Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Ecopsychological approaches to trauma: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity
Content deleted Content added
Topic development feedback
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 02:36, 2 September 2024

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi Beabosborne. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Revise heading structure to place less emphasis on background concepts and more emphasis on the target topic. The draft headings place too much emphasis on background concepts and too little on the relationship between the concepts.
  1. Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  1. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections.
  3. Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios)
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Insufficient development
  2. Basic use of citations
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  5. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed
  6. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  5. Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view

Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)

  1. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  2. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  3. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  4. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. Very good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    3. use dois where available instead of other links
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Use alphabetical order
  2. External links
    1. Not developed (see Tutorial 2)
  1. Used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. At least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
  1. If you fix a page, also remove the tag (e.g., [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FNature_and_psychological_distress&diff=2650224&oldid=2645903 I followed up after your edit)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply