Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 September 18
September 18
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Dubious own work: logo. Possibly the same as c:File:India against corruption.png, which was deleted per wmf:DMCA India Against Corruption logo. Stefan2 (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Irrespective of the other image taken down from Commons, this file is also pretty clearly non-free. It was uploaded here on 18 March 2011. It is identical (including its size) to the image which had been previously published on indiaagainstcorruption.org by at least 14 March 2011. See Wayback Machine capture. Voceditenore (talk) 08:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Having said that. There is a similar version still on Commons: File:India-Against-Corruption-logo.svg. That one was uploaded as public domain on the basis that: This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. The file under consideration here might qualify as public domain on that basis, but it seems rather borderline. Voceditenore (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have nominated that one for deletion on Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Having said that. There is a similar version still on Commons: File:India-Against-Corruption-logo.svg. That one was uploaded as public domain on the basis that: This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. The file under consideration here might qualify as public domain on that basis, but it seems rather borderline. Voceditenore (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
