Draft:Zirabagtaria ovata

Zirabagtaria; Temporal range: 575-585 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N ↓
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Stem Mollusca?
Class:	Kimberellomorpha
Genus:	Zirabagtaria
Species:	Z.ovata

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,356 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Zirabagtaria ovata (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 12 days ago by Zhenghecaris (talk: D · +) · Last edited 12 days ago by Zhenghecaris

Submission declined on 18 October 2024 by Theroadislong (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Theroadislong 39 days ago. Last edited by Zhenghecaris 12 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 4 October 2024 by NotAGenious (talk).

Doesn't appear to be an accepted taxon as absolutely no sources are available.

Declined by NotAGenious 53 days ago.

Submission declined on 3 October 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Declined by DoubleGrazing 54 days ago.

Submission declined on 3 October 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Declined by DoubleGrazing 54 days ago.

Submission declined on 2 October 2024 by Killarnee (talk).

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Declined by Killarnee 55 days ago.

Zirabagtaria is an solzid kimberellomorph (stem mollusk)from the Ediacaran aged Clemente Formation in Mexico discovered by the American paleontologist Mark McMenamin along with the stem chiton Korifogrammia and various other species in 2018.^[1]

Description

Zirabagtaria was oval shaped,a u shaped band defined its head, sclerites are preserved in the holotype, an asymmetrical head may be due to deformation or glide symmetry..^[2]^[3]

Classification

Zirabagtaria was an Solzid Kimberellomorph ( related to solza) , therefore it is an stem Mollusc.

Occurrence

Zirabagtaria is known from a single specimen from the Clemente Formation in Mexico.

Species

There is a single species, Z.ovata.^[1]^[3]

notes

1.Zirabagtaria is not always considered a valid taxon , since few researchers apart from Mark McMenamin consider it valid.

Shortcuts

1. For the pdf of deep time analysis a coherent view of the history of the life go to google scholar search for Zirabagtaria and find the title then, click on the pdf.

References

^[4]Fig. 1 The Cambrian Explosion: macroevolution and biomineralization

^ ^a ^b Mcmenamin, Mark (2018). Deep Time Analysis A Coherent View of the History of Life. Springer Geology. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74256-4. ISBN 978-3-319-74255-7.
^ Mcmenamin, Mark (2018). Deep Time Analysis A Coherent View of the History of Life.
^ ^a ^b Encyclopedia of Geology. Academic Press. 16 December 2020. ISBN 978-0081029091.
^ "Kimberella — A Checkered History". 4 September 2020.

[:0-1] Mcmenamin, Mark (2018). Deep Time Analysis A Coherent View of the History of Life. Springer Geology. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74256-4. ISBN 978-3-319-74255-7.

[2] Mcmenamin, Mark (2018). Deep Time Analysis A Coherent View of the History of Life.

[:1-3] Encyclopedia of Geology. Academic Press. 16 December 2020. ISBN 978-0081029091.

[4] "Kimberella — A Checkered History". 4 September 2020.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]