Jump to content

User talk:Rich Farmbrough

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 17:13, 15 January 2024 (Wikidata weekly summary #611: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Note
Email may very occasionally be delayed due to spam filtering.
Links
Talk Archive Index


Concern regarding Draft:Statesman

Information icon Hello, Rich Farmbrough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Statesman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedians for Sustainable Development - April 2023 Newsletter

This is our twenty-sixth newsletter, covering April 2023. This issue has news related to SDGs 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16.

Meetings

Activities

News

Research

New Wikidata properties

Featured content

This message was sent with Global message delivery by Ainali (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)ContributeManage subscription[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gold medallist

Template:Gold medallist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Antonio Nóbrega albums has been nominated for deletion

Category:Antonio Nóbrega albums has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:30, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The album that was in this category Pernambuco falando para o mundo is interesting as its name is the slogan of Radio Jornal di Commercio. There's probably more information in Music, National Identity and the Politics of Location: Between the Global and the Local (2016) and Antonio Carlos Nóbrega em acordes e textos armoriais (2011). All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]

To this page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you, anonymous friend of the Wiki. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Utah Western Railway (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Scrolling TOC

Template:Scrolling TOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bilateral ambassador category

Template:Bilateral ambassador category has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Downloading

Template:Downloading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:De-en

Template:De-en has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Signiferi

An article that you have been involved in editing—Signiferi—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. BlueCamille chat ! 20:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Link to page and redirects has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect +95 (disambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 8 § +95 (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 14:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:List element exists

Template:List element exists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Bamboo socks has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 15 § Bamboo socks until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 16:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not dead yet

User:Chris troutman, please revert yourself in these two edits:

  1. Unsuscribing me from Signpost
  2. Unsubscribing me from Bots:Spam

Please also leave an edit summary in the second revert that clarifies that your first edit summary is wrong, and that I have no Arbcom restrictions since they were all overturned or rescinded many years ago.

If there are any other places you or anyone you were working with have interfered with my business, please ensure that these are also reverted as far as possible, and inform me here.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]

@Chris troutman: It would appear that Rich is correct, and there are no outstanding ArbCom restrictions on Rich. Also, I don't see a reason why Rich can't be a subscriber to these. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chris Troutman (talk) 22:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Table oddities

I II III IV V VI VII VIII
4913
7903
8991
4913
7903
8991

4913
7903
8991

4913

7903
8991

4913

7903 8991

4913 7903 8991

4913

7903

8991

4913

7903

8991

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #596

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

The redirect H***** W***** has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 7 § H***** W***** until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrowtalk 21:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Edward-Woodrow you will find this pseudonym listed in Joseph F. Clarke (1977). Pseudonyms. BCA. p. 77.. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 00:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]
N.B. The page number is the same in the earlier Elm Tree Books edition. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 00:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #597

Category:Noble families in the British Isles has been nominated for merging

Category:Noble families in the British Isles has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #598

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chron Bot

Template:Chron Bot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

Wikidata weekly summary #599

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 26 § Category:Wikipedia XX-Class level-n vital articles on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 14:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:MSGJ Good work with these cats! I've always been ambivalent about the "Wikipedia" prefix. It might be worth asking some pro-prefix folk to comment. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome to the 600th Wikidata Weekly Summary!

The redirect Template:R from native name has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 4 § Template:R from native name until a consensus is reached. Place Clichy (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request

I've started a revamp of Wikipedia:Tools/Optimum tool set.

Please take a look and let me know (below) if there are any essential techniques or must have tools that you think should be included.

Thank you.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   07:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

Wikidata weekly summary #601

Wikidata weekly summary #602

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

Wikidata weekly summary #603

Notice

The article Peter Stafford (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn it's 3 dabs, if you read it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Can someone look at the deleted version of Paul Tabori and find out why "copyright concerns" were the reason for deletion? Did this issue go back to the first version? Why wasn't a new version created immediately? Why weren't contributors to the article notified?
Thanks, All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #604

The redirect Jhelum(city) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 28 § Jhelum(city) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 07:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

[Wikidata] Weekly Summary #605

Category:Queen's Awards for Enterprise has been nominated for renaming

Category:Queen's Awards for Enterprise has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Keivan.fTalk 18:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joan Richards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joan Richards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Richards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eddie891 Talk Work 21:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #606

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CLOC (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #607

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

Happy Holidays

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Happy Holidays. Thank you for all of your work over the years. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 06:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Hope you had a great Christmas! All the best: Rich Farmbrough 02:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #608

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rich Farmbrough (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have no intention of breaking editing restrictions. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 20:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked, see comment below — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Worm That Turned and Barkeep49: as the blocking administrators. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My block was for 1 month so I think WTT is really the blocking admin here. I will just note beyond the discussion which led WTT to turn my 1 month into an indefinite (which I believe I supported at the time) that Rich's behavior led WTT to make a good metaphor around wildflowers which I expanded and turned into the essay WP:WILDFLOWERS. But there was never any need for this to be an indefinite block so from my, non-blocking admin POV, if an admin is convinced rich will not repeat the problems that led to the first block, this should be accepted. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WTT hasn't edited in over a month. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 00:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Given the complicated history here, and the extensive discussion that led to the latest block, I think any unblock request should go to WP:AN for review. Rich, would you be willing to craft an unblock request more appropriate for that forum? – bradv 01:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think AN is an option for Rich but in no way should this block require community consensus to undo. That is not in the spirit of either the block I placed or what WTT placed. If Rich would prefer AN review, fine. If Rich prefers typical unblock review I think that should be on the table. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what could be clearer than my unblock request above. I'd rather keep this simple, it's an unblock request that addresses the block reason pretty much head on, and should be capable of resolution here. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome back. Very happy to see this rather belated request and look forward to seeing your return to the project in 2024. As noted above, Dave is currently inactive, however I believe he would support an unblock in the circumstances. The unblock request is quite clear, and I accept it as genuine and sincere. I will be monitoring your edits regularly and will not hesitate to reblock if I judge that you controvene your editing restrictions — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no confidence that Rich will remain on the right side of his editing conditions, but equally no objections to this unblock, good luck for the future WormTT(talk) 00:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I find your lack of faith … disturbing. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 04:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Rich, I blocked you indefinitely because you stated, clearly, that you felt the burden of the restrictions would be intolerable and you would not go along with them. Your unblock request simply stated your "intent" to follow them. Based on your history, I'm expecting you to breach your restrictions and claim good intentions. Please do prove me wrong. WormTT(talk) 11:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Martin. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 04:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Reminder

Editing restriction Regardless of the editing method (i.e. manual, semi-automatic, or automatic; from any account), Rich Farmbrough is indefinitely prohibited from making cosmetic changes to wikicode that have no effect on the rendered page (excepting those changes that are built-in to stock AWB or those that have demonstrable consensus or BAG approval). This includes but is not limited to: changing templates to template redirects, changing template redirects to templates (see here for AWB stock changes on this item, with the understanding that bypassing template redirects will only be done when there is a substantive edit being done), changing the spacing around headers and ordered lists (except to make an aberration consistent with the rest of the page), and changing the capitalization of templates. Furthermore, prior to orphaning/emptying and deleting categories or templates, the appropriate processes (WP:CFD/WP:TFD) should be engaged. Sanction imposed per this AN discussion, to be enforced by escalating blocks
Editing restriction Rich Farmbrough is not permitted to make any mass changes to articles, broadly construed, and regardless of editing method, cosmetic or not, without a demonstrable consensus from the community that he is explicitly permitted to do so. Further, he is entirely prohibited from using Auto Wiki Browser or directly making any edits to Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Template redirects or any other page related to the governance and use of automated or semi-automated tools. Any such changes desired must be proposed on the appropriate talk page, and may only be enacted by other parties. This sanction does not replace or nullify other pre-existing sanctions on this user, and may be appealed no sooner than one year from the date it was approved by the community. Sanction imposed per this ANI discussion.
Creation restriction Regardless of the editing method (i.e. manual, semi-automatic, or automatic; from any account), Rich Farmbrough is indefinitely prohibited from mass creating pages in any namespace, unless prior community approval for the specific mass creation task is documented. The definition of "mass creation" and the spirit of the restriction follows Wikipedia:BOTPOL#Mass article creation. Sanction imposed following this ANI discussion and the prior editing restriction, to be enforced by escalating blocks
Editing restriction Consensus in respect of Rich Farmbrough's editing restrictions shall be defined as approval at WP:BRFA or a formally closed WP:RFC with more than ten non-canvassed participants. Sanction imposed per this ANI discussion.

I'm fairly sure this is not needed, but for complete clarity, the restrictions above are applicable — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:35, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

And welcome back. Drink up! ——Serial 19:10, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Happy new year to you! All the best: Rich Farmbrough 04:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Wikimedians for Sustainable Development - December 2023 Newsletter

This is our twenty-seventh newsletter, a sort of year-in-review for 2023.

Dear Wikimedians for Sustainable Development,

As we bid farewell to 2023, we reflect on a year that has been an uneven year for our user group. While the journey has been marked by some truly inspiring events, most of our efforts have been largely uncoordinated and the user group hasn't been the support it could have been. Yet, there's a glimmer of hope and a world of potential for 2024.

Highlights of 2023:

Newsletters Galore
We kicked off the year with zeal, sharing updates and inspiration through four newsletters. The number of things happening in the movement is astounding, but we need to rethink the format of the newsletter going into the next year.
Growing Strong
The Wikimedians for Sustainable Development family welcomed 33 new members in 2023. Your passion and dedication continue to inspire us, and we look forward to nurturing this community spirit in the year ahead.
Wikimania Talks
Our voices echoed far and wide at Wikimania, where several members of our community took the virtual stage to share insights and ideas about everything from Wikipedians-in-Residence's to open data. Your contributions showcased our commitment to sustainable development on a global scale.
Content Creation Magic
Throughout the year, our extended community demonstrated incredible dedication to expanding the knowledge base on Wikipedia. Countless hours were spent creating and curating content that aligns with our mission, contributing to a more sustainable digital ecosystem.
Campaigning hard
We saw a large variety of campaigns, from writing challenges to editathons. The willingness to experiment with new formats and partners, as well as learning from past efforts, shows great promise for the future.

Acknowledging Challenges:

While we celebrate these achievements, we acknowledge that 2023 presented its fair share of challenges. A lack of global coordination reminded us that the road to sustainable development is not always linear. However, it is precisely these challenges that fuel our determination to work together more cohesively in the coming year and proof that the user group is needed.

Hopeful Anticipation for 2024:

As we turn the page to 2024, let's carry forward the lessons learned and the successes celebrated. We are optimistic that, with renewed energy and a collective commitment, we will overcome obstacles and create an even more impactful and connected Wikimedians for Sustainable Development community.

Here's to a year of collaboration, growth, and making a lasting impact on the world through our shared passion for sustainability. Together, we can turn challenges into opportunities and pave the way for a brighter future.

Wishing you all a joyous holiday season and a Happy New Year!

Warm regards, User:Ainali, User:Daniel Mietchen

PS. We have started writing our yearly report, please add your activities to it.

This message was sent with Global message delivery by Ainali (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)ContributeManage subscription[reply]

welcome back

Our editing heydays did not overlap much, so my only knowledge of you was that one time you popped by the Discord, but at any rate it is nice to see you free, happy Christmas, hope you will stay around a while :) jp×g🗯️ 07:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #609

Happy for your return

Hi, you may not remember by now, from the lunch at McDonald back home from Esino Lario, and Montreal; you taught and helped me with some stuff, and chatted a bit here after Esino. I was sorry to see you had to leave after your immense work which I stumbled upon in many articles, so welcome back, and happy you keep motivation, and wish you keep enjoying your contributions here. אומנות (talk) 11:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! I appreciate your good wishes. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]
+1, very happy to see you editing again Rich! the wub "?!" 23:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hooo you remembered :-) I appreciate your reply, you already have another person happy to see you here! אומנות (talk) 21:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #610

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § Category:Vital articles in an unknown topic by quality on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 16:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages containing cite templates with deprecated parameters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #611