Wikidata:Property proposal/population connectée
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
number of Internet users
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
| Description | number of people able to connect to the Internet |
|---|---|
| Data type | Number (not available yet) |
| Domain | human settlement (Q486972) et country (Q6256) |
| Allowed values | devrait être inférieur à la valeur de population (P1082) |
| Allowed units | de 0 à 10000000000 |
| Example 1 | Afghanistan (Q889) → 33300000 for year 2019[1] < estimate (Q37113960) > |
| Example 2 | Armenia (Q399) → 2930450 for year 2019[2] < estimate (Q37113960) > |
| Example 3 | Azerbaijan (Q227) → 10127874 for year 2019[3] < estimate (Q37113960) > |
| Example 4 | Cameroon (Q1009) → 20387939 for year 2017[4] < estimate (Q37113960) > |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| See also | literate population (P6499) |
- ↑ https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/icteye/#/query
- ↑ https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/icteye/#/query
- ↑ https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/icteye/#/query
- ↑ https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/icteye/#/query
Motivation
[edit]To show the broader access to Internet among countries and among time. Bouzinac 💬●✒️●💛 20:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- I have modified the label to make it more clear.--GZWDer (talk) 21:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Oppose for storing this information in the proposed way. It adds too much data/country item and increaes the size of country items too much. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 00:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)- Oppose on the country item per Christian but
Neutral if added to the "Internet in (place)" item. Mahir256 (talk) 00:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC) 
Comment I fail to see why literate population (P6499) should be fine and this isnt? Maybe the problem is not the property but the data model of Wikidata here? --Hannes Röst (talk) 16:00, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Support on "demographics of" items. @GZWDer, ChristianKl, Bouzinac: what do you think? --- Jura 12:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- I would be okay with the domain of "demographics of" and corresponding type constraints. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 12:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Not done Clearly lacking consensus. JesseW (talk) 19:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)