Wikidata:Property proposal/WikiProject importance scale rating

WikiProject importance scale rating

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Done: WikiProject importance scale rating (P10714) (Talk and documentation)

Description	rating of an article on a WikiProject's importance scale
Represents	Wikimedia article ranking (Q108610452)
Data type	Item
Domain	ranking (Q526719)
Allowed values	top-importance article (Q17580682), high-importance article (Q108606990), mid-importance article (Q108606992), low-importance article (Q108606993), bottom-importance article (Q108696732), unknown importance article (Q108696591), n/a importance article (Q108696592)
Example 1	ABBA (Q18233) has been rated as     → top-importance article (Q17580682) applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) → English Wikipedia (Q328)                                   → WikiProject Musicians (Q18699753)                                   → Wikipedia:WikiProject Pop music (Q19643379) has been rated as     → high-importance article (Q108606990) applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) → English Wikipedia (Q328)                                   → WikiProject Sweden (Q11509296) has been rated as     → high-importance article (Q108606990) applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) → French Wikipedia (Q8447)                                   → WikiProject Music (Q5830855) has been rated as     → top-importance article (Q17580682) applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) → French Wikipedia (Q8447)                                   → WikiProject Nordic countries (Q100878416) has been rated as     → top-importance article (Q17580682) applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) → Hungarian Wikipedia (Q53464)                                   → Wikipedia:WikiProject Pop music (Q19643379)
Example 2	Brewster Kahle (Q92945) has been rated as     → low-importance article (Q108606993) applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) → English Wikipedia (Q328)                                   → WikiProject Internet (Q15060227)
Example 3	Constitution of Belgium (Q633629) has been rated as     → high-importance article (Q108606990) applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) → English Wikipedia (Q328)                                   → WikiProject Law (Q8486941)
Source	article's talk page
Number of IDs in source	WikiProjects-wide
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
See also	ranking (P1352)
Single-value constraint	no
Distinct-values constraint	no

Motivation

Rating on the WikiProject (Q16695773) importance scale, qualifier for maintained by WikiProject (P6104). - Coagulans (talk) 14:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Support. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 18:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

@Coagulans: where can we find the information stating that ABBA (Q18233) is rated as top-importance article (Q17580682) by WikiProject Musicians (Q18699753). Which wikiproject is it: afwiki, arwiki, enwiki, etwiki, jawiki or mswiki? What about if there are different rating in different language versions? Pamputt (talk) 20:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

This would be problematic, I thought of it as being standardized undifferentiated. If not, maybe applies to part, aspect, or form (P518)? - Coagulans (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Or to split it into English rating, French rating and so on. - Coagulans (talk) 23:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

• If it's meant to be specific to each wiki, badges seem to be the feature to use. --- Jura 05:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Better as main statement with applies to part, aspect, or form (P518) as separator. - Coagulans (talk) 20:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

It might not work though if the importance for the same article is different for each project on the same wiki. --- Jura 11:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Revised. - Coagulans (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

•  Support, an important property for Wikipedia.--Arbnos (talk) 16:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• @Coagulans, Tinker Bell, Pamputt, Jura1, Badges, Arbnos:  Done: WikiProject importance scale rating (P10714) —MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)