User talk:24.212.225.184

UFC Fight Night: Rozenstruik vs. Gaziev

Hi, your edit on the above was reverted again. Pls note that fighters retired on the cage all the time and two fighter retired in the same event does not make is significant enough and also utube / social media is not a reliable source as per Wikipedia guidelines. However, the retirement of Tyson Pedro has been recorded in his Wikipedia page with independent, reliable sources. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 02:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

I disagree. Just because fighters "retire all the time" doesn't mean it isn't notable for two fighters to retire on the same card, which is actually pretty rare for that to happen. If you want to bicker about reliable sources, then I'll make the update again with a new non-social media source. For example: https://www.mmafighting.com/2024/3/3/24088855/tyson-pedro-announces-retirement-jokes-financial-difficulties-probably-going-to-have-to-rob-someone 24.212.225.184 (talk) 03:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your source. Fighters do retired in many of times after their fights. It would be significant if a champion wining the bout / champion of long time retired. There are more than 680 UFC event - see List of UFC events and we dont record fighters retired after the event unless the extremely rare occasions as per stated above. By the way, thank you for your contribution. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 03:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

If you mention the retirements on the individual wiki pages for each fighter, it therefore deserves to be mentioned on the wiki card page too. It's some questionable logic you're using here. I updated the card page again with RELIABLE, NON-SOCIAL MEDIA sources about the retirements. 24.212.225.184 (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

I have reverted your edit again. Pls note sourced content by independent, reliable sources does not means inclusion in the article. If you still disagree, pls go to the article talk page - see here and discussion or you will facing edit warring and blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 03:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

What you're doing is ridiculous. You are being ridiculous and absurd right now. If you mention the retirements on the individual wiki pages for each fighter, it therefore deserves to be mentioned on the wiki card page too. 24.212.225.184 (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

UFC Fight Night: Rozenstruik vs. Gaziev

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cassiopeia talk 03:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

I DISAGREE STRONGLY.

YOU ARE BEING ABSURD AND RIDICULOUS. YOU NEED TO CHECK YOURSELF.

IF YOU MENTION THE RETIREMENTS ON THE INDIVIDUAL FIGHTER PAGE, IT SHOULD BE MENTIONED ON THE CARD PAGE TOO.

I ADDED RELIABLE, NON-SOCIAL MEDIA SOURCES. YOU REMOVED THIS FACTUAL INFORMATION FOR NO GOOD REASON. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF. 24.212.225.184 (talk) 03:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

UFC Fight Night: Rozenstruik vs. Gaziev

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cassiopeia talk 03:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Small text

This isn't an attack. This is simply a disagreement over your RIDICULOUS decision making.

IF YOU MENTION THE RETIREMENTS ON THE INDIVIDUAL FIGHTER PAGE, IT SHOULD BE MENTIONED ON THE CARD PAGE TOO.

I ADDED RELIABLE, NON-SOCIAL MEDIA SOURCES. YOU REMOVED THIS FACTUAL INFORMATION FOR NO GOOD REASON. 24.212.225.184 (talk) 03:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cassiopeia talk 03:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. Cassiopeia talk 04:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are "repeatedly violating of WP:CIVIL. WP:NPA, WP:HERE, and WP:CIR. Before unblocking, the responding admin should confirm that this user has read, understands, and agrees to these concepts.".

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Swatjester (talk • contribs)

---