Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mabel (singer)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mabel (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Despite claims that he has reached the "top of the sales chart", I can find no evidence that this is the case, the article is unreferenced, and a google search shows little more than a myspace page. Unless there are references to show that Mabel did indeed top the charts, I don't think this meets notability guidelines. Richard Hock (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no significant and reliable 3rd party sources WP:MUSICBIO. JamesBurns (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep for now, there is evidence of singles charting in france (http://lescharts.com/search.asp?search=mabel&cat=s). Not top hits as suggested but nevertheless there's an argument for keeping under criteria 2 (WP:MUSIC). We need an expert to look up the other countries especially Germany, Italy and i can find hints of hits in Russia also. --neon white talk 02:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.