User talk:Yaels

Shaʿar Hagolan

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shaʿar Hagolan, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Sha‘ar Hagolan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading other's images

Hi Yaels, Looking through your recent uploads it seems that they are not your images. Can you please drop me a note if they ARE your images but at the moment it seems that you have taken images from various websites and uploaded them here. Please note that we can only accept image that have been published, by their owners, under free licences...not images taken from websites - 11:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

ALL THE IMAGES I HAVE UPLOADED ARE ORIGINAL, TAKEN BY US AND OWNED BY US. Unfortunately, I DID NOT pay attention to the fact I should put copyrights. Therefor, I am uploading all the images again. This time I sure will refer to images liscence.

Image source problem with Image:Yosef Garfinkel.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Yosef Garfinkel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Qeiyafa city wall1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Qeiyafa city wall1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ashkelon Pre-Pottery Neolithic C site.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashkelon Pre-Pottery Neolithic C site.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ashkelon Pre-Pottery Neolithic C flint arrowheads.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashkelon Pre-Pottery Neolithic C flint arrowheads.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gesher Pre-Pottery Neolithic A flint arrowheads.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gesher Pre-Pottery Neolithic A flint arrowheads.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gesher Pre-Pottery Neolithic A rounded building.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gesher Pre-Pottery Neolithic A rounded building.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gesher excavation

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gesher excavation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article doesn't state notability of subject.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Call me Bubba (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]