This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
(By `laws´ of prosody) it has to be steh´n - I am german and for maybe 99,99% of the time we say `steh´n´ instead of `stehen´. Even if it is written...--85.177.24.116 (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the lyrics to the song from the article because, first of all, in general Wikisource is probably a better place for these, and second, they were claimed to be public domain, but the author died in 1983, which is far from the required 70 year. If the lyrics are in fact public domain, some kind of source for this claim should be posted here on the talk page. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The song (I don't know whether just the text or the music, or both) are copyrighted. The rights holder is Schott Music International. They even registered a "Notice of Intent to Enforce (NIE)" their copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office [1]. Lupo11:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure that poster was correct. The original version was Lili Marlene. In fact, it's not even pronounced as a hard 'e'. At least not by Dietrich. Anyway, I was just at a reunion of WWII vets and they all knew it as 'Lili Marlene' Chaleur22:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then have a look at this photo. The title of the song is Lili Marleen. And check German pronunciation while your at it. (Marlene would be pronounced "Mahrlaynuh".) That the WII vets say otherwise doesn't mean a thing. They probably all picked up the mis-spelling from the same source anyway. Shinobu00:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The spelling Marleen is correct, as shown in Image:Manuskript Lili Marlen.jpg, written in Hans Leip's own handwriting. (The name of this particular image has the word spelled wrong, and the image will probably soon be deleted from Commons as a copyvio.) If "Lili Marlene" is widespread, it's probably because of association with Marlene Dietrich. Angr12:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The song is known worldwide and universally as "Lili Marlene" titling it differently is the height of pedantic b.s. Awotter
Is it really too pedantic to get right what most people get wrong? It seems to me that the only alternative to such pedantry is unreliability (and Wikipedia has plenty of that already).
219.90.185.1908:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are internal cues in the jazzprofessional site text that lead me to suspect this is a 1960s version, when antiwar protest songs were much in vogue. For example, "Verweht im Wüstensand" & "Am ölverseuchten Strand", "Gone for ever in the desert sand" & "On the oil-soaked beach" have a decided WW2 flavour, while the next 2 lines, "Say, how much suffering must still happen, Until we see the madness, the insanity?" echoes other 1960s antiwar protest songs.like "Where have All the Flowers Gone". Leip's original 1915 version is said to have been just [the first] three verses; he himself published the poem with two extra verses in 1937 in his volume of poetry "Die kleine Hafenorgel", according to the site SecondHandSongs, whilst lyrics.com attributes the 1937 version sung by Marlene Dietrich et al to Mack David, Hans Leip & Norbert Schulze. We may have to wait until Warner-Chappell/Stott lift their copyright to get at the full truth! OTOH, I can't help thinking that Wikipedia could claim fair use in presenting at least redacted versions of the original lyrics as part of a discussion of the song's origin. Food for later historical research.... D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 08:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
why noone didn't write down what does Lili Marleen mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.162.140.35 (talk) 11:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Quote from the article: "Leip reportedly combined the names of his girlfriend and another female friend" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srelu (talk • contribs) 23:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The PPL (UK music royalties agency) seem to think a 1940 version (ISRC number DEF060001090) is NOT in the public domain. As of 2012, their database says EMI own the rights to DEF060001090. The link is here :PPLuk.com.Just search for Lale Andersen. Obviously, if your copy is not marked DEF060001090 you're OK... Mongoosander (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does anybody have the lyrics to the Spanish and Italian versions of this song? I think that they should be added to show in what other countries this song became popular. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Marleen or Marlene is a misspelling, whatever the other people are writing here
The real title is the one given by the composer of the song. In the article you have the picture of the original disk, please DO READ what's written on it. Despite what everybody is thinking, the real name is MARLEN.
John Steinbeck's collection of his war journalism includes a piece on this song which is strangely at variance with much that is written here. Perhaps he didn't know the complete story; his article may have been merely propaganda. Steinbeck's interpretation if the lyrics make one wonder if he understood German at all. 121.44.145.247 (talk) 07:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Lili Marleen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on Lili Marleen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
.svg)
The redirect Vor der Kaserne vor dem großen Tor stand eine Laterne und steht sie noch davor has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 27 § Vor der Kaserne vor dem großen Tor stand eine Laterne und steht sie noch davor until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)