Talk:Brookite
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
look at the http://mikrominerals.wz.cz/alba/vrbak/vrbak.htm
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brookite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110515111256/http://cst-www.nrl.navy.mil/lattice/struk/c21.html to http://cst-www.nrl.navy.mil/lattice/struk/c21.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Picture caption needs correction
[edit]Comment regarding the first picture (at this time): File:Brookite-gem7-07a.jpg
The picture caption is not an objective description of the subject. In fact the name of the mineral is lost in a jumble of info about the sample location & the dimensions of the thumbnail. The 2nd sentence of the caption is an emotional, defensive statement, which begins as follows:: "OK, ok, so the stuff is common now after a HUGE find the last 2 years ..." — The caption continues to deteriorate from there. I don't know enough about the mineral to fix it, but it needs correction. Aimzzz (talk) 19:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)