Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prospero (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. primarily due to the lack of any reliable sources to verify article content even after participant's efforts to find them. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prospero (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BAND. Has no reliable sources. Couldn't find any elsewhere. StewdioMACK (talk) 19:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:BAND #5 with two full length albums on Artoffact Records, a significant indie label that has been in operation since 1999. As usual with start class articles like this, the article does need help, but that on its own is not deletion criteria. -- t_kiehne (talk) 02:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That criterion doesn't hinge on listing the albums, it hinges on showing that the albums received coverage about them (e.g. reviews by professional music critics) in WP:GNG-worthy publications. Bearcat (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are statements here that would be acceptable notability claims if they were reliably sourced — but notability doesn't hinge on what the article says, it hinges on how well the article supports the things it says with WP:GNG-worthy referencing to verify that the things it says are accurate. But this article cites no reliable sources at all, and even a WP:BEFORE attempt to find better sources fetched only primary sources and irrelevant accidental text matches, and turned up not one hint of GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about the band or their albums at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bearcat. I similarly wasn't able to find coverage in reliable sources. toweli (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.