Michael in a comment here on the mechanism of the Masamune-Bergman reaction notes that when it occurs as part of the Calicheamicin (an antibody-drug conjugate or ADC) version of this mechanism, a pre-step is first necessary. As discussed in this review article,[cite]10.3390/ph14050442[/cite] the trisulfide linkage is reduced and the resulting thiolate undergoes a facile 1,4-addition to the adjacent enone.
Archive for October, 2024
Mechanism of the Masamune-Bergman reaction. Part 4. Why was the DFT energy barrier too high for the Calicheamicin reaction?
Tuesday, October 29th, 2024A one-electron bond in methyl-λ1-borane.
Wednesday, October 9th, 2024In exploring one-electron carbon-carbon bonds, I had noted previously[cite]10.59350/88k04-2×509[/cite] that both hexafluoroethane and ethane itself could each lose an electron to produce such species. A discussion developed in which a molecule isoelectronic with ethane, namely the methyl-λ1-borane radical (H3B-CH3) was proposed by Jacob. The optimised structure at the ωB97XD/6-31G(d) level exhibited a B-C bond length of 1.57Å, with two of the B-H hydrogens forming a a 3c-3e bond with boron and so a one-electron B-C bond was discounted. Here I take a closer look at this system.
The one-electron carbon-carbon bond: Hexafluoroethane and ethane radical cations.
Thursday, October 3rd, 2024In the previous post, I looked[cite]10.59350/xp5a3-zsa24[/cite] at the recently reported[cite]10.1021/ja02261a002[/cite] hexa-arylethane containing a carbon-carbon one-electron bond, its structure having been determined by x-ray diffraction (XRD). The measured C-C bond length was ~2.9aÅ and my conclusion was that the C…C region represented more of a weak “interaction” than of a bond as such. How about a much simpler system, hexafluoroethane? Here, the two-electron C-F bonds are much lower in energy than the C-C bond, so when the molecule is ionised, it escapes from the C-C bond rather than any of the C-F bonds. The below is the structure computed at the ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP level, revealing a much shorter C-C bond of 2.149Å. The computed C-C stretching vibrational frequency is 179 cm-1 (FAIR data DOI: [cite]10.14469/hpc/14642[/cite])
A carbon-carbon one-electron bond! Or a weak carbon-carbon interaction?
Tuesday, October 1st, 2024More than 100 years ago, before the quantum mechanical treatment of molecules had been formulated, G. N. Lewis proposed[cite]10.1021/ja02261a002[/cite] a simple model for chemical bonding that is still taught today. This is the idea of the three categories of bond we know as single, double and triple, comprising respectively two, four and six shared electrons each, at least for the very common carbon-carbon bond. A little more than a decade ago, this was extended upwards to the eight-electron quadruple bond.[cite]10.1038/nchem.1263[/cite]. Now, at the other extreme of downwards, a molecule has been characterised in the solid state with a one-electron C-C bond.[cite]10.1038/s41586-024-07965-1[/cite] In this sub-two-electron region, bonds such as hydrogen bonds have long been recognised and they form part of a class of “weak” bonding known instead as exhibiting “non-covalent-interactions” or NCI. But specifically a one-electron carbon-carbon bond stands apart from these weaker types and so it is certainly news when one such is reported and characterised in the crystalline state by x-ray diffraction.