User talk:Kalajan

Blocked

Per consensus, the community has decided to block you from editing indefinately. You may appeal this block by using {{unblock|your reason}} although I would recommend you do not spam it. Kennedy ^(talk) 20:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe that I thought you can change. Oh, well. Simon^KSK 21:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked; I don't understand what I've done wrong. ←Kala jan→ 22:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ANI. Simon^KSK 22:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just an at-a-glance

You haven't shown any signs of improving your attitude. I'm not going to get into more long-winded discussions with you while you plead for an admin to unblock you as you've done on EN. I imagine this page will be protected soon. Hazardous Matt (talk) 22:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kalajan (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Please, I have yet to see a policy against spamming, I assume good faith; I just pointed out that the only vandals are IPs. Please, I've been reverting tons of vandalism, created new simplified articles, removed red links. I ask for a second opportuntiy. Please. I'm begging.

Decline reason:

As hard as it is to believe that you managed to do it, you exhausted the communities patience very fast. You were warned by a number of users to stop focussing on things that had nothing to do with building an encyclopedia and to start editing in main space. You don't really appear to understand what the point of wikipedia is. If you want to see what people said in the discussion reguarding your ban you can take a look on the Administrators notice board. -- Djsasso (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I saw it all, but please, I really love this place. Delete all my useless sub-pages - just please unblock me. I'm really devastated, and I haven't done anything wrong; perhaps a bit. But I don't deserve this. Keep me under extreme observation if you want. You'll see how I contribute to this encyclopedia very well. Please Djsasso, imagine being in my place. I haven't used socks, Sinofdreams was stated as unrelated at en. I'm not going back to socks. Beleive me, I really love wikipedia. And I've never vandalized a page in my life. You must have noted that I've been reverting vandalism, and at Fr33kman's talk page you'll see a whole discussion comproving my creating new simplified articles, I haven't actually spoken about the red links, but check my contribs. Delete the essay, just unblock me. I'll be much more careful and I won't be disruptive either. I swear. Ps I haven't made any socks, to comprove that I'm a changed man. ←Kala jan→ 14:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You spammed Simple:Talk about your essay, didn't AGF (or let it go) when no one left comments for it, you assumed bad faith in AnonIPs by welcoming another with a message that (paraphrased) read "unlike other anons you don't vandalize". Your priority was sending out valentine messages to people on EN just to try to get back there, not to be productive here. Then you randomly mention that Sinofdreams may have followed you and sure enough, about ten minutes after your block he shows up here. You were warned that you were being disruptive to the project and you once again claimed to listen, but failed to act on the advice of others. In my opinion you've had too many second chances already. Note to admin: This page should probably be protected. Hazardous Matt (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, before you do anything, I swear I won't do anything. Sins was a coincidence. He was proved unrelated at en. Hey, now it's you not AGF! Please! I'm really intent on being productive. Matt, tell me, is Adster95 going to unblock me? No, he isn't an admin, are Nici Truco and Will going to? Tell me. I don't deserve this. You don't block people because you don't like them do you? no, you block people for vandalizing and personnaly attacking people not for reverting vandalism and warning people about what I considered not a personal attack, but extremely rude. I'm on my knees. Matt think about it. And one of you admins, please unblock me, please. Have I done anything wrong? No. Therefore you can't justify the block. Have I made a sock? No, get a checkuser if you want. Please. Really. I came here looking for a second chance. Matt, you're so hard on me, when I try to treat you the best way I can. Save me, help me, unblock me. I do not deserve this. ←Kala jan→ 14:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it was determined that he was a possible sock not as unrelated, don't mistate the situation. I would stop writting here now so another admin can determine if the page warrants protect as I won't be the one to decline you and protect the page. However, the more you plead on this page the more likely another admin will just protect it. -Djsasso (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Simon and I tried to help you more than anyone, to the point where EN admins told us to back away, and now you think I'm being hard on you? Note to Admin: Can we consider protection here? No need for this to be as ridiculous as it was on EN. Hazardous Matt (talk) 14:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, wait [1] This is all wrong, Jasso, don't do it, I respect you all, and I know I don't deserve this. Don't protect the page. Listen, I'm never going back to socks, and I'm not sock of anyone. Ps. The case a en is closed, it has been prooved. It's not going to cause any harm unblocking me, if I do anything disruptive it dosen't take a dough to block me again, please. This is ~~inhumanity~~ torture! Listen, I'm a cheerful user, I'm quite nice, I don't personally attack people, I just sometimes get despaired and write in capital letters lol. No, listen, I swear I'll be productive, I promise, remember that if you keep me as I am it will be pointless, for I'm not doing anything disruptive. I just thought thsi place was the same as en, but it obviously is not. Please give me one more chance. What's there to lose?

Ps. Red is a joke - ←Kala jan→ 15:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not me

Okay that Boricua isn't me. I swear. I just saw him at new changes. He isn't me. Get a checkuser if you may. Just showing I keep my word. ←Kala jan→ 15:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matt

Matt, I really thought of you as a friend. Well I'm going off to spanish wikipedia now. So bye. I was so stupid not sending you to dig holes in a beach off in india or somewhere. Bye. ←Kala jan→ 15:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace?

Hello, I did not block you (and I am otherwise uninvolved with your block). I just did a small thing: I looked at the last 100 edits of yours here. I of these I counted about 18 edits to mainspace (ie. no prefix Wikipedia/Wikipedia_talk/User/User_talk). I might have overlooked one or two. This means that about 20% of your edits go to mainspace. As a comparison, about 30-35% of my edits are non-mainspace ones). This is neither Facebook nor MySpace; we try to make an Encyclopedia that is easy to understand. Comments? --Eptalon (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well quite frankly my dear I don't give a damn. I'm not going to be unblocked am I? So do whatever you may to me; You're mean and inhumane. -- ←Kala jan→ 15:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe someone should correct this. I've I wasn't blocked I would've fixed it some time ago. -- ←Kala jan→ 15:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I was trying to work out a solution, as blocks longer than about 6 months are counter-productive). At the moment you are blocked, we have no reason to change it (I won't, anyway, whoever blocked you would). Personal attacks will not get you anywhere. But I guess I'd rather waste my time somewhere else. --Eptalon (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The item pointed out above has been rolled back. --Eptalon (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page has been protected to stop this spam. Kennedy ^(talk) 15:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]