Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toontown Rewritten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Toontown Online#Closure. (non-admin closure) Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 00:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toontown Rewritten

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic in question has had several attention ranging from news webshows like "The Daily Byte" to articles on respected websites such as Bloomberg and The Escapist. This should be and is notable enough. Besides, have you seen a fanmade online game come this far into development with no sign of slowing down? I respectfully ask we keep it up. 71.28.167.114 (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This article should stay on the website. The topic in question has shown a rise in popularity and deserves to stay on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.32.153 (talk) 23:41, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Was tagged to be speedy deleted, but best discuss it properly. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Toontown_Online#Closure. I've made a one sentence mention of the game in the closure section of the TO article. Until this fan game gains more coverage, that's all it merits at this point in time- if that. Given that there was only one Bloomberg article about it, I can see where others would argue that it may not even warrant that much of a mention on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per User:Tokyogirl79; certainly not notable enough for a standalone article. However, I wouldn't be opposed to a mention of it in the ToonTown article, considering the limited coverage it has received in the media (and then having a redirect to the respective section). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Not yet notable enough for a standalone article. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. I had tagged the article for {{Db-web}} due to the repeat creation of this page after constantly being deleted (The current article was recently created at the title Toon Town Rewritten to bypass the creation protection that was on this article's current title ... until the article was moved here via a technical move request); however, if this does become a redirect, I highly recommend giving the redirect indefinite full protection until a draft is created that shows this topic with a higher level of notability. Steel1943 (talk) 18:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.