This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Georgia (country) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Georgia (country) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles
Discussions regarding the titles of the articles Georgia, Georgia (country) and Georgia (U.S. state) should be held at Talk:Georgia.
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
RM, Georgia (country) → Republic of Georgia, Opposed, 23 May 2005, Discussion
RM, Georgia (country) → Georgia, No consensus, 5 July 2006, Discussion
RM, Georgia (country) → Georgia, No consensus, 11 July 2007, Discussion
RM, Georgia (country) → Georgia, No consensus, 15 March 2008, Discussion
The "Georgia" move discussions in a nutshell:
On Wikipedia, the placing of a word in parentheses in the title of an article is primarily used as a method of disambiguation, with the parenthesised word usually being a set that the article's subject is a part of.
The basic debate has been whether the Eurasian country should be the primary topic, and therefore does not need any parenthesised word in the title. Those in favor of such a move often argue that internationally recognised countries should take precedence over sub-national units like the U.S. state, though there are other suggested reasons for primary topic. Some proponents of a move have also argued that the current failure to recognize Georgia (the country) as the primary topic displays a U.S.-centric bias.
Opponents of such a renaming note that under Wikipedia's guidelines, the primary topic can be determined based on which one is significantly more commonly searched for and read than other meanings as well as which one is more important or significant. They generally dispute that the U.S. state of Georgia is any less important; in fact, given the significantly greater size of its population, economy (especially its film industry), geographical area, and main airport, many argue the U.S. state is actually more important despite sharing some of its sovereignty with the United States federal government and not having a seat in the United Nations. They have also argued in the past that since the Eurasian country was (at the time of the above linked discussions) being actually slightly less searched for than the U.S. state, the former should not be the primary topic. Based on all of the foregoing factors, some contend the U.S. state should be the primary topic with no qualifier in its title. Some opponents have also argued that having Georgia as a disambiguation page is a better way to catch cases where an article contains wikilinks to the bare name "Georgia" that should be disambiguated.
Guidelines for editing the Georgia (country) article
Units in metric should be spelled out with the converted English units abbreviated in parentheses per Manual of Style.
Only external links pertaining to Georgia as a whole, or official government of Georgia links are solicited on this page. Please add other links in their respective articles. For further information, please see Wikipedia guidelines on External links and Conflict of interest.
All sections are a summary of more detailed articles. If you find any points missing, please add it in the section's main article rather than on this page to keep this page size within reasonable limits.
Please provide references when adding new information.
Please use the correct citation format when adding references. If you are not sure which one is appropriate, please see WP:CITE for a list of available citation templates.
There have been nine formal discussions about this on this page in the last 21 years and none of them have ended with a consensus to change it. The only way to succeed at it would be to come up with some argument never before raised that would be consistent with the guidelines on article naming and would inspire more support from discussion participants than has been obtained in the past. Largoplazo (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with Largoplazo. Keep in mind that many people, myself included, feel that the Georgia that deserves to own the name without any qualifier is the one with the giant airport and a metropolitan area with a larger economy and population than the entire country of Georgia. Most people who watch any television programs or films regularly will definitely see that Georgia on screen several times in their lifetime (because of how Marvel Studios loves to outsource its film and television projects to Atlanta), but they will never see Georgia the country unless they specifically look for it. --Coolcaesar (talk) 12:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only way to properly solve this ever recurring debate for once and for all is to campaign for the internationalisation of the name to Sakartvelo. That is the only viable way to put this name discussion to rest. Labrang (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why should country change ancient name that is used from middle ages just because recent British colony is also named like this? That is not such a nice "solution" and very arrogant.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 03:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Labrang didn't say they should. Lebrang said it's the only way to solve this problem. If they don't take that route to solving this problem, that's fine. It's up to them. Largoplazo (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support Whoa, this is refreshing: a natural and correct disambiguation rather than yet another repetitive feud over whether the country is the primary topic. Definitely better than the parenthetical disambiguation. Largoplazo (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Oppose I was taking for granted the premise that "Republic of Georgia" is its formal name. It apparently isn't, as has now been brought to my attention, and as appears to be plain from a look at the English translation of the country's constitution. So now I'm reversing my !vote, agreeing with SilverLocust about the false impression it would give. If it were even a very common name then it might still be OK but it isn't my impression that it's terribly common in comparison to just "Georgia". Largoplazo (talk) 23:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: This is an uncommon term and gives a false impression that it is an official name (since it sounds like an official name). It still needs to be a common name in reliable sources to be WP:NATDIS ("commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title"), which this is not — or at least it appears not to be, and no evidence has been provided to show otherwise. This article says it was common from 1991–1995, inaptly citing the Tbilisi article from Encyclopedia Britannica that doesn't say anything about that claim but does describe Tbilisi as the "capital of the republic of Georgia" (one instance where "republic of" is used as a disambiguating description within a sentence), whereas their article for Georgia does not use the term at all. The Ireland/Republic of Ireland/Northern Ireland distinction is a different situation. Republic of Ireland is pretty common and an official description (if not the official name of the country) per the Republic of Ireland Act, 1948. Those two things make it work well as natural disambiguation for the country's name. It is better with the Georgias to just disambiguate normally. SilverLocust💬17:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unlike Ireland which specifically has a formal official description I'm not convicted the longer descriptive name is common enough so using brackets seem best. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NATURAL says "do not use obscure or made-up names". Given it doesn't even appear its today the official descriptive name it appears at minimum its obscure, also the descriptive name for the US state doesn't appear to be commonly used enough. Similar to using Bray, Berkshire instead of Bray on Thames. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why don't this can be changed to simply Georgia. No other country has been humiliated so much as Gorgia, having to explicitly state that is is country, just because a random state in the united states of america has the same name. This would not have happened if the Georgia state is from the some other country, say from an asian/african/latin american countries. Also, it is not completely surprising that wikipedia has such a double standard and discrimination. 2A02:C7C:5E70:E700:A578:33E9:9DD8:47DC (talk) 11:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In English "Georgia" is probably as likely to mean the US state. As someone in England I can say that the US state is probably better known here and clearly it would be in American English. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this article is not only about the post-Soviet state. If you want to split the post-Soviet state into a separate article, then the proposed name is the one to use. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - this is not even its official name. It was in the early post-Soviet days, but already long time not. Nobody knowledgeable about the history would not even propose this change. Have a nice judgement, cheers Labrang (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ah - the wine competition between Armenians and Georgians. My latest is that the traces of wine making found n the Gadachrili Gora site (Imiri village near Shulaveri, Marneuli) are from roughly 6000BC, preceding the Areni-1 site with 2 millennia. See The Guardian and a research article on the findings in the site. Labrang (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In claiming that this Wikipedia article is wrong, you implicitly acknowledge your understanding that Wikipedia articles can be wrong. So why would you then cite another Wikipedia article as though it's the sacred truth, instead of realizing that it may be wrong? At most, it would be reasonable to note the inconsistency between the two and ask if anyone can resolve it.
But, here, there isn't any inconsistency! Georgian winemaking has been dated to as far back as 6000 BC. As your intention was to show that Armenian winemaking is older, why would you draw our attention to this Areni wine that's dated to 4100–4000 BC, around 2,000 years later than the earliest known Georgian winemaking? Largoplazo (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Georgia (country)" seems to be the many origins of the images displayed in the "Rumi tarot", the country has Persian roots alongside its neighbors such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran.
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
