Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aylton Alemão

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 11:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aylton Alemão

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable footballer who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets NFOOTY, played in Serie B and Pernambucano. --BlameRuiner (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets NFOOTBALL per this. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 12:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - appears to be a notable footballer who has played in multiple editions of the PE State championship as well as a handful of matches in the Brasileiro Serie B and C. Online Portuguese-language sources are mostly routine, but I think someone making better searches will find significant coverage. Jogurney (talk) 15:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above Dartslilly (talk) 19:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.