Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Exteroception and emotion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi U3239399. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Headings not applied in wiki heading format. It seems likely that Tutorial 2 hasn't been completed.
  2. Text-based 1-level heading structure suggested. I've converted these to heading format.
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Add a scenario or case study in a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  3. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  3. Is this genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. A relevant figure is not presented and cited (see Tutorial 2)
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Very good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. All references need to be cited in the text
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. include hyperlinked dois
    2. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. No links provided (see Tutorial 02)
  1. External links
    1. No links provided (see Tutorial 02)
  1. Not created – see Tutorial 02
  2. It seems likely that Tutorial 2 hasn't been completed
  3. User content found on chapter page and has been moved to user page
  4. Add link to book chapter
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter
  2. Socialcontribution|social contributions]].
  1. It seems likely that Tutorial 2 and 3 haven't been completed
  2. Social contributions found on chapter page and have been moved to user page. There are no direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply