (and in one case, providing a voice role), the creators of The Buzz on Maggie writing the film, and a release date change from August to May 2019. IceWalrus236 (talk) 04:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 17:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism bc he is a controversial referee. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 17:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unreferenced information by 175.143.166.187 over the past several days, with the ip's edit changed or reverted to the correct information each time. It seems however that the ip rechanges it to the unsourced information after the ip's edit is reverted or changed back to what it was before. Thesmartbird (talk) 14:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, please warn the IP and, if they continue disruption, they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Wickedterrier (talk) 18:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High amount of IP Vandalism . IanDBeacon (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Saqib (talk) 07:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC) That content is now sourced. How’s that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.97.80 (talk) 08:43, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined seems to have stopped. SoWhy 17:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued tag-team removal of sourced content based on editors’ original research. Calidum 15:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 17:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unregistered editors engaging in IP hopping. AuroraButterfly (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 17:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – May also consider blocking the warriors. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. SoWhy 17:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hoax edits from Special:Contributions/95.247.0.0/16 range. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 17:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various new or unregistered users have been periodically adding mentions of unscientific names for several weeks without a WP:RS. There appears to be a consensus against such inclusion (see page history, talk page, and Talk:Moscovium/Archive 1#Motorhead), yet the pattern of writing names and reverting such additions (i.e. edit warring) continues. ComplexRational (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 17:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of the page out of frustration by miscreant due to recent hot topic going on between two country. The page has been previously vandalisedd several times and protection was also provided before but for 7 days, so if possible this time provide a long time protection than last time. Please protect the article. Dey subrata (talk) 20:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only two such edits by the same IP, report the IP instead for blocking if it happens again. SoWhy 17:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unreferenced information. . SLBedit (talk) 21:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 17:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Occasional vandalism.

Declined I don't see any vandalism. SoWhy 17:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Should also be fully protected just like the WP:FA redirect. Goveganplease (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. It's not widely or prominently linked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; removal of sourced, unfavorable content, in favor of puffery. 2601:188:180:1481:6C38:7734:5599:B3E5 (talk) 12:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent multiple IP vandalism removing episodes not yet screened in the UK, but already screened in Australia. Nick Cooper (talk) 18:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. funplussmart (talk) 02:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Dlohcierekim. SoWhy 17:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP violations recently during the month of March and in late February. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 17:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuation of addition of unsourced content after block expiry. Redalert2fan (talk) 11:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 17:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Moxy (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death; IPs are changing birth year and death date, despite citations for both. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 17:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: mass edit warring. 119.160.69.15 (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Berean Hunter.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeated attempts have been made to remove internationally sourced content of neutral sources consisting of CNN, Business Insider, Guardian etc to push with biased Indian POV sources of India Today, NDTV etc. The article needs to be protected by the moderators. 91.212.53.253 (talk) 16:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Berean Hunter.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 17:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring over whether Chaldeans were Assyrian. . Leugen9001 (talk) 04:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired this morning, and edit-warring (by IP and newly-registered account) has immediately resumed. David Biddulph (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP keeps vandalising the page by unnecessarily enlarging the images to "make them easier to see", which breaks the formatting of the page. - 92.236.71.38 (talk) 15:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A user is edit warring using his IP socks despite being reverted by two users. Snowflake91 (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used in MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-DS (@AGK:). {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, appears that the image part of this "logo" isn't protected at all, so leaving this for more discussion. In the meantime I did add full move protection. — xaosflux Talk 02:44, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I semi-protected the image on Commons.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was not happening, I added a template editor protection. Feel free to renominate if needed, but it might be worthwhile to go to a broader noticeboard.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect this page to stop vandalism and disruptive edits . Mrittika.mehjabin (talk) 05:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated additions of nonsense about ancient Atlantis being in the middle of the desert. Mlewan (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – BLP vios due to recent events. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 07:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Recently unprotected, persistent content disputes. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 07:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I am seriously disappointed that, though a large number of users participate in edit-warring, and the edit-warring already going on for quite some time, nobody cared to start a talk page discussion so far.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism by socks inserting fake information and fake references. Sjö (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping socks of Special:Contributions/KhanAli1995. My report of that editor for vandalism was declined at WP:AIV. Flapjacktastic (talk) 10:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring - addition of uncited info. Davidelit (Talk) 15:09, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Currently the subject of trade rumors, so a swarm of ips are changing his current team, even though official trades cannot happen for another week. SWL36 (talk) 20:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor. Will resubmit when move warring becomes more apparent. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA - Nsmutte. Home Lander (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sro23 (talk) 03:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of speculation about signings (WP:CRYSTAL). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used in fully-protected Module:Toolbar (this is currently cascade-protected via the main page, but that will lapse soon as it is due a template in one specific on this day entry). {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined already TE-protected which should be sufficient. There are only few more TEs than admins after all and all of them should be trusted enough. SoWhy 21:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Used in MediaWiki:Category header. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined see above. I see no reason to bar template editors from editing these pages. That's why we have that usergroup. SoWhy 21:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs still making the unsourced claim that he changed his name to Macaulay Macaulay Culkin Culkin based on some PR stunt. Yes, he said that he would change his name to whatever the fans decided, but no-one has ever produced a source to show that he actually did so. Meters (talk) 19:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:00, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Warring anon adding unreliable info. uKER (talk) 21:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. They did provide a source in the edit summary. And there is no requirement that something was "officially announced" to include it. SoWhy 21:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced dates by IP hopper. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor 17:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please lock against this persistent IP vandalism. Cheers. Mramoeba (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 19:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism due to being in the news. JMHamo (talk) 19:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A fan of alt-med treatment is deleting criticism of the treatment from the article causing an edit war. RobP (talk) 20:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The majority of IP edits to this article have not been constructive and disruptive/vandal IP edits have occurred on a regular basis over the last few years.

The benefit of indefinite semi-protection outweighs the cost for this article IMO. Seppi333 (Insert ) 21:39, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP has gone stale. Samsara 22:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trump mispronounced his name and now people are vandalizing his page. Page was protected earlier for the same reason but it has worn off. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:43, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Protect this article for 2 weeks. Macropedia (talk) 09:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral comment Over a barely-noticed logo update which outside of kerning changes, is completely undesirable from the current one? There hasn't been any vandalism at all; two bad edits in fifteen since the new year (and those two were very minor) is certainly not worthy of protection, and in fact I'm reverting your edit, because the 'logo change' was barely noticeable. Consider this a warning; RFP is for cases of continuous and tenuous vandalism that reversion/warning isn't enough for. Not to protect your edits from reversion. Nate (chatter) 09:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – User keeps adding unsourced cast member. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:27, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 20:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Long-term edit warring going on between two editors over a "Controversy" section which involves BLP and COI matters. One editor, who the content is about, keeps removing the section and claiming that it's defamatory. The other editor keeps re-adding it and has left edit summaries like "LOL" in response. This has gone way beyond 3RR and it's surprising that nobody has been blocked yet. IPs are also removing the content (but these are probably same as the editor with BLP concerns). It might be a good idea to WP:FULL protect this until whatever COI issues and BLP issues there are can be sorted at WP:BLPN#Sword and Scale and WP:COIN#Sword and Scale. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Should have asked last September. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated editing by IPs with a likely COI; the MfD was closed almost a decade ago, so there is no reason for IPs to be editing the page. DannyS712 (talk) 17:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of forever, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 18:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Excessive edit warring resulting in the removal of content between a recently created SPA and others against talk page consensus. AnupamTalk 18:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected DlohCierekim 19:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Redundant: User JSON pages are protected by default, and the double protection is confusing the interface in a way that I had to work around. See MediaWiki talk:Protectedpagetext#Protected edit request on 10 March 2019. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MusikAnimal: {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux: {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done @Pppery: the "interface" isn't confusing - this page is only ever to be edited by admins, even if we were to allow others to edit json in the future. — xaosflux Talk 15:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done (for bot) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs/anon accounts keep adding a date of death for this BLP. I've looked, but can only find a blog that links back to a Facebook page, claiming a suicide. Seeing as she is an American who won a silver medal at the last Summer Olympics, I find it odd that nothing else shows up (for now). Maybe semi for a few days? Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:20, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of uncited article. Onel5969 TT me 17:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 17:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism target. StaticVapor message me! 17:20, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated, long-term Disruptive editing from IP-hopping editor, ignoring previous consensus on an issue. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Current event, large traffic volume at article including disruptive edits. 60.108.68.243 (talk) 17:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MilborneOne. (1 week) Airplaneman 17:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 18:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor is continuously trying to swap this article with various other transliterations of the subject's name. signed, Rosguill talk 07:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. but Move protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP editor disfigures this page in a prankish way, implying that men have labia (a female sex organ)! You can decide whether it is vandalism or no for yourself.

The IP editor in question has a history of obvious vandalism in the Dabney L. Friedrich article. Extremecia (talk) 08:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: As a disambiguation page, it seldom calls for any productive maintenance or editing. Many of the edits on this page are vandalism or other “silly” and unproductive edits, I suppose due to the polarizing and famous nature of the music artist Drake. Pending changes protection seems appropriate for this page. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 11:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP trolls are back at it again - please protect the article for a duration of at least 3 months, since the article has been protected before. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:24, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Article being listing of films of 2019 giving stats, there is persistent vandalism. . Rickyurs (talk) 05:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Is that a joke. You want to go from never being protected to indefinite full? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; target for test edits with nonsense edit summaries by multiple accounts. 2601:188:180:1481:6C38:7734:5599:B3E5 (talk) 05:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:49, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - end date is continually changed. Pokerplayer513 (talk) 06:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection just ended, vandalism returned. StaticVapor message me! 08:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:38, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Also sockpuppetry. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by multiple IPs (the general India-Pakistan fracass here has spilled over to this article because of the recent Kashmir-incident, where an Indian MiG-21 shot down a Pakistani F-16, only to be shot down by some other Pakistani plane). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 13:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous edit warring. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 13:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:39, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editors routinely incorrectly change his nationality to "Nigerian". WikiPedant (talk) 06:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 13:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kosack (talk) 14:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfA watchlist stuff

Full protection Used in Template:RfA watchlist notice, which is used in MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (Pinging relevant admins: Xaosflux, MSGJ) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added Full-protection for Template:RfA watchlist notice/textxaosflux Talk 02:35, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is directly related to the WL notice, so admin-only is reasonable. — xaosflux Talk 02:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Added template-protection for Module:ConvertNumeric. — xaosflux Talk 02:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect this can have other uses, and though it could break WL, it's not that bad, so am OK leaving it at TEP. — xaosflux Talk 02:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Someone want to figure out what is going on with the 'to word' templates and their relation to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_13#Template:Cardinal_to_word? — xaosflux Talk 02:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Same note as with ConvertNumeric though, TEP protection should be enough if needed. — xaosflux Talk 02:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux: What it looks like to me is that no one bothered to clean up the orphaned subpages after implementing the merge and luafication, but otherwise the TfD is done. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I added template protection for the remaining template and the redirect. If discussion of a full protection is neede, probably it should be individual and with specific arguments.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 1292simon and a few of his mates have constantly replacing the infobox image with Simons despite consensus on the talkpage for the red (current) one, Thanks, . –Davey2010Talk 11:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. SoWhy 17:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 01:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A blocked sock is using different Ips for edit Waring. Kishfan (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not enough transclusions to merit protection (@JJMC89:). {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It is used by {{Infobox book}}, which is widely translcuded. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I did block the most recent vandal. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I suggest we prevent IPs from posting on the talkpage or editing the essay, indefinitely. If someone wants to discuss this essay they can use their account not sock with an IP . Legacypac (talk) 21:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I am not seeing enough recent disruptive editing to justify protection. There are a handful of areas where the community has preemptively excluded IPs. But those are exceptions adopted on a case by case basis following community discussion. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent adds of unsourced content that then are reverted by diligent pagewatchers. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Much of this dispute is with one autoconfirmed editor, with whom you should discuss this, and whom you should report to AIV if they continue to add unsourced material. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring from 90.43.10.244. This is getting out of control and turn into a full blown edit war with this IP editor, they already been warned for their behaviour. There motive as they stated: "As anonymous wiki user,i won't let this unacceptable image represent the BMW E36". Vauxford (talk) 23:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a conflict with a single IP address, as the OP acknowledges. Protection is inappropriate; they've already been reported to ANEW; nothing further to do here unless there's evidence of disruption from multiple IPs Vanamonde (Talk) 23:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Saqib (talk) 12:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC) I added content with sources. It’s not vandalism. Stop edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.97.241 (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:07, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy (talk) 14:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The IP did not edit after warning, and edits are not vandalism, they are apparently a good-faith attempt to introduce content which is however not base on reliable sources. We need to wait and see whether edit-warring resumes.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:07, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and unsourced changes to a BLP. Page has been protected in the past. StaticVapor message me! 22:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruptive editing by various IPs. . Zefr (talk) 23:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry – Persistent WP:DE by IPs that are likely the same person. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Months of IP vandalism. (Hohum @) 20:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: there is an big increase of IP vandalism lately. A temporary semi-protection would be ideal. - SilentResident (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 20:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism after winning Melodifestivalen 2019.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Templates used in system messages

Full protection Used in system messages. (Pinging the admins who added each template to the system messages it is used on: @TheDJ, Ruslik0, and MSGJ:) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Vanamonde (Talk) 23:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... My formatting has confused the bot. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – lame edit war on "Spanish club Barcelona" or just "Barcelona". And being discussed in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Marc-André ter Stegen already. Matthew hk (talk) 10:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I for now blocked the IP for 3RR, and there was no warring for 12h, so that I suggest to wait a bit longer and then decline.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. SoWhy 17:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter if you blocked an edit, because the attacker is cycling IPs, request protection on the article. Govvy (talk) 18:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi the article. The sockpuppeteer will just change IPs. --Kingerikthesecond (talk) 18:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 20:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Troll target. Crboyer (talk) 17:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11 March 2019

Full or template protection Used in MediaWiki:Securepoll-voter-name-local (10 years of unprotected template use in system messages ...) . {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  AxG /   21:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. funplussmart (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous IPs keep removing "second highest" grossing R-rated film, which is not supported by sources as Wolf Warrior 2 grossed more money. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 22:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This Korean entertainer was booked for prostitution and announced his retirement from the industry; his page is attracting blp violations and other disruption. gnu57 19:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. (lol) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long history of protections, consistent stream of unconstructive edits due to being major us city known worldwide. Will120 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and unsourced changes to a BLP. Page has been protected in the past. StaticVapor message me! 20:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Mmoates has a history of sockpuppetry targeting Kelli Ward. See SPI case.

Several IPs have repeatedly removed sourced content from this page. The IP 107.208.101.169 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is also associated with articles edited by User:Mmoates. A previous request was declined by Oshwah (talk · contribs), but I am reopening since there has been further vandalism by IPs. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 21:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RuPaul's Drag Race season articles

Temporary semi-protection: Constant disruptive editing from dynamic IP address and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Nihlus 14:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Mmoates has a history of sockpuppetry targeting Kelli Ward. See SPI case.

Several IPs have repeatedly removed sourced content from this page. The IP 107.208.101.169 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is also associated with articles edited by User:Mmoates. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 15:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced and false content by IP. Ajf773 (talk) 19:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. Enigmamsg 20:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: No reason to have this editable by anyone. funplussmart (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Actually, I take that back. This is a situation where IAR / protecting outside the norms is acceptable to me given the status and importance of the account. Going to go ahead and do so. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of article about non-notable person. Onel5969 TT me 18:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article received heavy vandalism from the fans of a television show that the subject appeared on. During said TV appearance, the host gave the subject a pencil and called it the "Pencil Award" as a gag. Ever since, fans of the show have been adding "Pencil Award" to the subject's list of awards and accomplishments. The article received a 3-month protection as a result, which ended on March 9. Today, the disruptive additions of "Pencil Award" have resumed. NJZombie (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nihlus 18:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 19:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced additions and unexplained removals by IP editors and a new user. Possible COI. StaticVapor message me! 19:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Increase protection level to temporary extended confirmed protection: As another user, I’ve seen that much of the vandalism is not only from IP addresses, but also from new users with few edits. Extended confirmed protection would properly safeguard against all of that. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 18:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is overkill. I see constructive contributions from non-extended-confirmed users. I think the semi-protection is enough to filter out most of the disruption. We can always revisit this if there's evidence of autoconfirmed disruption going forward (of which there is not, currently). Airplaneman 18:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 18:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Warned one autoconfirmed. Will watch. They really came outa the woodwork. DlohCierekim 18:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. funplussmart (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The page was protected as IPs were adding news about her death. It is now confirmed by several RS's that she has died. There was no other vandalism. So we should allow the IP editors to improve the page. . DBigXray 09:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pinging the protecting admin, @CambridgeBayWeather:. Fish+Karate 10:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is still edit warring on this article. Natureium (talk) 17:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons adding rumored data about unannounced products. uKER (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The last disruptive edits where by just one IP. Lectonar (talk) 13:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/David_Beals. A Dolphin (squeek?) 15:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 16:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, edit warring, and IP-hopping. User:Ted hamiltun is blocked for 48H but used IP-hopping to continue edit warring.[13]. Wario-Man (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 16:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking at the protection log and the persistent disruption, this warrants longer semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated re-adding that the Super Bowl is between the NFC and the Patriots. Not funny anymore, at least not to me. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not big enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs over neo-nazi label. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - There's no need to apply protection due to a few edits being made by one IP user and who stopped editing the article after being warned for edit warring. If disruption picks up and at a rate that is very high and by multiple users, protection can be considered. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user keeps adding "of Lithuanian descent" without sources to back it up. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 06:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 206.45.24.97 (talk · contribs) blocked by NinjaRobotPirate. I think I'd want that to be requested by @EvergreenFir:, particularly as the request is for indefinite semi-protection. As it is, the IP has been blocked so the disruption seems to have ended. Fish+Karate 10:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content removal. --Let There Be Sunshine 10:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in last 24 hours. Fish+Karate 10:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been a consistent and protracted campaign to place silly and light-hearted compliments about the subject (such as "best boy") in the article. . –MJLTalk 06:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. (lol) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A blocked sock has been using multiple IPs for edit warring. Linked03 (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism to a BLP. bonadea contributions talk 08:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 23:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've applied a 72 hour block against the IP range making unreferenced changes to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure exactly what is appropriate-- Persistent unreferenced changes. Check the recent history. Adoring nanny (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 01:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Reason is because the page Dooney Boys was salted, and this was just recreated. Which is why I'm asking this to be salted also. Wgolf (talk) 02:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors have been adding BLP-violating vandalism. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Martin.j.fox (talk) 03:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:35, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Frenchie vandal. Binksternet (talk) 00:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: repeated IP vandalism in reaction to news story. valereee (talk) 19:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple ips vandalizing and antagonizing the editors reverting these vandals. . Zinnober9 (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ronhjones. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: As with Felicity Huffman, high level of IP vandalism in reaction to recent news. 93 (talk) 21:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was declined above. I'll explain myself more clearly. Note that User:OliverC200 is a Brian Frosh WP:SPA that was unblocked[14] with a request that they follow WP:COI. Can I prove that this is the same person as the IP editors? No, but based on the timing and the continuity of the conversation, it sure looks like it. If one wants to go back to October, User:BBcomm is another WP:SPA whose two contributions both consisted of removing sourced info with an edit summary saying that the info was unsourced.[15][16]Adoring nanny (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I was the user who declined this user's previous request made earlier. I'm going to leave it for another admin to review and decide. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Opabinia regalis:...would you be so kind and have a look at it? Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I think the issue here is COI editing and promotional tone, and this might be better being raised at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest noticeboard. Fish+Karate 09:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fish and karate - I agree. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: or Pending changes: part of electrical crisis in Venezuela, with ongoing BLP issues.

History: Betancourt López is one of the founders of Derwick Associates; both are names that come up in multiple sources with respect to the blackout in Venezuela. There is a history of paid editing, where the articles were being whitewashed. Considering recent developments, I checked on the articles this week and updated dead links. I am not able to convince myself that paid editing has not continued. Further, because of the blackout, the BLP is being hit constantly by IPs with BLP violations. I don't think semi-protection is enough for these articles, considering the history of paid editing. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia - Sure, no problem at all. Lets both keep one eye on the article. If you see that disruption is starting to pick up and at a high rate, leave a message on my user talk page and let me know and I'll be happy to take a look. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There's a request on the page's talk page to mark its protected status. If the page is to serve as a project's To Do list it needs to be accessible to all members of the project or else the page is pointless. Edit protection needs to be removed. KrakatoaKatie, the protecting admin, is off-wiki for a while. Cabayi (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Katie just edited yesterday... Enigmamsg 16:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined 92,000+ transclusions. Unprotection is not an option, in my opinion. Same as #Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Open tasks/tasks: You could consider linking to the to-do page rather than transcluding it in the WikiProject banner. MusikAnimal talk 16:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I've tagged it with the pp-template as originally requested. Cabayi (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP editing to change nationality in lede to Welsh, or include the term "international footballer" due to the English born player being recently called up by the Welsh national team. Please protect at a version without the word Welsh in the lede, such as [17]. Duration should be until the current pair of international fixtures is complete (24 March 2019). Gricehead (talk) 14:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced viewership numbers, despite reverts and warnings. livelikemusic talk! 15:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would like to change the protection to Autocomfirmed, cause of a recent dispute of if the page should not be protected to pending changes. I would like to say, that i would say to change the protection to Semi protection. Thank you. TheWinRatHere! 16:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please see my talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: In the last few days, addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content and also some disruptive editing. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Youtube Personality - persistent addition of unsourced claims by IP editors. Insufficient article watchers to keep up. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:26, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consider semi-protect my talk page due to ongoing vandalism. -- Tegel (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP continually disrupting page. Jeb3Talk at me here 18:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently something happened on the instagram. GMGtalk 18:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There's a request on the page's talk page to mark its protected status. If the page is to serve as a project's To Do list it needs to be accessible to all members of the project or else the page is pointless. Edit protection needs to be removed. KrakatoaKatie, the protecting admin, is off-wiki for a while. Cabayi (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined 40,000+ transclusions. The attack vector is too great. @Cabayi: One thing you could do is change your WikiProject banner template to simply link to the to-do page, rather than transclude it. That will reduce the transclusion count dramatically. I could also be convinced to lower it to extended-confirmed protection, but semi or unprotection is much too lax as it stands now. MusikAnimal talk 16:26, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
MusikAnimal, not my template, I'm just responding to the TPER on its talk page. I'll mark it as requested. Cabayi (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent changes to Mayor List to include incorrect information. Adam Goldstein is added as mayor by Tedickey and he never had been mayor. (talk) 10:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. (lol) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Galobtter. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced additions have resumed after previous protection expired. William Avery (talk) 14:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Enigmamsg 16:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resuming right after expiry of previous protection. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:27, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also Kisure Sports in mainspace. User keeps trying to spam this in. Non-notable website launched in 2018 . Legacypac (talk) 16:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Both. Lectonar (talk) 16:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There's a request on the page's talk page to mark its protected status. If the page is to serve as a project's To Do list it needs to be accessible to all members of the project or else the page is pointless. The protection seems to be a hangover from when it was a template. Edit protection needs to be removed. Cabayi (talk) 11:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Only 1 transclusion. MusikAnimal talk 16:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP trolls and new users are still trying to "correct" details about Lily (a transgender character) even after the dispute has been resolved within the talk page . Sk8erPrince (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you look in the article's history, the page has been protected multiple times, and had also been protected with pending changes for 3 months. There is also a new user that deliberately goes against consensus established within the talk page and will not stop removing sources. I've backed out to avoid 3RR, but I believe this issue needs to be addressed. Sk8erPrince (talk) 04:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave this request for another admin to review and weigh in. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:10, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just the normal proceedings....report, and if there is continuing disruption, a block ensues. Lectonar (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the decision to decline the request. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I gave Minnuss a warning that is clear and to the point. If they persist, edit warring notice board is the place to go. However, this is a prennial problem, so I PC'd to slow it down while allowing good edits. DlohCierekim 13:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 13:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring and some vandalism, specifically from IP 124.171.75.196 since January 2019. Pokerplayer513 (talk) 07:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You can report the IP to AIV too. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Maybe not full. But this needs to be locked down I think for a while... Crazynas t 09:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe just need to block the IP. Crazynas t 09:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. @Crazynas: I've blocked the IP address responsible, which should sort it. If it resumes, please come back here. Fish+Karate 09:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Fish and karate: thanks, I actually found out about it because of some stuff that happened on Wikipedia talk:Administrators is this the sort of thing we want to RevDel or OS? Crazynas t 09:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Crazynas: That appears to have been done. Fish+Karate 10:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tedickey (talk) reverts changes made to the Mayor list. Mayor list removed Adam Goldstein, who has never been mayor. The incorrect information was removed four times and readded by Tedickey (talk). Comments about the incorrect information was added to the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walke328 (talkcontribs) 12:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Endless attempts by IPs and throw-away user accounts to use Wikipedia for promoting non-notable pageants, particularly Miss Grand International, Miss Supranational and Miss Intercontinental, pageants that have all been found non-notable at AfD, and then recreated so many times that he titles have been SALTed. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 07:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It has repeatedly been explained, to what is either one user who uses various IP addresses or multiple now, not to insert charts that violate WP:SINGLEVENDOR or are component charts per the explanation at WP:USCHARTS. However, they refuse to listen, and keep inserting them every so often. It's basically a slow-motion edit war and as they IP hop, blocking one or leaving a message for them on one will be inffectual and not seen. Ss112 10:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – has been subject to multiple attacks today. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. (lol) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection Persistent contributions which appear to be in contradiction with WP:COI. Adoring nanny (talk) 01:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. How do you know for sure that the edits are in violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines? I see no evidence presented other than reverts and accusations in the edit summary... I need to see more than just, "they're making COI edits" before I consider any kind of action here... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 02:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued disruption from IPs and sock accounts, described at the ANI case Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Linkspam_citing_Eoghan_Lyng..._Filter?. Also needing the same protection is Big Train, The Fireman (band), and Paul McCartney's Liverpool Oratorio. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Persistent IP vandalism. This page was protected by User:Callanecc for 3 months in October 2018 here: [18]. As soon as the protection expired the IP vandal(s) returned. Mztourist (talk) 05:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Article relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict which was created by a sockpuppet. signed, Rosguill talk 21:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - I don't believe that this article directly relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I am open to input and rebuttal from other patrolling admins, though. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as page protection ended, IP address vandalism restarted. – The Grid (talk) 22:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the IP range involved (71.215.0.0/16). ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: I am actually forwarding a request made on my user's talk page by @Sabrala – diff [19]. Please handle it appropriately. . Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 22:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP sock repeatedly adding "fact" and other unwarranted tags to well sourced content. The owner of the IP (User:白骨青灰) has been blocked on zh-wiki for vandalizing the same article. Zanhe (talk) 23:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hrodvarsson (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., and:
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP address keep doing disruptive edits. Coderzombie (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every few months, this article gets strings of new accounts that edit only this article and introduce factual errors. I don't know if this is a class that's using it as some kind of example on how to vandalize people, or if it's the world's most boring sockpuppet, but it's been happening for over a year. Natureium (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also blocked each account involved. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive, persistent addition of a completely non-notable award. Historically, when editors make unconstructive edits involving Barstool Sports, they don't stop unless we make them stop. Larry Hockett (Talk) 00:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of hoax to article ("Atharva Mittal" hoax). Ravensfire (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. the first, and Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. the second. Lectonar (talk) 14:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Enigmamsg 23:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Enigmamsg 23:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-traffic page of a high-profile US congressmember. Tsumikiria 🌹🌉 23:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article subject is in the news regarding a contract with the Kansas City Chiefs, however, he cannot sign the contract until the 13th. IPs are changing the infobox already before it should be changed. Rockchalk717 00:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13 March 2019

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Mentioned on XKCD today. Only one vandalism edit so far. 72 hours of PC protection should be sufficient to prevent disruption. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Fish+Karate 16:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Fish and karate: vandalism seems to have picked up by multiple IP addresses. Breawycker (talk to me!) 18:37, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There is an IP hopper using proxy servers who is harassing talkpage commentators. I think I know which geocentrist this is, but as they are IP-hopping, it's not worth pursuing an WP:SPI. Temporary protection of the talkpage might put an end to their game-playing. jps (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been subject to repeated but very slow motion vandalism over many months from probably a single editor using at least two IP addresses and two, or possibly more, sock user names, all to change the climate data to suggest that the town has a somewhat more benign climate than it does. Reports to AIV have been dismissed as too stale etc.  Velella  Velella Talk   17:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 18:11, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 18:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – A BLP that is a subject of antisemitic editing, such as [20] from an IP or incoherent, also vaguely antisemitic confirmed accounts such as [21]. Falls under the WP:ARBEE topic area. Recommend indefinite protection, ECP would be ideal. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't believe that the article subject can be interpreted as being part of the topic of Eastern Europe or the Balkans. I'm going to leave this request open for other administrators to take a look and provide their input. If anyone disagrees, please let me know so that I can take a look and understand. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There have been big problems for some time in Poland, having do to with the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance (especially the 2018 amendment) and the perceived role of Poles in the Holocaust, so I am somewhat inclined to grant the protection request. Will leave this open for some hours, and, if no one objects, protect. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Perfectly fine by me. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism returned exactly one hour and two minutes after the protection template was removed, most likely by the same user with a different IP (not enough evidence for a sock report though). CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 16:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Brianmagallano IP sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  16:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:39, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Semi for as long as you can stomach. Last protection expired 04 March and we went right back to the sock puppetry. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phnom Penh Skyline. GMGtalk 19:20, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 19:28, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some users are found adding unsourced content to the article. AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 14:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 16:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: as IPs are trolling it in a vile manner. MarnetteD|Talk 17:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DeltaQuad. DlohCierekim 17:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing; IP is arranging credits in a manner contrary to the TV MOS, and has been reverted by various editors. — TAnthonyTalk 17:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Specifcally 1 IP, who has a permanent block on his account for vandalism and is using a proxy to have different IPs to get around his block.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The length of the protection log is remarkable for an article on a film released just three years ago. Giving all involved a rest. Fish+Karate 16:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It was recently semi-protected but the vandalism has not let up since the protection was lifted. Three counts of vandalism by three different IPs in the last 24 hours. Popcornduff (talk) 14:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - slow edit war between a group of IPs added unsourced indiscriminate pieces of information and being reverted by multiple editors who have gained talk page consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Bold page move contested, repeatedly made. ——SerialNumber54129 13:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Please ping me if the move-protection needs to be lifted. Lectonar (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant change of DMC 5's crack status by unregistered users. Eddmanx (talk) 13:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like Shivadee is back using an IP address this time. Unsourced change of biography d.o.b. Mramoeba (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 08:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 08:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Aréat (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi: the last good edit to this article by an autoconfirmed user was in January 2018. Recently, the article has been extensively edited by this LTA, and each edit had to be revision-deleted. This is why pending changes protection is not going to work.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor edit waring. Andrewgprout (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection; an IP seems hellbent on adding information about a lawsuit and editorialising about it at the same time. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 08:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of politically-motivated vandalism from multiple IPs. Note that this resumed immediately after previous protection (from 26 February) expired. Nick Cooper (talk) 09:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent promotional/COI edits . HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 06:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant BLP violations resume as soon as the previous protection expires. John of Reading (talk) 08:11, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Bennington

Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive edits from multiple IPs, possibly one user. Not sure if this should go here for ANI.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  01:22, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. Bowling is life (talk) 02:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. funplussmart (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - I don't believe that this article can be construed as being part of the related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, and hence applying protection here isn't necessary. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, following public split from wife. DarkGlow (talk) 22:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't think protection is the best option here. The disruption seems to be from 1 IP, so warning and then reporting them to WP:AIV for vandalism would be better here. Airplaneman 23:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Airplaneman. This is definitely not a situation where applying protection is necessary. The user causing the disruption should be warned and then reported to AIV if they continue to behave disruptively. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Plus non-auto-confirmed vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject has reportedly been agreed to be traded to the 49ers, but the trade cannot be completed until 4 pm eastern time tomorrow. IP addresses are prematurely changing the infobox. Rockchalk717 01:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Rob3512 chat? what I did 03:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Spencer. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:11, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 00:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous unregistered and new users have been vandalizing this page, with at least 10 reverts in the past hour alone. ComplexRational (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Troll target. People adding fake members. Crboyer (talk) 02:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 03:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs immediate reprotection. Before MusikBot even removed the lock template, they're at it again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 03:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and unsourced changes to a BLP. StaticVapor message me! 03:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 03:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A disgruntled fan is posting unsourced and poorly written content. How long was protection last time?. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection was for 3 weeks. Airplaneman 03:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes resumed just after the previous protection expired. Jetstreamer Talk 22:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. Temporary semi-protection was previously given on 1 September 2018. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Robby.is.on (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Well for one it strikes me as odd that a redirect has indefinite full protection. So when I went back and looked, the subject’s page had been deleted and that had been the request of an editor. Well, that was 6 years ago and times change (at that time it was assumed he would follow in his father’s football footsteps so it was deleted under NFOOTY). By now, 6 years later, the subject has more than enough independent coverage of his own in the most reliable sources such as The Independent, GQ, BBC, etc.; it is no longer inherited notability. Therefore I just want to get the page done with. The page itself is protected as David Beckham#Personal_life so I’m not sure how to link it properly. Trillfendi (talk) 21:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected It was protected because it was redirected twice as the result of AfDs and someone did it a third time. Protecting admin left Wikipedia but still has tools. Enigmamsg 00:28, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Insertion of poorly sourced/unsourced material by IP. The subject is related to WP:BLP and to ungoing presidential elections at Ukraine. My very best wishes (talk) 18:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - This is a content dispute. If edit warring is occurring, report the user at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Roaming IP appears to continually add himself to the page when there are no sources to remotely suggest the person to be connected to the team. Yosemiter (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. (2 days) Airplaneman 23:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 22:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent attempts by unregistered users to add unverified rumors to the article over the past 2 weeks. Cautilus (talk) 03:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Miniapolis 21:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It has started again unfortunately. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 18:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 18:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent changes to current team (and recently plain vandalism: [22]) brought on by rumors about where he will sign in free agency. SWL36 (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 20:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. VQuakr (talk) 16:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The disruptive IP has been blocked by Ponyo. The current PC protection seems to be working reasonably given that the sporadic IP vandalism is accompanied by at least one improvement by an IP. Abecedare (talk) 17:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Abecedare (talk) 17:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is consensus for the disputed content see [[talk: Tucker Carlson#Section heading reading "Misogynist remarks"]]. Also, the lengthy protection term is preventing routine improvements and corrections to the article. - MrX 🖋 17:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GB fan: Airplaneman 18:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done ~ GB fan 19:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP editor came back with another IP, adding unsourced claim that she's from Lithuanian descent. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 18:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 18:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – unsourced additions. Dolfinz1972 (talk) 04:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks to be a case of edit warring than vandalism; and in any case has stopped. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Emnetinlurve. Binksternet (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 13:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently vandalised recently, and shared quite a bit on Twitter. Seems likely to be the target of further vandalism due to the ongoing Brexit process in the UK. ThatJosh (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps removing the reliable source I've cited despite being warned not to. I'm backing off of this article for a while to avoid 3RR. . Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have died down; also see above. Lectonar (talk) 13:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending-changes: This page usually receives some protection around the actual date of the day (January 26) but it still also receives endemic vandalism at random times throughout the rest of the year. If you scroll through the last year of edits you will see a high percentage of edits which are vandalism. See also the discussion on proposing this request on the talk page. Thank you for your consideration. Oska (talk) 04:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Protect for 15 days. IP address keep adding speculative information/unreliable sources, not confirmed by officials. Coderzombie (talk) 14:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of the page for political reasons. -ThatJosh (talk) 16:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs are repeatedly adding in unsourced info despite being warned not to. I'm backing off of this and letting an admin handle it. . Sk8erPrince (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Fish+Karate 11:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP edit warring, obvious sock puppetry, possible off-wiki coordination Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. ~ Amory (utc) 15:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 15:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 15:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The eel hater is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Better to block the socks than protect the article.Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The eel hater again. Nothing Splash and Bubbles related is safe as long as this person is still around. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Better to block the socks than protect the article.Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users persistently blanking content for patently frivolous reasons (e.g. "too many Kowloon estates"). Citobun (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been trolled by IPs. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 08:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1990'sguy (talk) 12:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Protect Jesus article until Easter Sunday. Macropedia (talk) 03:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Macropedia (talk) 03:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No real disruption at the moment. Lectonar (talk) 09:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protect temp - this page was protected for a week. The protection just expired today and immediately the same person made another flurry of disruptive edits, using a sock account. Longer period is needed. (and the sock will be reported) - wolf 03:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Enough is enough. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection; new and unregistered users are attempting to readd promotional content that we've been constantly removing. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 06:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Change to extended confirmed protection. Macropedia (talk) 04:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's already fully protected; why reduce the protection level? Lectonar (talk) 10:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce level of protection from extended protection to Semi-protection: Legible users with less number of edits unable to newly upgrade information in the Vijay(actor) article page. Fgassh (talk) 10:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Exactly. Too much disruption; you can make an edit request on the article's talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Same IP as with the List of president of TogoAréat (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I warned the vandal. DlohCierekim 13:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The same pattern of editing as at List of Presidents of Togo and List of Presidents of Rwanda. --Sundostund (talk) 13:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 13:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I warned the vandal DlohCierekim 13:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users keep adding in unsourced information regarding the spelling of a character. Please protect the article temporarily. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: warned 'em for edit warring DlohCierekim 17:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Several users have been repeatedly moving the page to its Official name in violation of WP:COMMONNAME. The page should not be moved without a consensus via a move discussion. DBigXray 10:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jpcomic (talk) 08:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GABgab 09:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term spike in vandalism: suggest 2-3 day cooling off with semi-protection. —hike395 (talk) 10:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Radiphus (talk) 11:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It's today, hooray, which is resulting in a lot of vandalism. 24 hours should be plenty. As a contributor to the article I can't protect it myself. Cheers. Fish+Karate 11:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuing disruptive IP activity with no indication of willingness to engage in discussion. . Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-stop IP vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 20:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Non-stop? This is about one disruptive edit per day, if at all. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent disruption by IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts. There hasn't been a productive edit in months, aside from reverting disruption. R2 (bleep) 23:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Short-term semiprotection: XKCD-related vandalism.[23]. Guy Macon (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. Lectonar (talk) 10:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent burst of disruptive addition of unencyclopedic material to the article. Wham2001 (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring between IPs. Hhkohh (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Featured in xkcd [24], which has resulted in a ton of new users trying to add 'yachts' to the list (see the tooltip). – Teratix 23:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple IPs to make a POINT. BilCat (talk) 03:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 09:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent high level of news visibility on this and vandalism. ContentEditman (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: At this time, I'm not inclined to semiprotect the article. There's actually quite a bit of constructive (or at least not destructive) anonymous editing. Let's not stifle that unless there's a real need. I'll leave this request open in case things blow up in the edit history. Airplaneman 17:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tagging for the bot. I concur with the above. I'll keep an eye on it, but so far the anons are being productive. -- MelanieN (talk) 02:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations generic – Protected a number of times in the past. This page is still prone to frequent BLP violations, partly because of being a well known figure almost all over India. Recommend an indefinite protection. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 21:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies... it isn't a BLP, therefore I change to generic. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 21:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last real non-good faith edit was weeks ago. Lectonar (talk)

Semi-protection: Heavy BLP vandalism returns immediatly following end of last protection period. StaticVapor message me! 21:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. The vandalism is ongoing, unfortunately. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalization. Jeb3Talk at me here 17:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. VietPride10 (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15 March 2019

Semi-protection: To prevent much changing or vandalism. The page has a lot of templates in it and there is a big possibility of somebody changing it. Catinthedogs (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User pages may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists; I do not see the need, and many templates are already protected by themselves. Lectonar (talk) 10:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs keep replacing this redirect with an awfully sourced stub bio. –MJLTalk 19:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request comes off the heels of the subject's alleged participation of 2019 college admissions bribery scandal. –MJLTalk 19:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Enigmamsg 21:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Constant addition of cuss words. RRD (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 21:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 21:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone is deleting specific content (negative criticism about the article topic) at these targeted articles from different IP addresses for months. Longer protection please! Previous one lasted only a few days. Dan56 (talk) 02:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I do not see a need for any protection here. Waiting for a second opinion.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Enigmamsg 17:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone is deleting specific content (negative criticism about the article topic) at these targeted articles from different IP addresses for months. Dan56 (talk) 02:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigmamsg 17:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone is deleting specific content (negative criticism about the article topic) at these targeted articles from different IP addresses for months. Longer protection please! Previous one lasted only a few days. Dan56 (talk) 02:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Enigmamsg 17:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone is deleting specific content (negative criticism about the article topic) at these targeted articles from different IP addresses for months. Dan56 (talk) 02:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – First IP blocked for 10 reverts. Switched to a new IP. Rinse. Repeat. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 19:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit warring by ip hopper. Valenciano (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: In the past three days there have been 11 different acts of vandalism to this page, so it could probably use a period of semi-protection until this sort of negative activity dies down (inspired by what I do not know, although she is a high profile figure in history). Pericles of AthensTalk 16:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 17:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 17:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked for fiddling with talkpage/hoaxing. Deleted block notice and carried on with same U5 activity. Legacypac (talk) 03:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Indefinitely blocked user's ability to edit own talk page already removed. Fish+Karate 10:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Plenty of IP editors (2a04:4540:903:5b00:c5e6:5592:7a25:c1c4; 2a04:4540:904:f700:98bf:d6b3:b0bd:a8d6; 2a04:4540:904:100:11a9:8514:5183:e6da; 2a04:4540:903:e200:4cf7:8ddd:b2c2:c916; 2a04:4540:900:5100:f5d8:e5a9:a998:8eac; 2a04:4540:905:7f00:830:8291:6204:333; a04:4540:904:4500:4563:845c:a628:31ba;2a04:4540:900:cd00:357e:cfe:f32f:6666; 2a04:4540:904:ea00:a45c:d5b2:824a:8328; 2a04:4540:904:5600:9187:bcbc:d976:a51a; 2a04:4540:902:5700:8db4:d94a:5709:6d53) have kept emerging and disrupting the article, Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 03:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Most of the IP editors appear to be making good faith edits, as I'm sure you are too, but none of it is vandalism. Fish+Karate 10:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and newly-created accounts vandalism; disregarding sources/trolling. Possibly block until week of release, a la Avengers: Endgame. TropicAces (talk) 14:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one instance of IP-disruption in the last days. Lectonar (talk) 10:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Was about to reject for same reason. Endorse. Fish+Karate 10:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring by Indian IP addresses trying to change a Chinese holiday to an Indian one. Embuuzy (talk) 07:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. One user some days ago (which hasn't even been warned about his disruptive edits), before that days of no edits at all. Lectonar (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: For a few hours. Misinformation. Pushing matter to lead. Only admins to edit for a few hours. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 08:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now this is well under control; as can be expected, there is plenty of editing activity, but no disruption that would justify semi-protection, let alone full protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP spambots. LuckyLouie (talk) 12:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone is deleting specific content (negative criticism about the article topic) at these targeted articles from different IP addresses for months. Dan56 (talk) 02:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protect: IPs connected to longterm vandal User:Joshua Saldaña keeps on adding hoax information on this article. The first IP got blocked but the editor resurfaced using a different IP address, insisting on his edits. WayKurat (talk) 06:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 11:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Meloras (talk) 11:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I have been reverting repeated disruptive edit by apparently the same person but with different IPs can someone please protect this page? Thanks. SharabSalam (talk) 11:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vistadan 21:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 10:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent pov disruptive editing . Onel5969 TT me 23:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 10:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. funplussmart (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 10:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack by various Anon IPs. KNHaw (talk) 01:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 10:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 04:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 11:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 05:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 11:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 05:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 11:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very important battle that gets thousands of pageviews every day. The page history is so flooded with vandalism, it is sometimes difficult to find a good version. L293D ( • ) 19:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., stepping up from previous protection periods. Fish+Karate 10:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption. Far right activist, see protection log this has been happening for a while. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article ought to still be semi-protected, but it was briefly full-protected last month which caused the semi-protection to lapse. Fish+Karate 10:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – As well as Dharmendra Kumar. Wgolf (talk) 21:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Both. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Special:Contributions/2600:1702:1c0:5df0::/64 is edit warring, and has violated WP:3RR, in removing the well sourced section "Criticism of gender roles" which impartially records criticism of some of the book's themes which have been made. These criticisms are clearly notable, being published by the New York Times and even the book publisher itself in an afterword accompanying the book. There is extensive discussion amongst the editors who originally added this content on the talk page. The IP range is not discussing on the talk page as they were advised to do the first time they were reverted but instead continues to simply remove the section (which is being reinstated by multiple editors) with edit summaries such as "My source is this very page" and "Being able to site [sic] a source, does not make that source factual or correct". They have been warned for edit warring but as they are hopping betwwen different IPs it may be easier to protect the page (or, perhaps, rangeblock) to get them to start discussing. Dorsetonian (talk) 07:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: User is now making the same edits as Special:Contributions/108.66.252.10 so page protection definitely appears the best option. Dorsetonian (talk) 09:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I came here to make the same request. Have some diffs. [25] [26] [27] SKay (talk) 10:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Perhaps that gets them to the talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As visible in the edit history, anon users are repeatedly deleting a notable resident (that meets Wikipedia notability standards for musicians). It appears that they have set up a campaign and admit to that in their edit comments. . Itsasoa (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Enigmamsg 04:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed has returned. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Example. Enigmamsg 04:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Further vandalism and BLP violations again after the last temporary protection measure for persistent vandalism was lifted on 28 February 2019. Extensive protection history. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Enigmamsg 04:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too much disruption by IP editors for pending changes. Long protection history. StaticVapor message me! 22:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Example. Enigmamsg 00:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection Repeated vandalism by IP-hopping user. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent disruptive editing because of a member departing and a new album. Bowling is life (talk) 21:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Opencooper (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:25, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Persistent vandalism to template. BilCat (talk) 14:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Amorymeltzer. Albeit only at level semi. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Trying to get around full protection at Colors (TV channel). . A Dolphin (squeek?) 15:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Only created once. MelanieN (talk) 15:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and sock puppet vandalism. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 16:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article has been the target of various IP vandals over the past two weeks. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Skywatcher68 and Garnhami: I have warned 178.118.194.94 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) who has been the only one removing sourced content since March 9. If they continue or change IP, they can be blocked or the page protected (feel free to approach me on my talkpage). Abecedare (talk) 05:33, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Skywatcher68 and Abecedare: I have a suspicion that this IP adres is from someone closely related to C. de Zegher. Perhaps it is even C. de Zegher herself. The parts that are continuously removed are parts concerning a scandal surrounding C. Zegher. However, all statements are backed up with references (and I even included English ones). It seems that they want to remove all negative news regarding this person.
User(s) blocked., please let us know if disruption resumes.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sudden burst of persistent vandalism in which IP users and newly registered users are adding false names to the list of wrestlers within a well-known and popular stable. NJZombie (talk) 07:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

: Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC) My error. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA by socks of TomWatson 1970. . Sjö (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Please, protect this article for two years. Macropedia (talk) 09:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., last edit was in 2018.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:49, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of the article was recently involved in public controversy. Article is now seeing vandalism and the addition of BLP violations. Needs protecting against this, possibly full protection rather than only semi. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 10:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Abecedare. MelanieN (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It appears this page was recently featured on reddit and as a result there's been a high number of IP users posting a sexually explicit photo on the page. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 14:49, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf. MelanieN (talk) 15:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – It's the eel hater again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 2405:204:D189:E1E3:12E:AC6F:D405:4600 (talk) 08:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:. Based on previous history and ongoing vandalism a one day protection was not enough. Could my talk page get a semi-protection for at least a couple of month? Since I'm not active here and my talk page refer the user to my talk page on Meta a longer semi-protection shouldn't be a problem for the serious user. -- Tegel (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 09:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 09:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Severe BLP violations and smears inserted 6 times by IPs in the last month. – Þjarkur (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple article protection request

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by the same user using multiple ips. The GeForce 16 series was temporary semi-protected, so i am putting in a request for these two pages as well. An AVI notice was also posted to the multiple ips that is associated with this user. Thesmartbird (talk) 13:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two weeks of IP-hopping edits to remove mention of his wife. Meters (talk) 21:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. A single user 2001:1970:5C6B:5000:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) seems to have been active at that article and at Faith Hill since July 2018. Blocked for 6 months. Abecedare (talk) 04:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent IP and user vandalism. The CIA has not changed the list since at least 1991 - links - 1991 - http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/25/pg25-images.html "the 34 DCs are—Andorra[...]" - current - https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/appendix/appendix-b.html It is an educated guess that the list will not be changed for at least a few years more. There is persistent vandalism from countless IPs and users changing the list to be inaccurate. Led8000 (talk) 22:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please report the user for sockpuppetry if you suspect that is at play. Abecedare (talk) 04:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; has been targeted by sock/IPs all week. Dan56 (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User:Berean Hunter seems to have an eye on this and related pages; they have blocked the IPs and can protect if necessary. Abecedare (talk) 04:33, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism and removal of sourced content. Persistent edit warring over the past few years. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 22:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. At least for the last month, a single IP seems to be responsible for all the disruption at this and related pages. Abecedare (talk) 04:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; has been targeted by sock/IPs all week. Dan56 (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Abecedare (talk) 04:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; has been targeted by sock/IPs all week. Dan56 (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Abecedare (talk) 04:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; has been targeted by sock/IPs all week. Dan56 (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Abecedare (talk) 04:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; has been targeted by sock/IPs all week. Dan56 (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User:Berean Hunter seems to have matters under control for now. Abecedare (talk) 04:16, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PC isn't helping. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Actually this is the ideal article for PC protection, which will be in place for the better part of a year. Namely, the article is subject to occasional but widely spaced vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism of a politician's page in the lead-up to the Australian federal election (which should be held by 18 May), including repeatedly inserting pictures of her in lingerie as the lead image (which are copyright anyway) and adding false information about her weight. This has featured in the Australian media.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 70 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And thanks for specifying the Australian election date; saved me the effort to look it up. Abecedare (talk) 05:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, ongoing since November 2018. Page was protected for two weeks in January, after which IP vandalism immediately resumed until another page protection was put into effect at the end of January, this time lasting until March 1. IP vandalism resumed on March 4 and has been ongoing once again since. This would be the third time the page has been protected from IP vandalism since the year began. Temeku (talk) 05:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 05:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for more than a week. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of cited material, pov pushing . Onel5969 TT me 19:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See also my note at NPOVN. Abecedare (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Censorship, vandalism and COI (see the talk page). Freewheel56 (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute but since it raises BLP concerns I have full protected after reverting to a version o the article without the disputed Controversy section. Abecedare (talk) 05:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article had been semi-protected since 24 October 2012. But i want someone to remove the protection, because i want to fix a information. 168.0.233.8 (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Considering the history of the article as well as the nature of the subject, unprotecting doesn't seem advisable. Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Edit requests to request changes. Favonian (talk) 18:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs doing disruptive edits in the article has been reverted many times. . SharabSalam (talk) 19:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; unsourced puffery continuing after end of last block. 2601:188:180:1481:DC58:C3F7:4619:B4D9 (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing - IPs trying to change the name of the article to very immature names, alongside other vandalism due to the show's huge hatebase. Luigitehplumber (talk) 22:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since article subject became a free agent the other day, the article has been targeted by IP addresses making unsourced additions to the article. Rockchalk717 04:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:30, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, mass attack with BLP violations. JNW (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Abecedare (talk) 04:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced edits and vandalism by IP editors. Last protection period recently ended. StaticVapor message me! 23:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some IPs seem to have been making good edits, so lets give this a try. Abecedare (talk) 04:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP persistently re-adding information despite being reverted by other users and with BLP concerns. Opencooper (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection; SMR3333 (talk · contribs) has been consistently editing the AfD to remove "for Women" from the name of te article being AfD'd. The AfD has been closed for a fair while at this point. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 18:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined If anything, we would block the account... Enigmamsg 21:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant unregistered IP address users removing info of Parker being an Avenger and adding vandalism of fake actors cast. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: IP users (must be a sockpuppet) continuously come here to change her birth year for absolutely no reason other than vandalism. It’s been happening since January. Trillfendi (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: New and anonymous editors repeatedly adding the individual responsible for the recent shootings in Christchurch to the "Notable people" section of the article, despite the individual beiing "notable" for only a single event. This matter has been discussed at W:AWNB#Christchurch mosque shootings and the consensus there is that the content should not be added. AussieLegend () 16:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection; repeatedly recreated by a series of socks. Deleted 4 times today already. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 21:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection from creation protection: A while ago I contacted the protecting admin for permission to create the draft since the page had been creation protected because a sockpuppet kept abusively creating the article. I’m not a sock, obviously, but since I created the draft and have done all I can, I don’t want creation protection to block it from moving to the mainspace upon approval. In December, the protecting admin already left a comment requesting removal of page protection when the article is approved. Trillfendi (talk) 17:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Ivanvector and Trillfendi: pinging involved users. Reduced from full protection to extended confirmed protection. I think this is a good middle ground between unprotection (subject to abuse before moving draft to mainspace) and full protection (which would prevent you from moving said article). Let me know if this isn't a good solution for some reason. Airplaneman 21:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article has been target of disruptive editing by IPs since years ago but in the last 24 hours the situation has become more problematic than usually. A short semi would help. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit warring from IP addresses. Two weeks of page protection would help, I guess. . Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 16:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Edgar181. (1 day) Airplaneman 21:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopper constantly reverting quality edits for last several months. Discussion at Talk:Nobuhiro_Watsuki#Request_for_comments_about_2017_charges established that they were the sole supporter of the current layout. Xfansd (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – return of vandalism after block expiry . Redalert2fan (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several disruptive edits as of late, especially in the past 24 hours. –WPA (talk) 18:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:00, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There are constant attempts by one or more IP editors to remove the entire asexual section. This has been oppossed by several other editors. ★Trekker (talk) 19:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Galobtter. (1 week) Airplaneman 20:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has been subject to multiple IPs making unsourced edits. . Silverfish (talk) 19:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruption due to an off-wiki campaign. See this discussion for the details. Prolog (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruption due to an off-wiki campaign. See this discussion for the details. Prolog (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by IP, who has now switched to mobile phones it seems. Alexbrn (talk) 18:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Boing! said Zebedee. (1 week) Airplaneman 20:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently, her sons being large is a thing according to a slippery IP editor. - MrX 🖋 20:12, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 20:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Protect this article from creation for two years. Macropedia (talk) 13:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one creation so far. Additionally, create-protecting draft space would be somewhat unusual. Samsara 14:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 14:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Protect this article for 2 years, and because this is a redirect page. Macropedia (talk) 13:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 14:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Temporary semi-protection was added for three days about a week ago, but vandalism started continuing today and now I'm in an edit war with IP editors who think they know what to do. This vandalism has been going on ever since the page was created and it needs to stop. Semi-protection for a month or two would be amazing as the season ends in late May. Jayab314 17:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - by an admin per help request. (non-admin closure) RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 17:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Link for 2018 campaign website is insecure/obsolete. Suggest updating to briannawuforcongress.com. James Webber (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jamestwebber,  looking... RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 17:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jamestwebber, Done RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 17:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Paragraph about SPLC's view on BitChute keeps getting removed by possibly politically motivated IP users. Lawiki1534 (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal magnet. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 12:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs reverting disruptively. A D Monroe III(talk) 14:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There have been persistent, recent, unsourced additions proclaiming Bouteflika's death: see here, here and here for examples within the last three days. Wham2001 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant IP edits are changing his name. Skr15081997 (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level vandalism. He is died now. MalayaliWoman (talk) 14:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Paragraph about SPLC's view on BitChute keeps getting removed by possibly politically motivated IP users. Lawiki1534 (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal magnet. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 12:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs reverting disruptively. A D Monroe III(talk) 14:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There have been persistent, recent, unsourced additions proclaiming Bouteflika's death: see here, here and here for examples within the last three days. Wham2001 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant IP edits are changing his name. Skr15081997 (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level vandalism. He is died now. MalayaliWoman (talk) 14:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Paragraph about SPLC's view on BitChute keeps getting removed by possibly politically motivated IP users. Lawiki1534 (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal magnet. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 12:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs reverting disruptively. A D Monroe III(talk) 14:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There have been persistent, recent, unsourced additions proclaiming Bouteflika's death: see here, here and here for examples within the last three days. Wham2001 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant IP edits are changing his name. Skr15081997 (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level vandalism. He is died now. MalayaliWoman (talk) 14:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Paragraph about SPLC's view on BitChute keeps getting removed by possibly politically motivated IP users. Lawiki1534 (talk) 06:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal magnet. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 12:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs reverting disruptively. A D Monroe III(talk) 14:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There have been persistent, recent, unsourced additions proclaiming Bouteflika's death: see here, here and here for examples within the last three days. Wham2001 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant IP edits are changing his name. Skr15081997 (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level vandalism. He is died now. MalayaliWoman (talk) 14:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated removal of information by what appears to be a single editor using multiple IP addresses. OctoMocto (talk) 21:41, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Pallaviharsh (talk) 10:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of mildly defamatory statements, often in German. – Þjarkur (talk) 11:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New season same issues. @Bishonen: as she has dealt with this before. Thanks AIRcorn (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC). AIRcorn (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Sorry, User:AirCorn, I don't understand sports and can't tell who's right and who's the vandal here. If I could do it in the last season, I'm surprised. ;). Leaving it for a more educated admin. Bishonen | talk 23:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of until spring (3 months), after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Bishonen There is no admin what has got better education so I will have to do. Sorry. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC) Bishonen CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recurring anon vandalism since last pp expiry. Admin plz decide what level to apply. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I might be mis-remembering that this page used to be semi protected. It might have been another page of mine. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doesn't appear to have been protected before. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent additional of hoax by IP editor. Ravensfire (talk) 00:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – fake info vandalism. Crboyer (talk) 01:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffe316 (talk) 01:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Part of an ongoing and fractious content dispute featured at ANI. Several participants have been warned about edit warring. This dispute would be made far more harmonious if it were fully protected for a few days until the kinks are ironed out. I have not edited the page, but am not uninvolved, as I have engaged in discussion of the issue with involved editors at ANI. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 03:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: or maybe pending changes? Ongoing vandalism from ip hopper. Vandalism like [28] is sitting in this BLP for more than 12 hours at a time for the past few days. NiciVampireHeart 09:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple accounts and IPs at the time, looks like WP:MEAT. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – So called "edit warring" Already talked to him in user talk on the reasoning to revert his blanking on the sections of the article , started a RfC (and the sections are restored as they existed before the disagreement ), but he still keep blanking. Request to protect for a few days or until the end of RfC. Matthew hk (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of last name Flokr823 (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent content dispute and edit warring by IP-hopper(s). Wario-Man (talk) 20:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced changes continued just after protection expired. Jetstreamer Talk 20:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism target. This BLP has been semi protected like 10 times in less than five years. StaticVapor message me! 03:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: This model is often the target of vandalism regarding her personal life for whatever reason, therefore protection is required. Trillfendi (talk) 05:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses. L1amw90 (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I'm seeing very little vandalism, and a lot of constructive editing, from new or unregistered users. MelanieN (talk) 03:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ownship field keeps getting changed to recent game reference. Grey Wanderer (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - protection log going back many years. Entranced98 (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection BLP violations resumed after the last protection has expired. IPs are changing so I don't know if a range block can be used instead of this protection. MarnetteD|Talk 17:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Risker. Samsara 01:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SLBedit (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent newly registered user vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Doug Weller. Samsara 01:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Information page about mass message senders with a history of repeated disruptive edits by IPs. DannyS712 (talk) 18:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Consistent with Template:Requested move. funplussmart (talk) 21:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected — JJMC89(T·C) 01:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Nonconstructive editing/vandalism by multiple IPs and new users. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ferret. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PC is not effective enough. . Kingerikthesecond (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 01:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PC seems to be ineffective here as well. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; mass attack. Please at least block the registered account(s). 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JJMC89. Samsara 21:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 23:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently lost a wrestling match or something, so unregistered users are constantly claiming that he has died with no source (and after a rather thorough Google search I can't find any evidence that this is true); other forms of vandalism as well. SkyGazer 512 My talk page 00:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done now by Ferret, thank you.--SkyGazer 512 My talk page 00:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18 March 2019

Temporary Semi-protection: Edit war with a side of vandalism with repeat undos and edits. Frapsity (talk) 19:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman 19:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting page protection for a month or so for what appears to be socking. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Puppybone. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Let's see if one month of protection will help reduce trolling. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:25, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TropicAces (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Declined I'm seeing some helpful IP edits, and the vandalism is not egregious. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Is there anything we can do about this ? (I've never had to deal with a file talk). - FlightTime (open channel) 17:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please ping me with the resolution, thanx. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @FlightTime: The concern here is legitimate. However, we only protect talk pages in extreme situations, because protecting a page and its talk runs contrary to the fundamental principle that anyone can edit Wikipedia. With approximately two disruptive edits a month, this is not at that level. I could apply PC protection, but given that the content of the edits isn't something that needs to be hidden, this will only shift the load of dealing with these onto reviewers. In sum, I don't think there's much to be done here. If another admin is willing to semi-protect this indefinitely, I won't object, but I'm not willing to do so. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanamonde93: I was hoping it wouldn't too much of a problem as file talks are very rarely used, but your rational is logical. Thanks for your time. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, adding fake birthdays. DarkGlow (talk) 21:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Article has been declined by three separate editors, but the creator has attempted to move the article into the main space despite these rejections; they also used templates claiming the article was created through the AFC process, which is patently untrue. If this article is to be moved, it cannot be labeled as having been accepted by AFC; requesting move protection until this is sorted out. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. This disruption is from a single user with an obvious COI. I have blocked them. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @HickoryOughtShirt?4: Minor thing, but please be careful to ask for the appropriate protection level when requesting protection. Airplaneman 19:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Airplaneman: Was this not BLP violations? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@HickoryOughtShirt?4: Sorry, yes they were BLP violations. What I meant is that I've seen you and others request extended confirmed for IP-only vandalism, where semi-protection will do. I know it's easy to misclick with Twinkle (I did it just today!) but please try and be aware of this when requesting. It's honestly a minor quibble, and it doesn't really affect the outcome of the request. Airplaneman 20:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps removing image from infobox. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with some contribution from vandalism-only accounts. Good Article with high traffic (1,500 page views per day). Hasn't been one bona fide change in the last six months. Most had to be manually reverted rather than by ClueBot. Request semi-protection for a few months. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP's. Pepper Gaming (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by multiple IPs, some of them belong to an educational institution. theinstantmatrix (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Most likely due to the article's subject being honoured by today's Google Doodle. The Verified Cactus 100% 17:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism due to winning 200 races, IP users trolling. Museeeic (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 18:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure what has irritated these anons, but five days of protection should be enough. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I went to protect from my watchlist before reading the request for 5 days. Should be fixed now. Airplaneman 18:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent hoaxing by a long-term abuser. Blake Gripling (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP warriors changing sourced content according to their POV. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 14:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: 3 cases of IP vandalism since the temporary semi-protection lock expired on March 3rd (15 days ago). Lorde’s affiliation with the ‘’South Park’’ character Randy Marsh has resulted in IPs changing her name. This was a huge issue when the episode first aired and it is still an issue almost 5 years later. De88 (talk) 15:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 17:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, someone keeps changing the teams he played for without reference. Cam (talk) 10:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Revert back to indefinite semi again now that full protection is over, PC isn't doing much. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Restored, had lapsed when full protection was applied. Fish+Karate 13:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Article just created, the event is still live and in the news Sherenk1 (talk) 12:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No evidence of disruption. Fish+Karate 13:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L293D ( • ) 12:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A lot of editing is expected on articles featured on the main page; there aren't any more problematic edits than is usual for such an article, and many of the edits are beneficial. Fish+Karate 13:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Highly visible article that has experienced some vandalism and minor disruptive editing. Vandalism and disruptive editing will likely persist for a while due to the deadliness of this current event. NoahTalk 00:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fish+Karate 10:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP editors of redirected (empty) talk:pages of AfD articles . GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing how restoring WikiProject banners to a talk page of a redirected article is vandalism. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This seems somewhat lame; anyway, protection is not the way forward here; find another place to hast things out, please. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP editors of redirected (empty) talk:pages of AfD articles . GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing how restoring WikiProject banners to a talk page of a redirected article is vandalism. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This seems somewhat lame; anyway, protection is not the way forward here; find another place to hast things out, please. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – I'm surprised this isn't protected yet. funplussmart (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 09:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High-risk template. funplussmart (talk) 21:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 09:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This keeps popping up at NPP because of the redirect creation. Doc James has noted that consensus on the talk page is to maintain the redirect, it's common to sysop-protect redirects. Talk page can remain unprotected as consensus can change. SITH (talk) 23:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 09:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Abusive IP with roving addresses has got to work here. Alexbrn (talk) 06:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Boing! said Zebedee. Fish+Karate 10:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism. even though the ip addresses are different, i suspect that it is the same person as the vandalism are similar to each other and these IP addresses are geolocated in the same area. robertsky (talk) 07:25, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 10:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP vandalism and BLP violations related to recent events. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 09:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 10:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Babymissfortune 16:00, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit warring from IP addresses. Two weeks of page protection would help, I guess. . Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 16:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's a very long edit war over whether it should be an e or an E. Fish+Karate 09:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Talk page of a retired user, with persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Lectonar (talk) 09:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No longer TFA; vandalism has stopped. Airplaneman 04:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of registered user vandalism / addition of unsourced material. Oshawott 12 Talk to me! 00:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 05:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – On-going unexplained changes being made by an extended confirmed user. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @IanDBeacon: As a note: usually when a dispute involves just one problematic user, blocking, not protection, is the preferred method. Airplaneman 04:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by IPs from around the Washington DC area. Binksternet (talk) 05:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 05:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: In case, this article is about file sharing site, that complains copyright infringement, child pornography and the EU watchlist. Macropedia (talk) 01:37, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Macropedia: I don't see evidence that the situation's changed since it was salted last September. On a procedural note, you haven't contacted RHaworth, the protecting admin, as the instructions in this section ask you to do so before asking here. Airplaneman 04:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruption from Cambridge, Ontario, Canada, using multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 02:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; mass attack, WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Heavy vandalism by IP editors to a BLP, page was also recently protected. StaticVapor message me! 03:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 04:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi or PC1 protection: Persistent BLP violations by single user IP. A few examples: January 21, January 24, January 24, January 27, January 27, January 30, January 30, February 1, February 8, February 8. There are many more instances upto and including today. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ronhjones. Semi 1 month, indef PC. Airplaneman 04:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sock puppet continuously vandalizing article with nationalist edits (i.e. misrepresenting sources and POV). Selçuk Denizli (talk) 12:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman 21:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP edit of redirect, despite *every* page pointing to this page being intended for Peace Lines, the subject of the current redirect. Grunners (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please warn them, and if they remain unresponsive and continue reverted, they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman 21:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit extended-protected: extended confirmed protection to combat disruption such as IP vandalism, abusive sockpuppetry etc Pallaviharsh (talk) 16:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I think the semi-protection applied by CambridgeBayWeather (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is working as intended. Airplaneman 21:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by users and IPs. Dannyyankee12let's talk 17:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – POV-pushing by single-purpose accounts. Motivated by something related to the recent Christchurch mosque shootings. They should be free to voice any concerns on the talk page. wumbolo ^^^ 18:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The vast majority of contributions have been made my autoconfirmed accounts, such that semi-protection wouldn't do much to staunch POV-pushing. I don't think the level of editing conflict requires ECP or full protection just yet, but feel free to re-request here if such a need arises. Airplaneman 20:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Violation of WP:BLP policy by IPs. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP editors. Random86 (talk) 22:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent use of agressive language. Jetstreamer Talk 23:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary semi-protection of a reasonably long length (ideally a couple of months) to prevent rampant vandalism by multiple IPs. See page history and prior block log for history; pending changes has not helped the issue at all. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. It had indef pending-change protection, but that clearly wasn't working. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Last protection period recently ended. Unsourced edits and WP:SYNTH returned immediately. StaticVapor message me! 21:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 21:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing and persistent insertion of detail related to cadet and non-cadet situations at various institutions. I am not certain the current version is one approved by talk consensus, however, over the last three or so months the page has seen lots of socking (and subsequent account blocking) by at least one dedicated disruptor. I have no opinion on the merits; I do however believe semi-protection may force parties to talk this wording out instead of merely inserting the material again and again. BusterD (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 21:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to Pending Change Protection There was a flaw in the article that causes many to try to fix it (assuming that they are students in the school), but they are blocked by the semi-protection lock. The article was semi-protected because of long-term vandalism. Since then, there were no edits for four years, but there were some requests in the talk page to fix inaccuracies. I think the semi-protection should be removed and instead replace it with pending change protection. INeedSupport :3 15:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done CIreland (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent IP content removal. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 19:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 20:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, going back a few months irregularly. Vwilding (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every other edit is vandalism/NPOV/disruptive. Long-term pattern. PrussianOwl (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IPs and auto-confirmed users are causing minor vandalism problems and making disruptive, policy violating edits. The page is high visibility and will likely experience even worse edits as the number of deaths/damags increases (will remain a news topic) NoahTalk 10:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk | work) 10:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 15:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP addresses removing redirect after merge proposal consensus was reached. – The Grid (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 15:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs repeatedly adding content regarding disposition of a libel case without sources to back it up. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 13:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a class somewhere is studying arthritis today. Fish+Karate 13:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Persistent vandalism and removal/change of content by IP users without cause once again. IP users adding crude, inappropriate language into the article. Blocking IPs isn't enough. I already requested page protection for this article which is currently receiving a high number of views. Oliszydlowski, 13:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 13:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 11:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP also blocked for 31 hours. Fish+Karate 11:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Vwilding (talk) 11:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some more eyes on this would the article do good me thinks.Lectonar (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent addition of spam link by IP editors. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've also added the top level domain of the repeatedly-spammed website to the spam blacklist. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Living person's reputation repeatedly changed negatively RymaPedia (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Reintroduction of promotional content as soon as previous protection expired, meatpuppetry. Yunshui  08:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., and...
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Yunshui, instead of adding full protection (as you requested here), I felt that extended confirmed protection along with long-term pending changes protection was more appropriate. If you have concerns or objections, please let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good call Oshwah; I always forget EC is an option now! Yunshui  09:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yunshui - No worries ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent promotional editing. Please look in the history, this has been happening for a very long time and the page has been protected before. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article is currently experiencing a very high number of views. IP users already vandalised and removed content from article without decent reason, cause or discussion. Vandalism and crude behaviour visible in history of page. Can this be done ASAP because the vandalism occurs every 10 minutes. Oliszydlowski, 00:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term pattern of disruption from Bertrand101, a serial hoaxer. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article has been targeted by new accounts and IPs due to beginning of this new year holiday in upcoming days. 1-2 week protection would be helplful. Wario-Man (talk) 04:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, IP-hopping, and sockpuppetry by sockmaster User:Mujhideen101. Wario-Man (talk) 04:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 02:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruption, recent and long term. Nationalistic revisionism, at variance with article title. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection Athlete is the subject of persistent disruptive editing from IP editors. Trillfendi (talk) 03:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mujhideen101. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 03:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. 2405:204:D406:A955:F541:8550:3974:B251 (talk) 16:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page has accumulated more than 50,000 views in the last week and has been inundated with IP and newly created editors vandalizing it. The vandalism runs the gamut from minor things, like adding years to her birthdate, to people using the article to vent. As the subject of the article is being prominently featured in media, this shows no signs of slowing. Chetsford (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The IP(s) seemed to have stopped and apologized. Any hint of further vandalism and they should be blocked. Airplaneman 22:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 23:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Conflicting reports regarding WWE signing causing disruption. StaticVapor message me! 01:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 01:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – non-ECP (SPA to this article) / IP turned this BLP article into an article consisting of 50% ARBPIA conflict material (along the way, possible BLP issues as the cited sources were not on this BLP) - this version. The article (in the version edited to by the IP / non-ECP user) falls under WP:ARBPIA3#General Prohibition. I'm not sure this should be indef-ECPed (as I'm not sure the subject is inherently ARBPIA related) - but the current content dispute is between an ARBPIA article and a non-ARBPIA article - and while this content dispute is unresolved the article should be ECPed per ARBPIA3. Icewhiz (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The substantive content of the article is not pertinent to ARBPIA, and the fact an author writes an article for USA Today about US aid to Israel does not immediately render them subject to ARBPIA, even if an editor tries to coatrack the article to make it so. Fish+Karate 09:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Will re-raise if this continues (I agree the article shouldn't be ARBPIA (the oped either should be absent, or get a very minor mention) - the coat racking by an IP turned it into ARBPIA (over 50% by my eyeball)). Icewhiz (talk) 13:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If that continues then there's a valid argument for semi-protection if discussion with the IP editor does not resolve the issue. Fish+Karate 13:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article has been targeted by sock IPs all month: 3 March, 15 March, 18 March. Dan56 (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Something strange is going on here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20 March 2019

Request for indefinite 30/500 protection: Frequent target for vandalism, a lot of which come from unregistered users, though a some of the vandals are registered users. Due to the egg's status as a meme, I believe that the blue lock is more fitting than the silver lock. InvalidOStalk 17:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ GB fan 18:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for pending changes protection: Repeated vandalism by Andy Ashbourne, who also has made good faith edits but centered all of the images on the page. The changes were since reverted.

Declined edits are not vandalism. ~ GB fan 18:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I had a reason, but then I realized that it was invalid per WP:DUCK. My bad, I probably deserve a trout slap right now. InvalidOStalk 18:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism from multiple IPs today. Minima© (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent efforts to remove this redirect. This redirect should not be removed without discussion at this point. TarkusABtalk 19:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. I have deleted all versions except the redirect, and fully protected. Semiprotection would not be enough, because although most re-creations have been by single-purpose new editors, there have also been a couple of re-creations by autoconfirmed accounts. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Mr. Radovan Karadžić was sentenced to life imprisonment today (March 20) for commited war crimes. Page is in my opinion vulnerable to disruptive edits since this is a high profile case in the Balkans region. . CroGamer 1 (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No disruption until now. Lectonar (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New editor was making POV changes to the article, when they were warned about Edit warring, they started editing logged out. VVikingTalkEdits 17:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since long. 119.160.100.44 (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Short-term semi. Rmhermen (talk) 18:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA by socks adding unsourced/fake/poorly sourced info. . Sjö (talk) 16:14, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: IP editor(s) are claiming files uploaded at Wikimedia Commons prove their claims, but these are magazine cuttings uploaded illegally without copyright permissions, and at least two of the files were uploaded by an editor since blocked as a sockpuppet. Richard3120 (talk) 16:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: rev deled copyvio's. Perhpas they can add it back if it is properly sourced. DlohCierekim 17:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 13:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Part of the T-series v. Pewdiepie conflict, and is being attacked by pewdiepie fans. Protection would be good. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 14:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 14:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 14:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – by IPs. Suggest protect duration for at least 1-2 weeks. . Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by various IP's probably belonging to the same person! . Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 12:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Still have BLP issues from IP's. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 12:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too little disruption for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from students of the school, principal changed from Chrissy Collins to Ryan Shields, but students are adding many other names instead. Ryan Shields is principal right now at the college. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.104.226 (talk) 08:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., and...
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you are incorrect. Two users just checked references and they do not agree with your statement made here... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —RainFall 09:09, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One day? That's... pretty helpful. —RainFall 10:09, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep changing parameters without explanation or citations. Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IPs are vandalizing the article and removing content without sources stating otherwise. Appears the disruptive behavior has increased as the death toll has risen. At least 1 person self-reverted before someone else could get the chance. NoahTalk 10:09, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – As before, foreign-language page incorrectly put over dab page. MB 04:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IPs appearing in the last couple of days and playing with the 'Caused by' field in the infobox - the last couple inserted what appeared to be names of individuals, who are not mentioned anywhere in the article text, without any sources or discussion. GirthSummit (blether) 07:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 08:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes protection is not enough. Please see revision history. It's full of problematic edits by IPs. Wario-Man (talk) 05:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes protection will continue to hold edits from anonymous users after the protection expires. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EclipseDude (talk) 06:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've applied a block to the IPv6 range 2600:100b:b114::/46, which should stop the disruption. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP disruption, repeatedly adding poorly sourced content without neither any edit summary nor consensus on the talk page. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've applied a block to the IPv4 range 103.12.211.0/24, which should put a stop to the disruption. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption; some IP edits appear constructive, but vandalism still occurs. Aspening (talk) 04:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This protection level will allow legitimate IP users to continue to edit the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent recent BLP vio's pertaining to subject's partner(s). - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and seemingly intentional misinformation directed at the mosque. Suggest at least blocking all IP editors. . Roger 8 Roger (talk) 03:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 01:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PewDiePie stuff. Didn't take long for the vandalism to resume after previous lock expired. Grayfell (talk) 01:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The Final Season Hater is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., and...
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Final season hater again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., and...
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP subject by numerous anon IPS (probably the same editor) to the repeated addition of unreferenced and controversial content. Egghead06 (talk) 02:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – ip vandals, maybe semi but idk. startTerminal {haha wow talk page | waste_of_space#4023 on discord} 01:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite the edit notice, the page keeps getting drive-bys by IPs changing the numbers and adding their no-doubt-favorite artist, ignoring the cited source, and the big red edit notice. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 01:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent low quality edits by IP users. Multiple short term semi-protection periods have not changed this. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 01:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Portals are no longer really in use and this was protected almost 10 years ago. The problem has dissipated. Goveganplease (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting admin, Courcelles, to review this... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. @Oshwah: Courcelles appears to be inactive. Feel free to revert my action. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Anachronist - Your action seems fine to me. I see no reason to leave it protected. Thanks for taking care of this request. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Enigmamsg 02:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Enigmamsg 02:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of non-notable fictional character . Onel5969 TT me 12:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – As well as Ole Goethe. . Wgolf (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wgolf: The last deletion was due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olegoethe, which was closed as WP:SOFTDELETE. That means the deleting admin has no objection to the article being restored, or being re-created. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I didn't notice that, now that I looked at it, now I see that, thanks. Wgolf (talk) 20:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done DlohCierekim 21:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a good amount of vandalism/edit warring by IPs recently, constant disruption to editing. Spretznaz (talk) 23:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 00:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dlohcierekim: I have requested temporary semi-protection for this page multiple times and it's always the same story: as soon as the 2/4 weeks expire, the vandalism is back and I'm back here requesting it again. I believe permanent semi-protection is in order this time. Derek M (talk) 00:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from a single ip source. StarHOG (Talk) 20:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 20:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent recent BLP vio's pertaining to subject's partner(s). - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits as we approach the "official" consummation: but for all intents and purposes with the official start of trading for Fox Corp., it's pretty much disestablished today. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edits made by IP are not NPOV edits, IP keeps reverting edits. . Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. (lol) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon from Brazil has decided that the roster should be truncated. The roster is, however, sourced and the players who are being removed are present in that source. Since the anon keeps IP hopping, could we please protect the article (or at least add pending changes) until May 5, 2019? This is the day of the team's first competitive game. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unusual level of addition of random punters to "Notable former pupils" and other sundry vandalism today to an article that already has a low percentage of constructive edits. A couple of days' semi-protection kindly requested. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent string of unsourced genre warring. StaticVapor message me! 22:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and unsourced edits by IPs to a BLP. StaticVapor message me! 23:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21 March 2019

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes failed; zero valid IP edits, long protection log. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 18:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This and Alan Tafoya (actor) should be salted. Wgolf (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected DlohCierekim 22:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected DlohCierekim 22:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done ineligible DlohCierekim 18:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected: High level of IP vandalism, following tax case. DarkGlow (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 22:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive edits and persistent vandalism. Rhinen (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent changes to final order of the competition, which is clearly referenced. This without any explanation. Several IP used. Because of this request temporary increase to semi protection. Redalert2fan (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 22:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection Lately, this model has been the subject of disruptive and absolutely nonsensical edits, especially about promotion. In case anyone else wants to get ideas, pending changes protection should thwart that. Trillfendi (talk) 16:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DannyS712 (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 19:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 19:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please see (WP:BLOCKEVASION: 70.114.211.80). Kishfan (talk) 19:09, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 19:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long hisory of spam links, almost all of the recent edits are spam links, useless additions or reverts. WelpThatWorked (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 18:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Ratajkowksi is a natural target for reasons. But IP users like to come here trying to ruin up this currently “Good” article. Semi-protection must be returned. Trillfendi (talk) 17:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 18:38, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Page has been protected in the past but vandalism is continuing. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 18:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A block sock continuously using IPs for vandalism. Please see (WP:BLOCKEVASION: 70.114.211.80) . Kishfan (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 18:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 18:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

request to increase protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by Nochorus without providing credible sources. Reverting edits and creating edit wars when two administrators have already agreed upon an edit. Creating new Talk sections and attempting to reach consensus again with new users even though the topic has already been discussed before (which he contributed to already in the past so was well aware of it) is deceitful. Pebblefire (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Sounds more like a content dispute than vandalism. DlohCierekim 12:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I agree. Lectonar (talk) 12:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @Pebblefire: Calling the edits of those we disagree with vandalism is never a good idea. DlohCierekim 12:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Citobun (talk) 08:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One vandal edit in last 24 hours, two total in past week. Fish+Karate 15:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism; semi-protection has not worked. Catinthedogs (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see any vandalism. Fish+Karate 15:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User is making unnecessary redirects. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 13:38, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of hoax - adding themself as an actor to films. Ravensfire (talk) 14:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the recent arrest of Nirav Modi, he is in headlines and so are the irrelevant edits on his article. ML talk 14:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User is making unnecessary redirects. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 13:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A blocked sock continuously attacking the article with an IP range. Please see (WP:BLOCKEVASION: 70.114.211.80).-. Kishfan (talk) 13:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. INeedSupport :3 15:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 02:08, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 13:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 16:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 16:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 16:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. DlohCierekim 16:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Thsmi002 (talk) 16:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. DlohCierekim 16:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 13:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 15:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yes it has. Fish+Karate 15:44, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated changes made to assert that part of the corridor is in Pakistan, when in fact it is entirely within Afghanistan. I believe this (and the continued attempt in this article to assert that Gilgit-Baltistan is part of Pakistan) is done to forward a pro-Pakistan agenda. Paulmlieberman (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. @Paulmlieberman: Can I suggest you try discussing this politely with the user on their talk page as I note no efforts to do so have been made. Fish+Karate 15:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Undoing redirect, spurious speedy deletion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Redirect, shouldn't be much cause for an IP editor to need to edit. Fish+Karate 15:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated target of Bertrand101, a known long-term abuser. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stepping up from previous protection due to same reason. Fish+Karate 15:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent WP:BLP violations. Fuortu (talk) 12:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 14:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism from new and unregistered users, to BLP for a controversial politician. bonadea contributions talk 13:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 15:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute: an IP editor is repeatedly going against consensus of WP:HOCKEY and changing the lead on this article to say the person played hockey instead of the more accurate ice hockey. It's a dynamic IP that keeps changing, and the IP editor is not engaging in talk and has made this change 5 times this week so far. Echoedmyron (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 14:10, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today is Festival of Holi, and of course a lot of irrelevant IP edits are going on. It would be better to protect page for few days. ML talk 06:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protect, long term, to extended confirmed and above. There is an ongoing history here of disruption, by both multiple IPs and new SPAs. The most recent protection expired 5 days ago and disruption resumed immediately. Protection was again requested, but declined (?!), and article has since been vandalized again. (When is enough... enough?) - wolf 07:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 13:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Temporary semi-protection expired yesterday, the vandal returned immediately. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 13:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism. Futebol 9 (talk) 10:38, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeat target of IP nonsense: multiple unsourced/unexplained changes. . SummerPhDv2.0 12:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 14:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Also please add the {{ArbCom Arab-Israeli editnotice}} edit notice please . nableezy - 22:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 22:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I do not see actual disruption; the article is rarely edited at all. Lectonar (talk) 10:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It is today's featured article and has attracted almost hourly IP vandalism in the past 12 hours. Dan56 (talk) 02:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism to personal data on BLP. Begoon 04:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IffyChat -- 10:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 10:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Edit warring over ProD. Looks deleteable to me if amyone wants to AfD DlohCierekim 10:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised by IP continuously like this. These IP's put blocking tag on my talk page. Prongs31 10:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 11:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 11:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Now they can be mad at me instead. DlohCierekim 11:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A blocked sock is continuously attacking the article with different IPs. WP:BLOCKEVASION: 70.114.211.80.-Kishfan (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected DlohCierekim 13:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we get this protected again? The edit warrior is back... GirthSummit (blether) 20:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 109.145.136.108 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Samsara 22:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible IP hopper. S0091 (talk) 00:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Samsara 08:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/ BLP violations. Hrodvarsson (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. andritolion (talk) 17:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 70.60.148.54 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 19:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated insertion of uncited candidates who cannot be found through any search engine or searchable social media, performed by anonymous user(s). Recommend semi-protection extend until writ is dropped. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 17:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by ip hoppers. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple pending changes have had to be processed over the same string of words extremely frequently. An edit war seems to be currently happening over a content disagreement. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: insistent edit warring - it's been temporarily semi-protected before, and not effective. Or make the temporary long, like 6 months. We spend a lot of spurious time supervising this page. Sbalfour (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 02:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 21:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – This article is subject to significant POV editing by users who are barely autoconfirmed (such as this one). Given the nature of this topic and its editing history, I think ECP is warranted, but am too WP:INVOLVED as an editor to do it myself as an admin. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected DlohCierekim 18:44, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There is a DS note on the talk page if anyone wants to persue sanctions againt violating editors. DlohCierekim 18:44, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping mobile editors making major unexplained deletions. Meters (talk) 01:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hopping IP continues to disrupt page. S.A. Julio (talk) 19:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP addresses keep restoring an unsourced bit about the song not charting anywhere, even though it is a very recent release and could chart in the future.--NØ 19:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fish+Karate 13:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject has received some heavy recent media coverage [29] and her article is attracting vandalism. Britishfinance (talk) 10:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Britishfinance used the wrong pagelinks. I fixed it. Now correct and protected. Enigmamsg 17:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An ongoing edit war against a new user adding unsourced/somewhat promotional material to a BLP. Reverting to last good version may be necessary once page protection is applied. 78.28.54.83 (talk) 13:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 16:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page was protected last month due to an edit war December-January. No longer necessary. 64.106.237.12 (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined. Based on the recent spate of reversions of anonymous IP edits, it seems that the existing pending-change protection isn't working. If anything, the protection level should be increased. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is exactly what I thought, so I have done so. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Enigmamsg 16:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Update required. Tried to submit request but nobody updated the article. Can protection be removed for like a day so as to update and then can be put back if necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:43AE:3975:0:0:158F:C0B0 (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined You must be joking. You can't possibly be unaware that it was to prevent your disruption that the article was protected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Enigmamsg 16:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism where user repeatedly violates the policy on common names. See his talk page where I explained it to him, yet he persisted. Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 04:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Note O'Dea that technically both you and the IP are in breach of 3RR, as this is a content dispute, not vandalism - the IP is trying to improve the page (albeit in a way that goes against the MOS), you could try being a little bit nicer in your discussions, and also use edit summaries to explain why, rather than just spamming rollback. Fish+Karate 15:09, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did allow my annoyance to get the better of me at first but then I used edit summaries and the editor's talk page to explain that there was in fact a policy at issue, rather than merely a question of personal taste. But the IP ignored that. I knew I had exceeded 3RR so I withdrew from that and tackled the issue differently. — O'Dea (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Using rollback to edit war? ouch! DlohCierekim 16:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 01:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 14:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of article of non-notable fictional character. Onel5969 TT me 10:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 14:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permanently full-protection:High level of vandalism. Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi is a renowned Muslim scholar from Kerala. His Facebook page is verified as a Public Figure. (https://www.facebook.com/Dr.BahauddeenMuhammedNadwi/) Check his wikidata item and other wikipages: Malayalam Wikipedia, Wikidata, Arabic Wikipedia, Bangla Wikipedia and Urdu Wikipedia Nadwi Kooriyad (talk) 20:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: anon was removing AfD. Now blokced, but. Notice taken of reporter's username being similar to article title. DlohCierekim 22:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: again with the desperate removal of afd tag by anon DlohCierekim 22:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done DlohCierekim 22:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: also at afd DlohCierekim 22:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done DlohCierekim 22:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: At AfD DlohCierekim 22:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done DlohCierekim 22:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: also at AfD DlohCierekim 22:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism due to tournament . Will120 (talk) 23:38, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., i.e., the day after the final. Fish+Karate 13:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated changes by moving IP address to state that group disbanded in 2014, and removing links to other related pages, without ever leaving an edit summary or a reason for their edits, and breaking WP:3RR [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]. Polite requests to provide reasons for their changes have been ignored [36], [37]. Richard3120 (talk) 14:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 13:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High-risk template. funplussmart (talk) 21:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Fish+Karate 13:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MYS77 22:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 13:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 01:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Fish+Karate 13:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recently a repeated target of some sockpuppeteer whose MO is to taunt at admins on SPI pages. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:22, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PC hasn't really worked here either. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 22:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent unsourced COI edits from UDPs and IPs.--- Coffeeandcrumbs 04:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP user(s). Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 04:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. has died down Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Some unregistered users are making unnecessary edits. Pallaviharsh (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP editor returned again. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 08:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IPs back at it again. Request indefinite because of a fairly long protection log, and because the subject of the article is controversial. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 09:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the last few months. We have IPs trying to add spam links multiple times[38] and we have IP accounts try to add low quality sources.[39] Semi-protection for 6 month at least would be useful. The journal in question has an impact factor of zero.[40] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., please let us known if disruption continues after the expiration of the protection--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection (perhaps for a period of about a month or so until the dust settles on this article): After this page became unprotected, it still averages about one or two IP vandalism/disruptive edits per day. This is a commercial aviation disaster that killed all 157 people aboard, and the cause still hasn’t been determined, so I think it would be better for semi-protection to be applied for a longer period than the minimum 3 days. Thanks Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 05:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Very popular college basketball player, getting lots of attention. Protection just wore off and vandalism is starting again. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Semi-protection might be enough. wumbolo ^^^ 08:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since the image was semi-protected, dozens of empty edit requests have been added to this page. DannyS712 (talk) 02:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given you can't PC protect talk pages, semi will have to do. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Currently being improved by IPs (including User:84.46.52.92 and User:84.46.52.134) during a good article nomination (Talk:Sasha Grey/GA1). I did not discuss this with the protecting admin, since @Mark Arsten was last "active" in early 2017 (not counting the 3 edits since then, the last of which was 4 months ago). DannyS712 (talk) 23:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sure, we'll try unprotecting this article for a little while to see if the vandalism is still there. Anarchyte (talk | work) 07:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC would also work. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 23:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 23:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism shortly after protection expired. Dat GuyTalkContribs 23:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Request indefinite extended confirmed protection. Semi-protection has proven to be ineffective. This page still sees daily vandalism from unregistered users (IP addresses) Bacondrum (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23 March 2019

Semi-protection: An IP account continues to make contentious edits after several requests to discuss on Talk page and a warning about edit warring. Epinoia (talk) 15:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:47, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Hopping IP unsourced constant birth date changes. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent changing of track times by IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:45, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Article is edited infrequently, but most original edits are vandalism/disruptive.Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 10:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 10:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 10:58, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes protection: I’m not sure which would be more ideal, but it seems that some type of protection is necessary, or at least helpful. The article is edited often and many of the original edits are vandalism/disruptive edits coming from a variety of different IP addresses. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 10:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/Nsmutte. ——SerialNumber54129 11:14, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Karyachadu (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 11:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Jambhavii (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. (there was some overlap of activity between the page cited in the report and Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, where the named user was active) Samsara 11:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Various IP users are constantly trying to mark the incident as Islamic terrorism in the article without reliable sources. A PC protection may work as well. MrClog (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
'Constantly'? There was one such edit yesterday, and maybe one the day before. Not exactly a problem requiring semi protection! Silas Stoat (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 09:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP users have vandalized the "Members" section. . andritolion (talk) 07:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP edits of no particular help to the article. JarrahTree 09:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sudden increase of non-constructive edits from a WP:SPA IP and resorts to personal attacks in their edit summaries. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:25, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:54, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Heavy vandalism to a BLP. Page has been protected in the past. StaticVapor message me! 02:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 week and 1 month protection hasn't worked – Special:Diff/888997094. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 03:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. S0091 (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from the same person. His main account Jahmalm was blocked indefinitely for violating his 38-hour ban by continuing editing with IPs. Since the person is back with a new account (User:Zeitgeist89) and continues to push for his POV, I think the best solution is semi-protect this page. Check Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents history for more on this incident --> [41] Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 22:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This should be handled at WP:SPI. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ok, here we go again. This is getting ridiculous. Yes, I know Mr. Jimbo allows anyone to edit his profile, but this is clearly not working. Not many constructive edits. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 22:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like it has died down for now. And I am not going to indefinitely protect Jimbo Wales' page against his wishes. He is quite capable of protecting it on a long term basis if he so desires. On which note I think that may be the first time I have ever been there. Should I have removed my shoes? Ad Orientem (talk) 01:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's unnecessarily changing sentence structure of the article. Slightlymad (talkcontribs) 08:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like a single IP. If you believe their editing is disruptive and sufficient warnings given, report to WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. andritolion (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just the one IP. We don't protect in such cases. If you believe their editing is disruptive and after suitable warnings report to WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Lava Lamps (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent IP Vandalism, possible IP hopping. The IP has now hidden this request, clearly attempting to WP:GAME. Jay eyem (talk) 01:45, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SkyGazer 512 My talk page 02:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disable Pending Changes too. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:58, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SkyGazer 512 My talk page 02:11, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP block evasion

Temporary semi-protection: IP block evasion. The IP range 2601:449:C200:CDBF:0:0:0:0/64 has already been blocked and there is an ongoing conversation about this IPs disruption at WikiProject Ice Hockey. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible IP hopper. S0091 (talk) 01:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. John from Idegon (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP and new user vandalism. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Made his England debut. JMHamo (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; same person via similar IP addresses, targeting the same content over and over again—removal of lukewarm reviews from this album article—these past few months. Dan56 (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; same person (as above) via similar IP addresses, targeting the same content over and over again—removal of lukewarm reviews from this album article—these past few months. Dan56 (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive messages by LTA's. Semi-Protection for 24 hours please. Thanks. . Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 22:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism from IP-hopping user. S.A. Julio (talk) 20:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing from IP-hopping user. S.A. Julio (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing from IP-hopping user. S.A. Julio (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 20:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salted. Mjroots (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mjroots. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular attempts are made by IPs to replace the referenced and correct content here with some unreferenced nonsense about her being a "centerist". A period of semi-protection should discourage this. DanielRigal (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The other 6 seasons of Top Model Poland and the overview page are not Page Protected and no obvious signs of vandalism have been occurring on any of these 8 pages. Page protecting season 2 seems unnecessary now and the Page Protecting editor was contacted and does not object; as seen here((wrong user contacted; see below). Zinnober9 (talk) 05:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: That is not correct. The note you left was not to the protecing admin, and that editor said as much. They also directed you to the protecting admin, Ronhjones DlohCierekim 14:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dlohcierekim: You and he are both correct and I didn't know that at the time of posting this here. I saw Linguist's name in the page protect message and mistakenly thought he was the protector. I will come back here after I hear from Ron. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP and new user vandalism. GeekInParadise (talk) 04:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:My Royal Young. Areaseven (talk) 10:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from address-hopping ip editor. Spike 'em (talk) 10:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 14:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:24, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. --Let There Be Sunshine 16:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by anonymous users ahead of the matches. Shanze1 (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced claims lately of which football team he supports by hopping IP, maybe PC1 for a few months. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite creation protection: these drafts have been repeatedly recreated as unambiguous copyright violations despite the submitters having had the copyright policy explained to them. SITH (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Applied to last three. The first page has not been recreated. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

24 March 2019

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 14:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Large content and reliable sources being deleted persistently.भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 21:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 21:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of reverts recently. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 21:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes is not helping. Constant genre warring by IPs. StaticVapor message me! 19:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, block evasion, defamatory content. JNW (talk) 20:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam: It is protected against vandalism, but doesn't Wikipedia have auto filters to prevent vandalism in the first place? Or do people bypass the filters easily? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woshiyiweizhongguoren (talkcontribs) 15:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Yes, we do still see plenty of vandalism. Samsara 10:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Normally I'm fairly amenable to such things — 5+ years is a long time — but this is a hot-button topic that was protected basically nonstop for years and year prior. There's still occasional disruption from AC accounts, and I don't see many edit requests lately, so not sure we need to change anything. ~ Amory (utc) 10:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Enigmamsg 21:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Enigmamsg 21:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've fulfilled the request, but I don't understand how the first indef protection in 2016 by Kelapstick didn't prevent creations in subsequent years. Samsara 17:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac moved Kendall Vertes to this title after that protection, which removes it. — JJMC89(T·C) 17:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, JJMC89. Good to know it's not another new bug this time. Samsara 18:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by banned User:HarveyCarter, using IPs from Bury St Edmonds in Suffolk. Binksternet (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes or maybe a year of Semi BLP policy violations. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 17:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 17:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 17:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Now has 4000+ transclusions, but we are converting {{fb r}} templates to this module per TfD outcome. Hhkohh (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 16:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target by SPI vandal, protected a few days ago for same reason. SkyGazer 512 My talk page 16:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocked sockpuppet account is requesting his followers on Twitter edit the page in his stead. Mooeena💌✒️ 06:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I currently do not see sufficient disruption to justify protection, may be meatpuppets did not arrive yet.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Same — two accounts, sure, but only two recent edits. Please do rereport if it picks up, though! ~ Amory (utc) 10:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. S.A. Julio (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of redirect after merge. Onel5969 TT me 14:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Two large instances of IP vandalism without discussion or consensus over the past three days, likely to continue or increase due to recent events in the topic. Constant need to revert and fix these IP edits. TheNavigatrr (talk) 22:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Amory (utc) 09:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection for following articles

semi-protection: Semi protection is required,because some IP user the modified the data & Statics section, I not want IP user gives fall information Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 03:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, looks like content dispute to me, pls discuss at the talk pages. The close paraphrasing warning should be taken very seriuosly.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated recreation an ad at Draft:Bill King (politician) means it is just a matter of time before the campaign figures out they can create on top of the redirect. Legacypac (talk) 05:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We can deal with that if it happens. Until then, they've engaged in discussion so I don't think there's a need for this ~ Amory (utc) 10:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended temporary semi-protection: The previously persistent vandalism by IP users, who spammed the article with crude language, racist slurs and removed content without an explanation, which was unacceptable to Wikipedia policy. The article, which is currently trending, is prone to yet another vandal attack by unregistered trolls. A 1 month protection would be suitable. Oliszydlowski, 09:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the article is currently semi-protected, and I do not see any disruption from confirmed users.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mélencron (talk) 12:45, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP account is constantly adding programs that are not suitable for babies. BabyFirst is a channel for babies. The IP account added toddler/kids shows in the acquired programming section. That’s why it should be protected. HappyINC (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The user was warned 15h ago and did not edit since.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per above comments ~ Amory (utc) 09:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SkyGazer 512 My talk page 20:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 01:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Loliamawesome (talk) 08:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA IP vandalism, and also on Boeing 757 Boeing 777. May switch IPs and articles after being blocked. BilCat (talk) 03:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1017:b11d:805b:88ac:f0fb:cd32:f743 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara 08:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism / disruptive of method of the fight CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The edit rate went down considerably a few hours ago. I think this problem has resolved and administrative action will not be helpful now. Samsara 08:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Accesscrawl (talk) 06:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to add citations to a page that is lacking them to the degree it has a maintenance template on it, but FilmandTVFan2 keeps reverting my edits and removing my citations with no explanation given. I don't understand why a citation from the BFI wouldn't be allowed, especially on a page that says it needs citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.189.30.213 (talk) 07:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose protection, the disruption is not persistent. This protection request appears to be in order to win a content dispute. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 07:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~Swarm~ {talk} 07:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing concerning place of birth (India vs. Pakistan). Last extended protection request ended March 1, with many disruptive edits since then. Originating from wide range of IPs, though edits look like same person. -- GreenC 23:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article has actually never been extended confirmed protected, nor do I see any disruption from confirmed users.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Citobun (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See also the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Quick 1 week block request on edit war for User:Fcbjuvenil and User:Walter Görlitz and protect the article Marc-André ter Stegen‎‎ as well as the RfC in Talk:Marc-André ter Stegen. Matthew hk (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Fcbjuvenil (talk · contribs) blocked by Swarm. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unconstructive and unsourced editing by IP editors. StaticVapor message me! 02:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Longer-term semi-protection: Continued pattern of the same disruptive substitution of erroneous content, and ignoring of talk page topic, since the expiration of the last semiprotection at the article. --IJBall (contribstalk) 02:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The article is under siege by obvious IP sockpuppets editing in concert. See [42] and WP:PRECOCIOUS contributions. Both IPs geolocate to regions that are typically not associated with editing political American subjects. - MrX 🖋 11:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that I opened a talk page section for discussing the material being edit warred over, but there has not been much participation. It would be better to discuss there than revert continue to revert each other. Mr Ernie (talk) 12:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did protect it in the morning, and it has not been edited since, as far as I can see--Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see, I fully protected it, and you want to reduce it to semi. Well, I let another administrator decide.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've chipped in on the talk page discussion so wouldn't want to change / not change the protection. While I think the IPs are edit-warring, so are establishing editors, and semi-protection potentially just means the established editors get their own way on what is clearly a content dispute. I would shorten the full protection as a week is excessive, but not drop to semi-protection, but I can't make that call after participating in the discussion. Fish+Karate 14:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am fine with reducing the protection length, but they were edit-warring for already quite some time, this is why I have chosen a week.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
While I don't excuse the edit warring from anyone, nor do I necessarily think that the full protection needs to be removed until the talk page discussion resolves, I am pretty sure that the two IPs that I identified above are a blocked user sockpuppeting from open proxies or a TOR node. I'm not positive who the master is, but their behavior stands out as highly suspicious. I have reported the IPs to WP:OP, but changing IPs via proxies is trivial, so it won't actually do much good.- MrX 🖋 15:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)  [reply]
Since the above conversation, there was some discussion on the talk page that came to a consensus version of the text to include; at least one of the edit-warring editors was involved/signed-off, so yay, the process worked! With that in mind, I will lower the protection to semi for a bit, just to ensure it sticks. At this point, if any established accounts continue edit warring, a block seems more reasonable. ~ Amory (utc) 10:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done ~ Amory (utc) 10:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – MOS issue. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for 3 days, will appreciate a second opinion on whether full protection has been justified. Feel free to unprotect of needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Yeah, I think that's fine. Don't know that blocking(s) would've been more productive, so hopefully this can head that off. ~ Amory (utc) 09:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'd like a second opinion here - should we maybe redirect this to the sandbox? Unusual, I know, but a rare case where linking across namespaces might make sense. Samsara 20:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Redirects from the main space to other namespaces are amenable to speedy deletion, and I am sure someone will nominate such a redirect for deletion at some point. I think it is easier to create protect.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected Seems like the issue is users moving pages there, not sure how to request deletion. I create protected it with a message in the log that should hopefully be helpful. It's frequent but has been rare enough that it shouldn't be too much of an issue. ~ Amory (utc) 09:56, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent target of vandalism and disruptive edits by IP users. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 00:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the past several months, anonymous editors have been persistently adding completely incorrect information to the article. While long-term semi-protection seems the best course of action, there may be the occasional valid edit by an anonymous editor so PC might be a better option. either way, the article needs protection . AussieLegend () 01:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Stephen. Samsara 09:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Mélencron (talk) 03:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 10:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full move protection to none. This article has been fully move protected for almost eight years now but there isn't any current issue for the which the protection is currently in place. The original admin who move protected it is currently inactive right now. Therefore, I am requesting that the full move protection be removed from this article. TheGeneralUser (talk) 05:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can one think of any reason why the article should be moved?--Ymblanter (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TheGeneralUser: Why ? - FlightTime (open channel) 17:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I've mentioned above, there isn't any current issue for the which the protection is currently in place and blocks and protections are only applied to prevent disruption which in this case has already outlived its purpose. I'm not asking for the article to be moved, only for the move protection to be removed. There are millions of articles on Wikipedia that don't need to be moved, but we don't fully move protect them all indefinitely because things can always change in the future. TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TheGeneralUser: Note the policy phrase: "Highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved" under move protection. Samsara 08:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: There was move warring by a then autoconfirmed, now blocked user in April and May 2011. However, the user, KS700, wasn't actually blocked until 2012, then repeatedly until indef - apparently move protection was the preferred remedy. I believe ECP may not have been available to use at that time, so full protection would have had to be applied for it to be effective (or a block, as mentioned above). Nev1 was the admin making the move protection setting, and they've not edited in the last 4 months. In my opinion, lowering the move protection to ECP would be entirely uncontroversial, and lowering it completely might be considered given the time that's passed. Samsara 08:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected, I lifted the move protection (formally left indefinite move semi), let us see what happens--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous redirection of source page. Professor Profession (talk) 02:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Denver LTA target page. The majority of non-AC edits in the past several months are Denver LTA-style vandalism. Aspening (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users spamming links to copyright violating sites/how-to sites. This has been the case over the entire history of this page, both before and after its deletion/REFUND. Monitoring it is time-consuming and frustrating. Begoon 09:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. -- Begoon 09:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – The article is a regular target for spam-links to generic poetry sites/apps (eg) being added but for some reason the pace has picked up over the past few days. Abecedare (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {talk} 09:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected ~Swarm~ {talk} 09:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits & vandalism from anonymous and new editors. Calebh12 (talk) 01:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {talk} 09:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism returned after protection expired. TarkusABtalk 09:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {talk} 09:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like we need longer protection on this, continued issues after last protection came of on the 17 March 2019. No changes apart from vandalism and reverts. KylieTastic (talk) 23:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Yet again, IP users keep disruptive editing this model’s article (constantly changing her birth year for no reason with no source for it). Semi-protection is the only way to handle it as pending changes didn’t help. Trillfendi (talk) 04:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs edit-warring changing name in violation of current article name. Dr. K. 05:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I voted yesterday in a RM and I would rather not take any administrative action here, but the article absolutely needs to be protected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also ECP move protected for 1 week. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – PC1 is not working. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 23:28, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. S0091 (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unsourced content and number vandalism to ratings values. -- /Alex/21 00:45, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 01:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment should be Indefinite semi-protection like the other KCA ceremony articles (2017 and prior) since it becomes hard to catch all the vandalism after the ceremony passes. - Brojam (talk) 03:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Samsara 08:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for at least seven days: At least two disruptive edits from a United States-based IP address. -Ian Lopez @ 02:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment should be Indefinite semi-protection like the other KCA ceremony articles (2017 and prior) since it becomes hard to catch all the vandalism after the ceremony passes. - Brojam (talk) 03:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit warring (including an ip edit warring to himself) see also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Matthew hk (talk) 03:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Swarm. Samsara 08:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 04:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Semi-protection High level of IP vandalism/disruption since the page was last unprotected. The rotating IP involved in the edit war refuses to discuss things on the talk page, bordering on disruption 58.6.248.34 (talk) 05:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced or Likely Hoax information persistently added by IPs and new accounts alike. Crboyer (talk) 05:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing random vandalism edits from multiple IP-only or unregistered users. Would love to see this for a long while as this is a constant issue with ongoing reality shows. . SanAnMan (talk) 05:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any disruption coming from confirmed users. Please let us know if disruption resumes after the protection has expired.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor is insisting on adding sources that have been agreed upon to be not reliable at WP:RSN. See here. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor is insisting on adding sources that have been agreed upon to be not reliable at WP:RSN. See here. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once again my talk page being vandalised by this IP with abusive words in Hindi. I am bit confident that this IP is of globally blocked User:Dr Samkiv Kumar. Other pages are also continuously vandalised. Please protect my page for at least one month and also consider the block of IPv4 of this IP (117.225.0.0/16). Prongs31 06:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 06:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism / block evasion - may want to protect Anthony Weiner as well. . Larry Hockett (Talk) 08:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:11, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion. Please see 2601:449:C200:CDBF:0:0:0:0/64 and this discussion. . HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:58, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Anonymous IPs still continue to infiltrate number of awards, also block evasion of Special:Contributions/177.33.181.171. Raritydash (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After this (controversial) party had an enormous success during the 2019 Dutch provincial elections, many IP users and new users have been removing sourced content and adding unsourced content. This happens by users of both sides of the political agenda, by the way. MrClog (talk) 17:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of WP:OR by hopping IP see edit summary also. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor continuing to edit war. Bondegezou (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is one IP who has not been seen since two days. Please let us know if disruption resumes.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to sensitivity of article and coming elections . Rickyurs (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Maybe someday, but not now. I see very little vandalism and a lot of constructive editing by IPs. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent editing by self-admitted subject of article (acct was blocked) and another new account that is doing similar (probable sockpuppet). L1A1 FAL (talk) 13:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:Protection is necessary. Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 11:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant need to revert and fix IP edits, especially in the ever-growing Plot section (also a few passive-aggressive edit summaries by them). TropicAces (talk) 16:28, 23 March 2019 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 00:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Should also salt RUFFiH. Wgolf (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Both articles salted. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 00:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SkyGazer 512 My talk page 13:55, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Samsara 20:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SkyGazer 512 My talk page 13:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Samsara 20:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism over the past few days. Natureium (talk) 22:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

25 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this is a topical political event that has attracted drive by vandals. τ℗ʍ (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 wek, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – topical political subject has been vandalized multiple times in last 24 h. τ℗ʍ (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism to a BLP. Changing his wife's name to that of a character on a TV show. TomCat4680 (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 21:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 21:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request indefinite semi-protection of sockpuppet investigations due to attack by troll. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hi, I am a member of WP:SNOOKER and I am having real problems with an editor at this article who keeps corrupting one of the tables so it directly contradicts sourced information (the sources are documented directly in the table above). Even though the changes are being undertaken by different IP numbers and a newly registered account I am pretty sure this is just a single person. I started a discussion at Talk:List_of_world_number_one_snooker_players#Total_time_spent_at_#1 but the editor has just completely ignored this (explaining why their edits are wrong and contradict the sources) and reverted. Semi-protection for a week would force them to hack this out on the talk page rather than de-stabilising the article with incorrect and an unverifiable information. Betty Logan (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 22:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and non-autoconfirmed editors. Phyo WP (message) 16:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Had to RevDel one edit for WP:BLP violation. Jayjg (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socks have got a new registered account in order to edit semi protected articles. Please see (WP:BLOCKEVASION: 70.114.211.80). Kishfan (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to raise P-level.-Kishfan (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. Enigmamsg 20:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GABgab 18:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of the article clearly objects to it. Bigwig7 (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much ongoing, doesn't seem a consistent problem. Discuss on the talkpage if necessary, but protection doesn't seem warranted ~ Amory (utc) 17:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:59, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing IP disruption. Also, this is a prominent issue and there have been many disruptive non-AC edits to the page in recent history, however, there have been some constructive edits as well. Recommend short-term semi and/or long-term PC. Aspening (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 18:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Accounts blocked/locked but, meh, 12 hours won't hurt ~ Amory (utc) 20:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 20:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. andritolion (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This seems to have calmed down, but I'm leaving the request in case things pick up again. Had I reached this request in a timely way I would have blocked the ip. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined It's been about 20 hours since the last edit, seems to have quieted down. The recent stuff was limited to a particular range, so do rereport if they come back, but for now it seems this page doesn't need protecting. ~ Amory (utc) 15:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 17:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of information.

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 17:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As mentioned on Talk page, there appears to be some disruptive editing, content disputes, and as mentioned in Request for comment, a consensus that all references to Mr Karat should be removed from this page. As I mention on the Talk page, someone who is not logged into Wikipedia (as well as user Jasperjak) is undoing other people's edits and claiming that they are verified by evidence, however, this evidence is not provided nor linked to on the page. Therefore, regardless of the merits of Mr Karat's claims, can this page please be protected?. Jedison brussels (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 16:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For the past few days or so. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 17:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced changes continued after the protection expired. Please consider protecting for a longer period of time. Jetstreamer Talk 16:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 17:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – by an IP hopper removing content, refusing to provide an explanation. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. ~ Amory (utc) 17:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. ~ Amory (utc) 17:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism replacing the university's chancellor with a college basketball player following a loss in the current tournament. ElKevbo (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 17:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Request RPP last night but due to the hours were early in the morning, the vandalism slow down and the RPP was denied. The vandalism/disruptive edits are back to day and would like to RPP for a few days. - see [43] , [44] and [45]. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 13:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism by IPs. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and I suspect looking at the protection history the next time will be indefinite. Fish+Karate 13:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 15:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: KPOP fans who do not understand Mandarin keep vandalising the page and inflating album sales by combining digital album sales with digital song sales which is completely false. There seems to be some kind of competition going on as fans keep inflating their own sales and deflating others. Cynicalcynical (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fish+Karate 15:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. ~ Amory (utc) 15:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. [46], [47], [48]. Geo Swan (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is an admin on the scene, so this may get handled without piling on more. Samsara 18:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No further disruption occurred. Samsara 06:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 06:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced claims. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Removal of PC alone. Unneeded as indef. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 04:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined because of this bug. Samsara 06:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Removal of PC alone. Unneeded as indef. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 04:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined because of this bug. Samsara 06:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Some editor trying to put fake information. . Mr.Perfect 18:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. A steady stream of edits (and consequent edit wars) dating back to early 2017 falsely alleging that Bryant is the nephew of Roy Bryant, one of Emmett Till's killers. This claim originated from a poorly-researched article published in January 2017 which claimed that Gov. Bryant's mother was the sister of Roy Bryant. Not that the article even deserves the attention of disproval due to its shoddy information to begin with, I took it upon myself regardless to look into the family histories of the respective men & can say confidently that there is no immediate nor even distant familial link between them. I could go into the genealogical particulars but that seems inappropriate in this space. Anyway, such false claims, especially when made vindictively and emotively as they have been (one user making the edits was named EmmettsVoice; another accused their reverter of 'whitewashing history'), are highly damaging and surely, given their persistence, warrant article protection. Amos Reed (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 05:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism that is most likely to continue during the next few weeks. Nadler is a person of political interest in the recent controversies in U.S. Politics. I can almost guarantee he is going to continue being the target of severe vandalism for the next few weeks.--- Coffeeandcrumbs 06:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – dynamic ip keep on changing the map to non-SVG. A full protection may force them to sit down in talk page to discuss it. As a bureaucratic kick around , SPI clerk did not think this ongoing (for a few month of changing map to non-SVG ) is their problem (the actual wording is "Having a dynamic IP is not sock puppetry") So, please don't kick the disruptive edit problem to another venue. e.g. It seem the sockmaster or as WP:tag team hold other ip such as 111.192.193.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) (by compare of change of map). Matthew hk (talk) 04:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is redundant to protect the article Republic of China (1912–1949) because it is only about the detail that which map should be used for the article Republic of China (1912–1949). I changed the infobox map of the article Republic of China (1912–1949) for some reasonable reasons: the map "File:China 1933.jpg" shows the territories of the Republic of China between 1 January 1912, when it was established, and 25 October 1945, when it regained Taiwan from Japan, for nearly 33 years and 10 months. However, the map "File:Republic of China (orthographic projection, historical).svg" shows the the territories of the Republic of China between 25 October 1945, when it regained Taiwan from Japan, and 5 January 1946, when it officially recognized the independence of Outer Mongolia, for nearly only 2 months. By comparison, it is obvious that the map "File:China 1933.jpg" is more representative, reasonable and proper for the infobox map of the article Republic of China (1912–1949). In conclusion, 1. it is redundant to protect the article Republic of China (1912–1949) because it is only about the detail that which map should be used for the article Republic of China (1912–1949). 2. the map "File:China 1933.jpg" is most representative, reasonable and proper for the infobox map of the article Republic of China (1912–1949), so please use the map "File:China 1933.jpg" for the only infobox map of the article Republic of China (1912–1949) and never change it. 123.150.182.179 05:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Since you never use Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949) and you have been warned, temp blocked. It is required to do so to stop this edit war. Also, this venue RFPP is bad to document the discussion about the editing of the article, so please use the right venue Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949), or related article talk page that you guys edit warring at: Talk:Nationalist government, Talk:Beiyang government. Matthew hk (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I will talk about this problem in Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949) then. I just explain why it is redundant to protect the article Republic of China (1912–1949), what I did at the article Republic of China (1912–1949) on earth and my reasonable reasons. It is my free speech right. You have no rights to interfere. 123.150.182.180 05:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Declined, It appears that the ip has engaged on the talk page. Please relist (or drop a note on my talk if I"m around) if the problem repeats. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same old problem that led to Pahlavi dynasty being protected. IP with ability to hopping or WP:tag team keep on changing the map to non-SVG as bold edit, but no consensus was documented in talk page. In the past, i had even invite some registered user that involve in that removal to talk, see User talk:复旦大学张超, but that person did not use the talk page and he was blocked for socking. Matthew hk (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is redundant to protect the article Nationalist government because it is only about the detail that which map should be used for the article Nationalist government. I changed the infobox map of the article Nationalist government for some reasonable reasons: the map "File:China 1933.jpg" shows the territories of the Republic of China between 1 January 1912, when it was established, and 25 October 1945, when it regained Taiwan from Japan, for nearly 33 years and 10 months (from 1 July 1925 the establishment of Nationalist government, for nearly 20 years and 4 months). However, the map "File:Republic of China (orthographic projection, historical).svg" shows the the territories of the Republic of China between 25 October 1945, when it regained Taiwan from Japan, and 5 January 1946, when it officially recognized the independence of Outer Mongolia, for nearly only 2 months (of course the only 2 months is during the rule of Nationalist government). By comparison, it is obvious that the map "File:China 1933.jpg" is more representative, reasonable and proper for the infobox map of the article Nationalist government. In conclusion, 1. it is redundant to protect the article Nationalist government because it is only about the detail that which map should be used for the article Nationalist government. 2. the map "File:China 1933.jpg" is most representative, reasonable and proper for the infobox map of the article Nationalist government, so please use the map "File:China 1933.jpg" for the only infobox map of the article Nationalist government and never change it. 123.150.182.177 14:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not in your way of bold edit everywhere and user warn you to discuss it first. For Nationalist government, it even worse, at least a dozen ip keep changing the map without discussion, with a registered user 复旦大学张超 even blocked for socking. The article was high likely to have an edit war again if you guys did not sit down in the talk page to document the consensus. Before any new consensus, it should use the SVG map whcih appeared in the stable version of the article back to 2013. Matthew hk (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The IP user you said participate in the discussion now. There is no one change the infobox map these days. Thus, it is redundant to protect the article Nationalist government. 211.103.82.167 16:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Declined, Same situation as Republic of China (1912–1949) above. Relist or let me know if this continues. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent removal of content. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Looks likely to go stale after final warning. Samsara 16:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, per Samsara. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Controversial topic in wake of Christchurch shootings nine days ago. Frequently abused by IPs and new accounts making edits and removals of things already discussed in Talk page, which makes it disruptive editing. Requesting 30 day semi-protection, possibly even 50 days. DA1 (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Over the last few days there is only 1 IP editor; if disruptive it can be blocked. I note however, that its talkpage is redlinked, so perhaps some discussion or a warning is in order. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IP editors making unsourced additions. EggRoll97 (talk) 04:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. An athlete made a good play. Get over it. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 04:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —RainFall 06:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Samsara 06:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article is currently at pending changes protection, and it is being edited far too frequently for pending changes to be appropriate, especially in light of Rob Gronkowski’s recent retirement announcement. At one point, I saw that there were 20 pending reviews awaiting acceptance. I’m not sure how that could work in any productive or fair manner. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- It should also be noted that there is frequent vandalism and disruptive edits on the page going on now, hence the request for semi-protection as opposed to unprotecting the page altogether. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 22:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent Misgendering. This article was previously protected for the same reason. The vandals returned soon after the protection was lifted. Also appropriate is semi-protection for a longer period. Extended confirmed is not necessary.--- Coffeeandcrumbs 00:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary semi-protection isn't enough to stop IPs who are hellbent on attacking article subject. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping user. PohranicniStraze (talk) 01:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of odd/vandal-type edits today. Shearonink (talk) 01:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring/DE from Special:Contributions/186.151.60.0/22. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs in the midst of current events involving the subject. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 03:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continual disruption to DoB (sourced) by multiple IPs who also alter the ref content to suit their changes (I.e, date and title of source article). Ongoing since October 2018, when the page was briefly protected but resumed thereafter and continued since. Eagleash (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The lighter touch of PC seems appropriate, please relist if bad revisions flood the article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism pretty much every day committed by seemingly the same person, using various IP's, seemingly new IP-adresses almost every day. Banning the IP's wont be enough to stop this! . Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have just reverted yet another attempt at the same kind of vandalism on the page, this is urgent! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High ip vandalism since the movie just came out. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from at least 2 IPs. Wikipelli Talk 23:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Amorymeltzer. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple instances of vandalism by anonymous users in last 24h. τ℗ʍ (talk) 00:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: IPs and autoconfirmed users are adding blatantly false information. It basically feels like people are waging a war to keep the article correct. NoahTalk 13:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly substituted template. funplussmart (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Used heavily enough (by bots, ect.) that TP is warranted. funplussmart (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 23:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 21#🤣. General Ization Talk 23:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

26 March 2019

Indefinite full protection. ~~ JJBullet 10:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see anything in the recent history which would suggest an indefinite full protection is needed--Ymblanter (talk) 10:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected DlohCierekim 22:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 19:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive and unsourced edits by IPs. StaticVapor message me! 19:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – also requested on talk page by Fred.bradley. Danski454 (talk) 20:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 22:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saul Bass (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism by IP 2A02:C7F:3807:be00:5d99:5892:19cf:e9b3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Warning issued, but no notice taken. David J Johnson (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 22:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: for a single vandal, WP:AIV is the way to go. DlohCierekim 22:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism my multiple users. Jeb3Talk at me here 17:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dirkbb (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 17:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 14:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 16:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 16:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 16:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 17:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Sjö (talk) 18:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 18:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jeb3Talk at me here 16:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to recent events relating to Jussie Smollett the article is attracting vandalism and racist edits. Likely to continue as currently frontpage news . KylieTastic (talk) 17:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated reinsertion of mildly defamatory statements (often in German). Vandalism is slow but has been persistent over the last weeks. A week-long semiprotection ran out two days ago. – Þjarkur (talk) 13:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Doublethink1954 (talk) 15:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 16:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 16:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ravichandran Ashwin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism. 117.198.252.38 (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection Constant removal of categories, POV pushing and edit-warring. Changes were never properly discussed and the user keeps removing categories literally falling under WP:VAND Shokatz (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. DlohCierekim 17:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Both looked beyond 3RR DlohCierekim 17:14, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:14, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have at least one IP hopper and I think several IPs making it impossible use 3RR and leaving other editors fairly helpless. A cynical person would suspect that at least one is someone logged out. Doug Weller talk 09:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be random vandalism with no real intent, I imagine a temp protect will at least get them off this BLP. . SKay (talk) 11:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much longer protection is needed seeing the amount of IP vandalism and daily fancruft being added, including false sales, chart peaks etc. —IB [ Poke ] 13:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 13:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 13:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 00:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 49.176.187.182 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. Samsara 01:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant additions by IP using outdated and misleading sources, stringing together non-related sources to further an argument. Qiushufang (talk) 03:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and stop editwarring. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please protect in both draft space and article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Robert McClenon Draft:Antonio Bonke Mbashe was only created once and Draft:Antonio Bonké Mbashe was created twice. I have protected those. However, Antonio Bonke Mbashe and Antonio Bonké Mbashe have never been created and I haven't protected them. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Aréat (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I am seeing one or two vandalism/unsourced edits per month. Normal page watching should be able to handle that. MelanieN (talk) 00:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: I made a request, linked and explained here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=887988350#The_World_Factbook_list_of_developed_countries that was denied because there was not enough recent disruptive activity. Well, there is now, and the exact same type that I was mentioning and was happening before. Led8000 (talk) 23:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You and the other editor need to stop reverting each other and arguing in edit summaries. (And be warned: do not accuse the other editor of vandalism or sockpuppetry in edit summaries. See WP:Aspersions.) You BOTH need to go to the talk page and explain why you believe your version is correct. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent addition of non-notable documentary that appears promotional (two IP's and one new user). Due to the three revert rule, I will not be able to undo future edits. --GouramiWatcherTalk 00:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/Persistent disruptive editing. - Many IP addresses are adding the same individual under Notable people section that is not considered notable. Many page watchers (John from Idegon, TheMBDude, Tacyarg, and among others) have reverted the edits multiple times from different IP users.

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Garbage edits and reverts. Neils51 (talk) 03:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs in both articles. MadonnaFan (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MrClog (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption continued immediately once previous protection expired. Nihlus 22:59, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated insertion of unsourced content by an IP-hopping vandal. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

27 March 2019

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Praxidicae (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit on the 25th. With single IPs vandalising, AIV is the better way to go. Lectonar (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temp semi-protection: Persitent vandalism. Eight edits from multiple IPs today. O3000 (talk) 14:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Prolog. Enigmamsg 17:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warrior using multiple accounts. A Dolphin (squeek?) 15:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Enigmamsg 17:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. Enigmamsg 17:47, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: This page has been under constant IP attacks due to a YouTuber’s video game series called the Box. GN-z11 16:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. --108.162.179.91 (talk) 01:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 05:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliyar Known as Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad is an Islamic scholar with international acclaim, blessed speaker and an influential Muslim leader from Southern India. He was elected as the Grand Mufti of India on 24th February 2019 by Prominent Muslim organizations in India.

This page which follows the wikipedia rules and regulation and honest information. For a long time, frequent editing is going on with wrong information from different IP's. So, we have to get full protection for this page, as soon as possible. . Irfan Arimbra (talk) 12:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Who is "we"? Lectonar (talk) 14:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of spam links to fansite by multiple IP and registered users. 1, 2, 3, 4. AldezD (talk) 12:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Please change from pending changes to semi-protection, in line with the talk page. The BLP violations from IPs are relentless. Bradv🍁 15:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 17:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: ANyone who wants to make the SP longer, please feel free DlohCierekim 17:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Excessive violations, long protection log. IPs only bring disruption to this page. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 10:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending-changes protection is working just fine; about one vandalism edit per day (which doesn't even go "live") is not a disruption which warrants semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IPs that has been reverted but keeps coming back up.. Gagaluv1 (talk) 13:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 01:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been attracting racist jokes and modifications from anonymous editors. Most recent used misleading edit summary. . Seazzy (talk) 01:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced additions by IP editors. Page was just recently unprotected. StaticVapor message me! 04:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IPs, silly vandalism. GirthSummit (blether) 08:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EclipseDude (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent multiple IP address vandalism. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done DlohCierekim 13:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 13:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: not blocked editor made constructive edit DlohCierekim 13:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CalOtter (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too much disruption for pending changes. The event takes place April 5, so requesting protection until maybe a few days after at the least. StaticVapor message me! 04:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: This disambiguation page rarely needs editing, but most edits on this page are vandalism. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – String of unconstructive edits over the last few days. EclipseDude (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 07:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hhkohh (talk) 15:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User:Robminchin, an astronomer per his talk page, whose first edits many years ago included the Royal Astronomical Society's article and particularly with regard to the use of post-nominal letters, seems insistent that the post-nominal letters 'F.R.A.S.' are only to be used by Fellows of the Royal Astronomical Society, even though there is plentiful recognition of the use of these letters by the Fellows of the Royal Asiatic Society, in sources such as recent editions of Debrett's Peerage, The Oxford Dictionary of Abbreviations, etc, and plenty of evidence supporting use of these letters since the 1800s to the present, which I have added to the article. disruptive editing. 88.109.198.170 (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Semi won't stop this. DlohCierekim 22:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DlohCierekim 22:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous IP users, as well as sockpuppets of Lobert jyet, who has been vandalizing Mötley Crüe articles. . Areaseven (talk) 14:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 23:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 23:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism/edit warring. Debiit (talk) 23:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandal that has been attacking this page along with the Communist Party of Siam has returned! . Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protect temporary, due to persistent IP vandalism, and possible BLP vio's. - wolf 19:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 22:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. DlohCierekim 22:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 22:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Additions of dubious unsourced content or deliberate factual errors. Page has already been protected twice in its short (so far) life as a Wikipedia article. StaticVapor message me! 20:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 23:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 23:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. StaticVapor message me! 21:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected DlohCierekim 23:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Consistent vandalism. StaticVapor message me! 21:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 23:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 23:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:52, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected DlohCierekim 23:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

28 March 2019

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Aries Andres (talk) 03:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, never been recreated--Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Aries Andres (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, never been recreated--Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There are a lot of edit warring happening there . SharabSalam (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious violation of the 1RR rule by ip using multiple locations. Onel5969 TT me 12:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Not seeing a level of disruption that would require indefinite protection. Jayjg (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopping block evader replacing promotion of Kevin L. Walker. Blocked editor is User:Melissaburner, apparent PR person dedicated to promoting Walker. Twitter reference used in their last edit appears to reveal the driving force here [49]. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent disruptive and vandalism edits CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple incidents of clear trolling by multiple users in the last hour as a result of controversial news in recent days/weeks. 150.101.189.52 (talk) 02:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor keeps readding WP:UNDUE information despite multiple editors reverting edits. lullabying (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Returning IP editor making unexplained changes. Repeat flier. . SummerPhDv2.0 18:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The reason I'm requesting PC and not semi is because it seems that there are certain IP users that make valuable contributions to the page, and they shouldn't be hindered in doing so by a semi-protection. MrClog (talk) 13:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: You seem to be doing most of the heavy lifting at this article. Do you also support PC rather than semi? Samsara 15:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Samsara, Yes - PC would be best. Although there is some vandalism, most of the IP editors are being constructive (even if they need a bit of guidance on the whys and wherefores). Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 16:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: I see you semi-protected it. As per the above, could you change it to a PC protection? Thank you. --MrClog (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced date changes by hoping IP's. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – I am requesting full protection for this redirect because people keep acting as though it is an actual talk page and adding information to it that nobody else responds to. Thanks. Goveganfortheanimals (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC) : Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Since it has been semi-protected, there was no disruption. Lectonar (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done I am stupid; I have semi-protected the redirect now. Lectonar (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive changes by IP editors. StaticVapor message me! 03:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP,and they haven't even been warned yet... Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could someone please temporarily semi-protect my page so that I don't get another flood like last night from some idiot whose idea I actually supported? [50] Thanks. . Doug Weller talk 13:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If you want it shortened or lengthened, just ping me please. Lectonar (talk) 13:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Six-month protection expired a few days ago and every non-AC edit since then has been vandalism. Should probably be semi'd for at least a year, if not indef. Aspening (talk) 14:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only two instances, three days apart. Let's try PC1 and see if it remains a consistent pattern, then reach for longer semi. Samsara 15:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption is still limited to IPs. Lectonar (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP fancruft . - FlightTime (open channel) 15:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (The Bruce Dickinson?) This is too slow for semi-protection at the moment. Lectonar (talk) 15:54, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to recent, persistent disruption by hoping IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also because IP involved 2600:387:A:902:0:0:0:1 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has been blocked. Abecedare (talk) 08:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: High level of speculative or against source edits. Or deciding some how Fox units shut down before the Disney merger are some how Disney units. Spshu (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have no source that they shut down. Just because 21CF shut down, doesn’t mean Fox EG shut down. By that logic, 20th Century Fox would have been “shut down”. So it’s best to countinue to list these as Disney units UNLESS you give a source saying otherwise. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 20:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fox Entertainment Group has been split into two, TV and film. The highest unit under Walt Disney Studios was announced to be 20th Century Fox not Fox Entertainment Group, @HurricaneGeek2002:, with Walden as Vice Chair of 20th Century Fox moving over to Disney Studios. It doesn't necessarily Fox EG shut down, but you are assuming what and where this unit is. It could be used as a transfer vehicle for the TV units and moved under W.Disney TV or just a unit wind down. 21CF did not shut down it merged with WDC Merger Enterprise II, Inc. and became a holding company. Spshu (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: There has been vandalism and nonsense editing by both registered and IP users the past several days (that I've warned). Kay girl 97 (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 18:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 07:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Should remain a redirect unless an article is created with proper sources. Thsmi002 (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, please deal with the user, not with the article--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MrClog (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: One month, or until sources are provided on the talk page. WP:NOTADVERTISING, etc. . Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 07:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 37.48.247.164 (talk · contribs) blocked by Edgar181. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 07:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 187.64.136.132 (talk) 00:16, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This should die down once off the mainpage. Lectonar (talk) 09:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a back-and-forth changing between "Nate Oats" and "Snake Oats" for the past several hours (appears to be related to current news). Creffett (talk) 02:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Has possibly died down but semi-protecting for a short while in case some fans want to take another stab at it once they wake up. Abecedare (talk) 08:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

temporary protection: repeated mass dumping of production companies and random status changes, while the other editor ignores talk page discussion. Spshu (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: I appear to have edit-conflicted with you on this report. I agree that @Spshu and King Crimson the Third: need to discuss more and perhaps at this point involve other users esp. since template talkpages are often not well-watched. Howover, in order to stop the current slow edit-warring, I had full-protected the template for two weeks before I saw your message. No objection to you lifting that protection, if you prefer that. Abecedare (talk) 08:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Abecedare: There is no problem, protect away :). Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Spshu and King Crimson the Third: please read the above notes and use the time to resolve the dispute and come up with an inclusion criterion for the template. Abecedare (talk) 08:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Started just after the previous semi-protection period recently expired. 187.64.136.132 (talk) 00:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 08:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There appear to be multiple new editors adding and deleting content. What has been added has been cited, but is badly written; what's deleted is all the new content, often with no explanation. I have deleted the cruft, and further changes need discussion on the talk pages. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 08:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumes after expiry of 3-month protection. Hrodvarsson (talk) 04:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the next protection will likely be indefinite.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced edits and vandalism again after protection expired. --Let There Be Sunshine 04:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mobile IPs edit warring over which unsourced and apparently bogus nickname to use for this town. Meters (talk) 19:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 08:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by User:HarveyCarter, using IPs from Suffolk for the last two years. . Binksternet (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected. As long as they stay on IPs, extended-confirmed would be overkill. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Change of birth location and nationality from Taiwan(ese) to China/Chinese by IP users. Redalert2fan (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note; this is a recurring theme on this page after every block (PC or semi) expires. Redalert2fan (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected Lectonar (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IPs and anonymous users keep adding unsourced information. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 21:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism. It would probably be a good idea to have this page semi-protected until the end of the NBA regular season next month. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 06:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Sudden surge of vandalism and generally disruptive editing stemming from a dispute Zumock had on Twitter with Patton Oswalt in the past 24 hours. Some of the disruptive editing comes from a registered user of almost 14 years and involves drunk driving accusations with no sources provided. NJZombie (talk) 06:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. in response to an earlier request. I see that GuruAskew (talk · contribs) has not made unsourced edits after they were reminded of BLP on their talkpage. So not raising the protection from semi, yet. Abecedare (talk) 07:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of IP Disruption . IanDBeacon (talk) 13:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 07:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by ip users. SuperWikiLover223 (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 04:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People on Twitter are raging against the guy and sharing screenshots of the vandalism. A day or two of protection is probably a good idea for BLP reasons. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive editing from IP editors, protecting the page temporarily has not helped. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 04:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP slow-pace edit warring (dating back to Nov 2018) to remove a large chunk of sourced content from . "The Khazar hypothesis". Icewhiz (talk) 06:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given its subject the article has been, and will perhaps remain, a constant target of vandalism and POV edits (see article history and log). Abecedare (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC). Abecedare (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of LTA activity. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Stale. Besides, plenty of sysop traffic ~ Amory (utc) 01:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Australian user keeps removing content and adding hoaxes. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP(s), mainly repeated attempts to insert an unsourced statement despite a plea to enter into a discussion on the talk page. A problem that seems likely to escalate without intervention. Poltair (talk) 06:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ Amory (utc) 01:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: I made a request, linked and explained here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=887988350#The_World_Factbook_list_of_developed_countries that was denied because there was not enough recent disruptive activity. Well, there is now, and the exact same type that I was mentioning and was happening before. Led8000 (talk) 01:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warriors on the page....let's force these editors who know better to the talk page. Moxy (talk) 02:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LiberatorG (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is so dumb ~ Amory (utc) 01:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible IP hopper vandalizing the page since 25 March. . INeedSupport :3 19:47, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 01:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. El_C 22:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 20:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DlohCierekim 22:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Dispute resolution is that-a-way DlohCierekim 22:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ Amory (utc) 01:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs spamming nonsense. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 18:47, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Disruptive editing by several logged users who are persistently changing page name, lead and template to this one [51] [52] [53]. AveTory (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I second. I am an uninvolved editor, I came across this report after trying to file the same myself, after seeing this reported at ANI. I think a good week of full protection would allow the kinks to be ironed out behind the scenes. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 00:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

29 March 2019

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many unregistered user like anonymous IP address. Alif Fizol (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since March 8! Ad Orientem (talk) 19:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prevent from edit by unregistered user. Alif Fizol (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prevent from edit by unregistered user. Alif Fizol (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MikeTango (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war going on. Revert to oldest stable version, fully protect and handout blocks/warnings as appropriate. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I posted a strongly worded dummy edit which will hopefully get everybody's attention. If that fails drop me a line and I will deal with the matter more firmly. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many unknown unregistered user such unknown or anonymous IP address. Alif Fizol (talk) 18:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection – Persistent removal of information regarding a former co-host from the infobox by unregistered users. --Shadow (talk) 18:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. B dash (talk) 10:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like this is mostly one IP. If that is the case I would refer them to ANI after they have been suitably warned. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced changes or vandalism to a BLP. StaticVapor message me! 15:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Chaipu keep on deleting the content . Mr.Perfect 15:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 15:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quail Armor 15:20, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 15:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruption since last round of semi-protection expired. Semi-prot is a better option than the current PC due to the persistently high volume of disruptive edits (and the near absence of non-disruptive edits by unconfirmed editors). R2 (bleep) 17:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The level and persistence of disruptive editing is nuts. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 19:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent vandalism IllegalOperation (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:16, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This is a judge under attack because of a controversial ruling. Short term protection should be enough. MelanieN alt (talk) 15:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @MelanieN: One user yesterday and one user the day before, that doesn't seem like enough to warrant protection? ~ Amory (utc) 15:09, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not, if it has stopped there. I am expecting more because I often find this as a pattern driven by reaction to news, and since I am out of town and can't really monitor it I thought I should at least put it on people's radar. If you want to decline for not enough recent problems that's ok with me. MelanieN alt (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Deliberate vandalism, BLP abuse. 2405:204:D383:5AB5:3186:7474:4DEF:19E2 (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits. TheLostBoy (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced puffery. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by multiple IPs. Prongs31 15:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Grey Wanderer (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 16:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Living proof as to why pending changes protection is rarely good enough for famous people. Constant disruptive editing. Constant BLP violations. Trillfendi (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The last refused edit was 22 March and the last edit was 24 March. Pending seems to be working. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 15:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 15:07, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism, founder keeps being changed to an artist signed under the company. Alexanderlee (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP anonymous editor. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 08:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one ip with two edits to the article. El_C 08:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits are being made on this page, especially from IPs over the last few weeks. A semi-protection status would help in reducing such edits. 49.38.50.8 (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The disruptive IP can be warned and reported at AIV. Lectonar (talk) 10:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recent disruptive/unsourced edits. - FlightTime (open channel) 11:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – To match the protected of the "parent" module - Module:Protected edit request. DannyS712 (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Anarchyte:, can you weigh in on this. You recently unprotected this template. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 07:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Caknuck: I unprotected it at the request of Pppery. See here. I also think it should be protected as it is a part of a popular module, but I don't plan on touching the protection of this page again. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that it is a subpage of a high-use module is simply irrelevant to me. It only has 75 transclusions, and that is clearly not enough to warrant any kind of protection. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 11:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring against policy and BRD . Harmanprtjhj (talk) 05:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page is under 1RR, Please consider indefinite ECP also per Wikipedia:General sanctions/India–Pakistan conflict since this is part of India pakistan conflict. (source Statesman "Pakistan based Khalistan Commando Force" ) And then we have these open proxy IPs tag teaming for edit warring on content against policies. (courtesy ping Ivanvector) --DBigXray 06:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But ECP won't stop you from edit warring against talk page consensus and policies. That's why I asked for full-protection. Harmanprtjhj (talk) 07:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Leave that for admins to decide. You know our admins are smarter than you would assume they are. --DBigXray 07:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Disruption is minimal at the moment (far from ECP being needed, and even less full protection) ; the talk-page of the article is always open, and if you can't get real consensus there, there is always dispute resolution. Oh, and I am sure sniping at each other on this page here will get things done in a hurry...it always does. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IP hopping anonymous editor. AussieLegend () 05:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. 2 IPs in the last week. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Famous edit Warriors back at it again.....let's get them back to the talk page. Moxy (talk) 22:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I would say that this should just be extended protected so that decent Wikipedians can still add useful information to it. Goveganfortheanimals (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) blocked by CambridgeBayWeather. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is happening. . Aviartm (talk) 02:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP has been blocked. If they return then ask any admin. Although you won't get indefinite. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Edit warring between IP users over certain airline entries. Coastie43 (talk) 09:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Chronically problematic page that has been experiencing low-level disruption with some high volume flare-ups. Most edits from non-autoconfirmed users are disruptive, and the edits are not confined to one IP range. This sort of behavior has been going on since at least 2016. Aspening (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:23, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Some IP hopper is repeatedly replacing a reliable source with a dubious tabloid-like source which neither has an author nor even mentions the unit of the height, thereby creating the problems of BLP violation. As they are making every revert with a new IP address, it is hard to even discuss with them. So the page needs temporary semi-protection. NitinMlk (talk) 18:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why is a blog a reliable source?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
His author Sandeep Goyal seemed like a reputed media personality when I first added the source, as he seems to be writing for major Indian newspapers. But I will check again regarding him. – NitinMlk (talk) 19:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the source for the time being. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly recreated copyvios

Creation protection: both users having issues understanding copyright deletions. SITH (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One recreation of each isn't a problem. If the copyvio is a problem then the user should be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. ~ Amory (utc) 00:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Was protected and unprotected before the bo could react.... Lectonar (talk) 07:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. ~ Amory (utc) 00:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Was protected and unprotected before the bot could react.... Lectonar (talk) 07:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socking by banned sockmaster Banana19208. Begoon 03:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, addition of non notables. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 daays, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:09, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:10, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:10, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 04:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prime target of, um, certain users who keep on adding random, bizarre or nonexistent stuff on the article. See also WP:KIDSTVDATES. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:51, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 00:18, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP users continuously vandalize the article, inserting random adjectives that sometimes don't get caught for some time, wholly biasing the article. As is, the article needs editing, and the extra work doesn't help anyone who isn't trying to boost their edit count. puggo (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 01:18, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unconstructive edits.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  01:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Valueless vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 01:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aviartm (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism. . Aviartm (talk) 02:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day plus 6 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes Like the main page now under the same protection, we're now dealing with the usual IPs mad that 'X' lost to 'Y' and changing it to that, or trying to create fake categories; this would discourage them from sticking around and continuing their disruption. Nate (chatter) 20:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending is not enough. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:35, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes Almost immediately after the expiration of the previous protection, IP editors returned making defamatory edits to the article. The subject of the article continues to be heavily covered in the news and shows no signs of declining interest. Chetsford (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Editing is too heavy for pending. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Heartfox (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:38, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of hoax cast members by IP-hopping editor. Ravensfire (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 moths, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Currently part of a "scandal" so a lot of IP vandalism. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:40, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editors keep going back and forth on the artist's nationality without having a consensus on the article's talk page first. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IPs; edit warring over whether Yoji Harada has passed away.  vwilding talk 23:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Per template protection on 2 and 3. CoolSkittle (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Horst Hof (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Wikiedro_reported_by_User:EvergreenFir_(Result:_No_violation) as well. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Protection is require

semi-protection: IP users always interfere with these articles,they always remove sections ,this is not good thing ,help me regarding this.i always talk with IP Users but they not respond. Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two file pages

Temporary semi-protection: Both pages being targeted by IP editor adding links to cartoon porn images. I've added the editors to AIV but probably the pages will need to be protected since a variety of addresses are being used. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

30 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Debiit (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:58, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated namecruft vandalism multiple ips. John from Idegon (talk) 15:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 19:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.235.33.136 (talk · contribs) blocked by Acroterion. Samsara 18:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of puerile nonsense by anons. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, as stale; I would block the IP (it shows as static) but it would no longer be preventative. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection - The IP user whose page this is has been exclusively using it to demand Wikipedia assist him with harassment that (1) has nothing to do with Wikipedia and (2) has no chance of ever having anything to do with Wikipedia. Their most recent edit also included personally-identifying information. The reason I'm asking for protection as opposed to a block is because thus far they have only ever edited their user talk page. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 22:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This one is actually related to article Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić. It is impossible to develop article, which is now caught in prolonged edit-war, persistent reverts, content dispute and inclusion of unsourced files, claims and statements, disruptive editing; problem is also in fact that article is neglected with lowly statistic - low number of edits, no other editors involved for longer periods in editing or dispute resolutions. ౪ Santa ౪99° 22:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – same user keeps vandalizing over and over. Deauthorized (talk) 15:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, User appears to have stopped after final warning. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Related to Israel and Palestine (the hosting controversy). funplussmart (talk) 22:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had to fix a claim that wasn't supported by the source, so might be better if someone else examines this for protection. Samsara 07:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, Perhaps I'm naive, but the I/P connection seems sufficiently attenuated that I want to see an actual need for e/c protection as demonstrated by problematic edits.. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 17:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock-puppetry – User:Nsmutte sock activity. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Targets of IP socks of User:MariaJaydHicky. See prior protection log for history. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removed of content by IP. Alexbrn (talk) 06:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a dispute regarding the reliability of QuackWatch, specifically this, as a source of biographical information. Samsara 07:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. Samsara 19:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Muhandes (talk) 17:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing – disruption from a wide range of IP users, popular theme. Unfortunately, IP and new users are mostly unable to read and follow editing notes. It is tedious to revert these edits again and again. Jklamo (talk) 17:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent editing by IP users. Deauthorized (talk) 17:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; sock puppetry. Dan56 (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; recurring mass attacks. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Irfan Arimbra (talk) 09:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article has been target of disruptive editing by IPs since years ago. After a semi-protection expired a few days ago, the situation has continued to be problematic. A semi would help. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deauthorized (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing. As noted on the article's talk page, an editor is editing while logged out to continue an edit war. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect historical article from unregistered user like anonymous IP address. Alif Fizol (talk) 07:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I'd already put this on PC1, should be fine for now, and we can monitor what happens. Samsara 07:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP violations (only two so far but egregious). Might need revdel as well. Sjö (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent COI edits (3 users have been blocked so far so it's basically whack-a-mole). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected by NinjaRobotPirate (talk · contribs). Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:40, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: The page is about a city in India with a population of 500,000+, the 3rd of its state (Karnataka) after Bangalore and Mysore: so it has a high visibility. Gulbarga is persistently vandalized by anonymous IPs that, joking on its second name (Kalaburagi), enjoy creating a meaningless lead section, with a nonsense descriptions. And this is only a part of the vandalisms. It is absolutely urgent a full protection, because the vandalisms, despite any rollback, increases day by day and includes some vandalism-only accounts. Thank you. --79.51.38.58 (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like a possibly coordinated effort, either that or someone with access to multiple IP addresses. Doug Weller talk 08:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: lot of editing is going on by one user and also now one more user is doing some changes for photo. till the time needfull is done need protection for complete article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rusianejohn (talkRusianejohn (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC) contribs) 12:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, please continue using the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Indef semi or PC1 recent and persistent additions of unsourced political views, extensive protection log. Has been and will always be a disruption magnet. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman 17:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That will work. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 17:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High level of vandalism from new users and IPs, to a BLP about a politician. bonadea contributions talk 09:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated section blanking by IP editors after edit warring by SPAs. Melcous (talk) 11:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: lot of editing is going on by one user and also now one more user is doing some changes for photo. till the time needfull is done need protection for complete article.Rusianejohn (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, please continue using the talk page--Ymblanter (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, per the story detailed at AN/I, which will need more time to cool down, if the disruptive IP editor is willing to cool down at all (they've already ignored one discussion closure on the talk page). XOR'easter (talk) 12:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. XOR'easter (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I would think an SPI might prove useful after all...even if only to rule out meat-/sockpuppetry. Lectonar (talk) 13:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Low volume of unconstructive IP edits. EclipseDude (Chase Totality) 07:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 07:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption resumed shortly after last protection expired. EclipseDude (Chase Totality) 08:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term problem. funplussmart (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too much disruption for pending changes. . StaticVapor message me! 03:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of strange vandalism and disruptive edits from multiple users on this page due to a controversial event during a basketball game that the subject was involved in recently. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 05:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content; three different users and one IP have all made closely similar edits, so there may be another aspect to this. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP deleting blocks of reliably sourced text and adding unsourced material, article is currently undergoing FAC. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page was vandalised by multiple ip users / persistant vandalism . Deauthorized (talk) 03:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 05:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High amount of vandalism. . IanDBeacon (talk) 23:13, 29 March n2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deauthorized (talk) 05:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive-by IP edits ignoring talk page consensus. Grayfell (talk) 05:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

31 March 2019

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recent hopping IP removal of content to have their prefered version. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. funplussmart (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 22:48, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and accounts that always consists of adding irrelevant information without sources, the article has been previously protected. The users will return and return as have been doing since 2016 if not protected indefinitely. This request has apparently been rejected for "not enough recent activity" despite the fact these users have made 23 editions in the last 10 days. Super Ψ Dro 20:31, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection may have been an overkill given the sporadic nature of the disruption but, given that this has been a long-term problem I have added pending changes protection. If auto-confimed accounts continue the disruption by adding unsourced or undue content, they can be warned and subsequently blocked. Abecedare (talk) 20:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 18:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Samsara 19:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Samsara 19:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All Edits since early february are either vandalism or the removal thereof. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:55, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of hoax cast to article. Ravensfire (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:56, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and accounts that always consists of adding irrelevant information without sources, the article has been previously protected. The users will return and return if not protected indefinitely. Super Ψ Dro 10:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one IP recently, no need for protection ~ Amory (utc) 11:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Amorymeltzer, I do not know what is understood by recently, but in the last 10 days, 3 users (2 IPs and an account obviously of the same person) have made a total of 23 editions adding the same and reverting their own changes over and over again so that other users can not revert them. This person is not going to stop until we leave his changes in the article, it has been this way since 2016 and it's about time to end this. Super Ψ Dro 13:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 14:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 14:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Has been protected at least twice before but the vandalism hasn't gone away. Popcornduff (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:DE in the form of WP:BLP violations. I thought about going to WP:AIV with the latest IP, who has gotten two Level 4 warnings, but the WP:DE has all come from different IP addresses, so I think semi-protection is needed here. --IJBall (contribstalk) 14:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 14:30, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit Warriors back at it again after block and page protection has expired..... perhaps time to issue longer blocks to all parties involved. In the meantime let's lock up this page again. Moxy (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've protected the page. Nobody's innocent here but was loathe to issue more blocks without a broad warning to all parties (rather than them warning each other). ~ Amory (utc) 11:55, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – High level of LTA activity. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Eh. There's been nothing in the past 12 hours, but I might still do it if Favonian hadn't recently edited without doing so himself. He can manage I think ;) ~ Amory (utc) 11:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since March 27th, 2019. DisneyAviationRollerCoasterEnthusiast (talk) 00:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Some good faith editing going on, but regardess not too bad at the moment ~ Amory (utc) 11:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 11:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is going to keep on happening because there is a field called "owner" and childish editors like to change the field value for MLS teams to the team (or player) who last defeated the team. Two seasons ago, every MLS team article was protected for this very reason. It's a shame that we do not have responsible fans and editors. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 11:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations. LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony)

Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. ~ Amory (utc) 11:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:20, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 11:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit dispute/warring. Protected recently for same issue/edits. Gotitbro (talk) 20:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ivanvector. ExC ~ Amory (utc) 11:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Punk-ass bot ~ Amory (utc) 11:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ Amory (utc) 11:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated removal of details with cited sources and adding unsourced contents.  — Jojoyeet@lk 03:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been persistent vandalism on this page since 29th March. Hitro talk 10:30, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 11:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent, repeated efforts by COI editors to edit this page. COI templates added to talk pages of IPs have been ignored. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 20:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of POV/addition of unsourced content. Jusdafax (talk) 06:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep smearing the article. Request protection duration of 1 week or more. Sk8erPrince (talk) 07:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:26, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:29, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Page doesn’t require edits very often, but a large percentage of the recent edits have been vandalism or disruptive.

Declined Enigmamsg 04:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. Enigmamsg 04:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sro23. Enigmamsg 04:53, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 02:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Block has been made. Samsara 19:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High amount of disruptive IP editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Vandalism by blocked user, including defamatory ramblings. May require rev/deletion as well as user block. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. (by admin Samsara) Favonian (talk) 23:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]