Wikidata:Property proposal/hasFeldpostNumber
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
hasFeldpostNumber
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
Not done
| Description | Property to link German military units to their respective Feldpost numbers, referencing the specific identifier used during the military communications in the world wars. Referencing German military unit (Q63074246) to Feldpost number (Q467921) |
|---|---|
| Represents | Feldpost number (Q467921) |
| Data type | String |
| Example 1 | 2nd Company 8th Replacement Marine Artillery Battalion hasFeldpostNumber"31447 A" |
| Example 2 | Q125555196 hasFeldpostNumber"00309" <-- in this case the URI ofthe Secret Military Police Group 724 |
| Example 3 | 2nd. Company Sturm-Pionier-Bataillon 178 hasFeldpostNumber"15605" |
| Planned use | To create a link between German military units and their Feldpost numbers for better data accessibility and research. |
| See also | German military unit (Q63074246), Feldpost number (Q467921) |
Motivation
[edit]I want to create a database of German military units from the two world wars for a database project. To make all my data FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) and especially to make it publicly accessible, I need this new property "hasFeldpostNumber" to provide essential information on research about the units. This property will utilize the existing Feldpost number (Q467921) to mark these units. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sveburk (talk • contribs) at 11:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Discussion
[edit]- @LimaMario:, could you please fulfil the minimum requirements, see
{{Property proposal}}for more info. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)- Dear ZI Jony, I tried my best to meet the requirements, could you tell me, what information is still needed? Sveburk (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- why have the 'has' at the start? Is there a general military unit number that could be used instead, rather than create new properties for each country? Vicarage (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- The has is to imply the difference between the resource „Feldpostnummer/Feldpostnumber“ and the new property. As the German Feldpostnumbers have their own resource it is clear to me, to link the units to the resource with the unique post-code numbers that were used within the units. The use of a general number therefore would not be suitable, especially not for my project as described in the proposal. Sveburk (talk) 18:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think you need to make this clear with concrete examples and get people who know about German military structures to comment, as I don't Vicarage (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Oppose as concerns not addressed. This sounds like a personal project that's going to be poorly integrated into WD. Vicarage (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think you need to make this clear with concrete examples and get people who know about German military structures to comment, as I don't Vicarage (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- The has is to imply the difference between the resource „Feldpostnummer/Feldpostnumber“ and the new property. As the German Feldpostnumbers have their own resource it is clear to me, to link the units to the resource with the unique post-code numbers that were used within the units. The use of a general number therefore would not be suitable, especially not for my project as described in the proposal. Sveburk (talk) 18:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done, not created per lack of support. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
