Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Rooster Award lists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, as I'm withdrawing my nomination per WP:SNOW. ❤ Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 14:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Rooster Award for Best Director

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary list of information that isn't encyclopedic. Each movie's associated article, if any, can contain the information on what award(s) it won.

I am also nominating the following related pages because they all share the same reason for deletion:

Keep separately and improve. Golden Rooster Award seems to be very popular in China, see [1] or [2], it is noted by major Chinese news agencies, such as Xinhuanet [3]. We have similar set of articles covering the Academy Awards, so what's wrong with this Chinese award? Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:34, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you do more than just insist your opinion that it just doesn't WP:BELONG? This is apparently the highest honor in China's film industry, which means that not only is the award notable, but the recipients. postdlf (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can find a lot of sources in English here. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: obviously and demonstrably notable. This nomination doesn't really state a valid basis for deletion, since lists of notable award winners are clearly encyclopedic. Unless someone makes a cogent deletion argument in the next 24 hours or so, this would be a good case for WP:SNOW. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable film awards for/in China. Passes WP:GNG. Lugnuts ^{And the horse} 18:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.