Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Abusive supervision

Suggestions for 2024 Chapter

Hi there,

I've had a look at the 2023 Chapter for Abusive Supervision and it is dense with text! My suggestion for your chapter to improve on the last is to consider some separation between your main points, include knowledge checks, images, etc. so the reader isn't staring at a wall of text.

Unlike the 2023 chapter, I hope yours can include a definition of Abusive Supervision!

Best of luck! SMurray24 (discuss • contribs) 08:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@TJDuus: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Relationships
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Work
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hey James

Was just continuing with fleshing out some of the points on my page, and was wondering about the side effects of Abusive Supervision, both Mental and Physical and was just wondering about some advice for how much detail I should really go into. Mental area covers emotion and motivation, and then I can go further into the two in the physical with hormones etc, and then have a section on Extrinsic and Intrinsic motivation having been affected, do you think that is enough?

Alongside that with the word count (hopefully) having a section on how to prevent the behaviour from possibly occuring.

Is that enough?

Thanks

Tom D TJDuus (discuss • contribs) 04:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

@TJDuus:

I think concentrate on the psychosocial impacts because any physical effects likely flow from those effects unless of course the abuse is physical.

The task is really to synthesise what has been identified in the best psychological science about the causes and impacts of AS. See if you can find any major reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses to help guide decisions about what is notable. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi TJDuus. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I'll get on that now sir, thank you!

Tom D TJDuus (discuss • contribs) 04:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Some suggested sources for research on the dark triad.

Hey @TJDuus,

I've have a read through page and I'm super interested in your topic. I saw that you mentioned the dark triad but hadn't yet fleshed out your ideas and was wondering you needed some resources to look into. I did an essay on the dark triad traits in Personality and Individual differences last year and have a bunch of sources and peer reviewed articles you can look into.

Happy researching :)

See below:

Clark, M. A., Lelchook, A. M., & Taylor, M. L. (2010) Beyond the Big Five: How narcissism, perfectionism, and dispositional affect related to workaholism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(7) 786-791. https://dio.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.013

Furtner, M. R., Rauthmann, K. F., & Sachse, P. (2011) The Self-Loving Self-Leader: An examination of the Relationship Between Self-Leadership and the Dark Triad. Social Behaviour and Personality: an international journal, 39(3) 369-379. https://dio.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.3.369

Guerrero-Molina, M., Barbosa-Torres, C., & Moreno-Manso, J. M. (2023) Subclinical psychopathy and styles of intimate relationships. Behavioural Psychology, 31(1) 77-91. https://doi.org/10.51668/bp.8323105n

Kajonius, P. J., Persson, B. N., & Jonason, P. K. (2015) Hedonism, Achievement, and Power: Universal values that characterize the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 173-178. https://dio.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.055

Lindsay, K., Harms, P. D., & Credé, M. (2019) Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 183-196. https://dio.org/10.1037/apl0000357

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of the Dark Triad and Work Behaviour: A Social Exchange Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557-579. https://dio.org/10.1037/a0025679

Papageorgiou, K. A., Gianniou, F. M., Wilson, P., Moneta, G. B., Bilello, D., & Clough P., J. (2019) The bright side of the dark: Exploring the positive effect of narcissism on perceived stress through mental toughness. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 116-124. https://dio.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.004

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality 36. 556-563.

Sanz-García, A., Gesteira, C., Sanz, J., & García-Vera, M. (2021) Prevalence of Psychopathy in the General Adult Population: A systematic Review and meta-Analysis. Frontiers Psychology 12:661044. https://dio.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661044

Szabó, Z. P., Diller, S. J., Czibor, A., Resás, P., Jonas, E. & Frey, D. (2023). “One of these things is not like the others”: The associations between dark triad personality traits, work attitudes, and work-related motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 205 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112098

Widiger, T. A. (1998) Psychopathy and Normal Personality. In: Cooke, D. J., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (eds) Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for Society. NATO ASI Series, 88. https://dio.or/10.1007/978-94-011-39656_3

Wu, W., Wang, H., Lee, H. Y., Lin, Y. T., & Guo, F. (2019) How Machiavellianism, Psychopathy, and Narcissism Affect Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Resilience. Frontiers Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00779 U3239762 (discuss • contribs) 12:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section A description of the problem/topic is provided. Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment 4. Key points Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression such as checking grammatical and spelling errors Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Use APA style to cite figures Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Excellent use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: remove descriptions of sources capitalisation italicisation doi formatting include hyperlinked dois 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Very good Use sentence casing Use bullet points 9. User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making: direct improvements to other chapters (past or current) comments on the talk pages of other chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)