User:Revived

Userboxes

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

pig-1Isthay userway isway ableway otay ontributecay ithway away asicbay evellay ofway Igpay Atinlay.

1337-0This user has no idea what 1337 is or prefers to contribute using proper words.

AWW
DMBJ
AWGC
AWAI
FDSP
BATD
MTADThis user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists.

This user is a recent changes patroller.

This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.

This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks.

This user is contributing using a Macintosh computer.

This user runs macOS.

This user contributes using Safari.

This user uses Google as a primary search engine.

This user prefers the metric system.

This user is interested in religion.

IPThis person's IP is 127.0.0.1

This user's future is so bright he's gotta wear shades.

I studied computer programming in college, and all I got was this lousy compiler error.

ubx-5This user uses entirely too many userboxes.

Hello, and welcome to my user page! I'm a student in Software Engineering at the University of Waterloo in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. In the past, I contributed some content, but these days, I spend most of my time countering vandalism.

I'm fairly interested in mathematics (specifically combinatorial enumeration); however, as my program would suggest, my primary interest is in the application of engineering design principles to the implementation of computer software. (I should mention that I am by no means an expert in either of these fields: I'm just an undergraduate who has many interests!)

Articles I have successfully started

• Keith Geddes

Articles I have worked a fair bit on

• De Moivre's formula
• University of Waterloo Federation of Students

Associations

• Harmonious Editing Club
• Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist

My philosopy

Perhaps this sums it up: work together! I think that revert and edit warring is counterproductive. You're never going to get Wikipedia to read the way you want, and neither should you. Instead, get things hammered out to something that tells the story accurately.

If you think I've made a mistake, by all means, please tell me! By all means, I'll take a look at it. Just leave a note on my talk page.

Other stuff I stuck here

This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.