User talk:MarcGarver/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

→

Archive 10

Money Orders

Since I am a legal professional (Civil Law Notary) from Alabama, and have expertise regarding what the postal service means in their website at https://www.usps.com/shop/money-orders.htm - which you discounted as a source regarding the USPS fraud that their money orders (no distinction) are valid in 29 countries, I have asked that our issue be mediated. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volley36 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm afraid your "legal professional" status can't be proved so it isn't really relevant. However if you are then you will be well aware of the need for the evidence to support the claims you are making. The URL you have provided does not give a reference to anything to do with fraud - it's just an advert for them claiming in fact that they are "A safe and cost-effective way to pay—from any Post Office"! I fail to see how this verifies your claim that this is a reference to proving a fraud. Perhaps you could clarify? QU ^TalkQu 19:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

I see your problem now. You think the USPS web site is fraudulent and you are adding this statement to the article as you think it is a fact. This is why you need to read WP:OR. It doesn't matter if you think it is fraudulent because Wikipedia is not about expressing your opinion. Wikipedia is about presenting accepted facts supported by citable evidence. You need to find a reliable source that states that the USPS web site is fraudulent, then quote it. QU ^TalkQu 19:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "money orders". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 14 April 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 20:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

SOCK PUPPET BACK!

User:Therabbit123 is back under the alias User:Natandant thought I'd let you know! And I'm sure the IP Special:Contributions/97.88.42.87 is that user as well. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 23:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Why was all this posted in my post on your page? You ignored my comment!! _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 16:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

I didn't see your comment as the person who posted after you added it to the same section. You really need to raise sockpuppet concerns at WP:SPI or at WP:ANI - I'm not an administrator or a Checkuser so what I can do to help is quite limited. Last time I raised the request for you but you can raise your own at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Therabbit123. If I get time later I'll see if I can help but, like I said, you are better off asking at the admin noticeboard. QU ^TalkQu 18:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

I've reported the additional account and IP. The report is here QU ^TalkQu 18:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm not use to making those claims. And I added my two cents. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 19:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

No one is even commenting or possibly investigating it and they're already back to their own ways! _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 21:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Minnesota State Highway 236 & Hitler

It was just a joke. I considered undoing your revert claiming that Hitler built a whole lot of "Autobahnen" too … but it's enough. Have a nice day ~desu! 178.190.126.226 (talk) 22:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, at least from the perspective of jokers, Wikipedia strives to be a serious encyclopaedia so humour is discouraged. C'est la vie. QU ^TalkQu 22:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	Venkatarama Ramalingam Pillai			Richard Offiong
	Bhavanisagar			Doc McKinney
	Cottage Gallery			Maersk Dubai incident
	Pierre Gauthier (Canadian politician)		Merge
	Chithode			Knowledge discovery
	Burmese Pony			Guilford Lindsey Molesworth
	Whatshan Dam			The Simpsons
	Damals		Add sources
	De Stafford School			Tuareg people
	Schistosomiasis Control Initiative			Only Won
	Pallipalayam Agraharam			Peg Lautenschlager
	Armelia McQueen		Wikify
	Lincoln Memorial Bridge			List of languages by total number of speakers
	Skerne Park			Mondipalayam
	Where I Was From			Endevor
	Paul Walton		Expand
	'Tage Mahal			List of private schools in Texas
	Mąż swojej żony			Ninja Gaiden 3
	Kongu Kalvi Nilayam Matriculation Higher Secondary School			Thai American

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

User:Pokalarudra

Thanks for your message. I have now realised what the situation was, having looked at the user's talk page on commons, but I didn't know at the time I made the edit you referred to. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Money order". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 24 April 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Money order, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, Lord Roem (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)